[FairfieldLife] Re: Shani Claus
Thanks Rory. Psychosis occurred at the end of my Kundalini high - the first time for a few hours in Nov 09 and the second in late May for 4 days, my highs ranged from 3 weeks the first time and 5 the next. The psychosis was nothing but an ego coping mechanism of the peak and after the peak the energy dissipated slowly in a week or two. There would a crash after as I made sense of what had happened giving rise to a new understanding, balance and integration. I felt I transitioned to a new state or vibration where I felt, to borrow your terms - crucified and resurrected..:-), some made fun of it but it's just a beautiful metaphor. I could compare psychosis with fever. Fever being a coping mechanism of the body to deal with invading parasites whereas psychosis being the result of the body-mind-ego trying to deal with the overwhelming energy that was descending in droves (from an ego perspective it was invasion). So psychosis was a survival mechanism similar to fever, in fact I thought I was dying, many times. My kid used to have a shirt that had the words survivor kid on it. The mind is the real survivor kid, its survival instinct is so great that I find it hilarious. With the grace of Guru or the existence I was able to reach this insanely sane state..:-). Fever is not sickness, it is a sign of healing, it is a doorway to becoming healthy. In a similar way psychosis was a sure sign that Her work was coming to an end and that I was on the verge on becoming healthy again and be healed, that I would be reaching home, sweet home soon. There are stupid doctors and retarded psychologists not to forget the patients themselves who will condemn fever and psychosis, this list has a few but they miss the point - you can attack the fever and the psychosis but you stop the healing. When I was high I made a video and comments on this list that - I was both the doctor and the patient - everyone missed the metaphor. Love - Ravi. P.S - loved the Home Tat Sat part. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: Beautifully put, Ravi, many thanks! And I wouldn't be too quick to label your kundalini-episode a psychosis. If anything, She was removing pyschoses, but even amidst your bumpy ride, you have always looked quite sane to me (FWIW). Home Tat Sat! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raviyogi2009 no_reply@ wrote: Thanks for clarifying that. I was a bit shocked when you just said nothing happens and left it at that. Yes everything happens but nothing does happen, Nothingness is indeed a beautiful word, it is expansive yet is nothing in the dictionary sense. The comment on the stories of growth through archetypes is spot on - during my Kundalini psychosis I felt like I was playing the roles of my father, my mother, my brother and my son. I was the victim, the aggressor; the hunter and hunted, saint and sinner, the pain, wounds that were healed was tremendous - it was just surreal. Yet after all that I felt like I was just sitting at home in peace and really nothing happened even though it felt like I wandered all over the world to reach home..:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Yes, Vaj, a pretty long nothing by some standards. Does nothing have to be short in your world? In mine, nothing includes everything throughout the realms of spacetime -- that is, everything appears to happen, but in reality, doesn't. That includes the stories of growth perceived through our Inner Archetypes, including the various dramas of hurt, victimization, rage, rescue, demons, angels, subtle realms, ignorance, enlightenment, growth, and so on. All real enough on their own levels, to be sure, but really, just more of me to love! I am very, very fat! A big, fat nothing! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:34 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Actually not, Vaj. For me the various Initiations, like all models of growth and progress, are actually themselves stories or dramas of our inner Archetypes: powerful, moving, enjoyable, supremely useful for self-exploration, but ultimately unreal. Really, nothing ever happens! :-D Pretty long nothing: Rory Goff: A Spiritual Autobiography
[FairfieldLife] Dow 1000??
http://seekingalpha.com/article/227384-dow-1000-robert-prechter-thinks-so Home » US Market » Market Outlook Dow 1000? Robert Prechter Thinks So Before I start this piece let me acknowledge all of the Prechter haters that I hear from every time I bring him up. He was back in the news after doing this CNBC interview yesterday.
[FairfieldLife] X-mas miracle for Ozzy?
http://calvinayre.com/2010/12/25/lifestyle/christmas-miracle-for-ozzy-osbourne/ http://www.biotie.com/ (tie [~tee-eh] = road, way)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad his its accompanying physiology in the body. These physiological blocks start in the most subtle bodies and move through to the gross eventually. They have no ultimate reality for they are structured only in the lack of recognition of the non-relative nature of consciousness. While much can and has been made of the removal of these blocks through tapas, sadhana, healing, etc., the best approach is the actual recognition of consciousness by consciousness. End of transmission. --- On Wed, 12/29/10, whynotnow7 whynotn...@yahoo.com wrote: From: whynotnow7 whynotn...@yahoo.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010, 9:06 PM Whether significant blockages (quantify?) occur, or not, the whole point of TM is that the person doing it continues to transcend straight through the blockages, by continuing to do TM. Not always a pretty sight, and not necessarily in a straight line either- More like the path a bolt of lightning follows up from earth. Nonetheless effective, if a person chooses to go with it. That is my personal experience, by no means an absolute. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Peter wrote: Kundalini blocks? This is so ridiculous. Please, for the love of God, will someone tell me how such a block works, how it is installed and is there a maintenance contract on it! Simple. The shakti will just naturally take the path of least resistance. Once diverted, mental and physical doshas will accumulate at the point of diversion: ta da. But neurologically it's not well understood. To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:53 PM, tartbrain wrote: Oneness never lies. Even if you're at one with SATAN? :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote: Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad (Can't resist...) I guess you mean prajñaaparaadha (prajña + aparaadha)? aparAdham. offence , transgression , fault ; mistake ; %{aparAdhaM} 1: %{kR} , to offend any one (gen.) apa ind. (as a prefix to nouns and verbs , expresses) away , off , back (opposed to %{u4pa} rADhA f. beauty , splendour L. ; (sometimes written %{rArA}) N. of a district in the west of Bengal (= %{suhma}) and its capital Katha1s. Prab. 2 rADha mf(%{I})n. belonging to the district of Ra1d2ha1 ; m. N. of a tribe of Bra1hmans belonging to that district IW. 210 , n. 1 ; Vangueria Spinosa L. (cf. %{rATha}). 3 rAdha m. or n. = %{rA4dhas} , a gift , favour (only in %{radha...@patih}n. of Indra) RV. ; m. (fr. %{rAdhA}) N. of the month Vais3a1kha (= April-May) Ra1jat. ; of a man Buddh. ; (with %{gautama}) N. of two teachers Cat. ; (%{A}) f. see below. 4 rAdhA f. prosperity , success L. ; (also du.) N. of the 21st Nakshatra Vis3a1kha1 (containing 4 stars in the form of a curve supposed to be %{a} , %{t} , %{v} , Librae , and $ Scorpionis cf. %{nakSatra}) L. ; lightning L. ; a partic. attitude in shooting (standing with the feet a span apart ; cf. %{-bhedhin} , %{-vedhin}) , Pracan2d2. ; Emblic Myrobolan L. ; Clytoria Ternatea L. ; N. of the foster-mother of Karn2a (q.v. ; she was the wife of Adhiratha , who was Su1ta or charioteer of king S3u1ra) MBh. (cf. IW. 377) ; of a celebrated cowherdess or Gopi (beloved by Kr2ishn2a , and a principal personage in Jaya-deva's poem Gitagovinda ; at a later period worshipped as a goddess , and occasionally regarded as an Avata1ra of Lakshmi1 , as Kr2ishn2a is of Vishn2u ; also identified with Da1ksha1yan2i1) Gi1t. Pan5cat. c. (cf. IW. 332) ; of a female slave Lalit.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 30, 2010, at 8:09 AM, cardemaister wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote: Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad (Can't resist...) I guess you mean prajñaaparaadha (prajña + aparaadha)? Yes, it's a concept from Ayurveda. “Imbalance: Prajnaparadha” by Dr. Robert E. Svoboda Unless you are a saint, you will go out of balance and become sick from time to time. Occasional sickness is inevitable for a mortal; continuously perfect health does not exist on our planet. Every body- mind-spirit has some weak point, somewhere. Prajnaparadha – literally, “an offense against wisdom” – happens whenever one part of you insists on an action that is detrimental to the rest of you. It happens when you know deep inside that something is not right for your body-mind-spirit, but you obstinately go ahead and do it anyway, ignoring Nature’s warnings. Any part of you can perform prajnaparadha from the cancerous cell that rebels against the organism’s wisdom, to the mind that insists on its idiosyncratic version of reality. Ayurvedists who survey today’s world find prajnaparadha everywhere they look, and are not surprised to discover gargantuan imbalances emerging as rampant disease. My mentor was very big on the real reality. “It is always better to live with reality,” he would say, “because otherwise, without fail, reality will come to live with you.” While you are a child you live in a world of seemingly unlimited possibilities. As you become an adult, limitations set in, and you learn that you have to live within your limits if you want to enjoy unimpeded flow. Life without limits perverts your reality; it sours your sweetness, or turns it bitter. Sickness is “reality coming to live with you,” which is why it is all right to be sick. Sickness is Nature’s tap on your shoulder, her reminder to you that you have strayed from the path. When you open yourself to her again, and allow her to work within you, she will reawaken your body’s innate healing abilities to set things right. Until you return to that path, Nature will go on reminding you, for as long as it takes – or until your viability as a body-mind-spirit complex expires. How well your natural healing mechanisms will work in any specific instance depends mainly on two things: how carefully you follow the appropriate regimen (without being stiff or humorless about it), and how much vitality your system retains. After all, everyone has to die of something. When you are sick, you should ask yourself practical questions, such as how to change your ways so that your disease will disappear. Do not, however, fall into the trap of trying to figure out what you did to bring this on yourself. There is little to be gained by getting stuck on some simplistic cause-effect relationship when you are tying to extricate yourself from the jaws of a disease. You will do better to focus on regaining your health instead of trying to conduct an autopsy on how you went wrong. Because it is always best to detect and correct imbalances while they are still incubating, it is useful to learn about your own physical, energetic, mental, and emotional “blind spots” and then try to keep a regular eye on them. You should try to pay attention to yourself when you are feeling fine, so that you will quickly take notice when you are not feeling right. The earlier you can detect that something is wrong with you, even if it is not detectable on any of the standard diagnostic tests, the sooner you can treat yourself and prevent the disease from needing to manifest itself fully. This also applies of course, to everyone you are parenting. It is good to keep a watch on your children, by such means as their pulses, voices, or food habits, and try to nip any problems in the bud. You will find it easier to recognize blind spots if you can also identify strengths. Perhaps the most striking of the many differences between Ayurveda and Western medicine is that while the latter focuses on disease to the extent that it defines health as its absence, Ayurveda focuses on health. Ayurvedic diagnosis, therefore, begins with what is right with you: how well nourished, toned, and “excellent” your tissues are, and how effective your channels flow. Reprinted with permission from Ayurveda For Women; A Guide To Vitality and Health by Dr. Robert E. Svoboda, Healing Arts Press. ©2000 All Rights Reserved.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: The Matrix and Maharishi Occult Powers to siphon off energy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: Hey, Lawson!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote: Hey all, was bored and thought I'd let mysef get sucked into the mosh pit for a sec: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote: [quoting Earl Kaplan] April 16, 2004 I said, Maharishi, since you have the money and supposedly you have enough pundits, why don't you create a 10,000 group in India and then the world will experience peace and the TM movement will gain great support of the laws of nature and our other activities will work out. Mahesh looked at me like I was crazy and said Earl, if we created the group then we don't know if it would create world peace or not. We would have to have the group and then see what the effect it has. I keep thinking there was an earlier draft of this letter circulated where he quoted MMY as saying we don't know if that would happen or not not we don't know if it would create world peace or not. I dug around in the FFL archives a bit and couldn't find an earlier draft (according to Vaj, the one that Tom posted was the draft; as far as I can tell, it's the only version that's ever been posted or discussed on FFL). That's entirely possible. This dates back quite a few years. My memory is often off. I wonder if you could be remembering someone *paraphrasing* what Kaplan said MMY said. That's entirely possible. OTOH, MMY's normal phrasing doesn't sound much like what Kaplan said he said, so Kaplan may have been misremembering a bit, as well. IOW, we have no idea if the laws of nature will automatically support the continued existence of a group of 7000, just because it was created without infrastructure to support it. This later letter seems to plug this gaping hole in his logic which I recall pointing out on this forum when the first draft was circulated years ago. What gaping hole in his logic, specifically? Whose logic, MMY's or Kaplan's? Kaplan's. Kaplan was asserting to MMY that once world peace was achieved, then money would magically appear for the 7000 group to continue. MMY said that there was no evidence [of something]. Kaplan said it was no evidence that world peace would be achieved, but that flies in the face of every public statement MMY has ever said. Even if he didn't believe it himself, why would he reveal such doubts to a major donor? More plausibly, to me, at least, is what I apparently misread: MMY was referring to the expectation that money would naturally flow to the TM coffers just because and was pointing out that there was no proof that that would happen. And are you suggesting that MMY was confident a group of 10,000 (per the letter, not 7,000) would create world peace, but that it was possible that world peace would be created only temporarily and then would collapse again because the group couldn't be maintained due to lack of infrastructure? Right. While I believe that MMY believed there was proof that some measurable improvement in world consciousness would happen when a 7000 group (whatever the magic number has to be these days) was brought together, its certainly possible that he would admit to not being sure about the continued funding. Certainly, it makes sense that he would say such a thing to a major donor. It certainly does NOT make sense that he would express doubts about the very project he was hoping said donor would donate too. MMY, whatever else he was, was no fool when it came to getting people to donate money. Expressing doubts about the effectiveness of the group practice of the TM-Sidhis program is obviously counter to his entire history of being a canny fund-raiser, regardless of what he really believed. snip Its sad to see the same ole discussions going on. I may not have a life (yet) but I have found better ways to waste my time then rehashing arguments made over and over again over a period of many, many years. There are some new people here who weren't around for the earlier discussions. In any case, it's only natural that unresolved issues get rehashed, and the veracity/accuracy of Earl's letter is very much unresolved. In any case, this current discussion started after Tom had sarcastically described Earl's letter, Vaj disputed Tom's characterization, Tom posted the letter documenting that his description had been dead-on accurate, and Vaj did a fancy little backpedal-dance to avoid admitting that Tom had been correct. Eh, the more things change... Of course, Vaj will claim that he refuted Tom's characterization; you will claim that Vaj is lying; Vaj and others will make fun of your claim; etc. Personally, I'm excited by the work that the David Lynch Foundation is doing. There's even a school here in Tucson, AZ that has received funning from the Foundation. Ironically, I'm pretty sure that its
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:53 PM, tartbrain wrote: Oneness never lies. Even if you're at one with SATAN? :-) Actually, my recollection is that even using Satan as one's Ishta-devata would eventually lead one to full enlightenment. Which would explain why he tries to betray his followers whenever possible: he doesn't want them to gain enlightenment by following the path of devotion (even of him) so he betrays them so they will turn away before they gain benefit from their one-pointedness. Just a thought. There may be some allegorical nuggets for TM buried there somewhere, come to think of it. Lawson
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: The Matrix and Maharishi Occult Powers to siphon off energy
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:36 AM, sparaig lengli...@cox.net wrote: Eh, the more things change... Of course, Vaj will claim that he refuted Tom's characterization; you will claim that Vaj is lying; Vaj and others will make fun of your claim; etc. Personally, I'm excited by the work that the David Lynch Foundation is doing. There's even a school here in Tucson, AZ that has received *funning * from the Foundation. Ironically, I'm pretty sure that its the current incarnation of my alma mater, where the school counselor advised me to learn TM 37 years ago. Lawson Lawson, your kundalini block is leaking. So, the David Lynch Foundation is *funning *what you suspect is your former alma mater, eh? The truth comes out, no matter how much we try to keep it concealed.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Autobiography of a Vagi?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 30, 2010, at 9:37 AM, tartbrain wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 30, 2010, at 9:37 AM, tartbrain wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I. Your follow up book could be: Inner Secrets of the Vaj
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptyb...@... wrote: Only because no one expresses any awareness of this fact. Just the usual ... little baby jesus, may he be born in us. he If you knew then at least that makes at least two. Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. So if Saturn represents emptiness, then its fitting that the holiday to celebrate the savior that was not, would be with a celebration to the God of emptiness. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Good gosh ... is there not even a single person here who knows that Saturnalia was the pagan origin of Christmas? Why would you think that because *one* person here seems not to know, nobody else does either? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: It may have been too cold at that time period to perform a census count. http://christmasxmas.xanga.com/395124709/item/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Why do we have only the draft version of Earl's letter? Subject: Re: earl kaplan letter rendered readable authfriend: None of these links is relevant to my question, as you know. So, where is the final version of the Kaplan letter? Subject: Re: earl kaplan letter rendered readable Author: Michael Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: August 6, 2004 http://tinyurl.com/2e8a2qh
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote: Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad his its accompanying physiology in the body. These physiological blocks start in the most subtle bodies and move through to the gross eventually. They have no ultimate reality for they are structured only in the lack of recognition of the non-relative nature of consciousness. While much can and has been made of the removal of these blocks through tapas, sadhana, healing, etc., the best approach is the actual recognition of consciousness by consciousness. End of transmission. So is it the chicken or the egg --or neither. That is does the removal of blockages enable recognition of consciousness by consciousness, or that having been done, the spiritual chakras are like christmas tree decorations -- celebrating the event of RecConCon. --- On Wed, 12/29/10, whynotnow7 whynotn...@... wrote: From: whynotnow7 whynotn...@... Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010, 9:06 PM Whether significant blockages (quantify?) occur, or not, the whole point of TM is that the person doing it continues to transcend straight through the blockages, by continuing to do TM. Not always a pretty sight, and not necessarily in a straight line either- More like the path a bolt of lightning follows up from earth. Nonetheless effective, if a person chooses to go with it. That is my personal experience, by no means an absolute. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Peter wrote: Kundalini blocks? This is so ridiculous. Please, for the love of God, will someone tell me how such a block works, how it is installed and is there a maintenance contract on it! Simple. The shakti will just naturally take the path of least resistance. Once diverted, mental and physical doshas will accumulate at the point of diversion: ta da. But neurologically it's not well understood. To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl also went on to say...
Bhairitu: TM is nothing more than a technique for the masses... So, TM is the most popular form of meditation in India and masses of people practice it twice a day. If so, then maybe TM is the best practice for most people. Unless you're thinking you're more elite and deserve better teaching than everyone else. But not everyone has the leisure time to travel to India to rub shoulders with fakirs and pundits, or to live alone in a cave to practice tantric techniques for hours a day, and still raise a family and earn a living.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl also went on to say...
There's more below what I lifted and posted here... authfriend: This is also in the letter in the Files section. I still want to know: What's the story with the final version? Or was there never a final version? According to George deForrest, Earl mailed out numerous copies of his letter. Rick probably got a copy of the final version. Go figure. Subject: Re: earl kaplan letter Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Author: George deForrest Date: August 5, 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3amdcjx
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Yes, something like that! ;-) --- On Thu, 12/30/10, cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: From: cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, December 30, 2010, 8:09 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote: Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad (Can't resist...) I guess you mean prajñaaparaadha (prajña + aparaadha)? aparAdha m. offence , transgression , fault ; mistake ; %{aparAdhaM} 1: %{kR} , to offend any one (gen.) apa ind. (as a prefix to nouns and verbs , expresses) away , off , back (opposed to %{u4pa} rADhA f. beauty , splendour L. ; (sometimes written %{rArA}) N. of a district in the west of Bengal (= %{suhma}) and its capital Katha1s. Prab. 2 rADha mf(%{I})n. belonging to the district of Ra1d2ha1 ; m. N. of a tribe of Bra1hmans belonging to that district IW. 210 , n. 1 ; Vangueria Spinosa L. (cf. %{rATha}). 3 rAdha m. or n. = %{rA4dhas} , a gift , favour (only in %{radha...@patih}n. of Indra) RV. ; m. (fr. %{rAdhA}) N. of the month Vais3a1kha (= April-May) Ra1jat. ; of a man Buddh. ; (with %{gautama}) N. of two teachers Cat. ; (%{A}) f. see below. 4 rAdhA f. prosperity , success L. ; (also du.) N. of the 21st Nakshatra Vis3a1kha1 (containing 4 stars in the form of a curve supposed to be %{a} , %{t} , %{v} , Librae , and $ Scorpionis cf. %{nakSatra}) L. ; lightning L. ; a partic. attitude in shooting (standing with the feet a span apart ; cf. %{-bhedhin} , %{-vedhin}) , Pracan2d2. ; Emblic Myrobolan L. ; Clytoria Ternatea L. ; N. of the foster-mother of Karn2a (q.v. ; she was the wife of Adhiratha , who was Su1ta or charioteer of king S3u1ra) MBh. (cf. IW. 377) ; of a celebrated cowherdess or Gopi (beloved by Kr2ishn2a , and a principal personage in Jaya-deva's poem Gitagovinda ; at a later period worshipped as a goddess , and occasionally regarded as an Avata1ra of Lakshmi1 , as Kr2ishn2a is of Vishn2u ; also identified with Da1ksha1yan2i1) Gi1t. Pan5cat. c. (cf. IW. 332) ; of a female slave Lalit. To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Cooks passing
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:13 AM, merudanda wrote: Nancy Cooke de Herrera and the Beatles Different Nancy Cook, meru. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
I read that first draft you sent out. Here is my feedback: 1. Nice photoshop job on the front cover, substituting your face for Buddha's on that statue. 2. Pages should be numbered sequentially, unless you are looking to intentionally confuse your readers. 3. References, references, references. You oughta cite your sources to be credible. 4. Finally, five pages total length is just too short to be considered for a book. Especially written in crayon. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 30, 2010, at 9:37 AM, tartbrain wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I.
[FairfieldLife] How does this Energy Siphoning and Kundalini Blocking Really Work? (was 2011)
Thanks for the reply Doug. However, I am not following your response. Let's focus on two things: placement of kundalini blocks and siphoning off of significant amounts of energy. First, I am assuming that some spiritual diversion pipes / channels (for both kunblocks and energy siphoning) are put in place once, and doesn't need to be restablished at each sitting. If so, where and when do these pipes get installed? During initiations with puja? That would seem odd given SBS's presence during the puja. But what thing during initiation constructs these pipes? The puja? That doesn't fit because our puja is really quite a commonly used puja -- with the exception of the the specificity of SBS as the focus. Are you implying SBS is part of this plot? Or does the mantra set the pipes? That would seem odd given the bija mantras are used extensively by others. Or is it the process it self -- like maybe by letting go, we open ourselves up to the controlled astral beings who do the dirty work. Or is it the checking procedure. Now we are getting somewhere for I always thought the complete set of checking notes (is it up to 4000 pages) was the devil's work. (It was certainly hellish to memorize exactly, word for word) Or is it Only in the Domes that the kblock and energy syph piping occurs. That is, regular meditators don't get pipped, its only in the Domes that that occurs. That would be more plausible. In that scenario the under controlled astal beings may be hovering in the domes and sucking up the energy, via or alongside placing the blocks during each session. However if that is true, the domes are sort of spiritual gas chambers - they are killing off the spiritual essence of the Domers. So why would you want to play the role of a spiritual Eichman trying to round up as many people as possible to get spiritually killed in the Domes? Ah, but you say the mature, suave and sophisticated FF seeker has other magic from Sri Vidya, Janet Sussmen, various healers and others to ward off this black magic of piping, blocking and syphoning. OK. Lets accept that premise and assume that these sophisticated siddhas have extra non-TMO stuff that protects them from getting energy syponed off in the Domes. Does this involve doing non-TMO practices in the Domes? I think most agree that would be a no no -- or are you advocating that the domes become a spiritual bazar with every one doing their thing in the domes? Regardless of that, why would the protected ones have any desire or inclination to go to the Domes and watch the many unprotected ones spiritually being put to death? And why would you, or Earl, or anyone hip to the real truth want to live in FF. Thats like saying, I love living here in spiritual Auschwitz. I would be most appreciative if you can address these specific questions and let us know how this whole kundalini blocking and substantial energy siphoning actually works. Since you are good friends with Earl, and he apparently is still in FF, perhaps you could ask him for more specificity of how this whole thing works. '- PS, just thinking out loud, could the energy from the Domes, dissolving samsaras and lighting p darkness in Collective Consciousness be SEEN by these non-TMO physics and yogis as energy stealing? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote: Tart, Seriously, people have mostly graduated beyond that. Many here sit up and are disciplined now in Shri Vidya practices that protect from your concerns. TM folks might not be very well embodied or connected to heart and root chakras but its not generally a problem the way you are stating it as folks attend to their spiritual practice except possibly for a few afflicted TB'er souls. If they have not been able to seek the help of the stream of sat gurus who flow through or have gone to India before then John Douglas has been very helpful with his spiritual help and practices that he gives to people. The real inside TM people have facilitated him and he has been quite helpful that way if folks can not allow themselves to be with the Ammas that way. All along, Janet Sussman had also been very helpful with the way you are wondering. She has moved from the community but she is still available to help people with their energy systems and embodiment. Yes, there certainly is sad dispirited feeling in the dome about the failing of the movement and the latent background fear that people might always loose their eligibility to be in the domes for having visited saints, holy people and spiritual teachers. But that aside, the spiritual experience as the large group meditation experiment is still quite compelling. Hence people are here and want to be there for good reasons. If people are eligible and they can come, they ought to come back and help out. That would be quite high-minded. It's pretty nice here
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Real experts don't count. Apparently Real experts count for nothing. What is really strange about this story is that according to my sources the Sri Yantra was never stolen from the Jyotirmath. It's still there sitting on the altar where Guru Dev placed it. Professor Sawyer stated that he knew nothing about a stolen Jyotirmath Sri Yantra. Go figure.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: The Matrix and Maharishi Occult Powers to siphon off energy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip And are you suggesting that MMY was confident a group of 10,000 (per the letter, not 7,000) would create world peace, but that it was possible that world peace would be created only temporarily and then would collapse again because the group couldn't be maintained due to lack of infrastructure? Right. While I believe that MMY believed there was proof that some measurable improvement in world consciousness would happen when a 7000 group (whatever the magic number has to be these days) was brought together, its certainly possible that he would admit to not being sure about the continued funding. Certainly, it makes sense that he would say such a thing to a major donor. It certainly does NOT make sense that he would express doubts about the very project he was hoping said donor would donate too. MMY, whatever else he was, was no fool when it came to getting people to donate money. Expressing doubts about the effectiveness of the group practice of the TM-Sidhis program is obviously counter to his entire history of being a canny fund-raiser, regardless of what he really believed. That makes sense to me (what you said). However, MMY wasn't quite canny enough to foresee how Earl would misunderstand (or perhaps misrepresent) what MMY told him. Your analysis is in line with what I've always thought about the issue of why MMY didn't use TMO funds to establish big groups: He thought it was essential that parties other than the TMO (ideally governments) fund the groups so they had an investment (financial, psychological, political) in the results and could claim credit for them. If they owned the results, they'd have an interest in continuing to fund them.
[FairfieldLife] Fw: Earl-discussion
From: joerg dao [mailto:joerg...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:58 AM To: r...@searchsummit.com Subject: Earl-discussion http://joerg.8m.com/vedas/doe1.html http://joerg.8m.com/vedas/doe1.html Hi Rick, that discussion about the Earl-insights was already in 2004. I wrote a liitle reply than. cheers
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Cooks passing
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of merudanda Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:13 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Cooks passing Yes, let's cherish her light in happy memory and farwell in our heart for three days and talk/write about her, as tradition demands, after 7 days and then ask Rick Archer to kindly share with us more about her departure or anything more he want to share with us and we may do the same It's not Nancy Cook de Herrera who passed, but Nancy Cook, who lived in FF for many years.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Cooks passing
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of m2smart4u2000 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 10:43 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Nancy Cooks passing what happened to Nancy? She was a beautiful lady Liver cancer. Reportedly she hadn't been feeling well and was just diagnosed about 6 weeks ago.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote: Don't mind me, I'm answering my own question from the higher Self: Avidya itself is a kundalini blockage seen from the dynamic perspective of prana/shakti. Any localization of consciousness created through pragya-parad his its accompanying physiology in the body. These physiological blocks start in the most subtle bodies and move through to the gross eventually. They have no ultimate reality for they are structured only in the lack of recognition of the non-relative nature of consciousness. While much can and has been made of the removal of these blocks through tapas, sadhana, healing, etc., the best approach is the actual recognition of consciousness by consciousness. End of transmission. Very nicely said, Peter. Especially the the best approach is the actual etc. Not that I know from my own experience, but it certainly rings true somehow. --- On Wed, 12/29/10, whynotnow7 whynotn...@... wrote: From: whynotnow7 whynotn...@... Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, December 29, 2010, 9:06 PM Whether significant blockages (quantify?) occur, or not, the whole point of TM is that the person doing it continues to transcend straight through the blockages, by continuing to do TM. Not always a pretty sight, and not necessarily in a straight line either- More like the path a bolt of lightning follows up from earth. Nonetheless effective, if a person chooses to go with it. That is my personal experience, by no means an absolute. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Peter wrote: Kundalini blocks? This is so ridiculous. Please, for the love of God, will someone tell me how such a block works, how it is installed and is there a maintenance contract on it! Simple. The shakti will just naturally take the path of least resistance. Once diverted, mental and physical doshas will accumulate at the point of diversion: ta da. But neurologically it's not well understood. To subscribe, send a message to: fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl also went on to say...
On 12/30/2010 07:23 AM, WillyTex wrote: Bhairitu: TM is nothing more than a technique for the masses... So, TM is the most popular form of meditation in India and masses of people practice it twice a day. What proof of that do you have? :-D If so, then maybe TM is the best practice for most people. Show TM and it's mantras to any seasoned yogi and they will have problems with it. Unless you're thinking you're more elite and deserve better teaching than everyone else. You wouldn't get a better teaching with that attitude because it shows ego and the gurus will turn you down. But not everyone has the leisure time to travel to India to rub shoulders with fakirs and pundits, or to live alone in a cave to practice tantric techniques for hours a day, and still raise a family and earn a living. So hence that is why their are techniques for the masses but you also don't have to travel to India nor sit in a cave to learn advanced tantric techniques either. Think of it like learning to play a guitar. Some people are satisfied to play a few songs with a few chords while others choose to master the instrument. Are the latter elite?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shani Claus
Nicely said, Ravi, many thanks. Yes, agreed on all points; we apparently have a great many pain-bodies (separate Egos -- which are by definition utterly insane) in Us which need virtually infinite loving attention to integrate and heal, and very like Kundalini, fever is a most excellent way to do that! :-) Love, Light, and Laughter always and all-ways! :-D --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raviyogi2009 no_re...@... wrote: Thanks Rory. Psychosis occurred at the end of my Kundalini high - the first time for a few hours in Nov 09 and the second in late May for 4 days, my highs ranged from 3 weeks the first time and 5 the next. The psychosis was nothing but an ego coping mechanism of the peak and after the peak the energy dissipated slowly in a week or two. There would a crash after as I made sense of what had happened giving rise to a new understanding, balance and integration. I felt I transitioned to a new state or vibration where I felt, to borrow your terms - crucified and resurrected..:-), some made fun of it but it's just a beautiful metaphor. I could compare psychosis with fever. Fever being a coping mechanism of the body to deal with invading parasites whereas psychosis being the result of the body-mind-ego trying to deal with the overwhelming energy that was descending in droves (from an ego perspective it was invasion). So psychosis was a survival mechanism similar to fever, in fact I thought I was dying, many times. My kid used to have a shirt that had the words survivor kid on it. The mind is the real survivor kid, its survival instinct is so great that I find it hilarious. With the grace of Guru or the existence I was able to reach this insanely sane state..:-). Fever is not sickness, it is a sign of healing, it is a doorway to becoming healthy. In a similar way psychosis was a sure sign that Her work was coming to an end and that I was on the verge on becoming healthy again and be healed, that I would be reaching home, sweet home soon. There are stupid doctors and retarded psychologists not to forget the patients themselves who will condemn fever and psychosis, this list has a few but they miss the point - you can attack the fever and the psychosis but you stop the healing. When I was high I made a video and comments on this list that - I was both the doctor and the patient - everyone missed the metaphor. Love - Ravi. P.S - loved the Home Tat Sat part. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Beautifully put, Ravi, many thanks! And I wouldn't be too quick to label your kundalini-episode a psychosis. If anything, She was removing pyschoses, but even amidst your bumpy ride, you have always looked quite sane to me (FWIW). Home Tat Sat! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raviyogi2009 no_reply@ wrote: Thanks for clarifying that. I was a bit shocked when you just said nothing happens and left it at that. Yes everything happens but nothing does happen, Nothingness is indeed a beautiful word, it is expansive yet is nothing in the dictionary sense. The comment on the stories of growth through archetypes is spot on - during my Kundalini psychosis I felt like I was playing the roles of my father, my mother, my brother and my son. I was the victim, the aggressor; the hunter and hunted, saint and sinner, the pain, wounds that were healed was tremendous - it was just surreal. Yet after all that I felt like I was just sitting at home in peace and really nothing happened even though it felt like I wandered all over the world to reach home..:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Yes, Vaj, a pretty long nothing by some standards. Does nothing have to be short in your world? In mine, nothing includes everything throughout the realms of spacetime -- that is, everything appears to happen, but in reality, doesn't. That includes the stories of growth perceived through our Inner Archetypes, including the various dramas of hurt, victimization, rage, rescue, demons, angels, subtle realms, ignorance, enlightenment, growth, and so on. All real enough on their own levels, to be sure, but really, just more of me to love! I am very, very fat! A big, fat nothing! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:34 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Actually not, Vaj. For me the various Initiations, like all models of growth and progress, are actually themselves stories or dramas of our inner Archetypes: powerful, moving, enjoyable, supremely useful for self-exploration, but ultimately unreal. Really, nothing ever happens! :-D Pretty long nothing: Rory Goff: A Spiritual Autobiography
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Good call! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
More of me to love! I am getting fatter all the time! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotn...@... wrote: Good call! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
The Omniscient, Omnipresent, All Powerful Creator aka tubby. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: More of me to love! I am getting fatter all the time! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote: Good call! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
[FairfieldLife] some very nice experiences of transcendence
Some very nice experiences of transcendence http://www.tm.org/blog/enlightenment/jesus-christ-kingdom-god-within-you/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, RoryGoff wrote: I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini- blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising? I wouldn't steal your nickname, don't worry, I've already got plenty!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
*lol* Just don't think about the Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man! ...too late. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotn...@... wrote: The Omniscient, Omnipresent, All Powerful Creator aka tubby. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: More of me to love! I am getting fatter all the time! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote: Good call! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Only because no one expresses any awareness of this fact. Just the usual ... little baby jesus, may he be born in us. he If you knew then at least that makes at least two. Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. So if Saturn represents emptiness, then its fitting that the holiday to celebrate the savior that was not, would be with a celebration to the God of emptiness. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Good gosh ... is there not even a single person here who knows that Saturnalia was the pagan origin of Christmas? Why would you think that because *one* person here seems not to know, nobody else does either? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: It may have been too cold at that time period to perform a census count. http://christmasxmas.xanga.com/395124709/item/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
Josephus and his school were the ones who wrote the gospels and created the historical Jesus as a Roman state religion for the Flavians to counteract the Jewish problem, if Joseph Atwill (Caesar's Messiah) is correct. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Only because no one expresses any awareness of this fact. Just the usual ... little baby jesus, may he be born in us. he If you knew then at least that makes at least two. Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. So if Saturn represents emptiness, then its fitting that the holiday to celebrate the savior that was not, would be with a celebration to the God of emptiness. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Good gosh ... is there not even a single person here who knows that Saturnalia was the pagan origin of Christmas? Why would you think that because *one* person here seems not to know, nobody else does either? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: It may have been too cold at that time period to perform a census count. http://christmasxmas.xanga.com/395124709/item/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, RoryGoff wrote: I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini- blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising? I wouldn't steal your nickname, don't worry, I've already got plenty! Any you are tired of, just give them all to me; I will eat them all.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. There's some question about whether this mention was a later addition. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine how the Jesus legend that has come down to us could have developed in a vacuum, without there having been some individual who made a pretty strong impression at the time.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. IOW, we have no accounts of Jesus from anyone who was around at the time, so witnesses is just not an appropriate term.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:07 PM, authfriend jst...@panix.com wrote: On the other hand, it's hard to imagine how the Jesus legend that has come down to us could have developed in a vacuum, without there having been some individual who made a pretty strong impression at the time. Rick Archer gave me this link a few years ago when I was on IA. 'splains a lot. http://www.zeitgeistthefilm.com/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
Yogic flyer with Kundalini blockage: http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_6_Green-Faerie.html --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:52 PM, RoryGoff wrote: Oops. Here's the disclaimer: Real experts don't count. Caveat emptor. Let me guess. You're not a real expert, but you are absolutely certain you know some people who are. Right? I guess you'll have to wait till my Spiritual Autobiography is released. Nice deflection! Looks to be clearly indicative of a kundalini-blockage. Shall we call it the Vajranadi false-rising?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM, authfriend jst...@panix.com wrote: IOW, we have no accounts of Jesus from anyone who was around at the time, so witnesses is just not an appropriate term. But the Bible is the word of God. Says so right in there, I'm told. So it's by its very nature, true, right?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness [1 Attachment]
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:17 PM, yifuxero yifux...@yahoo.com wrote: Yogic flyer with Kundalini blockage:
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote: Real experts don't count. Apparently Real experts count for nothing. What is really strange about this story is that according to my sources the Sri Yantra was never stolen from the Jyotirmath. It's still there sitting on the altar where Guru Dev placed it. Professor Sawyer stated that he knew nothing about a stolen Jyotirmath Sri Yantra. Go figure. It's just another of Vaj's many fabrications.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote: Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I. Your follow up book could be: Inner Secrets of the Vaj Or maybe The Vaj Monologues
[FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I. Your follow up book could be: Inner Secrets of the Vaj Or maybe The Vaj Monologues LOL. Also known as The Vjj Monologues.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Earl Kaplan: Maharishi's darkness, draining student's consciousness
On Dec 30, 2010, at 4:02 PM, seventhray1 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote: Autobiography of a Vagi? The Way of the Vaj I. Your follow up book could be: Inner Secrets of the Vaj Or maybe The Vaj Monologues A keeper!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote: Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. I've often heard this expressed. I guess I can more easily consider that Krishna never existed since he had attributes quite out of the ordinary. But how do you figure that Jesus did not exist, any more than say Socrates, or Ghengis Khan. How do we know that they existed? What is the proof required for substantiation? And maybe for purposes of consideration let's consider a Jeffersonian Jesus, i.e. no miracles. I'd welcome a reply from anyone.
[FairfieldLife] Launching Operation Warrior Wellness VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS Bringing TM to Veteran
Meditation, People, Enlightenment, Research, Students, Videos and More * Home http://www.tm.org/blog * Enlightenment http://www.tm.org/blog/category/enlightenment/ * Maharishi http://www.tm.org/blog/category/maharishi/ * News http://www.tm.org/blog/category/news/ * People http://www.tm.org/blog/category/people/ * Research http://www.tm.org/blog/category/research/ * Students http://www.tm.org/blog/category/students/ * Video http://www.tm.org/blog/category/video/ * Yoga http://www.tm.org/blog/category/yoga/ Launching `Operation Warrior Wellness VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS Bringing TM to Veterans suffering from PTSD by Bob Roth http://www.tm.org/blog/author/bob-roth/ on December 29, 2010 [Post image for Launching `Operation Warrior Wellness VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS Bringing TM to Veterans suffering from PTSD] 49Share http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tm.org%2Fblog%2Fn\ ews%2Ftm-veterans-suffering-ptsd%2Fsrc=sp Veterans, medical doctors, researchers, and celebrities came together at the Paley Center for Media in midtown Manhattan on December 13 to support the David Lynch Foundation's launch of Operation Warrior Wellness. The outreach aims at providing funds to teach the Transcendental Meditation http://www.tm.org/ technique to 10,000 veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorderPTSD http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-pt\ sd/index.shtml and their families. [David-Lynch-Meditation] http://www.tm.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/David-Lynch-Meditatio\ n.jpg Academy Award-nominated filmmaker David Lynch http://www.lynchweekend.org/ hosted the event. It's so good that we have Operation Warrior Wellness. Soldiers are truly suffering. There are so many benefits from Transcendental Meditation, but for sure it is a `stress-buster.' And when the soldiers get this technique they are going to get their lives back again. Mr. Lynch said. [Operation-Warrior-Wellness] http://www.tm.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Operation-Warrior-Wel\ lness.jpg Operation Warrior Wellness http://www.crowdrise.com/OperationWarriorWellness/fundraiser/russellbra\ nd was inspired by Jerry Yellin, a decorated World War II fighter pilot who himself suffered from the acute problems caused by PTSDand who later enjoyed the stress-relieving benefits of the TM program. We have the ability to teach traumatized young veterans to meditateand help them enormously, Mr. Yellin said. [Colonel-Brian-Rees] http://www.tm.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Colonel-Brian-Rees.jp\ g Colonel Brian Rees http://istpp.org/news/fellows.html , M.D., who recently completed his fourth deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan, spoke about the suitability of the Transcendental Meditation technique for the military. Research has found TM to be very effective treatment for PTSD. It's easy to do, easy to learn and effortless to perform. It's really a very suitable intervention. [Norman-Rosenthal-Meditation] http://www.tm.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Norman-Rosenthal-Medi\ tation.jpg Norman Rosenthal, M.D., http://www.normanrosenthal.com/biography.html clinical professor of psychiatry at Georgetown University Medical School and for 20 years a senior researcher at the National Institutes of Mental, conducted recent research showing the beneficial effects of the TM technique on PTSD. Fifty years of research on this technique have produced astonishing results. I have been impressed by the excellence of the science and the large number of peer-reviewed publications. As a psychiatrist who tries to treat people with medications and therapy, I am fully aware that these approaches are far from perfect. Now, we have at our disposal a new meditation-based approach that can in a powerful, simple, and profound way help people, who, for the most part, do not receive any other ongoing input from mental health professionals. I think is very exciting development, especially in this era of diminishing resources. The news conferences ended with a special videotaped message from Clint Eastwood http://www.imdb.com/name/nm142/bio , who has been practicing Transcendental Meditation for over 40 years: I am a great supporter of Transcendental Meditation. I think that it is a great tool for anyone to be able to utilize to reduce stress. And when you consider the stress that our men and women of the Armed Forces endurethe anxieties of going through combatthen TM is a great tool for them. But it's great approach for anyone to use in life in general; otherwise why would I have been doing it all these yearsalmost half of my life!
Re: [FairfieldLife] How does this Energy Siphoning and Kundalini Blocking Really Work? (was 2011)
On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:54 AM, tartbrain wrote: Thanks for the reply Doug. However, I am not following your response. Let's focus on two things: placement of kundalini blocks and siphoning off of significant amounts of energy. First, I am assuming that some spiritual diversion pipes / channels (for both kunblocks and energy siphoning) are put in place once, and doesn't need to be restablished at each sitting. If so, where and when do these pipes get installed? During initiations with puja? That would seem odd given SBS's presence during the puja. But what thing during initiation constructs these pipes? The puja? That doesn't fit because our puja is really quite a commonly used puja -- with the exception of the the specificity of SBS as the focus. Are you implying SBS is part of this plot? Or does the mantra set the pipes? That would seem odd given the bija mantras are used extensively by others. Or is it the process it self -- like maybe by letting go, we open ourselves up to the controlled astral beings who do the dirty work. Or is it the checking procedure. Now we are getting somewhere for I always thought the complete set of checking notes (is it up to 4000 pages) was the devil's work. (It was certainly hellish to memorize exactly, word for word) Or is it Only in the Domes that the kblock and energy syph piping occurs. That is, regular meditators don't get pipped, its only in the Domes that that occurs. That would be more plausible. In that scenario the under controlled astal beings may be hovering in the domes and sucking up the energy, via or alongside placing the blocks during each session. However if that is true, the domes are sort of spiritual gas chambers - they are killing off the spiritual essence of the Domers. So why would you want to play the role of a spiritual Eichman trying to round up as many people as possible to get spiritually killed in the Domes? Ah, but you say the mature, suave and sophisticated FF seeker has other magic from Sri Vidya, Janet Sussmen, various healers and others to ward off this black magic of piping, blocking and syphoning. OK. Lets accept that premise and assume that these sophisticated siddhas have extra non-TMO stuff that protects them from getting energy syponed off in the Domes. Does this involve doing non-TMO practices in the Domes? I think most agree that would be a no no -- or are you advocating that the domes become a spiritual bazar with every one doing their thing in the domes? Regardless of that, why would the protected ones have any desire or inclination to go to the Domes and watch the many unprotected ones spiritually being put to death? And why would you, or Earl, or anyone hip to the real truth want to live in FF. Thats like saying, I love living here in spiritual Auschwitz. I would be most appreciative if you can address these specific questions and let us know how this whole kundalini blocking and substantial energy siphoning actually works. Since you are good friends with Earl, and he apparently is still in FF, perhaps you could ask him for more specificity of how this whole thing works. '- PS, just thinking out loud, could the energy from the Domes, dissolving samsaras and lighting p darkness in Collective Consciousness be SEEN by these non-TMO physics and yogis as energy stealing? Tart, the mechanics have to do with what is supposed to happen when shakti is awakened, and what happens when it's awakened incorrectly. When shakti is correctly awakened, prana is controlled and directed to break through the bottom end of central channel, rising in a straight, culminating line towards the third eye and the crown bindu, the summit. When it's awakened incorrectly, it leaves it's home at the muladhara-chakra and short-circuits up the vajra-nadi (or another less likely route), which directly activates the dalas or crown petals. When siddhis are directly cultivated, it activates these dalas along with their associated brain areas and virtually assures an imbalanced arising. It's the path of least resistance for shakti yet it cannot reach the makara-bindu where samadhi begins or it's culmination in the crown-bindu: unity. As samskaras and doshas accumulate in this new groove, the way to awakening is blocked, and the samskaras of vyutthana, the outward-stroke, are enhanced. As the tradition of Shankara puts it, the path to Unity in this lifetime is lost. They even go so far as to single out yogic flying. So I'm guessing this probably isn't what you thought it meant: it's not so much about blatant vampirism, but a scarring of consciousness at the pranic level, causing the person to stop evolving and enter a type of servitude. So in a sense, a disreputable teacher can use this to keep students sticking around, and therefore syphoning off their energy, for what they want, their world plans.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
Sorry but you are into wishful thinking here. St. Paul never met the so-call historical Jesus. Rather he was a Jewish opponent and persecutor of the Christians in his earlier days, until he converted on the road to Damascus after having a vision. This event occurred after the purported crucifixion. Maccoby theorizes that Paul synthesized Judaism, Gnosticism, and mysticism to create Christianity as a cosmic savior religion. According to Maccoby, Paul's Pharisaism was his own invention, though actually he was probably associated with the Sadducees. Maccoby attributes the origins of Christian anti-semitism to Paul and claims that Paul's view of women, though inconsistent, reflects his Gnosticism in its misogynist aspects. Hyam Maccoby, Chapter One. The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. New York: Harper Row, 1986. Historians discount the Gospel writers as being recorders of accurate history. Their purpose is only theological. Josephus Flavius supposedly wrote about Jesus in his text, Antiquities Of The Jews passages 18.3.3 and 20.9. This claim was purported to be from Origin's work Against Celsus. However: Louis Feldman, the pre-eminent Josephus scholar, has confirmed that the original text of Origen Against Celsus does not reference the 18th book of his Antiquities. We can therefore not be certain that Origen was aware of Josephus 18.3.3 when he wrote. Feldman concluded in 1963 that: The most probably view seems to be that our text represents substantially what Josephus wrote, but that some alterations have been made by a Christian interpolator. Then in 1971: In a startling find, Shlomo Pines publishes citations of the TF appearing in Arabic and Syriac works of the 9th-10th century. These quotations substantially resemble our current Testimonium, but do not have two of the most suspicious phrases: he was the Messiah and if indeed he can be called a man. Pines suggests these editions may have used an authentic, uninterpolated version of Josephus' work. However, there are no earlier texts which can prove whether any part of the Testimonium Flavianum was actually written by Josephus; and there is reason to be unsure of the veracity of Origen http://ptet.dubar.com/ecw/origen.html himself as a chronicler of history. ...I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me... [Deuteronomy 5:8-10] ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Only because no one expresses any awareness of this fact. Just the usual ... little baby jesus, may he be born in us. he If you knew then at least that makes at least two. Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. So if Saturn represents emptiness, then its fitting that the holiday to celebrate the savior that was not, would be with a celebration to the God of emptiness. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Good gosh ... is there not even a single person here who knows that Saturnalia was the pagan origin of Christmas? Why would you think that because *one* person here seems not to know, nobody else does either? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: It may have been too cold at that time period to perform a census count. http://christmasxmas.xanga.com/395124709/item/
[FairfieldLife] Re: How does this Energy Siphoning and Kundalini Blocking Really Work? (was 2011)
Invalid arguments, Vaj. Only in rare cases would TM activate the Kundalini, with even fewer instances of Sidhis, like negligible. So your 2 required components don't amount to anything. http://www.startlingart.com/Viewer.asp?ImageSource=fine_artFileName=ThroughTheCrack-Small --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote: On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:54 AM, tartbrain wrote: Thanks for the reply Doug. However, I am not following your response. Let's focus on two things: placement of kundalini blocks and siphoning off of significant amounts of energy. First, I am assuming that some spiritual diversion pipes / channels (for both kunblocks and energy siphoning) are put in place once, and doesn't need to be restablished at each sitting. If so, where and when do these pipes get installed? During initiations with puja? That would seem odd given SBS's presence during the puja. But what thing during initiation constructs these pipes? The puja? That doesn't fit because our puja is really quite a commonly used puja -- with the exception of the the specificity of SBS as the focus. Are you implying SBS is part of this plot? Or does the mantra set the pipes? That would seem odd given the bija mantras are used extensively by others. Or is it the process it self -- like maybe by letting go, we open ourselves up to the controlled astral beings who do the dirty work. Or is it the checking procedure. Now we are getting somewhere for I always thought the complete set of checking notes (is it up to 4000 pages) was the devil's work. (It was certainly hellish to memorize exactly, word for word) Or is it Only in the Domes that the kblock and energy syph piping occurs. That is, regular meditators don't get pipped, its only in the Domes that that occurs. That would be more plausible. In that scenario the under controlled astal beings may be hovering in the domes and sucking up the energy, via or alongside placing the blocks during each session. However if that is true, the domes are sort of spiritual gas chambers - they are killing off the spiritual essence of the Domers. So why would you want to play the role of a spiritual Eichman trying to round up as many people as possible to get spiritually killed in the Domes? Ah, but you say the mature, suave and sophisticated FF seeker has other magic from Sri Vidya, Janet Sussmen, various healers and others to ward off this black magic of piping, blocking and syphoning. OK. Lets accept that premise and assume that these sophisticated siddhas have extra non-TMO stuff that protects them from getting energy syponed off in the Domes. Does this involve doing non-TMO practices in the Domes? I think most agree that would be a no no -- or are you advocating that the domes become a spiritual bazar with every one doing their thing in the domes? Regardless of that, why would the protected ones have any desire or inclination to go to the Domes and watch the many unprotected ones spiritually being put to death? And why would you, or Earl, or anyone hip to the real truth want to live in FF. Thats like saying, I love living here in spiritual Auschwitz. I would be most appreciative if you can address these specific questions and let us know how this whole kundalini blocking and substantial energy siphoning actually works. Since you are good friends with Earl, and he apparently is still in FF, perhaps you could ask him for more specificity of how this whole thing works. '- PS, just thinking out loud, could the energy from the Domes, dissolving samsaras and lighting p darkness in Collective Consciousness be SEEN by these non-TMO physics and yogis as energy stealing? Tart, the mechanics have to do with what is supposed to happen when shakti is awakened, and what happens when it's awakened incorrectly. When shakti is correctly awakened, prana is controlled and directed to break through the bottom end of central channel, rising in a straight, culminating line towards the third eye and the crown bindu, the summit. When it's awakened incorrectly, it leaves it's home at the muladhara-chakra and short-circuits up the vajra-nadi (or another less likely route), which directly activates the dalas or crown petals. When siddhis are directly cultivated, it activates these dalas along with their associated brain areas and virtually assures an imbalanced arising. It's the path of least resistance for shakti yet it cannot reach the makara-bindu where samadhi begins or it's culmination in the crown-bindu: unity. As samskaras and doshas accumulate in this new groove, the way to awakening is blocked, and the samskaras of vyutthana, the outward-stroke, are enhanced. As the tradition of Shankara puts it, the path to Unity in this lifetime is lost. They even go so far as
[FairfieldLife] seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. I've often heard this expressed. I guess I can more easily consider that Krishna never existed since he had attributes quite out of the ordinary. But how do you figure that Jesus did not exist, any more than say Socrates, or Ghengis Khan. How do we know that they existed? What is the proof required for substantiation? And maybe for purposes of consideration let's consider a Jeffersonian Jesus, i.e. no miracles. I'd welcome a reply from anyone.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How does this Energy Siphoning and Kundalini Blocking Really Work? (was 2011)
On Dec 30, 2010, at 4:57 PM, yifuxero wrote: Invalid arguments, Vaj. Only in rare cases would TM activate the Kundalini, with even fewer instances of Sidhis, like negligible. So your 2 required components don't amount to anything. http://www.startlingart.com/Viewer.asp?ImageSource=fine_artFileName=ThroughTheCrack-Small Mantra meditation of many, many stripes, Hindu, Jewish, Jain, Buddhist, Christian, Sufi, etc. awaken shakti, shekinah, whatevah. One of the reasons TM works is because they make sure (or used to make sure) the TM teacher rounds enough to assure some sufficient shakti and a ritual whose mere performance transfers the teacher's acquired shakti to the mantra chosen from a list, to the student. The issue is the teacher or teachers should instruct the student in some simple basic kundalini awakening method FAQ's. Give them some simple, basic yogic/tantric instructions. Empower them. The thing is, if your shakti was awakened in a previous existence, it will be already awakened in this one, so you'll probably just go thru a bunch of reacquaintance experiences. You'll also be less likely to appreciate it in others, as you've carried it with you for so long, you take it for granted. There are many documented examples of TM mantra awakening people's shakti. Of course, unfortunately, they tend to overheat or over-vata out. But it appears people like SSRS are correcting errors that had crept into earlier examples of the TM technique. If this trend continues, that would mean that Sahaj-style mantra meditation could get even better as time passes. And that's good thing, esp. as more people instinctively shift their appreciation away from the TMO (less support of nature), and more towards movements like SSRS's (more support).
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
Orthodox treatments are for the most part ineffective in treating brain cancer. Often, the treatment will kill the patient before the tumors. Best bet, try Ecklonia Cava extract, ECE); take about 3 times per day. Available from Swanson's Health Products in Fargo, 1800-437-4148. Product D1SW1372, 60 caps for $4.99 ... While no claims are made for a cure, with brain cancer the idea should be to offset some of the delibating symptoms; and if leaving the physical is probable, one might have a chance of going peacefully rather than totally devastating the body with chemo and radiation. Forget the sheepskin. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirt...@... wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. I've often heard this expressed. I guess I can more easily consider that Krishna never existed since he had attributes quite out of the ordinary. But how do you figure that Jesus did not exist, any more than say Socrates, or Ghengis Khan. How do we know that they existed? What is the proof required for substantiation? And maybe for purposes of consideration let's consider a Jeffersonian Jesus, i.e. no miracles. I'd welcome a reply from anyone.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
Here in FF, and can be ordered online: http://overland.com/Products/Rugs---Car-Seat-Covers-1156/Rugs,-Pelts---Cowhi des-1200/Sheepskin-Rugs-1157/Browse.aspx or http://goo.gl/JFogz goo.gl/JFogz
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
The choice is hers to make on her care of her body. She has made the request of some sheepskin to help her keep warm. It is a small request . I will make this small miracle happen with or without you. There is small chance now for her physical body to stay here. Compassion warms. I will not forget her very small request. Small things are huge. Anyone who wants to partner w me is welcome.Sometimes in grief, a teddy bear is good medicine, and in this condition, of dis-ease... some sheepskin can be good medicine. I appreciate your advice;I personally would take another approach to her wellness, but it hers to decide. This is one thing she has asked. Thanks for your wanting to help. -M --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote: Orthodox treatments are for the most part ineffective in treating brain cancer. Often, the treatment will kill the patient before the tumors. Best bet, try Ecklonia Cava extract, ECE); take about 3 times per day. Available from Swanson's Health Products in Fargo, 1800-437-4148. Product D1SW1372, 60 caps for $4.99 ... While no claims are made for a cure, with brain cancer the idea should be to offset some of the delibating symptoms; and if leaving the physical is probable, one might have a chance of going peacefully rather than totally devastating the body with chemo and radiation. Forget the sheepskin. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirteen@ wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. I've often heard this expressed. I guess I can more easily consider that Krishna never existed since he had attributes quite out of the ordinary. But how do you figure that Jesus did not exist, any more than say Socrates, or Ghengis Khan. How do we know that they existed? What is the proof required for substantiation? And maybe for purposes of consideration let's consider a Jeffersonian Jesus, i.e. no miracles. I'd welcome a reply from anyone.
[FairfieldLife] New Years 9 Planet Yagya
A Special Navagraha Yagya for the New Year December 31, 7 pm to midnight; January 1 and 2: 8 am to 10 pm You are invited to join us for auspicious blessings for the New Year, with yagyas for Ganesh, Lakshmi, Shiva, Durga and the 9 planets, under the guidance of Pandit Dhruv Narain Sharma. Pt. Sharma will supervise the preparation of 9 elaborate traditional mandalas for each of the nine planets. Held at Morningstar Studio in Fairfield For details, go to: http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ These yagyas allow you and your friends to directly participate in these traditional methods of invoking the Divine and appeasing planetary influences. For the individual planetary propitiations, you will be instructed how to pronounce the appropriate mantras for each planet, and you will make offerings at the site of specially prepared mandalas for each individual planet. Please come to the free Orientation meeting on Thursday at 8 pm to learn how to get the most from this special weekend. You may attend one or all of the yagyas throughout the weekend. Please bring fruit and flowers as specified below for the specific planet. For details, go to: http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/
[FairfieldLife] Thursday Nite Special Orientation Meeting for the NavaGraha Yayga
An Orientation for the New Years Maha NavaGraha Yayga Dec. 30, Thursday 8 pm at Morning Star Studio http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Thursday Nite Special Orientation Meeting for the NavaGraha Yayga
An Orientation for the New Years Maha NavaGraha Yayga Dec. 30, Thursday 8 pm at Morning Star Studio http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/ Pandit D.N. Sharma will present an overview of the Vedic technologies for planetary propitiation, and provide personal guidance on how to get the most from the New Year's NavaGraha Yagya.
[FairfieldLife] Friday Nite of the Maha New Years Yagya
Friday New Year's eve at Morning Star Studio 7-8 pm: Ganesh Yagya 8 pm: MahaSankalpa: Setting individual intentions for the weekend's Yaygya 8:15-10:30 pm: Invocation of NavaGraha (9 Planets) Yagya Establishment of 9 planetary mandalas 1 for each planet 11-12:30 pm: NavaGraha Samuhik Japa Participatory Group Mantra Recitation (includes 108 Bija Japa for each planet)
[FairfieldLife] Saturday of the New Years Maha Yagya
Saturday January 1 at Morning Star Studio 1011 am Nitya Puja Invocation 11- noon NavaGraha Samuhik -- Group Recitation for all 9 planets Noon-3 pm Individual Propitiation at specific planetary mandalas 5-8 pm Individual Propitiation at specific planetary mandalas 8-9 pm MahaLakshmi New Year's Puja -- Blessings to start the New Year 9:30 pm MahaLakshmi Fire Ceremony at 2149 227th Street, Fairfield
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th? [1 Attachment]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptyb...@... wrote: snip The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. New York: Harper Row, 1986. Fascinating book. Maccoby doesn't question Jesus' existence, however, as I recall. He does make a case that Paul had *not* been a Pharisee, contrary to his claim; he says Paul was a pagan convert to Judaism who tried to become a Pharisee and couldn't make the grade, and that this turned him against the Pharisees. He also says Jesus *himself* was a Pharisee. He suggests that later redactors cast several of Jesus' arguments as being with the Pharisees when they were actually with the Sadducees, and portrayed his arguments with the Pharisees as hostile when they were really just the standard intellectual jousting of the Pharisees among themselves. As far as Maccoby is concerned, the Pharisees were the good guys. I have no idea whether his theses hold up, but they're really interesting, and the book is nicely written for the general reader.
[FairfieldLife] Post Count
Fairfield Life Post Counter === Start Date (UTC): Sat Dec 25 00:00:00 2010 End Date (UTC): Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 2011 549 messages as of (UTC) Fri Dec 31 00:10:29 2010 45 tartbrain no_re...@yahoogroups.com 44 yifuxero yifux...@yahoo.com 40 authfriend jst...@panix.com 39 Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net 35 RoryGoff roryg...@hotmail.com 34 Tom Pall thomas.p...@gmail.com 34 Buck dhamiltony...@yahoo.com 31 whynotnow7 whynotn...@yahoo.com 21 wgm4u wg...@yahoo.com 19 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 19 WillyTex willy...@yahoo.com 18 Peter drpetersutp...@yahoo.com 17 Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com 16 Joe geezerfr...@yahoo.com 14 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com 13 emptybill emptyb...@yahoo.com 12 seventhray1 steve.sun...@sbcglobal.net 12 merudanda no_re...@yahoogroups.com 11 Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@lisco.com 10 John jr_...@yahoo.com 10 Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 9 wayback71 waybac...@yahoo.com 9 raviyogi2009 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 5 m2smart4u2000 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 4 shukra69 shukr...@yahoo.ca 3 wle...@aol.com 2 wvosteen monr...@monroe-electronics.com 2 sparaig lengli...@cox.net 2 pranamoocher no_re...@yahoogroups.com 2 parsleysage meowthirt...@yahoo.com 2 johnlasher20002000 johnlasher20002...@yahoo.com 2 feste37 fest...@yahoo.com 2 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com 1 nitinadsul ni...@nitinadsul.com 1 mainstream20016 mainstream20...@yahoo.com 1 guyfawkes91 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 1 buckeyecreek buckeyecr...@yahoo.com 1 Yifu Xero yifux...@yahoo.com 1 Kanchan Dixit kanchan_0...@yahoo.com 1 JohnY john_youe...@comcast.net 1 Bill Coop williamgc...@gmail.com 1 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com Posters: 44 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times = Daylight Saving Time (Summer): US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM Standard Time (Winter): US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
eBay has genuine sheepskin seat belt covers for sale, two for $7 plus $4 shipping. They're 5 x 10.5, which sounds about right for putting in slippers: http://tinyurl.com/2dnxy62 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirt...@... wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M
[FairfieldLife] Primping Faerie
http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_7_Primping-Faerie.html
[FairfieldLife] Little Mermaid
http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_5_Little-Mermaid.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: How does this Energy Siphoning and Kundalini Blocking Really Work? (was 2011)
Although people talk on about kundalini quite frequently, what they describe is actually a variable degree of prana going up the spine. Actual kundalini is not within our power to control because it is the originating power of the jiva-atma when that jiva takes embodiment in a human being, male or female. When the kundalini power arouses from its quiescent state, it ascends toward its home above the head. During this ascension, the kundalini power takes every tributary manifestation of prana-shakti with it because it is the actual source of every form of shakti in the body. Real kundalini ascension is like the golden essence of the sun turned into a living, cosmic fluid, rising up and absorbing every actual and potential quality into a dissolving bliss. It manifests our essential nature of intelligence and utter joy and is not mysterious or problematic because it is what we really are. It is exquisitely pleasurable because it is the Ananda of chit-shakti. Think Sat-Chit-Anandam and if you are familiar with the meaning of that phrase then you will recognize what is the only reality of kundalini activation. All else is just prana-shakti playing around. The Tibetan yogas of Naropa and Niguma are also based upon prana going up and down the spine but they do not describe kundalini because they do not focus upon the avadhuta nadi (in the central spine) as it intersects the mula.adhara chakra. However the Tibetan yoga-s prescribe extensive practice of tsa-lung (nadi-prana) preliminary training to release nadi blockages and prevent problems. Most of it is very vigorous but this training is only for the purpose of assisting the yogin/yogini in accomplishing his/her personal sadhana. * --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote: Thanks for the reply Doug. However, I am not following your response. Let's focus on two things: placement of kundalini blocks and siphoning off of significant amounts of energy. First, I am assuming that some spiritual diversion pipes / channels (for both kunblocks and energy siphoning) are put in place once, and doesn't need to be restablished at each sitting. If so, where and when do these pipes get installed? During initiations with puja? That would seem odd given SBS's presence during the puja. But what thing during initiation constructs these pipes? The puja? That doesn't fit because our puja is really quite a commonly used puja -- with the exception of the the specificity of SBS as the focus. Are you implying SBS is part of this plot? Or does the mantra set the pipes? That would seem odd given the bija mantras are used extensively by others. Or is it the process it self -- like maybe by letting go, we open ourselves up to the controlled astral beings who do the dirty work. Or is it the checking procedure. Now we are getting somewhere for I always thought the complete set of checking notes (is it up to 4000 pages) was the devil's work. (It was certainly hellish to memorize exactly, word for word) Or is it Only in the Domes that the kblock and energy syph piping occurs. That is, regular meditators don't get pipped, its only in the Domes that that occurs. That would be more plausible. In that scenario the under controlled astal beings may be hovering in the domes and sucking up the energy, via or alongside placing the blocks during each session. However if that is true, the domes are sort of spiritual gas chambers - they are killing off the spiritual essence of the Domers. So why would you want to play the role of a spiritual Eichman trying to round up as many people as possible to get spiritually killed in the Domes? Ah, but you say the mature, suave and sophisticated FF seeker has other magic from Sri Vidya, Janet Sussmen, various healers and others to ward off this black magic of piping, blocking and syphoning. OK. Lets accept that premise and assume that these sophisticated siddhas have extra non-TMO stuff that protects them from getting energy syponed off in the Domes. Does this involve doing non-TMO practices in the Domes? I think most agree that would be a no no -- or are you advocating that the domes become a spiritual bazar with every one doing their thing in the domes? Regardless of that, why would the protected ones have any desire or inclination to go to the Domes and watch the many unprotected ones spiritually being put to death? And why would you, or Earl, or anyone hip to the real truth want to live in FF. Thats like saying, I love living here in spiritual Auschwitz. I would be most appreciative if you can address these specific questions and let us know how this whole kundalini blocking and substantial energy siphoning actually works. Since you are good friends with Earl, and he apparently is still in FF, perhaps you could ask him for more specificity of how this whole thing works. '- PS, just thinking out loud, could the energy from the Domes,
[FairfieldLife] Sunday Morning too, New Years 9 planet Yagya
Sunday Jan 2 at Morning Star Studio 1011 am Nitya Puja Invocation 11- noon Maha Mritynunjaya Group Recitation Noon-1 pm NavaGraha Samuhik -- Group Recitation for all 9 planets 1-3 pm Individual Propitiation at specific planetary mandalas 7-10 pm NavaGraha Fire Ceremony at 2140 227th Street Fairfield Concluding Ceremonies and Prasad Schedule Details: http://vedyagya.blogspot.com/
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
THIS is very kind and I forwarded it to her. Thank you ever so for the help. This truly is a mini miracle. A little love really is big and very warm- hopefully this is what she can use. :) -Meow --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: eBay has genuine sheepskin seat belt covers for sale, two for $7 plus $4 shipping. They're 5 x 10.5, which sounds about right for putting in slippers: http://tinyurl.com/2dnxy62 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirteen@ wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Little Mermaid
I thought this one was one of the best. http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_8_Dance-with-Iron-Fans.html --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote: http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_5_Little-Mermaid.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Deva Surfing the Himalayas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merudanda no_re...@... wrote: snip http://www.shrigurudevji.com/images/common/top_header.jpg like Swami Brahmananda Surfing the Himalayas in a Turques B -Uncle Tantra- Rama style? eh Exactly! But it only works if you see it out of the corner of your eye, rather than looking right at it. snip have a very very happy New Year Dear Judith all the blessing Thank you! May yours be blessed as well. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@ wrote: http://www.shrigurudevji.com/article.asp?article=about_gurudev When I clicked on this link, for a split-second in my peripheral vision, it seemed as though the illustration of Guru Dev in the upper left corner showed him wearing big wrap-around amber-tinted sunglasses.
[FairfieldLife] Polar bears vs. the BBC
BBC documentary filmmakers craftily send disguised robot cameras to observe polar bears, but the bears' curiosity makes hash of them. Very funny: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101230/us_yblog_thelookout/polar-bears-destroy-bbc-documentary-cameras http://tinyurl.com/27ep7g8
[FairfieldLife] Faerie mischief
http://www.fantasygallery.net/chang/art_3_faerie-mischief.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: Josephus and his school were the ones who wrote the gospels and created the historical Jesus as a Roman state religion for the Flavians to counteract the Jewish problem, if Joseph Atwill (Caesar's Messiah) is correct. Theological research shows that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Only because no one expresses any awareness of this fact. Just the usual ... little baby jesus, may he be born in us. he If you knew then at least that makes at least two. Which is sort of ironic, or perhaps symbolic, since he's a figment of our collective, historical imagination. There is no historical proof, Judaic or Roman, that he ever existed. So if Saturn represents emptiness, then its fitting that the holiday to celebrate the savior that was not, would be with a celebration to the God of emptiness. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Good gosh ... is there not even a single person here who knows that Saturnalia was the pagan origin of Christmas? Why would you think that because *one* person here seems not to know, nobody else does either? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: It may have been too cold at that time period to perform a census count. http://christmasxmas.xanga.com/395124709/item/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: snip Theological research shows What's theological research? There are no actual *facts* to back up any of this, other than that the Gospels were written long after Jesus' death. that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. What you're saying is correct. But St. Paul tells us that he himself persecuted the early Christian followers. This shows that the historical Jesus existed through the experience and eyewitness accounts of the followers. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. There's some question about whether this mention was a later addition. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine how the Jesus legend that has come down to us could have developed in a vacuum, without there having been some individual who made a pretty strong impression at the time. Some theologians state that something extraordinary happened during that time period. The witnesses and the tradition that followed conveyed the experience (including his birth and death) and miracles performed by Jesus. If nothing unusual occurred, we would not be hearing any of those stories today.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Josephus and his school were the ones who wrote the gospels and created the historical Jesus as a Roman state religion for the Flavians to counteract the Jewish problem, if Joseph Atwill (Caesar's Messiah) is correct. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: Theological research shows that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community. John, I am quite familiar with orthodox Christians' view of Christianity. If you would like to familiarize yourself with mine, I'd suggest you read Freke Gandy's The Jesus Mysteries: Was the 'Original Jesus' a Pagan God? for a glimpse at Christianity's powerful Archetypal underpinnings, followed by Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah for a look at the possible political motivations behind the creation of a historical Jesus, and then we'll talk.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: snip Theological research shows What's theological research? There are no actual *facts* to back up any of this, other than that the Gospels were written long after Jesus' death. There are a few Christian theologians who were able to analyze the sources of the facts or accounts written by the gospel writers. They were saying that the accounts came from essentially two main sources, as I recall. These sources were collections of stories from the early Christian followers and presumably from the gospel writers themselves. Nonetheless, you are correct in saying that the Gospels were written years after the death of Jesus. that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0293/0293_01.asp --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Josephus and his school were the ones who wrote the gospels and created the historical Jesus as a Roman state religion for the Flavians to counteract the Jewish problem, if Joseph Atwill (Caesar's Messiah) is correct. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community. John, I am quite familiar with orthodox Christians' view of Christianity. If you would like to familiarize yourself with mine, I'd suggest you read Freke Gandy's The Jesus Mysteries: Was the 'Original Jesus' a Pagan God? for a glimpse at Christianity's powerful Archetypal underpinnings, followed by Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah for a look at the possible political motivations behind the creation of a historical Jesus, and then we'll talk.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Polar bears vs. the BBC
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: BBC documentary filmmakers craftily send disguised robot cameras to observe polar bears, but the bears' curiosity makes hash of them. Very funny: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101230/us_yblog_thelookout/polar-bears-destroy-bbc-documentary-cameras http://tinyurl.com/27ep7g8 Nice find!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff roryg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Josephus and his school were the ones who wrote the gospels and created the historical Jesus as a Roman state religion for the Flavians to counteract the Jewish problem, if Joseph Atwill (Caesar's Messiah) is correct. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that most of the apostles were uneducated fishermen from Galilee, with the exception of St. Luke, who was a physician, and St. Paul, who was a former Pharisee. It is generally accepted that the disciples of the apostles wrote the gospels decades after the death of Jesus. In effect, the apostles and the early Christian followers were the first hand witnesses. Thus, the historical accounts came from these sources. But there is a strong argument that St. Luke wrote his own gospel based on his actual witness account. St. Paul did not actually see Jesus when he was alive. But he was learned in the Jewish tradition. He was also a Roman citizen. Thus, he understood the meaning of Jesus' message and synthesized the teachings in universal terms to appeal to Gentiles as well as the Jewish community. John, I am quite familiar with orthodox Christians' view of Christianity. If you would like to familiarize yourself with mine, I'd suggest you read Freke Gandy's The Jesus Mysteries: Was the 'Original Jesus' a Pagan God? for a glimpse at Christianity's powerful Archetypal underpinnings, followed by Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah for a look at the possible political motivations behind the creation of a historical Jesus, and then we'll talk. The titles look interesting. We'll revisit this theme when the discussion comes up again. In the meantime, I'll look for them. Thanks.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
I used to meditate on one of those until I ritamed the sheep's death in a slaughter house. Very unpleasant experience for the poor sheep. Now I sit on silk.worm gunk. --- On Thu, 12/30/10, Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com wrote: From: Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, December 30, 2010, 5:47 PM Here in FF, and can be ordered online: http://overland.com/Products/Rugs---Car-Seat-Covers-1156/Rugs,-Pelts---Cowhides-1200/Sheepskin-Rugs-1157/Browse.aspx or goo.gl/JFogz
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: The titles look interesting. We'll revisit this theme when the discussion comes up again. In the meantime, I'll look for them. Thanks. You're very welcome, John; I look forward to hearing your thoughts on them :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. What you're saying is correct. But St. Paul tells us that he himself persecuted the early Christian followers. This shows that the historical Jesus existed through the experience and eyewitness accounts of the followers. Not really. What Paul tells us shows what Paul wanted his audience to believe. And again, we have no eyewitness accounts. Look, I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm neither a believer nor a denier. I just think we should make a clear distinction between what we know for sure (very little) and what is conjecture (most of it). I don't like the term witnesses because we really don't have any at all, much less eyewitnesses. We have lots of long-after-the-fact stories that we have no way of verifying. The Gospel accounts contradict each other on many points. There were political interests very likely involved in shaping the stories in ways that favored one or another group. What we have is likely bits and pieces of accurate information mixed in with a lot of stuff that was made up for one reason or another, and in most cases we don't have any way of telling the difference. There was also an independent Roman historian by the name of Josephus who mentioned the existence of Jesus in Palestine. There's some question about whether this mention was a later addition. On the other hand, it's hard to imagine how the Jesus legend that has come down to us could have developed in a vacuum, without there having been some individual who made a pretty strong impression at the time. Some theologians state that something extraordinary happened during that time period. The witnesses and the tradition that followed conveyed the experience (including his birth and death) and miracles performed by Jesus. If nothing unusual occurred, we would not be hearing any of those stories today.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: snip John, I am quite familiar with orthodox Christians' view of Christianity. If you would like to familiarize yourself with mine, I'd suggest you read Freke Gandy's The Jesus Mysteries: Was the 'Original Jesus' a Pagan God? for a glimpse at Christianity's powerful Archetypal underpinnings, followed by Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah for a look at the possible political motivations behind the creation of a historical Jesus, and then we'll talk. The titles look interesting. We'll revisit this theme when the discussion comes up again. In the meantime, I'll look for them. Thanks. I'd also strongly recommend the book emptybill cited, Hyam Maccoby's The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. It's an eye-opener, whether or not you buy all his arguments, and it's a terrific read.
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
And maybe for purposes of consideration let's consider a Jeffersonian Jesus, i.e. no miracles. I'd welcome a reply from anyone. meowthirt...@... wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. namaste -M Thanks Meow, aren't they wonderful as they happen. Yep, the world is a miraculous place if you got eyes for it. All Blessings, -Buck
[FairfieldLife] Re: seeking a mini miracle-sheepskin
No trouble, happy to be of assistance. Hope it works for her. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirt...@... wrote: THIS is very kind and I forwarded it to her. Thank you ever so for the help. This truly is a mini miracle. A little love really is big and very warm- hopefully this is what she can use. :) -Meow --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: eBay has genuine sheepskin seat belt covers for sale, two for $7 plus $4 shipping. They're 5 x 10.5, which sounds about right for putting in slippers: http://tinyurl.com/2dnxy62 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, parsleysage meowthirteen@ wrote: Instead of debating miricles or not, I seek them. My neighbor has taken in her sister -cancer has spread to brain. Her sister is cold-she is going thru chemo- and has requested some sheepskin to cut into foot shapes and place in her slippers, shoes, etc . She was thinking of enough to cut 2 feet shapes out- and it looks like she wears a 9 or maybe an 8 1/2. Any of you have a large piece of sheepskin, an old set of seat covers, or know of any place to get this? I want to offer her some comfort and peace. please let me know. namaste -M
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. What you're saying is correct. But St. Paul tells us that he himself persecuted the early Christian followers. This shows that the historical Jesus existed through the experience and eyewitness accounts of the followers. Not really. What Paul tells us shows what Paul wanted his audience to believe. And again, we have no eyewitness accounts. Look, I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm neither a believer nor a denier. I just think we should make a clear distinction between what we know for sure (very little) and what is conjecture (most of it). I don't like the term witnesses because we really don't have any at all, much less eyewitnesses. We have lots of long-after-the-fact stories that we have no way of verifying. The Gospel accounts contradict each other on many points. There were political interests very likely involved in shaping the stories in ways that favored one or another group. What we have is likely bits and pieces of accurate information mixed in with a lot of stuff that was made up for one reason or another, and in most cases we don't have any way of telling the difference. FWIW, St. Paul was a Pharisee and a Roman citizen. Why would he all of the sudden change his mind from persecuting Christians to joining them in the end? He spent his lifetime building the new church, amidst difficulties and struggles. He even died for his new found faith in the end. There most have been something very significant that was happening to him and the Christian community at the time. For him, the Jesus message was clear and struck a new resonance to his old Jewish views. He did not consider the evidence, albeit stories from mostly uneducated followers of Jesus in Judea, to be specious.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: snip John, I am quite familiar with orthodox Christians' view of Christianity. If you would like to familiarize yourself with mine, I'd suggest you read Freke Gandy's The Jesus Mysteries: Was the 'Original Jesus' a Pagan God? for a glimpse at Christianity's powerful Archetypal underpinnings, followed by Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah for a look at the possible political motivations behind the creation of a historical Jesus, and then we'll talk. The titles look interesting. We'll revisit this theme when the discussion comes up again. In the meantime, I'll look for them. Thanks. I'd also strongly recommend the book emptybill cited, Hyam Maccoby's The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. It's an eye-opener, whether or not you buy all his arguments, and it's a terrific read. Judy, this book looks controversial by its title. The subject has been addressed before. The question remains: If St. Paul made up his story, why would he die for it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Theological research shows that Jesus existed historically. The main witnesses were the gospel writers, St. Paul, their disciples and the followers of Jesus at the time of his life in Judea. The Gospels were all written many decades after Jesus' death. St. Paul never knew Jesus in the flesh either. And those who followed him during his lifetime didn't write any of the Bible. What you're saying is correct. But St. Paul tells us that he himself persecuted the early Christian followers. This shows that the historical Jesus existed through the experience and eyewitness accounts of the followers. Not really. What Paul tells us shows what Paul wanted his audience to believe. And again, we have no eyewitness accounts. Look, I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm neither a believer nor a denier. I just think we should make a clear distinction between what we know for sure (very little) and what is conjecture (most of it). I don't like the term witnesses because we really don't have any at all, much less eyewitnesses. We have lots of long-after-the-fact stories that we have no way of verifying. The Gospel accounts contradict each other on many points. There were political interests very likely involved in shaping the stories in ways that favored one or another group. What we have is likely bits and pieces of accurate information mixed in with a lot of stuff that was made up for one reason or another, and in most cases we don't have any way of telling the difference. FWIW, St. Paul was a Pharisee and a Roman citizen. That's what he says. But Maccoby thinks there's good evidence in the biblical text that he was a pagan convert to Judaism who tried and failed to make the grade as a Pharisee. According to Maccoby, Paul's supposedly expert rabbinical reasoning in his epistles is a joke; it's not even remotely in the Pharisee style. Why would he all of the sudden change his mind from persecuting Christians to joining them in the end? Why not? People change. He could have been disappointed in Judaism after his conversion from paganism and trying to justify making a break. Maybe he had trouble following all the commandments and knew he couldn't be a good Jew. Maybe it was a sour-grapes kind of thing. He spent his lifetime building the new church, amidst difficulties and struggles. He even died for his new found faith in the end. There most have been something very significant that was happening to him and the Christian community at the time. All we know is what he says. I think he probably did have some kind of experience on the road to Damascus, but who knows what it was? For him, the Jesus message was clear and struck a new resonance to his old Jewish views. John, he *made up* most of the Jesus message. Read Maccoby. What he made up was brilliant, but it wasn't necessarily based on anything Jesus said. Certainly the notion that Jews who became Christians must stop following the Law wouldn't have met with Jesus' approval. But if Paul was a pagan convert to Judaism who discovered that being a good Jew was harder than he'd thought, his dismissal of the Law as not just unnecessary but harmful would make perfect sense psychologically. He did not consider the evidence, albeit stories from mostly uneducated followers of Jesus in Judea, to be specious. He was certainly looking for something, but he wasn't necessarily any more perceptive about whether what he heard was true than anybody else at the time. Standards for belief were a lot looser back then. Bottom line, we can't take anything in the New Testament as historical documentation unless we can verify it from other sources.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Was Jesus Really Born on December 25th?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip I'd also strongly recommend the book emptybill cited, Hyam Maccoby's The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. It's an eye-opener, whether or not you buy all his arguments, and it's a terrific read. Judy, this book looks controversial by its title. The subject has been addressed before. The question remains: If St. Paul made up his story, why would he die for it? He did a good job of convincing himself that this was what Jesus was all about. He didn't think of it as something he'd made up; he thought of it as revelation. He'd invested most of his adult life in preaching it. He wasn't a scam artist; he truly believed it. But there's no evidence he got it from Jesus or Jesus' followers.