SMTP relay problem??
Hi there I recently got a message from Spam Cop stating that my server was being used as a relay. I went back to my server, and the IMC connector was set to +ACI-do not relay+ACI-. I changed that to allow relay for incoming domains only, specifying the domains, as per SANS. I also cranked up the logging on the IMC. I just got another message from spam cop saying my server was being used as a relay. I had my server tested by abuse.net, and I haven't gotten a response from there attempt to spam me. Is there another test I can use on the internet to double check myself?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP relay problem??
Exchange will accept any message inbound but that doens't mean the message will be relayed. Most likely Spam Cop is mistakenly assuming that accepting the message means successful relaying. Contact them directly. - Original Message - From: +ACI-Etts, Russell+ACI- +ADw-retts+AEA-harman.com+AD4- To: +ACI-Exchange Discussions+ACI- +ADw-exchange+AEA-ls.swynk.com+AD4- Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM Subject: SMTP relay problem?? +AD4- Hi there +AD4- +AD4- I recently got a message from Spam Cop stating that my server was being used +AD4- as a relay. I went back to my server, and the IMC connector was set to +ACI-do +AD4- not relay+ACI-. I changed that to allow relay for incoming domains only, +AD4- specifying the domains, as per SANS. I also cranked up the logging on the +AD4- IMC. +AD4- +AD4- I just got another message from spam cop saying my server was being used as +AD4- a relay. I had my server tested by abuse.net, and I haven't gotten a +AD4- response from there attempt to spam me. Is there another test I can use on +AD4- the internet to double check myself?? +AD4- +AD4- Thanks +AD4- +AD4- Russell +AD4- +AD4- ++AF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXw- +AD4- List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch+AF8-faq.htm +AD4- Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp +AD4- To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange+AEA-ls.swynk.com +AD4- Exchange List admin:listadmin+AEA-swynk.com +AD4- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP relay problem??
Thanks for answer+ACE- Russell -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault +AFs-mailto:DanielC+AEA-trinity.mensa.net+AF0- Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP relay problem?? Exchange will accept any message inbound but that doens't mean the message will be relayed. Most likely Spam Cop is mistakenly assuming that accepting the message means successful relaying. Contact them directly. - Original Message - From: +ACI-Etts, Russell+ACI- +ADw-retts+AEA-harman.com+AD4- To: +ACI-Exchange Discussions+ACI- +ADw-exchange+AEA-ls.swynk.com+AD4- Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM Subject: SMTP relay problem?? +AD4- Hi there +AD4- +AD4- I recently got a message from Spam Cop stating that my server was being used +AD4- as a relay. I went back to my server, and the IMC connector was set to +ACI-do +AD4- not relay+ACI-. I changed that to allow relay for incoming domains only, +AD4- specifying the domains, as per SANS. I also cranked up the logging on the +AD4- IMC. +AD4- +AD4- I just got another message from spam cop saying my server was being used as +AD4- a relay. I had my server tested by abuse.net, and I haven't gotten a +AD4- response from there attempt to spam me. Is there another test I can use on +AD4- the internet to double check myself?? +AD4- +AD4- Thanks +AD4- +AD4- Russell +AD4- +AD4- ++AF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXw- +AD4- List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch+AF8-faq.htm +AD4- Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp +AD4- To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange+AEA-ls.swynk.com +AD4- Exchange List admin:listadmin+AEA-swynk.com +AD4- +AF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXwBfAF8AXw- List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch+AF8-faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange+AEA-ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:listadmin+AEA-swynk.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP relay problem??
Thanks for the gumball, Popeye! -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP relay problem?? Thanks for answer! Russell -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP relay problem?? Exchange will accept any message inbound but that doens't mean the message will be relayed. Most likely Spam Cop is mistakenly assuming that accepting the message means successful relaying. Contact them directly. - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM Subject: SMTP relay problem?? Hi there I recently got a message from Spam Cop stating that my server was being used as a relay. I went back to my server, and the IMC connector was set to do not relay. I changed that to allow relay for incoming domains only, specifying the domains, as per SANS. I also cranked up the logging on the IMC. I just got another message from spam cop saying my server was being used as a relay. I had my server tested by abuse.net, and I haven't gotten a response from there attempt to spam me. Is there another test I can use on the internet to double check myself?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Relay Problem
Win2k SP1 Exch 5.5 SP4 ScanMail 3.52 VirusWall 3.52 SMTPSERVER is running Virus Wall and is set to allow ERPSERVER to send outbound. ERPSERVER is an Oracle server using its Email Service send out notifications. An NSLOOKUP from SMTPSERVER finds and resolves erpserver.americredit.com with no problems. Error Message: ** From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 550 REQUESTED ACTION NOT TAKEN: DNS FAILURE Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c Content-type: message/rfc822 Received: from 10.192.3.138 by smtpserver.acf.americredit.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:02 -0500 Received: (from applmgr@localhost) by erpserver.americredit.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA104142; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:01 -0500 From: Oracle ApplMgr User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AmeriCredit Canadian Operation 25-Oct-2001 03:57 SUCCESS 4468 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Tuffield), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Polly Reeves), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicole Hassard), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary Collier) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 101 03:57:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c-- ** Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Relay Problem
Could not deliver mail to this user. Which user could it not deliver to? -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Relay Problem Win2k SP1 Exch 5.5 SP4 ScanMail 3.52 VirusWall 3.52 SMTPSERVER is running Virus Wall and is set to allow ERPSERVER to send outbound. ERPSERVER is an Oracle server using its Email Service send out notifications. An NSLOOKUP from SMTPSERVER finds and resolves erpserver.americredit.com with no problems. Error Message: ** From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 550 REQUESTED ACTION NOT TAKEN: DNS FAILURE Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c Content-type: message/rfc822 Received: from 10.192.3.138 by smtpserver.acf.americredit.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:02 -0500 Received: (from applmgr@localhost) by erpserver.americredit.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA104142; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:01 -0500 From: Oracle ApplMgr User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AmeriCredit Canadian Operation 25-Oct-2001 03:57 SUCCESS 4468 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Tuffield), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Polly Reeves), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicole Hassard), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary Collier) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 101 03:57:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c-- ** Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Relay Problem
The NDR doesn't really specify that information. And I can't find any kind of Session Logs in Virus Wall to find out. Rick Sends -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Relay Problem Could not deliver mail to this user. Which user could it not deliver to? -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Relay Problem Win2k SP1 Exch 5.5 SP4 ScanMail 3.52 VirusWall 3.52 SMTPSERVER is running Virus Wall and is set to allow ERPSERVER to send outbound. ERPSERVER is an Oracle server using its Email Service send out notifications. An NSLOOKUP from SMTPSERVER finds and resolves erpserver.americredit.com with no problems. Error Message: ** From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received 550 REQUESTED ACTION NOT TAKEN: DNS FAILURE Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c Content-type: message/rfc822 Received: from 10.192.3.138 by smtpserver.acf.americredit.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:02 -0500 Received: (from applmgr@localhost) by erpserver.americredit.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA104142; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:57:01 -0500 From: Oracle ApplMgr User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AmeriCredit Canadian Operation 25-Oct-2001 03:57 SUCCESS 4468 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Tuffield), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Polly Reeves), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicole Hassard), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary Collier) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 101 03:57:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --=_NextPartTM-000-158455d4-25c1-4ecf-abc9-ae419d88a68c-- ** Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem
Yep - worked fine. Regards -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duane Purcell Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem I will modify the existing policy covering these recipients to include this additional smtp address and let you know how it goes. Thanks everyone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem There must be a recipient policy defined, even if no recipients are covered by it, for an inbound domain to work properly. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Purcell Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem There isn't a recipient policy for quest.skilled.com.au, however, the 50 or so (out of 1000 odd) users have had their new email address entered in Exchange 5.5 Admin. This has successfully replicated to AD and I can send test messages from the E2k server to E5.5 recipients so the new addresses are working internally. Do I still need you add a recipient policy for these particular users? Thanks for your input. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone Sent: Friday, 31 August 2001 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Have you added the new domain to the recipient policies ? Otherwise it will not be seen as an 'internal' domain. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Background: Exchange2000/5.5 mixed organisation with Exchange 2000 in DMZ handling outgoing smtp traffic (We are phasing out our solaris machine which currently handles incoming email). We (skilled.com.au) have recently purchased a company and the bosses want their email address to be @quest.skilled.com.au. Our internet DNS has been setup with an A host quest.skilled.com.au to point to the Ex2k server. Our MX record for skilled.com.au points to the solaris server. My problem is that I have found that the only way email will flow from the internet to quest.skilled.com.au users is to enable relaying on the smtp virtual server. If I disable relaying, the sender gets an NDR ...smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email is arriving at the E2k smtp so why do I need relaying enabled to allow it to be delivered internally? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem
Yes. -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/31/2001 12:46 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem There isn't a recipient policy for quest.skilled.com.au, however, the 50 or so (out of 1000 odd) users have had their new email address entered in Exchange 5.5 Admin. This has successfully replicated to AD and I can send test messages from the E2k server to E5.5 recipients so the new addresses are working internally. Do I still need you add a recipient policy for these particular users? Thanks for your input. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone Sent: Friday, 31 August 2001 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Have you added the new domain to the recipient policies ? Otherwise it will not be seen as an 'internal' domain. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Background: Exchange2000/5.5 mixed organisation with Exchange 2000 in DMZ handling outgoing smtp traffic (We are phasing out our solaris machine which currently handles incoming email). We (skilled.com.au) have recently purchased a company and the bosses want their email address to be @quest.skilled.com.au. Our internet DNS has been setup with an A host quest.skilled.com.au to point to the Ex2k server. Our MX record for skilled.com.au points to the solaris server. My problem is that I have found that the only way email will flow from the internet to quest.skilled.com.au users is to enable relaying on the smtp virtual server. If I disable relaying, the sender gets an NDR ...smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email is arriving at the E2k smtp so why do I need relaying enabled to allow it to be delivered internally? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem
Have you added the new domain to the recipient policies ? Otherwise it will not be seen as an 'internal' domain. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Background: Exchange2000/5.5 mixed organisation with Exchange 2000 in DMZ handling outgoing smtp traffic (We are phasing out our solaris machine which currently handles incoming email). We (skilled.com.au) have recently purchased a company and the bosses want their email address to be @quest.skilled.com.au. Our internet DNS has been setup with an A host quest.skilled.com.au to point to the Ex2k server. Our MX record for skilled.com.au points to the solaris server. My problem is that I have found that the only way email will flow from the internet to quest.skilled.com.au users is to enable relaying on the smtp virtual server. If I disable relaying, the sender gets an NDR ...smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email is arriving at the E2k smtp so why do I need relaying enabled to allow it to be delivered internally? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem
There isn't a recipient policy for quest.skilled.com.au, however, the 50 or so (out of 1000 odd) users have had their new email address entered in Exchange 5.5 Admin. This has successfully replicated to AD and I can send test messages from the E2k server to E5.5 recipients so the new addresses are working internally. Do I still need you add a recipient policy for these particular users? Thanks for your input. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Stone Sent: Friday, 31 August 2001 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Have you added the new domain to the recipient policies ? Otherwise it will not be seen as an 'internal' domain. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP Relay problem Background: Exchange2000/5.5 mixed organisation with Exchange 2000 in DMZ handling outgoing smtp traffic (We are phasing out our solaris machine which currently handles incoming email). We (skilled.com.au) have recently purchased a company and the bosses want their email address to be @quest.skilled.com.au. Our internet DNS has been setup with an A host quest.skilled.com.au to point to the Ex2k server. Our MX record for skilled.com.au points to the solaris server. My problem is that I have found that the only way email will flow from the internet to quest.skilled.com.au users is to enable relaying on the smtp virtual server. If I disable relaying, the sender gets an NDR ...smtp;550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email is arriving at the E2k smtp so why do I need relaying enabled to allow it to be delivered internally? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
