[FairfieldLife] Re: Great Olbermann video today

2006-09-26 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
There's a difference. O'Reilly is mocked because he invites it by 
making a mockery of himself. Judy is mocked by intellectual inferiors 
because they can't rebut her arguments.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ 
 wrote:
   
http://www.alternet.org/
   
   Wow. Edward R. Murrow would be proud.
   
   Who is this guy?
  
  Name is Keith Olbermann.
  
   Does he actually have a forum
   on broadcast TV? (You have to remember that I
   live in France and don't get American TV unless
   it's been put on the Web or made available for
   illicit download.)
  
  He has a one-hour news program on the cable channel
  MSNBC, of which about a third to a half is pure fluff,
  and the rest very hard-hitting journalism.  I believe
  the program (called Countdown) is MSNBC's highest-
  rated prime-time program (but that's not saying much).
  
  He has a blog on MSNBC's Web site:
  
  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240
  
  He was originally a sportscaster (and still has a
  show a couple of times a week on ESPN, I think).
  Then he had a news show during the Lewinsky mess
  but quit in disgust at having to do all Lewinsky,
  all the time.  Went back to sportscasting, then
  eventually got the Countdown show, which started
  out as a primarily humorous news program (he's a
  very witty chap) and slowly morphed into a more
  serious show, and lately into one of the very few
  programs to be consistently sharply critical of the
  Bush administration.
  
  He's only recently started doing these commentaries.
  The first one made a huge splash among progressives,
  and he's been doing them regularly ever since.  Most
  of the transcripts are linked to from his blog page.
  
  The show is on weeknights at 8 p.m. EST and is
  rebroadcast at midnight.
 
 
 He really has it in for Bill O'Reilly, who he will mock at every 
 opportunity.  It's actually very amusing...kinda like the way we 
 like to mock Judy Stein every chance we get.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: How many of you agree with Chavez

2006-09-21 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
I think it is hyperbole to call Bush the Devil. But, I do think Bush 
and his supporters are spiritually much less evolved.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 So tonight on the news I saw Venezuelan President Chavez call Bush 
the 
 Devil, claim he smelled sulphur from Bush being there from the 
 previous day and then Chavez -- quite seriously -- crossed himself.
 
 I've heard pretty much the same sentiments echoed on this forum by 
 many.
 
 How many of you agree with Chavez?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Global Good News! JGD!

2006-09-11 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
9/11: FIVE YEARS ON
By RALPH PETERS

September 11, 2006 -- THE biggest story since 9/11 is that there 
hasn't been an other 9/11. According to our hysterical media culture, 
everything's always going wrong. The truth is that we've gotten the 
big things right.

On this fifth anniversary of the cold-blooded murder of thousands of 
Americans by Islamist fanatics, it's tempting to settle for grand 
rhetoric honoring our dead and damning our enemies. But the greatest 
tribute to those lost on that September morning is what we've since 
achieved.

In this vile political season, with those on the left suggesting that 
our president's a worse threat to civilization than Islamist terror, 
the rest of us should just review what's happened - and what hasn't:

Islamist fanatics have not been able to stage a single additional 
attack on our homeland. For all its growing pains, our homeland-
security effort worked. In this long war with religion-poisoned 
madmen, the most important proof of success is what doesn't happen - 
and we haven't been struck again. Wail as loudly as they can, the 
president's critics can't change that self-evident truth.

Eventually, some terrorists will get through. That's just the law of 
averages. But we've enjoyed five golden years of safety and 
prosperity, thanks to our men and women in uniform and those who 
serve at all levels of government.

Al Qaeda is badly crippled. While the terror organization and its 
affiliates remain a deadly threat, al Qaeda is no longer the 
powerful, unchallenged outfit it was in the years of Clinton-era 
cowardice. Instead of holding court, Osama bin Laden's a fugitive. 
Almost all of his deputies are dead or imprisoned. The rest are 
hunted men.

And yes, we'll get Osama. Those who whine that we haven't offer no 
specific solutions themselves - and they'd like us to forget how long 
it took to apprehend criminals such as the Unabomber here at home. Al 
Qaeda can still kill, but its power has been reduced by an order of 
magnitude.

Terrorists no longer operate in freedom. Even Europeans have begun to 
awaken to the nature of Islamist fanaticism. One terror plot after 
another has been foiled. Those that succeeded proved 
counterproductive, mobilizing anti-terrorist sentiment. The world 
hasn't fully come to grips with the threat, but the progress has been 
remarkable. The terrorists are now on the defensive.

Our enemies fear our military again. Despite tragic mistakes in Iraq, 
we've already accomplished one crucial mission neglected for a 
generation: We've resurrected the reputation of the American soldier.

After our maddening retreats from Beirut and Mogadishu, and the 
Clinton administration's unwillingness to retaliate meaningfully 
after terrorist attacks, Islamist extremists concluded - and bragged 
- that Americans were cowards who wouldn't fight and hid behind 
technology. Well, Iraq proved that our troops don't run, but fight 
more fiercely than any other soldiers on earth. Now it's the 
terrorists who rely on stand-off weapons - roadside bombs. They're 
terrified of taking on our forces in combat. The importance of 
regaining our street cred can't be stressed enough.

Iraq has become al Qaeda's Vietnam. No end of lies have been 
broadcast about our liberation of Iraq and Afghanistan creating more 
terrorists. The terrorists were already there, recruited during the 
decades we looked away. Our arrival on their turf just brought them 
out of the woodwork.

As for Iraq, Osama  Co. realized full well how high we'd raised the 
stakes. They had to fight to prevent the emergence of a Middle 
Eastern democracy. As a result, they've thrown in their reserves - 
who've been slaughtered by our soldiers and Marines.

The media obsesses on the price of this fight for us, but the 
terrorists have been forced to pay a terrible cost in trained 
fighters - while alienating fellow Muslims with their tactics. 
Pundits will argue forever over whether deposing Saddam was a 
diversion from the War on Terror, but the proof of its relevance - 
even if unexpected - is the unaffordable cost we've forced on al 
Qaeda.

We've achieved new levels of domestic security without compromising 
civil liberties. Frisking granny at the airport may be silly, but 
(despite the lies of the Left) Americans continue to live in 
unprecedented freedom. The Patriot Act and other measures worked - 
without harming the rights of a single law-abiding citizen. The only 
people who lost out were the terrorists and their supporters. We 
should be applauding the feds, not running them down.

America is much stronger today than we were five years ago. We have 
new homeland-security structures up and running, improved 
intelligence agencies - and the most experienced military in the 
world.

The dishonest nature of domestic politics and the media's 
irresponsibility obscure the fact that no one - not even the 
terrorists - now believes that our enemies can win a global victory. 
The terrorists 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Does Judy Have A Life?

2006-08-28 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
 
  
  Perhaps Judy and Sparig should get a room?  :)
 
 I was thinking the same thing but ew!

The Judy obsessed halfwits, Barry and geezerfreak, are the ones who 
need to get the room.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Shedding Light on American Politics

2006-08-11 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
http://www.dudehisattva.com/







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: My Dome Rejection Second Letter to Hagelin's Office

2006-08-09 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
This woman is nuts if she thinks these emotionally distraught letters 
will get her into the dome. If anything, they are good reason to keep 
her out.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 2nd Letter
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Dear John,
 
 I am writing to you again just in case you have not had a chance to
 read my first letter, dated August 2, 2006, regarding my dome
 rejection. I WOULD LIKE TO BE ACCEPTED FOR THE DOME!!!
 
 I honestly expressed My Highest Truth in that letter and I would
 truly appreciate a response, any response, especially whether you
 received it or not, and what Maharishi wants me to do. PLEASE READ 
MY
 FIRST LETTER TO MAHARISHI.
 
  I know most people working for Maharishi may be afraid to let him
 know what some of his governors have done to get in the dome, but I
 know you have INTEGRITY and will tell him the truth. Those governors
 who do not know Maharishi's intentions about them visiting other
 saints or using other self improvement techniques, should  be told 
by
 Maharishi on the daily phone calls to the course, what he really
 expects, regarding this very important issue
 
  Just because they were not asked if they do other things, many
 governors have  justified that it's o.k with Maharishi, and that 
they
 would not be in the dome unless he wanted them there. They feel 
those
 who are not there, somehow could be, if THEY REALLY WANTED IT.
 Everyone has to start being accountable for their actions, including
 the MOVEMENT REPRESENTASTIVES!
 
  I feel that THE RULES OF DOME ACCEPTANCE SHOULD APPY TO
 EVERYONE!  A few should not be rejected if the many are 
 doing
 the same things Everyone should be asked the same 
 questions...
 whether they visit the saints!  Not just those who are on some
 administrative black list. This is just common sense.  This is 
also
 how many people, that I have talked to,  feel avout it.
 
 Someone actually said to me the other night:  Why do want to spoil 
 it
 for the rest of us? Why didn't you just keep quiet.  So many people
 visit saints in India or other cities around the U.S. and the 
world. 
 I
 guess they feel that if they don't do it in Fairfield then it's o.k.
 No one will catch me, seems to be the theme.
 
 PLEASE DO NOT GET ME WRONG I do not feel that visiting the saints is
 in ANY WAY WRONG... To the contrary it is A GREAT GIFT to those who
 have the grace to receive it. I feel anyone who wishes to visit the
 saints should be encouraged to do so. As it is stated in the VEDAS
 KEEP THE COMPANY OF THE SAINTS.
 
  A lot of people over the years have felt THE MOVEMENT
 REPRESENTATIVES have lied to them. They somehoe feel that Maharishi
 doesn't say the things they hear from course officials. MAHARISHI
 PLEASE ADDRESS THIS POINT!! EVERYONE NEEDS TO HEAR IT FROM YOU
 WHAT YOU REALLY EXPECT!
 
 My first letter to you has somehow  made it on the internet on the
 Fairfield Life site. I hope in some way this is helpful to others
 who have also not compromised their integrity,  just to get their
 Dome Badge.
 
 John, I would like to be accepted for the dome, having told the
 TRUTH about my life. I could have very easily lied when I was
 questioned but I chose to be completely HONEST and NOT HIDE 
ANYTHING
 ABOUT MY SPIRITUAL LIFE.
 
 Please respond to me,
 Shiva Ma
 
 
 
 First Letter from ShivaMa:
 
 
  FWD:From Shiva Ma Ryan, My Dome Rejection
  Please share this letter I wrote to John Hagelin with anyone you 
  think
  may benefit from it.
  All Love,
  Shiva Ma
  
  My Dome rejection
  
  Shiva Ma Ryan  to  John Hagelin
  
  Aug 2 (5 days ago)
  
  Dear John,
  I was told to e-mail you if I had any trouble getting accepted at 
 the
  dome. Hence this letter to you, because I have been faced with 
one 
 of
  the most difficult choices of my life. John will you PLEASE share 
  this
  letter with Maharishi, as I want Him to know THE REAL TRUTH  
 about
  what has happened in Fairfield. Please read everything I have 
 written
  in this e-mail John, I have tried to be as honest and 
 as TRUTHFUL 
  as
  I can. I also have suggestions at the end of this e-mail, that may
  benefit EVERYONE!
  
  When I applied for the course, I was told I would need more time 
 to 
  be
  processed. I knew I probably would not get an immediate 
acceptance,
  because a few years ago I applied and was asked if I practiced any
  techniques other than Maharishi's. I went to India with a GREAT 
 saint
  from Asam, India, Shree Maa, in 1999, and I told the man 
 questioning
  me I had experienced EVERYTHING that India had to offer, and that
  what I learned in private, I kept private. I had asked the 
 question 
  to
  over 600 people that I initiated,  back in the 
 seventies: Everything
  we learn in private, we keep private. Do you agree? This answer
  seemed the most truthful and appropriate to me,  yet I was not
  accepted then for the dome.
  
  This past Saturday July 

[FairfieldLife] Re: I Snark, Therefore I Am (feeling better, if not superior)

2006-08-04 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:
  
   --- Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
  
   On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
  
 
  
   I love these people that talk about something they
   have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
   I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
   technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
   Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
   will co-author the article with me.
  
  
  Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to 
be  
  sure to maintain purity!
 
 Such a feast of snarky  comments! 
 
 Its fun! its a nice release of frustration with stupid or at least
 'limited' others. I do it. We all do. 
 
 As if there is 'an other.
 
 Its sort of passive-aggressive.  Or perhaps, if that is not
 technically correct -- its something similar. 
 
 And what is the result? More snarky comments by those snarked. And
 what does that lead to? Yes -- you are catching on. Good insight. 
 
 Whats the way out of this odd loopy mobius strip of snaky insults? 
Yes
 -- you got it. I always knew *you* were one of the bright ones.


Spare the snark, spoil the seeker.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/