RE: display names during conversion

2002-09-13 Thread Jonathan Beeler

Good point, Ed.  You're absolutely correct.  During the ADMT process, the
display name is getting placed in there.

The ADC appears to be working fine.  Before we run the ADMT, the disabled
user accounts in AD are showing the display name from 5.5.


Now that that's established, how do I alter that from happening? 

Thanks for the help.


No way.  First, moving the mailbox doesn't affect the display name.
 That would be established when you ran the connection agreement.
 Second, ADC doesn't talk to the NT SAM.  My guess is that the display
 name got populated the way you see it from when you ran the ADMT, and
 your connection agreement hasn't written over it.  Are you sure your
 recipient connection agreement is working properly?
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
 Tech Consultant
 hp Services
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Beeler
 Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:55 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: display names during conversion
 
 
 So we've finally started our migration to 2000.  
 The environment: 
 w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode.
 a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k.
 After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox
 from 5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes.
 Instead of taking the 5.5 display name, it is taking the NT4.0 User
 Manager Full Name field and using that for the display name.  I have
 been referencing q269843 and using ADSI edit to try and solve the
 problem.  It tells you to modify the selected CA, however, I'm not
 sure if there are additional ones that I need to.  There is the one that
 I created, and modified, but there are also two others, namely the
 CN=Default ADC Policy and the CN=Config CA_NYC_NYEXCH03 (the CA created
 during install).
 
 Does anyone know which CA or CA's I need to modify via ADSI Edit, or
 does someone have another solution to this?
 
 Thanks
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



display names during conversion

2002-09-12 Thread Jonathan Beeler

So we've finally started our migration to 2000.  
The environment: 
w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode.
a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k.
After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from
5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes.  Instead
of taking the 5.5 display name, it is taking the NT4.0 User Manager Full
Name field and using that for the display name.  I have been referencing
q269843 and using ADSI edit to try and solve the problem.  It tells you to
modify the selected CA, however, I'm not sure if there are additional
ones that I need to.  There is the one that I created, and modified, but
there are also two others, namely the CN=Default ADC Policy and the
CN=Config CA_NYC_NYEXCH03 (the CA created during install).

Does anyone know which CA or CA's I need to modify via ADSI Edit, or does
someone have another solution to this?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: display names during conversion

2002-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley

No way.  First, moving the mailbox doesn't affect the display name.
That would be established when you ran the connection agreement.
Second, ADC doesn't talk to the NT SAM.  My guess is that the display
name got populated the way you see it from when you ran the ADMT, and
your connection agreement hasn't written over it.  Are you sure your
recipient connection agreement is working properly?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Beeler
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: display names during conversion


So we've finally started our migration to 2000.  
The environment: 
w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode.
a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k.
After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox
from 5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes.
Instead of taking the 5.5 display name, it is taking the NT4.0 User
Manager Full Name field and using that for the display name.  I have
been referencing q269843 and using ADSI edit to try and solve the
problem.  It tells you to modify the selected CA, however, I'm not
sure if there are additional ones that I need to.  There is the one that
I created, and modified, but there are also two others, namely the
CN=Default ADC Policy and the CN=Config CA_NYC_NYEXCH03 (the CA created
during install).

Does anyone know which CA or CA's I need to modify via ADSI Edit, or
does someone have another solution to this?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]