Re: [Factor-talk] paste.factorcode.org
I think we were having a ton of spam problems and @erg disabled it temporarily. We had wanted to maybe upgrade to Googles new "I am not a robot" captcha system but didn't have that patched yet. > On Sep 11, 2016, at 7:29 AM, Jon Harperwrote: > > Hey, > trying to write a new paste on http://paste.factorcode.org , I'm getting > 404 Not found > > Anyone knows what's up ? > > Jon > -- > ___ > Factor-talk mailing list > Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk -- ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
[Factor-talk] paste.factorcode.org
Hey, trying to write a new paste on http://paste.factorcode.org , I'm getting 404 Not found Anyone knows what's up ? Jon -- ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
[Factor-talk] prettyprinter number-base float errors
Hi list, I'm working on factor's number parsing/printing. I'd like some inputs on the following problem: Basically the problem can be seen from this paste: http://pastebin.com/jxV8UKG2 : setting number-base to 2 or 8 gives pprint-errors for floats. So we have the number-base variable in prettyprint.config to chose the prettyprinter base for numbers. For reals, it supports 2 8 10 and 16. For floats, only 10 and 16. Since 99804fd054d5, using an unsupported base throws an exception instead of defaulting to base 10. What should we do ? - go back to the previous behavior: default to base 10 ? - add new variables to configure rationals (integers + ratios) and floats separately? - allow floats to be printed in base 2 and 8 ? (for info the parser supports it: 0b1.1p0 0o1.4p0 0x1.8p0 all parse to 1.5) - a mix of the previous ? What do you think ? Jon -- ___ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk