[Factor-talk] User update magic in edit-profile
Hi, I've written an implementation of the furnace authentication provider protocol for couchdb. I decided to do a direct implementation, rather than write a tuple db interface for couchdb, since when using couchdb you need to jump through various hoops in order to ensure the uniqueness of usernames and email addresses. It's all working fine, except that the edit-profile controller is not saving the modified user tuple back to the DB. I see that it sets the changed? flag of the tuple once its submit action finishes, but I'm having trouble working out how I should hook into whatever method is supposed to get called in order to commit the update to the DB. It works fine if I use the following nasty code to manually ensure that a user-saver is created, and its destructor called: edit-profile-action [ responder [ [ call( -- response ) logged-in-user get user-saver dispose ] curry ] change-submit drop ] [ auth-boilerplate edit-profile add-responder ] bi But this is pretty ugly, and I'd like to know what the Right Way is, if there is one. Any help appreciated. Alex -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
Re: [Factor-talk] User update magic in edit-profile
Hi Alex, Does the call-responder* method of your authentication realm execute call-next-method? Because M: realm call-responder* calls save-user-after, which sets up a destructor that will call update-user when the request is done. If you implement the update-user generic word then editing the profile should work. Slava On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Alex Drummond a.d.drumm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I've written an implementation of the furnace authentication provider protocol for couchdb. I decided to do a direct implementation, rather than write a tuple db interface for couchdb, since when using couchdb you need to jump through various hoops in order to ensure the uniqueness of usernames and email addresses. It's all working fine, except that the edit-profile controller is not saving the modified user tuple back to the DB. I see that it sets the changed? flag of the tuple once its submit action finishes, but I'm having trouble working out how I should hook into whatever method is supposed to get called in order to commit the update to the DB. It works fine if I use the following nasty code to manually ensure that a user-saver is created, and its destructor called: edit-profile-action [ responder [ [ call( -- response ) logged-in-user get user-saver dispose ] curry ] change-submit drop ] [ auth-boilerplate edit-profile add-responder ] bi But this is pretty ugly, and I'd like to know what the Right Way is, if there is one. Any help appreciated. Alex -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
Re: [Factor-talk] User update magic in edit-profile
Oops, when I switched back to using allow-edit-profile instead of the hack in the previous email, it worked fine. I guess there must previously have been a bug in my update-user method which somehow led me to think that it wasn't being called at all. (I am just using login-realm, so there wouldn't have been an issue with call-next-method.) sorry for the false alarm... Alex On 21 February 2010 04:08, Slava Pestov sl...@factorcode.org wrote: Hi Alex, Does the call-responder* method of your authentication realm execute call-next-method? Because M: realm call-responder* calls save-user-after, which sets up a destructor that will call update-user when the request is done. If you implement the update-user generic word then editing the profile should work. Slava On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Alex Drummond a.d.drumm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I've written an implementation of the furnace authentication provider protocol for couchdb. I decided to do a direct implementation, rather than write a tuple db interface for couchdb, since when using couchdb you need to jump through various hoops in order to ensure the uniqueness of usernames and email addresses. It's all working fine, except that the edit-profile controller is not saving the modified user tuple back to the DB. I see that it sets the changed? flag of the tuple once its submit action finishes, but I'm having trouble working out how I should hook into whatever method is supposed to get called in order to commit the update to the DB. It works fine if I use the following nasty code to manually ensure that a user-saver is created, and its destructor called: edit-profile-action [ responder [ [ call( -- response ) logged-in-user get user-saver dispose ] curry ] change-submit drop ] [ auth-boilerplate edit-profile add-responder ] bi But this is pretty ugly, and I'd like to know what the Right Way is, if there is one. Any help appreciated. Alex -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
Re: [Factor-talk] User update magic in edit-profile
Excellent. Looking forward you seeing your code contributed. Are you interested in refactoring furnace.sessions to allow alternate session storage as well? Right now its hard-coded to use the database, but it could also use in-memory sessions (faster performance, no failover) or couchdb (for people who don't want an RDBMS at all). Slava On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Alex Drummond a.d.drumm...@googlemail.com wrote: Oops, when I switched back to using allow-edit-profile instead of the hack in the previous email, it worked fine. I guess there must previously have been a bug in my update-user method which somehow led me to think that it wasn't being called at all. (I am just using login-realm, so there wouldn't have been an issue with call-next-method.) sorry for the false alarm... Alex On 21 February 2010 04:08, Slava Pestov sl...@factorcode.org wrote: Hi Alex, Does the call-responder* method of your authentication realm execute call-next-method? Because M: realm call-responder* calls save-user-after, which sets up a destructor that will call update-user when the request is done. If you implement the update-user generic word then editing the profile should work. Slava On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Alex Drummond a.d.drumm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I've written an implementation of the furnace authentication provider protocol for couchdb. I decided to do a direct implementation, rather than write a tuple db interface for couchdb, since when using couchdb you need to jump through various hoops in order to ensure the uniqueness of usernames and email addresses. It's all working fine, except that the edit-profile controller is not saving the modified user tuple back to the DB. I see that it sets the changed? flag of the tuple once its submit action finishes, but I'm having trouble working out how I should hook into whatever method is supposed to get called in order to commit the update to the DB. It works fine if I use the following nasty code to manually ensure that a user-saver is created, and its destructor called: edit-profile-action [ responder [ [ call( -- response ) logged-in-user get user-saver dispose ] curry ] change-submit drop ] [ auth-boilerplate edit-profile add-responder ] bi But this is pretty ugly, and I'd like to know what the Right Way is, if there is one. Any help appreciated. Alex -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
Re: [Factor-talk] Vocab for comparing complex data types
On 21/2/2010 16:28, Jim mack wrote:
I have some complicated datastructure, mixing containers tuples,
like an ast. I would like to get a report on what's different between
two of them, say for a test. Is there an existing vocab for that? It
won't need to be fast. My first thought was to get the prettyprint
representations, then diff through an external tool.
Hi Jim, do you know of mirrors?
I'm not sure if that's what you mean, but maybe something like this:
: obj-diff ( big small -- diff )
[ mirror alist ] bi@ swap diff ;
TUPLE: xyz x y z ;
xyz new 4 z 2 x
xyz new 3 x
--- Data stack:
T{ xyz f 2 f 4 }
T{ xyz f 3 f f }
( scratchpad - auto ) obj-diff .
{ { x 3 } { z f } }
Best Regards, Kobi
--
China: stop persecuting Falun Gong!
http://faluninfo.net
URGENT: Innocent people are being persecuted for their belief inside Communist
China.
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
Re: [Factor-talk] Vocab for comparing complex data types
Thanks! Never thought to look at that. I did get something going with the
lcs library, but this may be better.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Kobi Lurie k_lu...@gbrener.org.il wrote:
On 21/2/2010 16:28, Jim mack wrote:
I have some complicated datastructure, mixing containers tuples,
like an ast. I would like to get a report on what's different between
two of them, say for a test. Is there an existing vocab for that? It
won't need to be fast. My first thought was to get the prettyprint
representations, then diff through an external tool.
Hi Jim, do you know of mirrors?
I'm not sure if that's what you mean, but maybe something like this:
: obj-diff ( big small -- diff )
[ mirror alist ] bi@ swap diff ;
TUPLE: xyz x y z ;
xyz new 4 z 2 x
xyz new 3 x
--- Data stack:
T{ xyz f 2 f 4 }
T{ xyz f 3 f f }
( scratchpad - auto ) obj-diff .
{ { x 3 } { z f } }
Best Regards, Kobi
--
China: stop persecuting Falun Gong!
http://faluninfo.net
URGENT: Innocent people are being persecuted for their belief inside
Communist China.
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
--
Jim
I'm for extending the working Medicare program for our seniors all the way
back to contraception, so Americans can concentrate on living their lives
without fear of changing a job, going bankrupt from deductibles or fighting
HMO bureaucracy.
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev___
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
