Understood, thank you, Chris! In the end I used a promise, which is almost the same thing.
I have another question, though. Is it possible to use the facilities offered by the db.tuples vocab from within a thread? When I try to call `ensure-table`, I get the `no-defined-persistent` exception, even if I call `define-persistent` on the same class earlier in the same thread. Is this a principal limitation, or it should be possible and I'm doing something wrong? I can post a minimal example code if it helps. 21.12.2017, 01:44, "Chris Double" <chris.dou...@double.co.nz>: > The easiest way might be to use futures: > http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-concurrency.futures.html > > eg: > > [ 42 ] future ?future . > => 42 > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> If I spawn a thread using the threads:spawn word, is there a way to wait >> for the thread to finish its work? >> I need something like WaitForSingleObject(ThreadHandle, INFINITE). ---=====--- Александр ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
