[FairfieldLife] Should the Pope Resign?
Some cardinals want him to resign. If there is an obvious trend that a schism will occur if he continues to be pope, IMO that's the time he'll resign. I think he's trying to shake up the church to encourage renewal of the member's attitude. There are liberals and conservatives in the church, but they have to learn how to live together. Should TMers in the church teach others how to transcend? http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/report-some-cardinals-want-pope-franics-resign-fear-schism-worse-reformation http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/report-some-cardinals-want-pope-franics-resign-fear-schism-worse-reformation
[FairfieldLife] Re: basis of morals
Yep, you are onto something with the polyvagal in this, ..a stronger case is made when introducing the evidence relating to the Polyvagal nervous system. Different than moral philosophizing it would seem spiritual morality possibly is better understood as rooted or embodied more by reflection of the presence of consciousness through the whole subtle system and this well-being moderated ably by the Golden Rule in life. Of spiritual morality it is like one has the practical law of the Golden Rule protecting or promoting the hologram of the subtle system and then cultural administrative state regulation like of the ten commandments. All about operationalizing the embodiment of consciousness in the light body from the mental fields on down through the polyvagal into the heart, solar plexus and root energetics of the system. Cultivating and grounding spirituality. MMY on spirituality: “..for it is the unfoldment of the essential nature of the soul, or inner consciousness.” The last techniques Maharishi was working on teaching were in this direction of grounding, bringing the mental fields down into the body. The relative direction of experience then as to the cultivation of spirituality becomes the litmus of morality. That simple. Virtuous, sinful or neutral in effect on the unfoldment of spirituality in life. basis of morals Yifuxero writes: Ironically, advances connecting meditation to morals have been made outside the TM Movement by people like Sam Harris; and a stronger case is made when introducing the evidence relating to the Polyvagal nervous system. # ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,wrote : Atheists AronRa and Matt Dillahunty take on a caller questioning Matt's statement that adherence to reality is an asset when making decisions relating to well being. The process involves correct knowledge preferably based on testable assertions Other segments carry the Theist arguments to an extreme. Their arguments go like this: 1. Atheists make a claim that moral values have evolved over time, and are thus not absolute. 2. Theists reply that since moral values without God are subject to change, one needs an absolute basis for judgment coming for am All-Knowing, All-Loving Creator who is the Lawgiver and Source of Absolute morals. 3. Atheists reply that a. the existence of the Creator-God is questionable since there's no direct evidence, .b. the problem of evil (especially the questions raised by Epicurus). c. the question of which God is "true" one .d. the Bible-based statements demonstrating that the Judaeo-Christian condoned slavery and .actually sanctioned it (Cf. Exodus 21), and also condoned and promoted stoning for a variety of .offences such as adultery, working on the Sabbath, and for unruly children. Can the debate be applied to TM? Yes, at least the TMO has tried to make the connection between the practice of TM and one's well-being. Parameters such as blood pressure and brain waves are the low-hanging fruit and haven't countered the effect of control techniques such as Mindfulness. Ironically, advances connecting meditation to morals have been made outside the TM Movement by people like Sam Harris; and a stronger case is made when introducing the evidence relating to the Polyvagal nervous system. Finally, the TMO needs a stronger connection to Compassion, not merely a few lip-service statements by MMY. A 3 min video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG6ljqgf4CA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG6ljqgf4CA
[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sat 04-Mar-17 00:15:11 UTC
Fairfield Life Post Counter === Start Date (UTC): 02/25/17 00:00:00 End Date (UTC): 03/04/17 00:00:00 75 messages as of (UTC) 03/03/17 16:07:49 15 jr_esq 11 dhamiltony2k5 9 hepa7 8 yifuxero 7 Bhairitu noozguru 5 email4you mikemail4you 5 Archer Angel archonangel 3 ultrarishi 3 Dick Mays dickmays 2 srijau 2 emily.mae50 2 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569 1 rajawilliamsmith 1 FairfieldLife 1 'Rick Archer' rick Posters: 15 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times = Daylight Saving Time (Summer): US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM Standard Time (Winter): US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] basis of morals
A softer, sweeter way to punish people for their imagined religious offences is drowning in molasses. There is morality which has religious origins, and ethics which supposedly could give a secular spin to behavior. The goal, or if spoken of in evolutionary terms, the result of greater societal coherence seems to break down in the following way --- lover (wife, husband etc.), family, extended family relationships, societal group (politics, religion and others), country, country allies. This appears on the basis of studies to be a result of evolutionary unfolding, which is later codified as secular laws or religious prohibitions and permissions. Ethics involves finding a rational basis for such laws, while morality keeps the priests and their equivalents in business. In watching animals, you see some of these effects, but you do not see morality or ethics, which is a layer added by the human capacity for thought. From: "yifux...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 1:40 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] basis of morals Atheists AronRa and Matt Dillahunty take on a caller questioning Matt's statement that adherence to reality is an asset when making decisions relating to well being. The process involves correct knowledge preferably based on testable assertionsOther segments carry the Theist arguments to an extreme. Their arguments go like this:1. Atheists make a claim that moral values have evolved over time, and are thus not absolute.2. Theists reply that since moral values without God are subject to change, one needs an absolute basis for judgment coming for am All-Knowing, All-Loving Creator who is the Lawgiver and Source of Absolute morals.3. Atheists reply that a. the existence of the Creator-God is questionable since there's no direct evidence,.b. the problem of evil (especially the questions raised by Epicurus). c. the question of which God is "true" one.d. the Bible-based statements demonstrating that the Judaeo-Christian condoned slavery and .actually sanctioned it (Cf. Exodus 21), and also condoned and promoted stoning for a variety of .offences such as adultery, working on the Sabbath, and for unruly children.Can the debate be applied to TM? Yes, at least the TMO has tried to make the connection between the practice of TM and one's well-being. Parameters such as blood pressure and brain waves are the low-hanging fruit and haven't countered the effect of control techniques such as Mindfulness.Ironically, advances connecting meditation to morals have been made outside the TM Movement by people like Sam Harris; and a stronger case is made when introducing the evidence relating to the Polyvagal nervous system. Finally, the TMO needs a stronger connection to Compassion, not merely a few lip-service statements by MMY. A 3 min video.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG6ljqgf4CA #yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617 -- #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp #yiv4941588617hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp #yiv4941588617ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp .yiv4941588617ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp .yiv4941588617ad p {margin:0;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-mkp .yiv4941588617ad a {color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-sponsor #yiv4941588617ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-sponsor #yiv4941588617ygrp-lc #yiv4941588617hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617ygrp-sponsor #yiv4941588617ygrp-lc .yiv4941588617ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4941588617 #yiv4941588617activity span .yiv4941588617underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4941588617 .yiv4941588617attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv4941588617 .yiv4941588617attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4941588617 .yiv4941588617attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4941588617 .yiv4941588617attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4941588617
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published
Thanks. If one or other of the authors is still at MUM maybe you could contact them. From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published Yes, and apparently there are more papers coming to be published with a similar level of certainty based on publicly available public health stats. The 'replication' in certainty of their observations coming in to an aggregate as statistical fact seems to get more and more uncomfortable for some critics who may for ideological reason would like to believe otherwise, sort of like it seems for science-deniers in other areas of public policy and publicly available data sets. These papers on meditation will probably be available to read from other channels in time, places like Truth about ™ and Honest Truth about ™. They are not in the farm journals I subscribe to. I will see who I run into around here as to getting copies that we can all easily read. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : .. is there a published data set of dome numbers since the construction of the domes? It would be nice to see. I am not disputing the possibility there is the stated effect, but that there are other correlations that are just as plausible such as safer cars. The promotional PDF states, "For example, the reduction in motor vehicle fatality rates could not be explained by the total number of vehicle miles traveled, weather patterns, the proportion of young drivers, improved vehicle safety features, improved roadway conditions, or alcohol consumption." But the promotional document gives no indication how those conclusions were arrived at. The paper needs to disprove these alternative explanations, not just dismiss them. Maybe they are in the full paper? The federal government seems to think auto safety features are the reason for the fatality decline, which is the most plausible explanation. There is also Journal Quality as a metric for published research.There is something called the h-index which is a metric used to evaluate this. The top Journals Nature, and Science, have an h-index of 948 and 915 respectively while the Journal of Consciousness Studies ranks 49, not very good by comparison, though some journals rank 0. Another ranking called SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) has Nature and Science at 21 and 13 respectively, and the Journal of Consciousness Studies ranks at 0.25. These rankings indicate that poorer quality scientific papers get published in this consciousness journal, that fewer scenentists are interested in stuff published here. If you are a scientist, not very good, and want to be published, then you look for lower ranked journals to try to get published. The journal wants almost $30 for a PDF of the full paper, which is only summarized by the PDF posted here. Does one of the scientists have a copy they could send you which you could post? They usually have these things on hand. The Contribution of Proposed Field Effects of Consciousness to th...: Ingenta Connect | | | | | | | | | | | The Contribution of Proposed Field Effects of Consciousness to th...: Ingen... By Cavanaugh, K.L. | | | | Another point, Scientific Journals are not Scripture. But continue to meditate. The byproducts of meditation, whatever they are, are not as important as enlightenment. From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published Observations and correlations about meditation and well-being were made throughout the last half of the 20th Century in published pilot research. A rightly skeptical criticism of that body of scientific research conducted has been that much that was substantial was without “replication”. The challenge in 'repetition' from a general decline in the teaching of meditation to new practitioners and the separation of many experienced practitioners from organized group practice of group meditations in the 1990’s and 2000’s was then obtaining repetition in that scope of research occurring previously in the 1970’s and 1980’s in the shear size of those previous meditating groups to measure with controls. This scale of size recurred again, occurring for a period of time running between 2007 and 2010. These published papers as hypothesis testing appear now as 'critical' replications in the correlation process of science. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ArcherAngel, It would seem you could legitimately lodge your beefs on the research with the journals themselves and their peer review processes. It would
[FairfieldLife] La Trompe français??
Marine Le Pen, French Trump?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9WZeAVbSTo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9WZeAVbSTo
[FairfieldLife] Fraught with History, “Enemies of the Movement”
A strong term like, ‘Enemy of the People’. ‘Enemy of the People,’ a Phrase With a Fraught History https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/world/europe/trump-enemy-of-the-people-stalin.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/world/europe/trump-enemy-of-the-people-stalin.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published
Yes, and apparently there are more papers coming to be published with a similar level of certainty based on publicly available public health stats. The 'replication' in certainty of their observations coming in to an aggregate as statistical fact seems to get more and more uncomfortable for some critics who may for ideological reason would like to believe otherwise, sort of like it seems for science-deniers in other areas of public policy and publicly available data sets. These papers on meditation will probably be available to read from other channels in time, places like Truth about ™ and Honest Truth about ™. They are not in the farm journals I subscribe to. I will see who I run into around here as to getting copies that we can all easily read. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,wrote : .. is there a published data set of dome numbers since the construction of the domes? It would be nice to see. I am not disputing the possibility there is the stated effect, but that there are other correlations that are just as plausible such as safer cars. The promotional PDF states, "For example, the reduction in motor vehicle fatality rates could not be explained by the total number of vehicle miles traveled, weather patterns, the proportion of young drivers, improved vehicle safety features, improved roadway conditions, or alcohol consumption." But the promotional document gives no indication how those conclusions were arrived at. The paper needs to disprove these alternative explanations, not just dismiss them. Maybe they are in the full paper? The federal government seems to think auto safety features are the reason for the fatality decline, which is the most plausible explanation. There is also Journal Quality as a metric for published research.There is something called the h-index which is a metric used to evaluate this. The top Journals Nature, and Science, have an h-index of 948 and 915 respectively while the Journal of Consciousness Studies ranks 49, not very good by comparison, though some journals rank 0. Another ranking called SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) has Nature and Science at 21 and 13 respectively, and the Journal of Consciousness Studies ranks at 0.25. These rankings indicate that poorer quality scientific papers get published in this consciousness journal, that fewer scenentists are interested in stuff published here. If you are a scientist, not very good, and want to be published, then you look for lower ranked journals to try to get published. The journal wants almost $30 for a PDF of the full paper, which is only summarized by the PDF posted here. Does one of the scientists have a copy they could send you which you could post? They usually have these things on hand. The Contribution of Proposed Field Effects of Consciousness to th...: Ingenta Connect http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2017/0024/F0020001/art3 The Contribution of Proposed Field Effects of Consciousness to th...: Ingen... By Cavanaugh, K.L. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2017/0024/F0020001/art3 Another point, Scientific Journals are not Scripture. But continue to meditate. The byproducts of meditation, whatever they are, are not as important as enlightenment. From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published Observations and correlations about meditation and well-being were made throughout the last half of the 20th Century in published pilot research. A rightly skeptical criticism of that body of scientific research conducted has been that much that was substantial was without “replication”. The challenge in 'repetition' from a general decline in the teaching of meditation to new practitioners and the separation of many experienced practitioners from organized group practice of group meditations in the 1990’s and 2000’s was then obtaining repetition in that scope of research occurring previously in the 1970’s and 1980’s in the shear size of those previous meditating groups to measure with controls. This scale of size recurred again, occurring for a period of time running between 2007 and 2010. These published papers as hypothesis testing appear now as 'critical' replications in the correlation process of science. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ArcherAngel, It would seem you could legitimately lodge your beefs on the research with the journals themselves and their peer review processes. It would be interesting to hear their responses. You did notice and open in the original post on this topic that a pdf of the research was included? As replication testing of
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Statistical Fact: new Maharishi Meisnner-like Effect article published
Sorry, Meissner effect is NOT an electromagnetic field; Wiki: The Meissner effect is the expulsion of a magnetic field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field from a superconductor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductor during its transition to the superconducting state.