[FairfieldLife] Re: For Share - Peter Mayer Holy Now (with lyrics in captions) - YouTube

2013-04-24 Thread mainstream20016

A beautiful, inspiring song.  Thanks to you, and Share as well.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 Just ran into Share at the store and told her about this song. I think all
 will enjoy it.
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiypaURysz4





[FairfieldLife] Re: MSAE graduate on youtube - the guy's probably sincere

2013-01-11 Thread mainstream20016
Matthew is probably the son of Walter Reifslager, Jr., a long-time TMer, and 
grandson of a Walter, Sr., a recently deceased very community-minded and 
honorable Psychiatrist in Austin. Or a close relative thereof of those two 
gentlemen. Until proven to be otherwise, or to harm someone,  he deserves the 
opportunity to expound that which he sincerely believes, even if he's deceived 
himself.
  Exponents of a new version of reality regularly pay a heavy price.  Of 
course, it's not ironic that FFL's sets such a high threshold for acceptance. 
If he is an MSAE grad, he's had thousands of hours of exposure to MMYs 
discourses. IMHO he's contributing to creation of new knowledge.  I'm not drawn 
to it, but may he be given room to try to 'splain it as he sees it. 
-Mainstream

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann  wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley  wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan  wrote:
  
   He's doing a take-off on some new agish types, right?  This is a
   joke, right?
  
  No, it's not a joke. From what I've heard, it's a very messed up cult trip 
  where the guy controls people by telling them, Divine Mother says..., 
  even to the point of people going into debt to support him financially. I 
  watched some of the video, and I'm creeped out by it.
 
 There's a sucker born every minute. These creepy gurus are laughing all the 
 way to the bank and man are they getting off on the adulation, big time. 
 Anyone want to go crash the party? It could be a riot.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108  wrote:
   
From TMFree, apparently a graduate of MSAE who's got his own
little thing going. Thoughts anyone?

http://youtu.be/T1V_JD9rODk
   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: MSAE graduate on youtube - the guy's probably sincere

2013-01-11 Thread mainstream20016

Ann said:  when he's speaking is a dead giveaway.   
In this case, if you have even a drop of intuition or reason, let alone 
instinct, this guy would get you running for the door. In fact, I'd bet my life 
on it.

Bet your life on what?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann  wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016  wrote:
 
  Matthew is probably the son of Walter Reifslager, Jr., a long-time TMer, 
  and grandson of a Walter, Sr., a recently deceased very community-minded 
  and honorable Psychiatrist in Austin. Or a close relative thereof of those 
  two gentlemen. Until proven to be otherwise, or to harm someone,  he 
  deserves the opportunity to expound that which he sincerely believes, even 
  if he's deceived himself.
Exponents of a new version of reality regularly pay a heavy price.  Of 
  course, it's not ironic that FFL's sets such a high threshold for 
  acceptance. 
  If he is an MSAE grad, he's had thousands of hours of exposure to MMYs 
  discourses. IMHO he's contributing to creation of new knowledge.  I'm not 
  drawn to it, but may he be given room to try to 'splain it as he sees it. 
  -Mainstream
 
 Gee, I don't know. I think anyone who speaks like that and does what he does 
 when he's speaking is a dead giveaway. The guy is seriously a turn off in 
 every possible way. In this case, if you have even a drop of intuition or 
 reason, let alone instinct, this guy would get you running for the door. In 
 fact, I'd bet my life on it.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann  wrote:
  
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley  wrote:
   


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan  wrote:

 He's doing a take-off on some new agish types, right?  This is a
 joke, right?

No, it's not a joke. From what I've heard, it's a very messed up cult 
trip where the guy controls people by telling them, Divine Mother 
says..., even to the point of people going into debt to support him 
financially. I watched some of the video, and I'm creeped out by it.
   
   There's a sucker born every minute. These creepy gurus are laughing all 
   the way to the bank and man are they getting off on the adulation, big 
   time. Anyone want to go crash the party? It could be a riot.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108  wrote:
 
  From TMFree, apparently a graduate of MSAE who's got his own
  little thing going. Thoughts anyone?
  
  http://youtu.be/T1V_JD9rODk
 

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: A physical basis of the ritum level -- fourth state of water

2012-12-02 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
 Think Chapter 8 SBAL -- when consciousness becomes conscious


From Lesson #8 of the 33 video lesson Science of Creative Intelligence course 
by MMY:
  When existence becomes conscious, Intelligence becomes Intelligent.

Or something ;)

 
 Which other forum?  BATGP?  
 
 The research seems very professional.  To me this describes how there could 
 be a purity in human wetware that could be contacted by consciousness.  
 
 Liquid crystal -- fourth state of water.  Amazing.
 
 Edg
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  Edg, I watched the first 12 minutes of it but couldn't get past the 
  microspheres.  So I bunged it to my ex who LOVED it so much that he will 
  be putting it on his high tech blog.  Well he said it was very cool.  
  When I said he LOVED it that was me being a girl.  Anyway, he didn't think 
  it was about ritam or the unified field.  He's still on that other forum 
  you used to frequent in case you want to discuss further.    
  
  
  
  
   From: Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:27 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A physical basis of the ritum level -- fourth 
  state of water
   
  
    
  Come on -- isn't anyone interested in the discovery of the primal source of 
  ORDER in creation?
  
  And this is actual science -- not Keith Wallace dinky stuff.  Heavy duty 
  laboratory precision. 
  
  Edg
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
  
   Hey, anyone even look at this yet?  This is NOT METAPHORICthis is 
   about the finest relative -- it's EXPLAINED.
   
   BY A GOSH DURNED JIM DANDY ACTUAL REAL RESPECTED SCIENTIST.
   
   It's long, but do even ten minutes and you're going to watch the whole 
   thing.
   
   This is about the Unified Field.
   
   This is about the actual mechanics of how light makes water orderly and 
   begins LIFE. 
   
   This is about free energy.
   
   
   Edg
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=XVBEwn6iWOo

Maybe Being is OBVIOUS.

Maybe it's VISIBLE to the naked eye.

Spill a bit of water, and you've made A BATTERY.

I'm excited!

Edg
   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: John Farrow in the news? apologies to John T. Farrow, and TM research commu

2012-11-17 Thread mainstream20016






Thank you, spairig, for the clarification.  My apologies to John T. Farrow, and 
the TM scientific research community.  I deleted the original  erroneous post 
to FFL.
-Mainstream 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:

 That was JT Farrow.
 
 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=farrow%20J%20%5Bauthor%5D%20meditation
 
 
 Mia Farrow's brother appears to be a different person: JC Villier-Farrow.
 
 
 L
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Brother-of-Mia-Farrow-Accused-of-Child-Sex-Abuse.html
  
  John Farrow was welcomed into the TM scientific research community; he's 
  credited in a number of early TM research studies.  See the Collected 
  Papers, Vol. 1 - 5.
  ---
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
  
   Charged with child sex abuse:
   http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/15/brother-of-mia-farrow-charged-with-child-sex-abuse/
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: John Farrow in the news? Farrow's '68 brush with MMY in the news

2012-11-16 Thread mainstream20016
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Brother-of-Mia-Farrow-Accused-of-Child-Sex-Abuse.html

John Farrow was welcomed into the TM scientific research community; he's 
credited in a number of early TM research studies.  See the Collected Papers, 
Vol. 1 - 5.
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:

 Charged with child sex abuse:
 http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/15/brother-of-mia-farrow-charged-with-child-sex-abuse/





[FairfieldLife] Thanks, Curtis- Summer Eggplant recipe

2012-10-17 Thread mainstream20016
Thanks, Curtis for your Summer Eggplant recipe, posted to  FFL some time ago.  
I am enjoying a dish of it now, and despite the calendar showing we're into the 
Fall Season, the dish is wonderful !Kudos!
-Mainstream



Summer Eggplant recipe – contributed to FFL by Curtis (delta blues)
I associate eggplant with this season. 
I layer them with perorino
 And mozzarella 
with vadalia onions
 and slices of stale bread that the Tuscans use as an ingredient in lots of 
dishes. Sometimes I sacrificesome tomatoes and of course shower each layer with 
olive oil and fresh marjoram, oregano and basil.  (Again not subtle, I want to 
taste them!) 
I might pour a can of crushed tomatoes over the top before topping it all with 
cheese. 
Bake it hot 400 to brown the edges in a glass pan. I want to see brown when I 
open the oven 30-40 minutes later. 

Let it set a bit and then carve away and let it wash over the plate because 
waiting didn't set it up as you hoped, it is one glorious mess. 

You can throw it on top of pasta if you want. Top with the best olive oil you 
can find Mario Battali style
 and some
more fresh basil leaves 
and inhale. I mean breathe baby, this is
Summer so fill your lungs.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Poll Numbers- Obama played a dead opossum in first debate

2012-10-08 Thread mainstream20016
I love the following theory- Obama played a dead opossum in the first debate.

  Obama is no dummy.  Just days before the Oct. 3rd debate, the grim prospects 
for Romney caused big Republican financiers to plan to give up on Romney to 
instead divert money meant for Romney toward Republican Congressional races.
Obama wants fewer Congressional Republicans rather than more following this 
election, to prevent increased opposition to his plans for the second term.  
  Romney's big first debate win re-inspired his financial backers to 
re-commit their financial resources to Romney; and the Republican Congressional 
races won't receive new funding, increasing the chances of Democratic 
Congressional candidates, and improving Obama's chances of success during his 
second term. 
- Mainstream  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@... wrote:

 Romney is ahead.  The people have spoken.  Obama is now on the spot to 
 perform better during the next debate.  If not, his gig as prez is done. 
 
 http://news.yahoo.com/pew-romney-leads-4-post-debate-survey-200329539--politics.html





[FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor

2012-10-04 Thread mainstream20016
 Neil Paterson and his team of Canadian WYMS,???


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@ wrote:
 
  That sounds just like Claire - I wanted to send this to you privately cuz I 
  didn't want to seem mean to Claire - she got furious with me and two other 
  people on the sidhi preps - I was getting to use a week of my credit and 
  she was there in the dining room at Pinehurst and offered three of us some 
  chutney her mother had made - she made a big shoe of it and was praising it 
  to high heaven - now mind you, we had been rounding for some days. 
  
  I tasted it and it tasted like vinegar and nothing else. I looked at the 
  other two people at my table and they were both looking and me and each 
  other, no one saying anything and Claire in that high pitched voice of hers 
  was wanting us to praise the chutney as she was - I finally said it tastes 
  like vinegar to me and the other two agreed.
  
  Claire jumped up from her chair, stomped over to our table, snatched the 
  jar up, and stormed back to her seat, saying over her shoulder in the most 
  offended voice imaginable Pearls before swine!
  
  She was on MD last I heard - she was so large when she went on, I heard 
  Triguna made her go on a strict diet, no sugar or breads and she supposedly 
  lost a lot of weight.
  
  Did you ever do any of the sidh prep course in the late '70s at Pinehurst 
  or Boone? That is when I was around?
  
 
 Yes, she did lose alot of weight on MD. Nope, I did AEGTC at the Manor end of 
 1977 and early 1978 then stayed on staff until after Vedic Science. Things 
 were really hopping around the Manor those years...first WPA at Amherst, 
 Central America Peace Projects, Sidha businesses, Vedic Atoms, early Purusha, 
 Washington DC, Neil Paterson and his team of Canadian WYMS, then Vedic 
 Science. A wonderful, lively time of the Movement, and it was a pleasure to 
 be part of it all. Nothing like the negative things that some people write 
 about Maharishi or the Movement.
 
  
  
  
  
   From: laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 6:47 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor
   
  
    
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74 mjackson74@ wrote:
  
   
   I am laughing and laughing - yep you nailed it - it was Claire Baxter.
   
  
  Another fun story about Claire: She wore glasses just about all the time. 
  One day she came into the TM Center not wearing them and she had this 
  glazed looked about her. She started telling us that she had had a great 
  morning meditation that had corrected her vision so that she no longer 
  needed glasses. She was kind of floating around the center. Of course, this 
  changed back to normal at the end of the day!
  
  snip
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: If Obama wants to win

2012-09-14 Thread mainstream20016

Mike,
Obama will win this November, but it won't be due to warmongering or 
military action against Iran.  There is no benefit for the U.S. or the West to 
engage Iran militarily, although its petroleum riches make Iran a natural 
target for colonization.  For their good, you of course understand.
   It's little known that the country that's protesting Iran's possible 
development of one single nuclear warhead has itself acted without restraint 
with about 70 nuclear warheads in its back pocket for decades. 
-Mainstream 
 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:

 If Obama wants to win in November, he should (i know that reeks of TM Speak) 
 call Netanyahu to the White House, make a big deal of it, and plan the 
 Nuclear bunker-busting strike on Iran and do it as quickly as possible. The 
 Arabs have shot their load and are too emotionally spent, to do much of 
 anything, after protesting for the Prophet. They will hate him but they will 
 respect him for it. He can throw a bigger temper tantrum they they can and 
 that is what seems to talk in that part of the world. It's going to have to 
 be done, might as well be now. Let them wonder was it something I said?





[FairfieldLife] Remote TM checking - would Skype be effective?

2012-04-26 Thread mainstream20016
Might Skype be an effective bridge for a TM checking session when a meditator 
and a TM checker are separated by distance? 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Beautiful Videos: Maharishi Smarak in Allahabad

2012-03-12 Thread mainstream20016
Might it be- Raja Felix Kägi-from Switzerland?
He seems more Sattvic than the average Raja, imho.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 The Raja in the part 1 video who m-c's the report, who is that guy? The one 
 who starts it off who has the close beard. Is he European?  Just wondering, 
 he was not introduced like everyone else in the videos.
 
 
 
  Thanks for posting.  These give some insight into an element of the 
  movement today.  It is a long way from David Lynch Foundation work of 
  teaching TM to people or the university here.  It is amazing how a few 
  people can take and plunge a whole movement otherwise in to something of 
  that scale.   
  
  Are there a lot of TM meditators living there in the area of this monument? 
   This is different from the pundit project in the geographic center of 
  India?
  
  Best,
  Buck in FF 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merlin vedamerlin@ wrote:
  
   
   Beautiful Videos showing the progress on 
   the 
   .Maharishi Smarak in 
   Allahabad, 
   near Triveni Sangam, the confluence of the 
   3 holy rivers..
   
   http://www.maharishisamadhi.org/videos.html
   
   .Jai
Guru Dev
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Beautiful Videos: Maharishi Smarak in Allahabad

2012-03-12 Thread mainstream20016
Yet, Raja Raphael David, from Purusha, is probably the person in the video.  
Raphael is identified in several associated Samarak construction reports.

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 Is interesting that these are folks who are some of the MOST important people 
 in adjudicating how the resources of the TM-movement going forward will goe 
 an none of the top dozen or so people posting on Fairfieldlife according to 
 the `post-count' could come up with the name of the guy who is on that video. 
  
 
 That says a lot about how FFL has gone.  Really poor list moderation that it 
 (FFL)) could be so hijacked by non-Fairfudlians, anti=meditator people 
 carrying on their personal stuff.  It is a kind of terrorism.  Lot of these 
 people should take their end-less personal non-spiritual ad hominem personal 
 stuff off-line an communicate directly by e-mail.
 
 Jai Guru Dev,
 -Buck in FF  
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  Might it be- Raja Felix Kägi-from Switzerland?
  He seems more Sattvic than the average Raja, imho.
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
  
   The Raja in the part 1 video who m-c's the report, who is that guy? The 
   one who starts it off who has the close beard. Is he European?  Just 
   wondering, he was not introduced like everyone else in the videos.
   
   
   
Thanks for posting.  These give some insight into an element of the 
movement today.  It is a long way from David Lynch Foundation work of 
teaching TM to people or the university here.  It is amazing how a few 
people can take and plunge a whole movement otherwise in to something 
of that scale.   

Are there a lot of TM meditators living there in the area of this 
monument?  This is different from the pundit project in the geographic 
center of India?

Best,
Buck in FF 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merlin vedamerlin@ wrote:

 
 Beautiful Videos showing the progress on 
 the 
 .Maharishi Smarak 
 in Allahabad, 
 near Triveni Sangam, the confluence of the 
 3 holy rivers..
 
 http://www.maharishisamadhi.org/videos.html
 
 .Jai
  Guru Dev

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Long Term TMer Ray Dalio in the news

2012-02-28 Thread mainstream20016
http://tinyurl.com/85xbhoy



[FairfieldLife] Re: Long Term TMer Ray Dalio in the news

2012-02-28 Thread mainstream20016
Dalio takes hedge crown from Soros
Bridgewater Pure Alpha made $13.8bn for investors last year


 http://tinyurl.com/85xbhoy





[FairfieldLife] National Yagya program- taking two steps back

2012-01-09 Thread mainstream20016
One step forward - over the past 5 years - was the restoration of the good name 
of TM - through the David Lynch Foundation.

Taking Two steps back - http://www.nationalyagya.org/emailing/



[FairfieldLife] Re: 100 Purusha leaving MUM, going to NC?

2012-01-07 Thread mainstream20016
The Invincible America website link enumerating the numbers of Yogic Flyers in 
Fairfield   http://invincibleamerica.org/tallies.html has Sept 30th 2011 as 
its last entryh  

675 Pandits? Weren't there over 1,000 in the Spring, with 1,200 expected Summer 
2011?What happened? 

Perhaps the benefactors of IA became distracted from their focus on IA by pleas 
from the international TMO, and they are now supporting the larger 
International Movement.

The source of the IA benefactors wealth is Natural Gas exploration / 
production-  the  commodity price of Natural Gas dived in the past year. 

Regarding 100 Purushas move to NC - where to ?  Heavenly Mountain, the new home 
of Mother Divine?  Perhaps Purusha will be restoring the roof and plumbing 
infrastructure there.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 
 Despite the best efforts of many, as you may know we have not yet been able 
 to increase Vedic Pandit numbers. As of today they stand at 675.
 
 
  
   The Community number (~800) is the number excluding Maharishi Vedic 
  Pandits, Purusha, and other special groups
  
  
   I am writing to thank you personally, from the bottom of my heart, for 
   your extra efforts to get to group program during December. On average 
   there were 104 more community members like yourself at evening program 
   and 99 more at morning program during December 2011 than during December 
   2010. This is a tremendous achievement, the result of great determination 
   on your part, and a very heartwarming response to the appeals from 
   Maharaja Adiraj Raja Raam-ji, Drs Howard and Alice Settle, Mayor Ed, John 
   and myself to keep numbers high while Vedic Pandit numbers are low.
   -Buck in FF
   
   
   
Om, this has the mark of the hand of the Prime Minister on it.  Yep, 
there's something vindictive about them doing this with-drawing of 
Purusha from the Dome numbers now. 



 Everyone who lives in Fairfield should be concerned about this.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck  wrote:
 
  Boots on the ground, this is a serious draw-down of peace-keepers 
  here.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck  wrote:
  
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   

FWIW, I'm afraid the 13th baktun, or stuff, of Maya-indians, is
approaching its end... :0
   
   
   Maya- or Mayan-Indians, it don't matter which.  
   This is really bad for the Dome numbers, Fairfield, and the World.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:

 The immediate urgent priority for national invincibility and 
 world peace is to join the Invincible America Course at MUM. 
 Only 2000 Flyers, rising to 2500, in Fairfield/Maharishi 
 Vedic City will bring security to America and defuse the 
 precarious escalation of conflict in the world.
 
 
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall 
  thomas.pall@ wrote:
  
   This is from a faculty member at MUM.   100 Purusha are 
   leaving VC next
   month to go to North Carolina.   Is there a new place for 
   Purusha in NC?
  
  
  
  There go the Dome Numbers, again.
 

   
  
 

   
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Dome meeting with Maharaja-ji

2011-12-06 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@ wrote:
  
   Sounds really good - glad you were able to go.
  
  Yep, I have to thank Raja John Hagelin for granting me an 
  exemption to attend the meeting.  It was very nice . 
 
turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
(snip) 
 I have very little interest in hearing what King
 Tony has to say to any easy audience. But I'd
 actually be interested to hear what he says to
 a tough audience. No entry requirements. No
 badges to be shown. Just people, filing in to
 fill the seats and hear how the supposed leader
 of a supposedly still-important spiritual move-
 ment talks its talk. 
 
 In my not so humble opinion, someone willing to
 expose themselves to the public only in situations
 in which he gets to predetermine the loyalty 
 factor or pre-programming of the audience just
 isn't worth listening to. I'm gonna hold out for
 those who will talk to anyone...no preconditions,
 no expectations. 
 
 But, that said, was there anything *in particular*
 he said that resonated with you? You are often 
 WAY too vague on this forum. Just as I'd like to
 see King Tony deal with a real world audience for
 once, I'd like to see you get real with us for 
 once and tell us what still gets you off about 
 the TM dogma.


Raja Ram has the balls to face a 'tough audience'. Once saw him in-person in 
front of, and taking questions from, a non-screened, non-ticketed, 
non-controlled and highly-educated urban audience.  He was totally wonderful 
with whatever came his way. 
If not interested in Raja Ram's talk last night, why probe Buck's nascient 
interest in the talk?   How about internally discerning your wasted decade-plus 
court-side seat with Frederick 'Rama' Lenz, Instead of Incessantly degrading 
TMers' far less stupid spiritual interests?
-Mainstream




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's Sandals

2011-07-19 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 From a friend (with apologies to Dan Friendman):
 
 Dear Rick
 
  MMY had several sets of sandals made for him over the years.  Mark's were
 not the original set.  Helen Lutes had a set of sandals that M left behind
 when new ones came as did a few others.  
 
 Mark had the sandals M used during that time period.  But they were not the
 first set.
  
 Five million?  
 
 Should be careful making personal gain from a holy man's belongings.  
  
 Bevan has some rules about that and if Mark connects to Rajas he may come
 across those rules. We had some items and ran into the rules. Nothing
 happened as a result.
 
 I think the rules come from MMY.
  
 Perhaps Mark should try Craig's list instead.


I envision Bevan as emcee stoking the well-heeled to donate vast sums toward a 
museum at MMY's pyre site in India to showcase MMY's artifacts (a memorial 
building to MMY is under construction there).  The best return to John Landau 
from parting with Maharishi's sandals might well be had by donating the sandals 
to such a cause.  The beneficent effect of donation increases the value of 
Maharishi's sandals and the other items that were vaguely mentioned above.   
Bevan has some rules.means that private transactions are deeply frowned 
upon.John, a donation of Maharishi's sandals could mean much to the TMO.  
What does the TMO have that you want or need to make your future years 
worthwhile? 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Summer - food porn (with a few revisions)

2011-07-15 Thread mainstream20016
A cornucopia of pleasure.
Bravo!  
-Mainstream

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... 
wrote:

 I'm gunna talk Summer. Steamy hot, makes every fragrant thing rise
 into your nose like Jesus's mom ascending into heaven, Summer.
 
 It started yesterday when I stuck my nose into a box of white Virgina
 peaches at a farmer's market. The smell was intoxicating as every 
 perfectly ripe fruit rose up and greeted me with the perfume of 
 Summer. For me trips to this market are church. It is a communion 
 with the season and nothing smells as good as the things in a 
 farmer's market in the steamy season. I'm a fan of all the seasons
 and each has its foodie charms. But for take-your-clothes-off and pour a 
 pitcher of lemonade mixed with ice tea all over your body 
 (here you will have to put in the type of body you would like to
 see this drink streaming down)naked sensual joy, nothing beats 
 Summer. It's the heat baby.
 
 I have my Summer rituals. I plant a container garden of herbs with 12
 kinds of Basil from all over the world. (Yeah, I'm bragging here.)
 I go out and grab a handful of whatever I touch first when I cook in
 the Summer. This is key because I am an heirloom tomato fanatic. 
 Thwarted by a lack of enough sun to grow my own, I fork over a
 percentage of my income each week to stay stocked up. I found this olive oil 
 with a harvest date on it in Whole Foods, Prima something
 which costs as much as a bottle of good bourbon. It is worth it 
 because when you pour it on the sliced tomatoes it also rises up to 
 meet your nose. The fresher the better with white wines and olive 
 oil. That's how I roll. Then I shower the tomato slices with
 too much basil. I say too much because I am not subtle about this. I 
 am basil rich and I revel in it. Salt, pepper and here comes the
 airplane into the hanger. That is a magical combination that only 
 comes together at this time of year. You can't do it in the Winter.
 That green basil substitute they grow in greenhouses can't hold a 
 candle to the sharp flavor of the tiny leaves on my Greek Basil. And 
 if you had to ask about the tomatoes you wouldn't have read
 this far.
 
 I associate eggplant with this season. I layer them with perorino and
 mozzarella with vadalia onions and slices of stale bread that the 
 Tuscans use as an ingredient in lots of dishes. Sometimes I sacrifice
 some tomatoes and of course shower each layer with olive oil and 
 fresh marjoram, oregano and basil. (Again not subtle, I want to taste 
 them!) I might pour a can of crushed tomatoes over the top before 
 topping it all with cheese. Bake it hot 400 to brown the edges in a 
 glass pan. I want to see brown when I open the oven 30-40
 minutes later. Let it set a bit and then carve away and let it wash 
 over the plate because waiting didn't set it up as you hoped, it is 
 one glorious mess. You can throw it on top of pasta if you want. Top 
 with the best olive oil you can find Mario Battali style and some 
 more fresh basil leaves and inhale. I mean breath baby, this is
 Summer so fill your lungs.
 
 I bought two kinds of corn, one white delicate and sweet and one 
 mixed white and yellow on each cob which is not as sweet but has a
 butteriness to it. I eat one of each alternating bites. Each has been
 blessed with olive oil and salt and fresh ground pepper. I know the 
 purists eat it with nothing and some people eat it with butter, which
 I love too. But I usually stock fantastic Irish butters in the Winter when I 
 am craving heavier food so I don't have butter around in the Summer too 
 often. I do have lard that I rendered myself but I would 
 never be so indulgent to...oh man I am putting my lard butter on an 
 ear tonight. It comes from special pigs who live in the woods and
 have a great life and one bad day, just like the rest of us. Only 
 theirs is accomplished by a pro and we will have to make do with whatever 
 random crap comes our way to snuff out our life.
 
 (Uncomfortable pause having alienated the vegetarians as well as 
 people who prefer their food porn without a dash of existential death
 reality check vinaigrette. Sorry.)
 
 There are zukes and yellow squash including those funny ones that
 look like flying saucers and are firmer, have you seen them? You can
 put them in with the eggplant. But the money shot is the melons. Of
 course I am referring to lady's breasts pushing against the  
 gauze-like fabric of Summer dresses...wait...sorry, I actually mean
 melons this time. Cantaloup that you can smell right through
 their patterned skin and of course the only fruit accused of being 
 racist, watermelons. I prefer them with seeds because I am a snob and
 that goes against the yuppie trend for convenient everything. Plus my
 farmer's market owner claims they are sweeter cuz when you mess with
 genetics you get what you ask for and if you ask for no pits
 sometimes the sweet gene goes too. This is complete bullshit of
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Across The Universe - Maharishi, The Beatles, Mike Love, Donovan in Rishikesh

2011-07-10 Thread mainstream20016
Familiar faces among Beatles in Rishikesh group photo scene  - 
Walter Koch?- in red, to MMY's left; 
Geoffrey Baker? -  to Lennon's left, waving?
Maureen Wynn?, to Ringo's right?

and who is at 2:50 - looks like Katy Perry!




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@... wrote:
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, stevelf ysoy10li@ wrote:
  
   the good-old-days can really be refreshing.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
   
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnLkNl2dplo
  
  Indeed; Knowledge is refreshing !
 
 And it is the ultimate video:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnLkNl2dplo





[FairfieldLife] Re: Across The Universe - Maharishi, The Beatles, Mike Love, Donovan in Rishikesh

2011-07-10 Thread mainstream20016



Familiar faces among Beatles in Rishikesh group photo scene? 
Walter Koch?- in red, to MMY's left;
Geoffrey Baker? - waving, to Lennon's left;
Maureen Wynn?- to Ringo's right.

Who is at 2:50? - looks like Katy Perry!
-Mainstream


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@... wrote:

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, stevelf ysoy10li@ wrote:
  
   the good-old-days can really be refreshing.
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
   
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnLkNl2dplo
  
  Indeed; Knowledge is refreshing !
 
 And it is the ultimate video:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnLkNl2dplo




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'

2011-07-04 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardjwilliamstexas willytex@... 
wrote:

 mainstream20016: 
  ...the spontaneous combustion of Texas 
  Governor Rick Perry on an outdoor public 
  stage during his announcement that he will 
  be a candidate for President. 
  
 You sound very prejudiced against certain
 groups of people, based on their birth
 circumstances. It's difficult to imagine
 you being a TM Teacher with this kind of
 negative attitude.
 
 Didn't we just go over this kind of flaming
 a few months ago with the Gifford attack,
 which was roundly condemned by almost all 
 of the FFL respondents?

My bias - Texans who are  Pitta-deranged and who propagate for Texas values 
such as dominance by force- who think their Texas values ought to be the values 
of the entire country- e.g. - invading a foreign country such as Iraq with the 
attitude, What are these Iraqis doing living atop my Oil?   Spontaneous 
combustion is a farciful concept of nature's fury.  Have a bit of lemonaid, 
Richard, and please offer some to your neighbors. Heaven knows it's hot in 
Texas.   




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'

2011-07-03 Thread mainstream20016



If all tropical storms and hurricanes would be guaranteed to refrain from 
hitting neighboring states, and  only hit Texas instead, then I'd support your 
wish.  However, the risk of devastation to neighboring states is too great to 
wish for tropical storms and hurricanes.  

That is not saying that Nature's fury cannot bring beneficent results. While 
you wish for the drenching effect of tropical storms and hurricanes to douse 
the extreme pitta planet of Texas, perhaps nature's heat wave in Texas has a 
different plan that would be welcomed to bring good to all - such as the 
spontaneous combustion of Texas Governor Rick Perry on an outdoor public stage 
during his announcement that he will be a candidate for President. 
-Mainstream   



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:

 Texas could use a couple or three direct hits from hurricanes or tropical 
 storms 
 over the next few months. Even the pine trees are starting to turn brown and 
 we've already lost the Capitol of the Age of Enlightenment in Navasota Tx due 
 to 
 wildfires. The rice fields will be bone dry, no ducks!
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Robert babajii_99@...
 To: fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sun, July 3, 2011 3:45:59 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'
 
   
 Hurricaine season is underway, as the gulf heats up with heat waves across 
 Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and Southern California...
 Fires in Arizona and Texas this season, have been historical...
 Stay tuned.
 
 Agni and Indra




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'

2011-07-03 Thread mainstream20016
Excuse me.  Aren't you the one who's surrounded by flames?  Perhaps you might 
suck your own concoction.  Of course wishing death on someone is not life 
supporting, and neither is the prospect of another right-wing Texas governor 
as President.   

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:

 Oh my, the *hate*! Mainline, a little skullcap tea, daily, might cool that 
 raging pitta. BTW, is wishing death on someone *life supporting* thought?
 
 
 
 From: mainstream20016 mainstream20016@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sun, July 3, 2011 1:51:53 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'
 
   
 
 
 If all tropical storms and hurricanes would be guaranteed to refrain from 
 hitting neighboring states, and only hit Texas instead, then I'd support your 
 wish. However, the risk of devastation to neighboring states is too great to 
 wish for tropical storms and hurricanes. 
 
 
 That is not saying that Nature's fury cannot bring beneficent results. While 
 you 
 wish for the drenching effect of tropical storms and hurricanes to douse the 
 extreme pitta planet of Texas, perhaps nature's heat wave in Texas has a 
 different plan that would be welcomed to bring good to all - such as the 
 spontaneous combustion of Texas Governor Rick Perry on an outdoor public 
 stage 
 during his announcement that he will be a candidate for President. 
 
 -Mainstream 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
 
  Texas could use a couple or three direct hits from hurricanes or tropical 
 storms 
 
  over the next few months. Even the pine trees are starting to turn brown 
  and 
  we've already lost the Capitol of the Age of Enlightenment in Navasota Tx 
  due 
 to 
 
  wildfires. The rice fields will be bone dry, no ducks!
  
  
  
  
  
  From: Robert babajii_99@
  To: fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sun, July 3, 2011 3:45:59 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] 'Gulf of Mexico continues to Heat Up...'
  
    
  Hurricaine season is underway, as the gulf heats up with heat waves across 
  Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and Southern California...
  Fires in Arizona and Texas this season, have been historical...
  Stay tuned.
  
  Agni and Indra
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Record Corporate Profits and the Rich -vs- Everybody Else

2011-07-03 Thread mainstream20016

No.
Perhaps you were thinking,  if Corporate Profits were LOWER, the deficit would 
have been 'worse'.  
-Mainstream

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
 
  
  
  Record Corporate Profits, the GOP's Wet Dream - But where's the ' 
  Trickle-Down ' ?
  
 
 Hey, if taxes had been higher, the deficit would have been *worse*!!!
 
 Isn't that self-evident?
 
 
 L.





[FairfieldLife] Re: MD moving back to Heavenly Mountain?

2011-05-31 Thread mainstream20016

see maharishi global family chat of April 27th, 2011 
http://tinyurl.com/3c75sov

purchased: at a cost of $12 / sq. ft, the east campus group buildings; purchase 
price includes 224 acres of the former 7K acres property.  Apparently a great 
deal of due diligence was applied by the purchasers during the negotiation 
process to prevent post-purchase surprises. 
Still needed for occupancy:
monies for remedial repairs to interior finishes; plumbing; and of course, 
roofs. 
-Mainstream

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool fflmod@... wrote:

 
 Just heard this from someone who lives in Boone. Word is it was purchased 
 outright. Anyone hear anything?   
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor

2011-02-18 Thread mainstream20016
For 48 years in the U.S.,  the wealthy have steadily succeeded in transferring 
the responsibility of funding the public treasury away from themselves and onto 
everyone else. It's past time to refute the constant drumbeat in the media that 
the U.S. has an excessive
'spending problem'.  In reality, the U.S. has an inadequate 'revenue problem'.  
Until 1963, the wealthy paid 91% of their income in federal taxes.  In 1964, 
the rate dropped to 77%, and has steadily declined since, to 36.5%.   The 
Republicans and Tea Partyers screamed when the Bush43 tax cuts were set to 
expire and raise the rate to 39.5%, which would have yielded $750b additional 
revenue over the next 10 years. 
Even the most well-educated among us are oblivious to the historical tax rates. 
 In May, '09, I called the office of Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate 
Finance committee, to object to a proposal floated by his committee to heavily 
tax 'Cadillac health care plans'.  I was connected to Finance committee staff 
member to discuss the issue.  I asked the staffer what he knew of historical 
income tax rates in the U.S. in the 1950s. That Senate Finance committee 
staffer guessed that the highest rate of taxation in the late 1950s was 
probably about 30%.   He had no idea that the rate was 91% !  
http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:

 Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This is 
 the 
 problem.
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Bhairitu noozguru@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 11:26:53 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
 
   
 Count Von Dixon,
 
 Sounds like a Rakshasa plan to me. Let's see Republicans and Rakshasas 
 both start with R. No wonder.
 
 I don't know of any poor person who wants to be poor. Their cards play 
 out that way. You'll have to pay for them anyway so why not organize it 
 and give them a stipend so they don't fall through the cracks that cost 
 YOU money?
 
 slavin' to the grave ain't no way to go,
 must be time for Revolution 2.0.
 
 On 02/18/2011 11:05 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
  Hey, it's time to stop subsidizing poverty. Tax people who earn less than 
  20K 
 at
  a higher rate than those who earn more than 20K. Poverty should be taxed 
  like
  any other bad behavior. No social programs for those that don't pay into the
  system and no SS or Medicare until all previous benefits received are 
  repaid 
 in
  full.
 
 
 
  
  From: WillyTexwillytex@...
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 9:52:28 AM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
 
 
 
 
  With my plan, which is to create good paying
  jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
  zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
  flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
 
  Bhairitu:
  So you advocate a social jobs program like FDR had?
 
  No, free enterprise system.
 
  And a flat tax is disproportionate for lower wage
  earners.
 
  So, you're thinking that 2% of wage earners would pay
  the federal income tax for the remaining 98% of U.S.
  wage earners? Screw that! What happened to equality
  spelled out in the U.S. Constitution? I am opposed to
  federal and state income taxation, but if everyone
  paid a flat and equal tax, I would pay my share.
 
  Why won't you pay your fair share of federal income
  tax? You probably get an income tax refund. Go figure.
 
 
 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

2011-01-13 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut no_reply@... wrote:

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut no_reply@ wrote:
   
I think that group-program, from its very outset, was 
never meant to create world-peace or anything. It was 
always a control mechanism, and that shows. If group 
programs would work, the chinese could have never 
massacred tibetan monastries, who had thousands of 
people meditating together, on a permanent basis. 
   
   Thanks for your thoughtful analysis. I was also
   around back then in 1977, and agree with you.
   
One more clue, why that is so, is the fact how it 
developed: there was never any emphasis on group 
meditation before the sidhis, that is approximately 
before 1977. Until that time people simply meditated 
in their rooms, and that was perfectly alright. With 
the introduction of sidhis, and especially flying, 
foam matrazes were needed, and having people hopping 
in their beds, with the consequent damages was simply 
no option. Originally people came together only for 
flying sessions into a flying room or tent.
   
   Exactly.
   
Only around the years 1977, towards the end, beginning 
of 1978 the whole ideology of group- practise for world 
peace, super-radience or how-ever it was called developed.
   
   Exactly again. I bailed from the TMO towards the end
   of 1977, after coming back from my TM-siddhis course.
   Up until the time I left, there was never a *hint* 
   of the Maharishi Effect or You're doing it for
   world peace. That was all invented later, as you
   say.
  
  Interesting. I knew quite a few people then, who left right after the 
  Siddhis/Enlightenment course,some right away to India to either Muktananda 
  or Osho. At the time I was still thoroughly immersed in the TM movement. I 
  would have bailed out some 4 years later, but ironically, it was meeting a 
  saint, who made me stay in the movement some years more, and actually have 
  both worlds, until it became clear which way to go.
  
  
   My theory as to *why* it was invented is a little 
   different than yours. Yes, group practice is a 
   control mechanism, and an enforced test of fealty
   (You're either with us or against us, and check-
   ing attendance allows us to see which), but the
   whole ME You're doing it for the world thang 
   was not trotted out until people had started to
   realize that the siddhis had very little payoff
   for them, personally. There was no there there.
   People were starting to quit and drift away from
   the TMO, because they'd paid big bucks for its
   most expensive program, and it did diddleysquat
   for them.
  
  Certainly the promises were to high by far. We all thought we would fly 
  within a few month, get lots of initiations. When I first heard of siddhis 
  there were reports of people waking through walls, getting invisible, (I 
  still got that sutra, it was skipped later on)
  
  
   Can't have that. Rephrase things to take the
   emphasis away from discernible personal benefit,
   and cast it in terms of You're doing it for the
   world. Try to appeal to the higher motives of
   people to get them to stick around, because the
   techniques themselves weren't sufficient to keep
   them around. 
  
  This 'appealing to higher motives' was a very conscious thing from 
  Maharishis side. I actually heard him say, we should always make very 
  general (not specific) appeals, like mentioning 'ideal society' and the 
  like. There is an added thing. People started to move to communities to be 
  able to 'fly' together. Sidhaland came up.So people become dependend 
  (psychologically) on group practice, on the existence of such groups, move 
  their whole lives, families, jobs to other places, Fairfield for example, 
  and such become more and more dependend on the group.
  
  If you had an individual scheme of enlightenment, you were told that we are 
  doing it for the world, we are like soldiers for world peace, that we are 
  karmically connected to the world. Sort of like the Bodhisattva ideal, but 
  TM movement version. Skip your own individual enlightenment, and wait till 
  day X when we get all enlightened. May be you weren't around anymore, when 
  Maharishi would answer to questions, why we don't fly yet, that it was 
  because of world consciousness. Again the shift from individual to 
  collective. 
  
  This is called goal displacement 
  http://www.ex-premie.org/papers/goal_displacement.htm
 
 Just as a small follow up: the siddhis were already a goal displacement to 
 the original goal of enlightenment. The group effect, was a goal displacement 
 for the siddhis. The siddhis (as goals in themselves) were just an 
 intermediate station of a larger goal displacement from individual to 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Dome Numbers

2011-01-13 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfreak@... wrote:

 I was around when the first sutra/flying attempts were made. We were all 
 sitting in chairs in a circle...there was no sitting on foam mats at that 
 time. (This was in one of the hotels around Lake LucernI forget which 
 now.) This would have been probably late 1975.
 
 I've mentioned this before since its one of my favorite recollections from 
 that time, but I'll trot it out one more time:
 We would meet every day at the appointed time, meditate and then run the 
 sutras, finishing with the flying sutra. After 3 or 4 days of nothing, my 
 inner comic finally perked up and I rigged up a device made from a coat 
 hanger that would fit into my tie. I could then manipulate the rising of my 
 tie with one finger of my right hand (which was cupped in my left in classic 
 hands in lap mode.)
 
 Several minutes before we were to come out I pulled my right index finger, 
 and like magic, my tie gently lifted up and floated in front of me. I was 
 even able to give the tie a little quivering motion, like it was struggling 
 to stay in a levitated state.
 
 I kept my eyes closed while people slowly began coming out. I would hear a 
 gasp to my left, then a gasp to my right...then more people apparently poking 
 each other and pointing. For a minute or so, the group, having meditated for 
 1/2 hour in the midst of a deep rounding anyway, followed by 
 sutras.thought they were witnessing the true dawn of a new age. I was 
 doing everything I could to remain calm and keep my eyes closed. But when I 
 heard one of my buddies start to chuckle I lost it.
 
 Tellingly, about 1/4 of the group thought it was hilarious. The rest were 
 horrified and made it clear that this enlightenment business was NO laughing 
 matter. I think that was probably the moment that the first real crack in my 
 belief system started.

Who was the first to - ahem - fly ?  
Was  eventual TM Sidhi administrator Gregg Wilson (husband of Georgina),  the 
first?





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO connection with the Paterson trial?

2010-12-29 Thread mainstream20016
Rick,  do you think MMY was party to the deliberate dishonest exaggeration of 
the gold content from the exploratory mines that led to Global Gold Corp's 
stock value surge ? 

Perhaps MMY, rather than an intimate participant in the dishonesty  by the 
Global Gold Corp, was innocent of the stock fraud.  

I recall that Neil P was said to have had a nervous breakdown earlier in the 
decade. Perhaps news of Neil's 'nervous breakdown' was related to the discovery 
of the fraud.   


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Paterson_(politician): Neil Paterson
 owned 92% of Global Gold Corp, while his brother John owned the remaining
 8%. Where did Neil get the money to own that 92% share? He worked full-time
 for the TMO all his life. Unless there was an inheritance, the TMO must have
 invested in the company, as it often did in business ventures. If that is
 the case, knowing MMY's micro-managerial tendencies, he was probably
 consulting with Neil on a regular basis, dictating or influencing decisions
 which led to the current state of affairs. The company was worth over $800
 million in 2004, when MMY was still very much alive. If you think he
 wouldn't have had his fingers in that pie, you don't know him very well.





[FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits

2010-07-12 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Alex Stanley
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:41 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits
 
  
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Stanley
  Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:07 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits
  
  
   The language is not at all clear, but it sounds like ditzy wants
   to forward to FFL a privately emailed reply from Judy. Or publicly
   reply to Judy's private email on FFL. 
  
  
  If either of those are what he wants to do, then that would be up
  to Judy. He could ask her privately and then post them if she 
  approves.
 
 That would amount to Judy posting by proxy, with ditzy essentially giving
 away part of his allotment. I can see the potential for abuse. OTOH, few
 people post enough to need such a workaround. But, it's your call, so what
 the hell do I care?
 
  
 
 I see what you mean and I agree with you. Forwarding emails from people
 whose allotment had expired would just be an end run around the posting
 limit. So if that's what you're asking ditzy, the answer is no.


Thanks, Alex and Rick for preventing posting by proxy.  The 50 post / week 
limit  prevents FFL from generating more heat than light. 







[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk Feet of Clay - RooSFoC

2010-07-12 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, andrasayer sandraa...@... wrote:

 Is Judith American or Swedish? Does anyone know if she was at Estes Park?


You apparently were at Estes Park.   Please tell us more about it.  Was that 
late Summer and early Fall of 1973 ? 

Judith I Bourque is Probably an American by birth, yet perhaps is a Swedish 
citizen.  The following is likely Judith's mother's obit, which notes her 
mother reared a family, and was buried, in Massachusetts.  This obit of 
Judith's mum also mentions a grandchild named Jonathon Olivegren Bourque, 
likely the issue of Judith and the Seelisburg TMO official named Olivegren.   
Jonathon apparently posted a positive comment about RooSFoC within the past 
month on some site or another that is promoting RoosFoC. 

Judith's mum's obit, from:  
 http://www.genealogybuff.com/ucd/webbbs_config.pl/noframes/read/2501
Bourque, Doris 
Nov. 7, 1915 - May 15, 2003 
Doris Ikalainen Bourque, passed away peacefully on May 15, at her home in 
Newcastle at the age of 87. 
She was the daughter of Karl and Mary Ikalainen. Born in Fitchburg, Mass., on 
Nov. 7, 1915, she grew up in Princeton, Mass. and attended school there. She 
received her Bachelor's degree from Lowell Teachers' College and taught 
elementary school in Rutland and Holden, Mass. She then went on to teach 
remedial reading to students with learning disabilities. She raised her family 
in Princeton, Massachusetts and retired to Newcastle with her husband Ellsworth 
J. Bourque in 1996. 
She was predeceased by her husband in January 2001. 
Doris was a devoted wife, mother and homemaker. She enjoyed handwork and was 
especially known for her braided and hooked rugs. She also did hospital 
volunteer work. Doris was proud of her Finnish heritage. She spoke Finnish 
fluently and traveled to Finland to research for family's roots. 
She is survived by her son, Bruce J. Bourque of Hallowell; daughter, Judith I. 
Bourque of Stockholm, Sweden, as well as three grandchildren, Amanda Bourque, 
Garrett Bourque and Jonathan Olivegren Bourque, a niece, Mary Ann Mastrorio; 
nephew, Allen Ikalainen; and her cat Muffin. 
Graveside service Woodlawn Cemetery in Princeton, Mass., Sat., June 15, 11 a.m. 
Arrangements are under the care of Strong Funeral Home, 612 Main St., 
Damariscotta.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Personal News from Raja Hagelin

2010-05-26 Thread mainstream20016
Her taste for men is interesting - here's an article from '99 about her ex :
 
http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/19990430scam3.asp


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:

 Poor woman -- how long before he betrays her?
 
 Edg
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  Dear fellow Faculty, Staff and Trustees,
  I would like to take a moment to share with you some personal news.
  I will soon be announcing my intention to become engaged. This is clearly an
  important step for me--one which I have made with careful deliberation,
  including several discussions with Maharishi. I have felt drawn these days,
  given my expanded National and Global responsibilities, to have more support
  close at hand-emotional support and nourishment to bring me greater
  fortitude for what I face each day.
  Kara Anastasio, 43, was a star organizer for the NLP in Ohio. After the
  Party dissolved, she continued to serve twice as the Democratic Party
  Candidate for US Congress-running on the NLP Platform. She is a long-term
  meditator and aspiring Sidha. She has a 12-year-old son, Brecon Llewellyn,
  named after his father (Kara's former husband). Kara and Brecon are planning
  to move from Ohio to join me in Fairfield, where Brecon will attend the
  Maharishi School and Kara will help me with my numerous Movement
  responsibilities. 
  As will be obvious to all who know me, this change in my home life will not
  change, one iota, my one-pointed focus on my crucial responsibilities as a
  National Raja, Global Minister, MUM faculty and Trustee. On the contrary, I
  hope to gain even greater strength and solidarity to focus wholeheartedly
  and dynamically on this. Kara's support and assistance will be invaluable. 
  I look forward to working closely with all of you as we conclude another
  triumphant year, and look forward to even greater success and expansion in
  the year ahead. 
  With best wishes, 
  Jai Guru Dev, 
  John Hagelin, Trustee
  Raja of Invincible America
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gas Pump Blues

2010-04-18 Thread mainstream20016

For more than two weeks I have repeatedly and closely listened to the BATGAP 
episodes via iTunes downloads via a portable iPod. The BATGAP episodes are a 
fascinating record of the personal histories and subjective perspectives of 
persons who have courage to publicly discuss permanently established positive 
shifts in awareness. Here-to-fore, an individual's declaration of a permanent 
shift in awareness called into question the validity of the experience. Rick 
Archer and the BATGAP interviewees promote egalitarian principles of experience 
and expression of higher states of awareness. BATGAP is a vehicle for positive 
cultural advancement by diminishing the influence of exploitive individuals and 
hierarchical institutions that for control purposes employ excessively 
exclusive principles of experience and expression by default and discourage 
members' advancement. 
-Mainstream



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote:
  
  And the yahoo group -- I read a 20 or so posts. The posters are way into 
  their heads -- it would appear from their posts. Dry expositions. 
  While a small sample, i don't see the energy, vibrancy, life surging from 
  their words.
 
 Hard to strike gold twice.  FFL with all it's problems has some good edg 
 (edge) and gets into some interesting discussions. But I think you've pretty 
 well nailed this Buddha at the Gas Pump.  And those interviews-I've only 
 listened to the Foster's piece, but there wasn't much there to make me want 
 to push on.  Then again, I don't have time to do a lot of speculative 
 exploring.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Transcendental Fairfield - BATGAP

2010-04-14 Thread mainstream20016
Every episode is fascinating and together the series presents an intimate 
insight into the histories and perspectives of the constellation of characters 
that live in town.

My favorite guest to date is Michael 'not Mike' Baxter. His tutorial 
presentation on the primacy of the Self, and Rick's wise probes of his theory, 
are a real treat. 

Highly recommended as a series.
 
iTunes audio downloads make convenient listening.  Thanks, Rick. 
Congratulations.

-Mainstream

 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@... 
wrote:

 =--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote:
 
  I have only seen one BudPump, but seek to watch more. 
  
  The contrast of unfettered description of change in ones inner life (kind 
  of ironic huh) from the high-tea, silk couch, victorian approach of the 
  TMO, to a more blue jeans approach of BudGas, snip
 
 
 I agree and think the conception of this project is brilliant no matter where 
 you stand on the higher states thoery.  I have listened to 3 of them so far 
 and think Rick is doing an excellent job in providing a safe venue for people 
 to expose something pretty intimate while throwing in some good questions to 
 keep the ball rolling.  I'm sure their openness has a lot to do with Rick's 
 friendly acceptance.
 
 I've been trying to collect the specific claims about what has changed in 
 their lives.  Predictably the people who are still very Maharishi directed 
 use his terms and people who look elsewhere for their intellectual framework 
 use those terms to describe their inner states.  Very little to put in a 
 wheelbarrow as should be expected.  But the language is so vague and 
 imprecise that is it difficult to pin down what exactly is being claimed.  
 Objects appear more transparent, their self expands.  Terms that used to 
 mean so much to me but now seem so empty outside the language system of 
 spirituality.  Believing that your self is the Self of everything is 
 poetic.  Does it really matter? I'm not sure.
 
 I do believe that trans-personal experiences can be helpful but I'm not sure 
 if taking this long to have them might develop a type of internal state, 
 self-fascination that strikes me as odd.  It might be best for people to drop 
 a hit of whatever, embrace the feeling of being everything for a while, and 
 then drop back into daily life refreshed but without years of 
 self-absorption.  That might give most of the claimed benefits.  And despite 
 the strong opinions to the contrary, most of my psychedelic insights have 
 brought permanent shifts in my perspective. It just depends what you want to 
 pay attention to. They certainly are on a par with anything I got out of 
 meditation for permanently shifting my inner states. 
 
 Nothing has convinced me that this is more than a POV on their inner 
 experiences. People who enjoy thinking this much about their inner state of 
 mind who become more and more expressive of every shift and change.  I have 
 had enough shifts of mind myself to believe that they aren't making this up, 
 but believe they may be making a big deal about states that the rest of us 
 take for granted.  There are some whose admitted mental history should give 
 us some insight into how radically their minds might shift at any given time. 
  If this time it made them feel better, good for them, I hope it stays that 
 way.
 
 Most of all it is a bit hard to get through entire interviews because their 
 micro fascination with their own internal states lacks a language that does 
 it any justice.  Describing it head on may be the poorest way to express 
 these states.  It may be that for me it is art that does it best.  Perhaps if 
 I saw the dancer in the series dance I might be more impressed that she was 
 different in a way that mattered to anyone outside herself.  Maybe it is that 
 people who can convey inner states though the arts can actually move and 
 inspire me in a way that these descriptions can't.  What is it in art that 
 moves us that shifts our states and conveys such beauty. Why is that 
 inspirational quality lacking in these descriptions? Or perhaps it is just 
 me.  I may have drifted too far out of the insider perspective that fills 
 these descriptions with glowy charm.  I sense that these people are 
 experienced in describing their new states of mind and have honed their 
 narrative to in corporate the reactions they have had to their phrasing.  We 
 are not the first audience for these stories.
 
 But if these people are expressing true significant shifts of consciousness 
 that would benefit humanity then Rick's project is going way beyond the 
 movement in opening them for examination.  I think either way Rick is really 
 on to something with this project.  By now we should expect people living in 
 the states Maharishi described vaguely and promised repeatedly.  Hearing from 
 them is a great resource for all of us interested in evaluating these 

[FairfieldLife] Re: http://www.maharishichannel.in/archives/gfc-2010.html

2010-03-29 Thread mainstream20016
Nablusoss,  The Maha Rajeshwari seems to play an increasingly important role in 
Vlodrop. By what other names might she be known?

 nablusoss1008 wrote: 
 March 24th http://streaming.mou.org/MOU/Chat/24_Mar_10.wmv  Today is
 the highly auspicious day of Ram Navami in the Vedic Calendar.
 The day started early at Meru, Invincible Holland, with a Vedic ceremony
 to begin planting 400 young fruit trees. The trees are the gift of our
 dear Maha Raja Rajeshwari and they will always be a reminder of her
 enlightened and simple nature, and her generosity to all future
 generations. snip  

 This morning all the Rajas, Ministers, and leadership gathered with
 Maharaja-ji at the auspicious time in the Brahmasthan for Puja to Guru
 Dev,  snip





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Right: Constantly On The Wrong Side Of History

2010-03-29 Thread mainstream20016
The Eastern Establishment moderate Republicans who composed a large segment of  
Republican Party during the 1960s who supported progressive social legislation 
are now extinct.  Following the passage of '60s Civil Rights legislation, the 
Republican party's Southern Strategy encouraged entrenched southern racists to 
align with the Republican party to maintain their racism-Republican god  Ronald 
Reagan chose tiny Philadelphia, Mississippi, the scene of a brutal triple 
murder of 60s civil rights workers, to formally announce his 1980 candidacy.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 
 
  do.rflex:
   They were wrong about Social Security...
  
 FDR passed Social Security with massive 
 Republican support -- 81 Republicans voted 
 in favor of the measure in the House and 
 only 15 against while 16 Republicans voted 
 in favor in the Senate and just 5 against...
 
 Newsbusters: 
 
 Read more: 
 http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/03/25/lehrer-accuses-gop-blocking-civil-rights-act-kyl-corrects-him#ixzz0jcPOAD0A
 
 http://tinyurl.com/yghhj9c





[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Bullshit Bingo

2010-03-27 Thread mainstream20016
Hey, Dix,
Check your math regarding 10 generations of your family in 
America since 1640.
About 30 generations of my family have been born in America, beginning in 1637. 

By the way, in 2000 the U.S. was in great shape, until G.W. Bush and the far 
right took total control of all aspects of our government.  They ruined the 
country.  

Barack Obama is extraordinary.  This Patriot loves him.  

- Mainstream 





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@... wrote:

 Steve, when Obama was elected, I thought it might take about four years to 
 piss off enough people to at least take back the WH and at least one branch 
 of congress. We may be ahead of schedule to take back one or possibly both 
 branches this November. If we don't, two more years will just pound it into 
 the minds of those that voted for Obama that maybe we could have chosen a 
 better candidate. It took four years of Jimmy Carter to  create the Reagan 
 Revolution. South America? Why would I want to move there? My family has been 
 here ten generation, since 1640 in Jamestown Virginia. Oh yeah, I've got lots 
 of faith in the American people. When they screw up and see it, they are 
 pretty good at fixing things. Voting, of course all law abiding citizens 
 should vote, however I think there should a voter ID with photo to prove who 
 you are when casting that vote and maybe even at least a high school diploma 
 to show some understanding of our system of government and
  economics, it's free. If you're not hearing about the war on terror 
 everyday, it's not because we aren't at war, it's because your media choices 
 don't talk about it as much so it will look like Obama has solved the 
 problem. We're safe? Tell that to the 13 that died at Fort Hood at the hands 
 of a terrorist who infiltrated the military or the two army recruiters shot 
 by another terrorist in AK. or the people on the flight coming into Detroit 
 that were nearly blown up, but no, I'm not upset, it's to be expected these 
 days. I thought the war on terror* is* an international  issue. I  also 
 thought Obama was going to get the rest of the world to take up their fair 
 share of responsibility in that war. Remember that? What bothers me is that 
 we've got a moron *focusing like a  dim flash light*on domestic and 
 international issues making things much worse in the short and long run. Now 
 Steve,when Obama and his leftist government ARE thrown out, will you go
  berserk? Can you go berserk if you already are? 
 
 . 
 
 From: lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 5:29:27 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Bullshit Bingo
 
   
 Come November you can vote the bums out of office Dix. What the HELL are you 
 going to do if that doesn't happen. Maybe you should move to South America. 
 Do you have faith in the American people, or only when they vote your way? 
 Should the American people even have the right to vote? Maybe they can't be 
 trusted with a ballot. Are you upset that the country has been safe, even 
 though we don't hear about the War on Terror everyday. Does it bother you 
 that we have a president who is focussing on domestic, and international 
 issues, and not spending 80% of his time on the War on Terror. And the fact 
 that he lets the military prosecute our conflicts in the way they see best, 
 and not having the president, vice president and secretary of defense trying 
 to call all the shots. Or would it serve your purposes if the country was 
 attacked. How bout it Dix? What's the scoop?. Which is better? And what's 
 your take on the American people Dix? Is their judgment to be
  trusted, or not. God, you better hope that in November they vote your way. 
 You may just go beserk if they don't.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ ... wrote:
 
  Bullshit  Bingo
  
  1. Before  Barrack Obama's next televised speech, prepare your Bullshit 
  Bingo card by drawing a square -- I find that 5 x 5 is a good size 
  --  and dividing it into columns -- five across and five down.  That 
  will give you 25  1-inch blocks.
  
  2. Write one of the following words/phrases in each block:
  
    ·        Restored our reputation
    ·        Strategic fit  
    ·        Let me be clear
    ·        Make no mistake
    ·        Back from the brink
    ·        Signs of  recovery
    ·        Out of the loop  
    ·        Benchmark  
    ·        Job creation
    ·        Fiscal  restraint
    ·        Win-win 
    ·        Affordable health care
    ·        Previous  Administration
    ·        Empower (or empowerment)  
    ·        Greed on Wall  Street
    ·        At the end of the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Bullshit Bingo

2010-03-27 Thread mainstream20016
My apologies to Dix and his math - 10 generations in America since 1640 is  
accurate. I misquoted my family's generations in America since the 1630s as 30 
generations. The correct number is 13.  I'm sorry for questioning your math, 
Dix.
-Mainstream 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20...@... 
wrote:

 Hey, Dix,
 Check your math regarding 10 generations of your family in 
 America since 1640.
 About 30 generations of my family have been born in America, beginning in 
 1637. 
 
 By the way, in 2000 the U.S. was in great shape, until G.W. Bush and the far 
 right took total control of all aspects of our government.  They ruined the 
 country.  
 
 Barack Obama is extraordinary.  This Patriot loves him.  
 
 - Mainstream 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ wrote:
 
  Steve, when Obama was elected, I thought it might take about four years to 
  piss off enough people to at least take back the WH and at least one branch 
  of congress. We may be ahead of schedule to take back one or possibly both 
  branches this November. If we don't, two more years will just pound it into 
  the minds of those that voted for Obama that maybe we could have chosen a 
  better candidate. It took four years of Jimmy Carter to  create the 
  Reagan Revolution. South America? Why would I want to move there? My family 
  has been here ten generation, since 1640 in Jamestown Virginia. Oh yeah, 
  I've got lots of faith in the American people. When they screw up and see 
  it, they are pretty good at fixing things. Voting, of course all law 
  abiding citizens should vote, however I think there should a voter ID with 
  photo to prove who you are when casting that vote and maybe even at least a 
  high school diploma to show some understanding of our system of government 
  and
   economics, it's free. If you're not hearing about the war on terror 
  everyday, it's not because we aren't at war, it's because your media 
  choices don't talk about it as much so it will look like Obama has solved 
  the problem. We're safe? Tell that to the 13 that died at Fort Hood at the 
  hands of a terrorist who infiltrated the military or the two army 
  recruiters shot by another terrorist in AK. or the people on the flight 
  coming into Detroit that were nearly blown up, but no, I'm not upset, it's 
  to be expected these days. I thought the war on terror* is* an 
  international  issue. I  also thought Obama was going to get the rest of 
  the world to take up their fair share of responsibility in that war. 
  Remember that? What bothers me is that we've got a moron *focusing like 
  a  dim flash light*on domestic and international issues making things much 
  worse in the short and long run. Now Steve,when Obama and his leftist 
  government ARE thrown out, will you go
   berserk? Can you go berserk if you already are? 
  
  . 
  
  From: lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 5:29:27 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Bullshit Bingo
  
    
  Come November you can vote the bums out of office Dix. What the HELL are 
  you going to do if that doesn't happen. Maybe you should move to South 
  America. Do you have faith in the American people, or only when they vote 
  your way? Should the American people even have the right to vote? Maybe 
  they can't be trusted with a ballot. Are you upset that the country has 
  been safe, even though we don't hear about the War on Terror everyday. 
  Does it bother you that we have a president who is focussing on domestic, 
  and international issues, and not spending 80% of his time on the War on 
  Terror. And the fact that he lets the military prosecute our conflicts in 
  the way they see best, and not having the president, vice president and 
  secretary of defense trying to call all the shots. Or would it serve your 
  purposes if the country was attacked. How bout it Dix? What's the scoop?. 
  Which is better? And what's your take on the American people Dix? Is their 
  judgment to be
   trusted, or not. God, you better hope that in November they vote your way. 
  You may just go beserk if they don't.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@ ... wrote:
  
   Bullshit  Bingo
   
   1. Before  Barrack Obama's next televised speech, prepare your 
   Bullshit Bingo card by drawing a square -- I find that 5 x 5 is a 
   good size --  and dividing it into columns -- five across and five 
   down.  That will give you 25  1-inch blocks.
   
   2. Write one of the following words/phrases in each block:
   
     ·        Restored our reputation
     ·        Strategic fit  
     ·        Let me be clear
     ·        Make no mistake
     ·        Back from the brink
     ·        Signs of  recovery
    Â

[FairfieldLife] Re: EVERY Republican voted against Clinton's Economic Plan

2010-03-27 Thread mainstream20016
Not a single Republican vote.  Sound familiar ?Clinton led America to 
create tremendous prosperity, surpluses, peace and put the U.S. clearly in a 
beneficent and dominant role at end of his second term.  No good deed goes 
unpunished - and the Republicans, green with envy at Clinton's economic record 
- relentlessly pursued Clinton with accusations of immorality and perjury witch 
hunts that led to impeachment by the House, and just short of expulsion from 
the Presidency  by the Senate.  
G W Bush quickly sewed up the 2000 Republican Presidential nomination, then 
stole the general election, with the aid of the Supreme Court.  The next decade 
was a disaster largely under complete Republican control.  The Republicans have 
less than zero credibility.  November is going to be an aberration as a 
mid-term election.  The Dems will pick up seats, instead of lose them.  Bring 
it On.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:

 
 President Clinton signed into law the largest deficit reduction plan in
 history
 
 As part of the 1993 Economic Plan, President Clinton cut taxes on 15
 million low-income families and made tax cuts available to 90 percent of
 small businesses, while raising taxes on just 1.2 percent of the
 wealthiest taxpayers.
 
 From Wikipedia:
 
 The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 ... was passed by the
 103rd United States Congress
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/103rd_United_States_Congress  and signed
 into law by President
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States  Bill
 Clinton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton . It has also been
 referred to as the Deficit Reduction Act of 1993. Part XIII, which dealt
 with taxes, is also called the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.
 
 [...and just like today's Republicans ]
 
 Ultimately *every Republican in Congress voted against the bill,* as did
 a number of Democrats. Vice President
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_the_United_States  Al
 Gore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore  broke a tie in the Senate
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate  on both the Senate
 bill and the conference report
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress_Conference_committe\
 e#The_conference_report .
 
 
 The House bill passed 219-213.[1]
 http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1993/roll199.xml  The House passed the
 conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216
 (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders  (VT-I)) voting in favor;
 41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against)
 
 ...The Senate passed the conference report ... on Friday, August 6,
 1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore
 voting in favor, ... and 44 Republicans voting against). President
 Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993#L\
 egislative_history
 
 
 [Results:]
 
 
 During the Bill Clinton Presidency:
 
 * Average economic growth of 4.0 percent per year, compared to average
 growth of 2.8 percent during the previous years. The economy grew for
 116 consecutive months, the most in history.[36]
 
 
 * Creation of more than 22.5 million jobs—the most jobs ever created
 under a single administration, and more than were created in the
 previous 12 years. Of the total new jobs, 20.7 million, or 92 percent,
 were in the private sector.[37]
 
 * Economic gains spurred an increase in family incomes for all
 Americans. Since 1993, real median family income increased by $6,338,
 from $42,612 in 1993 to $48,950 in 1999 (in 1999 dollars).[38]
 
 * Overall unemployment dropped to the lowest level in more than 30
 years, down from 6.9 percent in 1993 to just 4.0 percent in January
 2001. The unemployment rate was below 5 percent for 40 consecutive
 months. Unemployment for African Americans fell from 14.2 percent in
 1992 to 7.3 percent in 2000, the lowest rate on record. Unemployment for
 Hispanics fell from 11.8 percent in October 1992 to 5.0 percent in 2000,
 also the lowest rate on record.[37]
 
 * Inflation dropped to its lowest rate since the Kennedy Administration,
 averaging 2.5 percent, and fell from 4.7 percent during the previous
 administration.[39]
 
 * The homeownership rate reached 67.7 percent near the end of the
 Clinton administration, the highest rate on record. In contrast, the
 homeownership rate fell from 65.6 percent in the first quarter of 1981
 to 63.7 percent in the first quarter of 1993.[40]
 
 * The poverty rate also declined from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 11.8
 percent in 1999, the largest six-year drop in poverty in nearly 30
 years. This left 7 million fewer people in poverty than there were in
 1993.[41]
 
 * The surplus in fiscal year 2000 was $237 billion—the third
 consecutive surplus and the largest surplus ever.[40]
 
 * Clinton worked with the Republican-led Congress to enact welfare
 reform. As a result, 

[FairfieldLife] Re: EVERY Republican voted against Clinton's Economic Plan

2010-03-27 Thread mainstream20016
The Republicans voted unanimously AGAINST the Clinton Revenue Reconciliation 
Act of 1993. The Republicans had NO PART in the legislation that created the 
basis of economic strength, prosperity and surpluses in the decade of the 90s.
The Republican Congress true colors were revealed as soon as G W Bush took 
office. Together Bush and the Republican Congress immediately did what they 
always do - cut taxes on the wealthiest.  First and foremost, Republicans cut 
taxes on the wealthy.  Reagan the Republican in the 1980s also dismantled 
America's then-role as the largest creditor nation into the largest debtor 
nation, before Reagan left office in 1989.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG wg...@... wrote:

 Thank God he had a Republican Congress!
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  Not a single Republican vote.  Sound familiar ?Clinton led America to 
  create tremendous prosperity, surpluses, peace and put the U.S. clearly in 
  a beneficent and dominant role at end of his second term.  No good deed 
  goes unpunished - and the Republicans, green with envy at Clinton's 
  economic record - relentlessly pursued Clinton with accusations of 
  immorality and perjury witch hunts that led to impeachment by the House, 
  and just short of expulsion from the Presidency  by the Senate.  
  G W Bush quickly sewed up the 2000 Republican Presidential nomination, then 
  stole the general election, with the aid of the Supreme Court.  The next 
  decade was a disaster largely under complete Republican control.  The 
  Republicans have less than zero credibility.  November is going to be an 
  aberration as a mid-term election.  The Dems will pick up seats, instead of 
  lose them.  Bring it On.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
  
   
   President Clinton signed into law the largest deficit reduction plan in
   history
   
   As part of the 1993 Economic Plan, President Clinton cut taxes on 15
   million low-income families and made tax cuts available to 90 percent of
   small businesses, while raising taxes on just 1.2 percent of the
   wealthiest taxpayers.
   
   From Wikipedia:
   
   The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 ... was passed by the
   103rd United States Congress
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/103rd_United_States_Congress  and signed
   into law by President
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States  Bill
   Clinton http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton . It has also been
   referred to as the Deficit Reduction Act of 1993. Part XIII, which dealt
   with taxes, is also called the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.
   
   [...and just like today's Republicans ]
   
   Ultimately *every Republican in Congress voted against the bill,* as did
   a number of Democrats. Vice President
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_the_United_States  Al
   Gore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore  broke a tie in the Senate
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate  on both the Senate
   bill and the conference report
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress_Conference_committe\
   e#The_conference_report .
   
   
   The House bill passed 219-213.[1]
   http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1993/roll199.xml  The House passed the
   conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216
   (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders  (VT-I)) voting in favor;
   41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against)
   
   ...The Senate passed the conference report ... on Friday, August 6,
   1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore
   voting in favor, ... and 44 Republicans voting against). President
   Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
   
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993#L\
   egislative_history
   
   
   [Results:]
   
   
   During the Bill Clinton Presidency:
   
   * Average economic growth of 4.0 percent per year, compared to average
   growth of 2.8 percent during the previous years. The economy grew for
   116 consecutive months, the most in history.[36]
   
   
   * Creation of more than 22.5 million jobs—the most jobs ever created
   under a single administration, and more than were created in the
   previous 12 years. Of the total new jobs, 20.7 million, or 92 percent,
   were in the private sector.[37]
   
   * Economic gains spurred an increase in family incomes for all
   Americans. Since 1993, real median family income increased by $6,338,
   from $42,612 in 1993 to $48,950 in 1999 (in 1999 dollars).[38]
   
   * Overall unemployment dropped to the lowest level in more than 30
   years, down from 6.9 percent in 1993 to just 4.0 percent in January
   2001. The unemployment rate was below 5 percent for 40 consecutive
   months. Unemployment for African Americans fell from 14.2 percent in
   1992 to 7.3 percent

[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi off-stage - is there a video archive?

2010-03-25 Thread mainstream20016
 The question is whether an audio or video record exists of Maharishi's 
non-public life – such record could give a view of Maharishi's more earthly 
ambitions, talents, actions, and achievements.  We know from anecdotal accounts 
of Maharishi's immense drive and activity behind the scenes to further the TMO. 
  It would be great to see a documentary record of his non-public life that 
highlights his worldly actions.  Not looking for a holy grail - just the 
opposite – a record of his practical actions dealing with earthly matters to 
get things done.   Such a documentary would enhance his legacy, not threaten 
it.   
-Mainstream



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merudanda no_re...@... wrote:

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
  On Behalf Of mainstream20016
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:55 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi off-stage - is there a video
 archive?
 
 
  Every public moment of Maharishi's life was recorded for posterity,
 probably
  beginning in '70 or so, right ? The public Maharishi, for all of his
  expounding of Vedic knowledge ..It's such a joy.. In reality offers
 a very
  incomplete perspective of Maharishi and the evolution of the TMO. The
 TM
  movement was shaped by Maharishi during his extensive activity behind
 the
  public view. Might an extensive audio and/or video record exist of
 Maharishi
  `s activities behind the public veil ? What a documentary such a
 record
  could become...
  There was tons of stuff taped that sits in archives not being viewed
 by
  anyone, but in all the smaller, more private meetings I was ever in, I
  didn't notice any taping going on.
 Right Rick
 
 In the beginning of the movement at Olson's place , may be
 
 but then
 
 Never ever fortunately ---there are some private notes, written records
 after organizational (and spiritual personal)meetings  and many many
 cherished memories ---and few private recordings by some movement's
 bystander without  real responsibilities
 
 (BTW--of course there are some assembly meeting recording in the earlier
 years and recording during the courses with  course participants-- not
 to be public  seen)
 
  but  to get to the point
 
 there are no secret archive!
 
 there are no secret private archive! and  starting with such a myth and
 rumor let's ask the question
 
 Cui bono? and
 
 I really do not understand the question.
 
 Were there not enough misuse of private and personal remarks given by
 Maharishi and said under special circumstances and situation  ONLY  and
 hasn't it  not enough damage done to the movement in the last 40(I
 certainly know of) years?
 
 In search of a hidden GRAIL OF PRIVATE ARCHIVE what an idea
 
 Now HE is laughing
   REST IN PEACE
 





[FairfieldLife] Maharishi off-stage - is there a video archive?

2010-03-24 Thread mainstream20016
Every public moment of Maharishi's life was recorded for posterity, probably 
beginning in '70 or so, right ?  The public Maharishi, for all of his 
expounding of Vedic knowledge ….It's such a joy….In reality offers a very 
incomplete perspective of Maharishi and the evolution of the TMO.   The TM 
movement was shaped by Maharishi during his extensive activity behind the 
public view. Might an extensive audio and/or video record exist of Maharishi `s 
activities behind the public veil ?What a documentary such a record could 
become…..



[FairfieldLife] Re: Healthcare. Have you Septic Tanks gone civilised?

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tres...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
 And how do you feel that your health system costs the British
  taxpayer half of what the US system costs the US taxpayer?
  
  OffWorld
 
 A lot of Nones here. As for the last, these insurance companies,
 now with a flood of new custom, are going to be very interested
 in remedies that are cost effective. They could have a very
 pragmatic attitude.
 
 TM should get in the frame.



You're right - as a newly reconstituted SIMS-like pre-1975 secular TM 
organization, based in the U.S., the only product of which is TM instruction,  
TM checking and residence courses.  Start by decoupling from the Global Country 
of World Peace.  Eliminate isolation of the stand alone Peace Palace location 
as a storefront and  associate with existing group medical practices, which 
provide a stream of referrals and space.  Advance the concept of health care 
instead of disease care where the medical group is compensated for the health 
of its patients instead of the treatment of disease.   Creation of a TMer 
Health Insurance Exchange will bring many financial advantages to its members, 
lower health insurance premiums, and thereby rejuvenate interest in TM.  Who in 
the U.S. TM movement has the courage to make it happen ?  Fullfill Maharishi's 
goal to make TM available to every human on earth  !!!




[FairfieldLife] Re: Health insurance reform: TM's future

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, uns_tressor uns_tres...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
 And how do you feel that your health system costs the British
  taxpayer half of what the US system costs the US taxpayer?
  
  OffWorld
 
 A lot of Nones here. As for the last, these insurance companies,
 now with a flood of new custom, are going to be very interested
 in remedies that are cost effective. They could have a very
 pragmatic attitude.
 
 TM should get in the frame.



You're right - as a newly reconstituted SIMS-like pre-1975 secular TM
organization, based in the U.S., the only product of which is TM instruction, 
TM checking and residence courses. Start by decoupling from the Global Country
of World Peace. Eliminate the isolation and high overhead of the stand alone 
Peace Palace location as a storefront - associate with existing group medical 
practices, which provide
a stream of referrals and space. Advance the concept of health care instead of 
disease care where the medical group is compensated for the health of its 
patients instead of the treatment of disease. Creation of a TMer Health 
Insurance Exchange will bring many financial advantages to its members, lower 
health insurance premiums, and thereby rejuvenate interest in TM. Who in the 
U.S. TM movement has the courage to make it happen ? Fullfill Maharishi's goal 
to make TM widely available !!!






[FairfieldLife] Re: The health care meltdown

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016
Whoa,  Off.   This bill is a necessary small step in the right direction, not 
in itself an admirable bill. All of inefficient stake holders in the health 
care industry are boosted by this bill.  Private health insurance companies, 
exhorbitantly-priced pharmaceuticals, for-profit and non-profits who act as 
for-profit hospitals and health care personell will all see a boost from this 
bill.  
The inefficiencies and profit motivation of the private health insurance 
industry are still in place, despite this bill.  How is that admirable, when 
40% of health insurance premiums will still go to profits and administrative 
overhead.  
Had I not been paying attention to the issue for the past decade and  was 
presented  today's headlines and stories on the bill, I'd have thought the 
Republicans sponsored the bill, because this bill favors the Republican party's 
interests.
Hopefully, this bill is a small step toward a single-payer healthcare system 
which hopefully will be funded by the top 15% of the U.S.  population who've 
disproportionately   benefitted most over the past 30 years.   
The Republicans, normally loathe to advocate for tax increases, will now 
advocate FOR a national sales tax, which as a regressive tax would place a 
greater burden on low-income and middle-class taxpayers.  Charles Krauthammer, 
a conservative columnist,  today proposed a national sales tax to pay for 
healthcare costs.  Republicans represent the wealthiest among us, and they will 
begin to advocate for a national sales tax, to protect the interest of the 
wealthies among us.
-Mainstream   


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
  snip
   It looks like we voted for the right man for the job when we voted
   for Obama. Super-big high-five to the O-man.
  
   Ted Kennedy's smiling down on us all.
 
  Ted Kennedy is royally pissed because Obama sacrificed
  the public option (while pretending to still be for it).
 
 It is WAY better than any Public Option. It insures millions more, and
 in time will cover anyone currently not covered. It is now illegal for
 people to not have coverage, but just like in the past, the Democrats
 made it illegal for hospitals to refuse someone, and so local, state,
 and federal funding HAD to cover the treatment costs. As it should be.
 NOW everyone who is not insured has to have insurance, but THEY do not
 have to pay a penny if they cannot afford it - it is subsidized by the
 tax payers now.
 
 Those who can afford it, but do not want health insurance of any kind
 (like Willyltex for example, if he was ever self-employed), it will
 simply be like a tiny insignificant tax on them that they won't even
 notice, and they will have to put up or shut up, just like in Britain.
 And the British like their system, and the health insurance tax (which
 is seperated out on payroll checks) is the LAST thing they would
 complain about on their paycheck deductions.
 
 I saw this is what Obama was doing a long time ago, and these rules will
 never be repealed, even if Republicans gain in the Fall --- which they
 won't.
 
 This is a GREAT day for America. This is a watershed moment for America,
 and due to its influence, for the world. The Neocons and Fundies are
 dead in the water. Change has come.
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: The health care meltdown

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016

Whoa, Off. This bill is a necessary small step in the right direction, not in
itself an admirable bill. All of inefficient stake holders in the health care
industry are boosted by this bill. Private health insurance companies,
exhorbitantly-priced pharmaceuticals, for-profit and non-profits who act as
for-profit hospitals and health care personell will all see a boost from this
bill.
The inefficiencies and profit motivation of the private health insurance
industry are still in place, despite this bill. How is that admirable, when 40%
of health insurance premiums will still go to profits and administrative
overhead.
Had I not been paying attention to the issue for the past decade and was
presented today's headlines and stories on the bill, I'd have thought the
Republicans sponsored the bill, because this bill favors the Republican party's
interests.
Hopefully, this bill is a small step toward a single-payer healthcare system
which hopefully will be funded by the top 15% of the U.S. population who've
disproportionately benefitted most over the past 30 years.
The Republicans, normally loathe to advocate for tax increases, will now
advocate FOR a national sales tax, which as a regressive tax would place a
greater burden on low-income and middle-class taxpayers. Charles Krauthammer, a
conservative columnist, today proposed a national sales tax to pay for
healthcare costs. Republicans represent the wealthiest among us, and they will
begin to advocate for a national sales tax, to divert attention away from any 
move toward re-establishing a progressive tax system.
-Mainstream




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
  snip
   It looks like we voted for the right man for the job when we voted
   for Obama. Super-big high-five to the O-man.
  
   Ted Kennedy's smiling down on us all.
 
  Ted Kennedy is royally pissed because Obama sacrificed
  the public option (while pretending to still be for it).
 
 It is WAY better than any Public Option. It insures millions more, and
 in time will cover anyone currently not covered. It is now illegal for
 people to not have coverage, but just like in the past, the Democrats
 made it illegal for hospitals to refuse someone, and so local, state,
 and federal funding HAD to cover the treatment costs. As it should be.
 NOW everyone who is not insured has to have insurance, but THEY do not
 have to pay a penny if they cannot afford it - it is subsidized by the
 tax payers now.
 
 Those who can afford it, but do not want health insurance of any kind
 (like Willyltex for example, if he was ever self-employed), it will
 simply be like a tiny insignificant tax on them that they won't even
 notice, and they will have to put up or shut up, just like in Britain.
 And the British like their system, and the health insurance tax (which
 is seperated out on payroll checks) is the LAST thing they would
 complain about on their paycheck deductions.
 
 I saw this is what Obama was doing a long time ago, and these rules will
 never be repealed, even if Republicans gain in the Fall --- which they
 won't.
 
 This is a GREAT day for America. This is a watershed moment for America,
 and due to its influence, for the world. The Neocons and Fundies are
 dead in the water. Change has come.
 
 OffWorld





[FairfieldLife] Re: FAIRFIELD SPECIAL SCHOOL ELECTION APRIL 6th

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016
FFSD is seeking an increase of property tax levy from $2.70 / $1,000 to $4.05 / 
$1,000.
Sounds rich, particularly for Iowa, which has managed to produce excellent 
public education at the existing lower levy.
What is particularly troubling is the referendum provides no recourse for 
renewal, but could allow the higher rate of taxation indefinitely.  That's a 
cardinal no - no, IMHO.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 A hot local issue:
  
 Subject: Re:  - FAIRFIELD SPECIAL SCHOOL ELECTION
  
 Ed,
 The vote is April 6th. There are many things involved. You can go to
 www.fairfieldsfuture.org and click on April 6th Referendum on the left
 side of the main page.  This will give you some information from the school
 district's point of view.  This vote is the most local opportunity we have
 to make a difference in the ever increasing tax burden issue.  They want to
 raise our property taxes up to $4.05 per $1000.00 of assessed value.  If
 this passes, our district will have the highest taxed bond referendum in the
 state of Iowa.  I am very opposed to this and their proposed spending plans.
 They have continued to spend blindly even in the most recent meetings,
 passing expenditures with plans of getting this passed.  I want to get the
 word out to as many people as possible.  I would be happy to speak with you
 and anyone else who has a concern for our local economy and taxation
 situation.  The school board just last week voted to close Lincoln
 Elementary School for the reason (they say) to save money because the
 district is seeing a shortfall in enrollment.  Then at the same meeting,
 they discuss adding on to the high school.  They talk poor and spend rich!
 We need to stop them and make them accountable for every penny they spend of
 our money!  Please help us stop this...it is NOT the time to raise taxes
 AGAIN!  If you have any further questions please call me! 641-472-0380
 -Carol Lee
   :-( Didn't they promise in the Ledger that this referendum would not
 cost more thanabout 30 million dollars?
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 YES, I WANT MY CHILDREN TO RECEIVE THE BEST EDUCATION POSSIBLE BUT NO, I DO
 NOT BELIEVE THAT THE CURRENT SCHOOL BOARD HAS EDUCATION IN PRIORITY.  
  
 THE SCHOOL BOARD SEES OUR TAX DOLLARS AS AN EASY MEANS TO CONTINUE A BAD
 SPENDING HABIT.
  
  
 AS VOTING CITIZENS OF THE FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT- WE HAVE A
 VOICE - LET IT BE HEARD!
  
 I ATTENDED EVERY MEETING REGARDING THE CLOSURE OF LINCOLN ELEMENTARY AND THE
 MOVE OF THE FIFTH GRADE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL.  A FEW PERSONS SPOKE UP AT THE
 MEETINGS IN AN ATTEMPT DISSUADE THE ALREADY CONCRETE MINDS OF THE BOARD
 MEMBERS (ASIDE FROM MR. WAUGH) (THE ONLY ONE BRAVE ENOUGH TO CAST A NO
 VOTE).  
  
 THE SCHOOL BOARD LET US KNOW THAT THEY WOULD NOT LISTEN TO THE VOICES OF A
 FEW - 
  
 BUT THEY MUST LISTEN TO THE VOICES OF THE MANY!
  
 IF YOU SUPPORT ME IN THE NO (DON'T RAISE OUR TAXES UNDER THE GUISE OF
 EDUCATION) VOTE, PLEASE CONTACT ME.
  
 I ENCOURAGE YOUR EMAIL RESPONSES AND OR PHONE CALLS.
  
 CAROL LEE KESSEL
 641-472-0380
 CELL: 641-233-0092
 EMAIL: silverla...@...
  
 WE CANNOT AFFORD TO BE COMPLACENT ANY LONGER!





[FairfieldLife] Re: The health care meltdown

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@
  wrote:
 snip
   I read what you said. All that would have been the same
   with the public option, except that there would have been
   the *additional* component of competition with the private
   insurance companies to bring down premiums and increase
   benefits. To say the current bill is better than the
   public option makes no sense; it's like saying a car
   without brakes is better than a set of brakes.
  
  I can assure you, it is a much better option.
 
 One more time: The options were (a) the current bill but
 with a public option, and (b) the identical bill except
 with no public option.
 
 We got (b).



Your logic assumes the (a) version, with the public option, was acceptable to 
the Senate. It was not.  Perhaps your hero Hillary would have insisted on the 
(a) version, but she would have failed insisting on it, similar to her failures 
on the health care issue in 1994.  Obama is head and shoulders above everyone, 
in intellect and termperment.  Thank God he beat Hillary.

 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The health care meltdown

2010-03-22 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@
  wrote:
 snip
   I read what you said. All that would have been the same
   with the public option, except that there would have been
   the *additional* component of competition with the private
   insurance companies to bring down premiums and increase
   benefits. To say the current bill is better than the
   public option makes no sense; it's like saying a car
   without brakes is better than a set of brakes.
  
  I can assure you, it is a much better option.
 
 One more time: The options were (a) the current bill but
 with a public option, and (b) the identical bill except
 with no public option.
 
 We got (b).


Your logic assumes the (a) version (with the public option), was acceptable to
the Senate. It was not. Perhaps your hero Hillary would have insisted on the
(a) version, but she would have failed insisting on it, similar to her failures
on the health care issue in 1994. Obama is head and shoulders above everyone,
in intellect and temperament. Thank God he beat Hillary.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Response to Judy

2010-03-15 Thread mainstream20016
Imagine the horror of Judy's distorted personality at the time her father 
considered his daughter an insufferable aging 30+ year-old wench before Judy 
learned TM in 1976.  It's 34 years later…..and Judy's now 65+.  Perhaps her dad 
embellished his take on TM's positive effect on his spinsterish daughter then, 
in the now-proven false hope that her neuroses would abate.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:

When I accuse you of sophistry is it in regard to a specific 
technique you are using.
   
   I am not using any technique. I'm being completely
   straightforward. You are not.
  
  Yeah, that doesn't work with someone who knows what
  sophistry refers to.
 
 I'm sure you have your own special definition. I'm going
 by the one in my dictionary--
 
 subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
 
 --or Wikipedia:
 
 a specious argument used for deceiving someone
 
 That's what you do. Not all that subtle to those who
 have been following closely (i.e., you and me) but
 sufficiently so to fool casual observers.
 
I am not labeling you as a sophist as an identity. Your
attempt to shift the discussion into being about my 
character mean
   
   There was no such attempt on my part. I made a side comment
   on your post to Willytex about *my* choices, which you
   decided to interpret as a slam on you, which *you* then used
   to shift the discussion to Bad Judy, collaborating with Barry
   to demonize me.
   
   The rest of this is just more of your standard slippery
   sophistry when you've been caught out. As I said, I'm
   pretty sure it'll fool everybody else just fine.
  
  Again you misuse a technical term with zero evidence thinking
  it it a general put down.
 
 Like I say, I'm going by the standard dictionary
 definition. And I've already provided gobs of
 evidence that this is precisely what you do.
 
  I am not buying your bullshit and now after a short drum
  roll what do you do:
   
   FOAD.
  
  FUCK OFF AND DIE, why use an acronym when we can savor your
  malevolence in full by spelling it all out.
 
 I think everyone here knows what the acronym means.
 
 Besides, I like the way the sound of it conveys disgust:
 
 FOAD.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Question to Shemp

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016
Shemp,
So you advocate lowering income tax rates.   At what rate of 
income is tax revenue maximized ?   Please don't insult our intelligence by 
suggesting 0%. 

-Mainstream  



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
 
 
 [snip]
 
 
 
  
  That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts
  for the rich because of this scenario?
 
 
 
 No, that is precisely why I am FOR the tax cuts for the HIGHER tax brackets 
 (which, yes, affect the rich).
 
 Lowering the higher tax brackets INCREASED tax revenue.
 
 The problem was lowing the lower tax brackets which DECREASED tax revenues.
 
 
 
 
  That would have made this figure
  smaller per person,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No, the opposite would have happened.  You know not of what you speak.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by
  all legal means, would hardly notice any significant difference if those
  tax cuts were repealled. Problem solved, debt paid.
  
  Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid
  the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
  
  The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war
  costs put on the books properly.
  
  So what's your point again Shemp? I don't get it.
  
 
 
 
 Keep reading the post over and over again until you do.
 
 
 
  OffWorld
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Question to Shemp

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ 
 wrote:
 
  Ok, that makes sense.  I thought it might be for other reasons.  I agree. I 
  think we're in trouble.  But you don't really see that reflected in the 
  markets.  Dollar has regained strength.  Gold is moderating. Of course 
  sentiment can change quickly.
  
 
 
 
 People knew for years we were in deep shit regarding the mortgage crisis.  
 Yet the stock market reached unprecedented highs.
 
 Same thing happening here, I believe.
 

What is of real concern of the wealthy is the inevitable return to progressive 
taxation;  the noise from Republicans about deficit spending is meant to 
distract from the solution - much higher marginal tax rates on the top earners. 
  


 
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
  
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 
   steve.sundur@ wrote:
   

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
   As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel
Peace
   Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America
gave him the
   White House based on:
   the same credentials.

Shemp, take away health care for a moment.  What is it you find to be so
objectionable about Obama's presidency so far?
   
   
   
   Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit.
   
   Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States 
   paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt.  That 
   represents about $700 per person per year.
   
   This cost, please bear in mind, was born while interest rates were, as 
   they are now, at historic lows.
   
   Obama has not only taken Bush's ridiculously high deficits but expanded 
   them to an unbelievable level: $1.6 trillion.
   
   What will happen when interest rates go up WHICH THEY MUST AT SOME POINT? 
When nations such as China stop buying our debt, in order to attract 
   them to buying it, interest rates will have to go up.
   
   So, for starters, triple the $230 billion figure to $750 billion a year 
   on the $10 trillion.  And that's based on putting interest rates up to a 
   meager 6 or 7 percent interest figure.  Not a hard level to reach.
   
   Then double the $10 trillion national debt to $20 trillion which we'll 
   reach in about 3 or 4 years. That $750 billion a year in interest will 
   now be $1.5 trillion a year in interest.
   
   This represents about $4-5,000 a person, per year, just to service the 
   debt.  Factor out the people who don't pay any tax (about 50% of all 
   taxpayers) and you're looking at about $8-10,000 per person per year to 
   service the debt.
   
   And all that without reducing the debt at all.
   
   And by this time Barack Obama will be out of office and concentrating on 
   his presidential library oblivious to it all.
   
   They say that most empires in history ended because of the debt they 
   incurred.  This is probably the end of America as we know it.
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Financial Crimes of GW Bush.

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid
  the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
  
  The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war
  costs put on the books properly.
  
  OffWorld
 
 
 
 Your math doesn't make sense.
 
 Bush left office over a year ago.  If he left us with a national debt of 11.3 
 trillion and you're saying that the current national debt clock is 12.5 
 trillion, that's a difference of only 1.2 trillion (despite the fact that 
 the deficit is $1.6 trillion, not 1.2 trillion).
 
 So where are the hidden costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars if Obama put 
 the war costs on the books?  These costs didn't come with revenue attached to 
 them; they are expenses and would therefore be put properly by Obama on the 
 debt side of things.  I always hear that the war in Iraq alone has cost $1 
 trillion.  If that's the case, the national debt clock should be 13.5 
 trillion, not 12.5 trillion.


Perhaps the national debt clock doesn't  include the Bush-era (2003-2008) Iraq 
war costs; that would account for the lower figure.   




[FairfieldLife] Re: Response to Judy

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:

When I accuse you of sophistry is it in regard to a specific 
technique you are using.
   
   I am not using any technique. I'm being completely
   straightforward. You are not.
  
  Yeah, that doesn't work with someone who knows what
  sophistry refers to.
 
 I'm sure you have your own special definition. I'm going
 by the one in my dictionary--
 
 subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
 
 --or Wikipedia:
 
 a specious argument used for deceiving someone
 
 That's what you do. Not all that subtle to those who
 have been following closely (i.e., you and me) but
 sufficiently so to fool casual observers.
 
I am not labeling you as a sophist as an identity. Your
attempt to shift the discussion into being about my 
character mean
   
   There was no such attempt on my part. I made a side comment
   on your post to Willytex about *my* choices, which you
   decided to interpret as a slam on you, which *you* then used
   to shift the discussion to Bad Judy, collaborating with Barry
   to demonize me.
   
   The rest of this is just more of your standard slippery
   sophistry when you've been caught out. As I said, I'm
   pretty sure it'll fool everybody else just fine.
  
  Again you misuse a technical term with zero evidence thinking
  it it a general put down.
 
 Like I say, I'm going by the standard dictionary
 definition. And I've already provided gobs of
 evidence that this is precisely what you do.
 
  I am not buying your bullshit and now after a short drum
  roll what do you do:
   
   FOAD.
  
  FUCK OFF AND DIE, why use an acronym when we can savor your
  malevolence in full by spelling it all out.
 
 I think everyone here knows what the acronym means.
 
 Besides, I like the way the sound of it conveys disgust:
 
 FOAD.


One can only imagine the horror of Judy's personality at the time her father 
considered her to be insufferable prior to Judy learning TM in 1976.  
It's 33 years later……..perhaps her dad embellished what he told her then,  in 
the now-proven false hope that her neuroses would abate.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Response to Judy

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016



One can only imagine the horror of Judy's personality at the time her father 
considered her to be insufferable prior to Judy learning TM in 1976.  
It's 34 years later……..perhaps her dad embellished what he told her then, in 
the now-proven false hope that her neuroses would abate.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:

When I accuse you of sophistry is it in regard to a specific 
technique you are using.
   
   I am not using any technique. I'm being completely
   straightforward. You are not.
  
  Yeah, that doesn't work with someone who knows what
  sophistry refers to.
 
 I'm sure you have your own special definition. I'm going
 by the one in my dictionary--
 
 subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
 
 --or Wikipedia:
 
 a specious argument used for deceiving someone
 
 That's what you do. Not all that subtle to those who
 have been following closely (i.e., you and me) but
 sufficiently so to fool casual observers.
 
I am not labeling you as a sophist as an identity. Your
attempt to shift the discussion into being about my 
character mean
   
   There was no such attempt on my part. I made a side comment
   on your post to Willytex about *my* choices, which you
   decided to interpret as a slam on you, which *you* then used
   to shift the discussion to Bad Judy, collaborating with Barry
   to demonize me.
   
   The rest of this is just more of your standard slippery
   sophistry when you've been caught out. As I said, I'm
   pretty sure it'll fool everybody else just fine.
  
  Again you misuse a technical term with zero evidence thinking
  it it a general put down.
 
 Like I say, I'm going by the standard dictionary
 definition. And I've already provided gobs of
 evidence that this is precisely what you do.
 
  I am not buying your bullshit and now after a short drum
  roll what do you do:
   
   FOAD.
  
  FUCK OFF AND DIE, why use an acronym when we can savor your
  malevolence in full by spelling it all out.
 
 I think everyone here knows what the acronym means.
 
 Besides, I like the way the sound of it conveys disgust:
 
 FOAD.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Response to Judy

2010-03-14 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:

When I accuse you of sophistry is it in regard to a specific 
technique you are using.
   
   I am not using any technique. I'm being completely
   straightforward. You are not.
  
  Yeah, that doesn't work with someone who knows what
  sophistry refers to.
 
 I'm sure you have your own special definition. I'm going
 by the one in my dictionary--
 
 subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
 
 --or Wikipedia:
 
 a specious argument used for deceiving someone
 
 That's what you do. Not all that subtle to those who
 have been following closely (i.e., you and me) but
 sufficiently so to fool casual observers.
 
I am not labeling you as a sophist as an identity. Your
attempt to shift the discussion into being about my 
character mean
   
   There was no such attempt on my part. I made a side comment
   on your post to Willytex about *my* choices, which you
   decided to interpret as a slam on you, which *you* then used
   to shift the discussion to Bad Judy, collaborating with Barry
   to demonize me.
   
   The rest of this is just more of your standard slippery
   sophistry when you've been caught out. As I said, I'm
   pretty sure it'll fool everybody else just fine.
  
  Again you misuse a technical term with zero evidence thinking
  it it a general put down.
 
 Like I say, I'm going by the standard dictionary
 definition. And I've already provided gobs of
 evidence that this is precisely what you do.
 
  I am not buying your bullshit and now after a short drum
  roll what do you do:
   
   FOAD.
  
  FUCK OFF AND DIE, why use an acronym when we can savor your
  malevolence in full by spelling it all out.
 
 I think everyone here knows what the acronym means.
 
 Besides, I like the way the sound of it conveys disgust:
 
 FOAD.


One can only imagine the horror of Judy's personality at the time her father 
considered her to be insufferable prior to Judy learning TM in 1976.  
It's 34 years later……..perhaps her dad embellished what he told her then,  in 
the now-proven false hope that her neuroses would abate.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Did you have this experience in India ? If so how did it influence you ?

2010-03-12 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 snip
 This is a crock, and Curtis knows it's a crock.  

snip
 
 He doesn't agree with my position, but yesterday he made
 it clear that he understood what it was.
 
 Today he egregiously and quite deliberately misrepresents
 it.
 
snip
 That's 50 for me. I'll respond more this evening or
 tomorrow.

When you return, you might apologize to Curtis.  He writing isn't a crock, yet 
you are full of _ _ i t,  the discomfort of which perhaps  drives you to create 
 unfounded  citations of deficiencies in others' logical expressions  and 
imagine misrepresentation of your 'position'. How about assuming a position for 
a self-administered laxative enema ? 
  






[FairfieldLife] Re: Did you have this experience in India ? If so how did it influence you ?

2010-03-12 Thread mainstream20016

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
snip
 
 This is a crock, and Curtis knows it's a crock.
 
snip
 
 He doesn't agree with my position, but yesterday he made
 it clear that he understood what it was.
 
 Today he egregiously and quite deliberately misrepresents
 it.
 
 That's 50 for me. I'll respond more this evening or
 tomorrow.


When you return, you might apologize to Curtis. His writing isn't a crock, yet
you are full of _ _ i t, the discomfort of which perhaps drives you to create 
unfounded citations of deficiencies in others' logical expressions,  and to 
imagine
misrepresentation of your 'position'. 
Please assume a position for a self-administered laxative enema and purge 
before returning.





[FairfieldLife] Re: A possibly impossible task: Is there a cool area of Houston, TX?

2010-03-11 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:

 Rick Archer wrote:
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Buck
  Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:29 PM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A possibly impossible task: Is there a cool
  area of Houston, TX?

  The greater FFL truth about Turq is, he's a CIA operative. A Jason Borne
  
  James Bond spy. Going to Houston? He posein' as a 'writer' in Spanish resort
  towns/ Says he got contracts with big company. You bet, Blackwater in
  Houston. He's clearly a Blackwater man. MMY saw through Turq's soul years
  ago and squeezed him out then. Uncovered him. Remember MMY talking about
  CIA? It evidently was Turq and his friends.

 
  Really Turq, who else was CIA? It's been some decades now since the famous
  Thailand TM course where Maharishi turned out those CIA infiltrators. 
  The CIA infiltrator in Thailand wasn't anything of the sort. He was just
  an innocent guy on whom Maharishi chose to vent his paranoia. 
 
 On my TTC I had to go over to the other hotel one day without my buddy 
 (who was sick) and they let me go alone.  On the way back I saw one of 
 the course participants target practicing with a gun from his third 
 story balcony.  He looked concerned because he didn't expect to see 
 anyone else on the course walking back to the hotel at that time.  I 
 probably should have asked the course coordinators why anyone would have 
 a gun on the course. ;-)


Was it a handgun the CP was firing ?If so, it was probably Doug Birx, the 
current Sidhis program administrator leading the Invincible America course in 
the men's dome.  :)
Doug supposedly loves handguns and fires them regularly.




[FairfieldLife] Re: George Dubya Bush in a Dream

2010-03-10 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:

 In my dream, I submitted a short paper to Bush about my analysis of a small 
 town called Sausalito in California.  He read it and appeared to approve the 
 contents of the report.  But he soon rewrote the paper to include his own 
 thoughts using words that came from prior reports, using typical government 
 phrases and presentation.  In the end, the report became a thick analysis of 
 what was supposed to be an informal paper.
 
 I then found out that he actually had bought a piece of land several miles 
 north of the town.  He was farming the land for his own interest.
 
 This is an interesting dream in that I'm not a registered Republican nor have 
 I voted for him when he was running for president.
 
 Does anyone know what the symbolism of this dream means?



Sausalito has a new village idiot. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Janis Joplin's Original Band, Big Brother and the Holding Company In Fairfie

2010-03-05 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
 
  I wonder how many of the original members are in this 2010 version.
 
 When we were at MIU remember the rumor that Susy Levin had sung with Big 
 Brother before Janis?
 

 Suzy Levin (now Dillbeck) let her hair down on-stage with a rock band to sing 
with great voice and incredible stage presence at the wedding reception of 
Chris Jones and Ellen Abrams in '80 or '81.  The woman had great talent as a 
rock-and -roller.  Yeah,  she had the chops to have done it at that level - not 
surprised by the BB  H Co. rumor.   

 
 
 
  
  Of the 5 original Beachboys, how many beside Mike Love still tour?  Or is 
  it just Mike?
  
  At least with The Who you've got 50% of the members still alive (Pete 
  Townsend and Roger Daltry) although, for my money, the group died with 
  Keith Moon.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  
   
   IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE: Janis Joplin's Original Band, Big Brother and 
   The Holding Company in Fairfield, Iowa on Thursday the 15th of April at 
   the Fairfield Arts and Convention Center.

   On Thursday the 15th of April, Simple Man Enterprises Presents Janis 
   Joplin's Original Band, Big Brother and the Holding Company, with BMA 
   nominee, Blusion artist, Eddie Devilboy Turner at the Fairfield Arts 
   and Convention Center in Fairfield, Iowa. Tickets are $22 in advanced, 
   with a percentage of the proceeds going to the SME music scholarship fund 
   for area high school students. Last years scholarship was given to Andrew 
   Powers of Fort Madison, Ia.
   The doors open at 6:30pm and the show starts at 7:30pm. This is a one 
   time show and tickets are limited.   

   Big Brother and The Holding Company( www.bbhc.com/ )are primarily 
   remembered as the group that gave Janis Joplin her start. But Big Brother 
   also occupies a significant place in the history of San Francisco 
   psychedelic rock, as one of the bands that best captured the era's 
   loosest, reckless, and indulgent qualities in its high-energy mutations 
   of blues and folk-rock.
   
   Big Brother was formed in 1965 in the Haight-Ashbury; by the time Joplin 
   joined in mid-1966, the lineup was and still is(with the exception of the 
   late James Gurley, who just passed away in December), Sam Andrew and 
   James Gurley on guitar, Peter Albin on bass, and David Getz on drums. 
   BBHC currently tours with a new guitar player and talented female 
   vocalist. 
   
   Big Brother catapulted themselves into national attention with their 
   performance at the Monterey Pop Festival in June 1967, particularly with 
   Joplin's galvanizing interpretation of Ball and Chain (which was a 
   highlight of the film of the event). High-powered management and record 
   label bids rolled in immediately, but unfortunately the group had tied 
   themselves up in a bad contract with the small Mainstream label, at a 
   time where they were stranded on the road and needed cash. Their one 
   Mainstream album (released in 1967), contains some of their stronger 
   cuts, such as Down on Me and Coo Coo. It didn't fully capture the 
   band's strengths, and with the help of new high-powered manager Albert 
   Grossman (also handler of Bob Dylan, The Band and Peter, Paul  Mary), 
   they extricated themselves from the Mainstream deal and signed with 
   Columbia.
   
   The Big Brother album for Columbia that featured Joplin, Cheap Thrills 
   (1968), Celebrated its 40th Anniversary 2 years ago. It was assembled 
   from both studio sessions and live material. Cheap Thrills went to number 
   one when it was finally released, and though it too was an erratic 
   affair, it contained some of the best moments of acid rock's glory days, 
   including Ball and Chain, Summertime, Combination of the Two, and 
   Piece of My Heart. 
   
   Cheap Thrills made Big Brother superstars. By the end of 1968, Joplin had 
   decided to go solo, a move from which neither she nor Big Brother ever 
   fully recovered. Big Brother and the Holding Company still tour today on 
   rare occasions and they bring with them an extremely talented female 
   vocalist, who never lets you forget who Big Brother and the Holding 
   Company are. 

   Also filling the bill, is national Blusion recording artists(Northern 
   Blues Records) and Blues Music Award nominee, Eddie Devilboy Turner( 
   www.eddiedevilboy.com http://www.eddiedevilboy.com/  ). 
 
   If you're seeking a guitar player that can channel the spirit of Jimi 
   Hendrix then look no further than Eddie Turner.
   If anybody ever went down to the Crossroads and let the Devil tune his
   guitar it was probably Eddie Turner. Man, you get chills every time the 
   guy
   strikes a note! And the expressions he makes while he's talking out each
   lick leave one convinced he's 

[FairfieldLife] Hillary Slams Greenspan's 2001 tax cut rationale

2010-03-04 Thread mainstream20016
See Reuters' account of 2/25/10 testimony on the Hill:

http://tinyurl.com/yd3xodn



[FairfieldLife] Re: The W T F Factor

2010-03-02 Thread mainstream20016
For a day or two this posting week,  a glimpse of maturity appeared.  Now, the 
sixth-grader has reappeared.  Go away, sixth grader ! Don't take the bait !
Re-enter the classroom devoid of juvenile neuroses.  You can do it.  





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Speaking only for myself, your reason is bogus.
  
  There is only one reason for all of this, Curtis, and I
  think we both know what it is.
  
  She'd laid low for the early part of the week and had not 
  achieved her normal quota of using at least half her posts
  to rag on one or the both of us. Now she has.
 
 Now that both of you have made a special effort to start
 some fights.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Let's hear it for Jerry+Any particular question lingering for the last 30 ye

2010-02-28 Thread mainstream20016
Willy,
 Whereas  Jay Latham's Galaxy of Fire apparently profusely praises 
Jerry Jarvis, it is more than a tad deceptive to quote Latham's book 
immediately after extensively identifying down to the ISBN, Thirty Years 
around the World.  

Please identify the page numbers of Thirty Years around the World that 
support the idea that the TMO acknowledged Jerry Jarvis.  

- Mainstream






(Judy wrote:) 
   Maybe, but he was also *excluded*--persona non grata.


(Willy wrote:)
 Maybe you're thinking of Deepak Chopra?
 

(Curtis wrote:) 
  He was written out of the movement's first history books 
  for Shiva's sake!  As if SIMS had never existed.
 

(Willy wrote:)
 Maybe so, but not in this early Maharishi history:
 
 'Thirty Years Around the World'
 Dawn of the Age of Enlightenment - Volume 1 1957 - 1964
 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi 
 MVU Press, Netherlands, 1986
 No. 1008 ISBN 90 71750 01 9
 Hardback. Gold gilt edge. 600 p.
 Illustrated. Appendix. Index.
 
 Read more:
 
 This was a great time for TM. Maharishi had a fantastic 
 organization in the States. Jerry Jarvis was our national 
 leader and, in my opinion, the most popular leader in the 
 history of the TM movement other than Maharishi. Under 
 Jerry were four regional coordinators. Charlie Donahue was 
 in charge of the Eastern USA. Bobby Lee ran the South. 
 
 Stan Crowe and Bill Witherspoon headed up the Midwest and 
 Western states. Under them were state coordinators and 
 regional lecturers such as John Shaw and Larry Kutt, two 
 personal friends of mine. We were one well-coordinated, 
 motivated, successful group, coast-to-coast. 
 
 The result of this organization was that more than one 
 million people started TM in the United States by the end 
 of the seventies. Under the leadership of Maharishi, 
 Jerry Jarvis and the four regional coordinators, around 
 forty thousand people per month were starting TM, making 
 the American TM organization the most successful of all 
 the countries teaching TM in the world...
 
 Work cited:
 
 Galaxy of Fire
 by Jay Latham
 Sunstar, 2000
 p. 219-220.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- do the math

2010-02-20 Thread mainstream20016
The 50 post / week limit has the potential to improve post quality and thereby 
maximize the utilization of one's attention. 
I far prefer seeing your name attached to 1 of 8 posts -
50 out of 412 of last week's total FFL posts;
as opposed to seeing your name attached to only 1 of 10+ posts -  
482 out of 5,152 of Oct., '06's total FFL posts, the last month FFL went 
without posting limits.





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 Let's see if this analysis of posting frequency holds
 up under examination.
 
 After Barry had made his first post, one (or more)
 of his pals got to him quickly to let him know the
 arithmetic he wanted us to let him do for us (because
 we weren't smart enough to do it ourselves, you see)
 wasn't quite on the up-and-up. He hastily got out in
 front of that embarrassing situation, so there's no
 need for me to go over it again. A narrow escape, that!
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   Just in case anyone is incapable of doing the
   math and realizing what the result would be
   of getting rid of the posting limits, I'll do
   the math for you.
  
  Ooopsie. :-) Even though it would be fun to
  see THE CORRECTOR waste five posts correcting
  my math, I'll do it myself.
 
 Actually one would have been more than sufficient.
 Would've been fun, but there's plenty to correct
 besides Barry's arithmetic.
 
   This week one of the people *for whom the post-
   ing limits were originally created* got her
   panties in a bunch over Curtis and managed to
   make 50 posts in slightly less than 75 hours.
 
 Only 10 of them in the brawl with Curtis.
 
 Note what Barry doesn't mention--and what Curtis
 won't tell you either: the brawl erupted because
 Curtis got *his* panties in a bunch over an 11-word
 one-liner of mine. He also made 10 posts in that
 brawl over the same period.
 
   That's basically 1.5 posts per hour, average.
  
  Really . posts per hour. Assuming that she
  slept at least 24 of those 75 hours, that's an
  average of 1 post per waking hour.
  
   If she were free to do what she used to do, 
   that means she would be making an estimated
   252 posts per week.
  
  More like 112 posts per week. Mea culpa.
 
 Even this, of course, isn't right. Only if I'd
 continued posting at the same rate would I have
 been making 112 posts that week.
 
 In the case of the fight with Curtis, as he has
 noted (to Barry, so Barry is aware of this), 
 Curtis pursued the fight so assiduously because
 was snowed in over the weekend and had time on
 his hands; and I usually make most of my posts
 on the weekend. It's highly unlikely the fight
 would have continued at the same rate into the
 rest of the week.
 
  Which, interestingly, is pretty much on the
  money given actual past history. During the 
  month of October 2006 (the pre-posting limits
  Bad Old Days), FFL's top 3 posters (accounting 
  for almost a third of all posts) were:
  
  1. shempmcgurk -- 541 (11.6%)
  2. sparaig -- 533 (11.4%)
  3. authfriend -- 482 (10.3%)
 
 From Barry's earlier post:
 
   I would remind people WHY the posting
   limits were created in the first place.
   Three posters -- two still present, one
   now gone -- were essentially Out Of 
   Control and using their ability to post 
   as much as they wanted to drown out 
   others here.
 
 This is just silly. Nobody makes posts to drown
 out other posters. It's impossible on the face
 of it, not to mention undesirable (fewer posts to
 respond to). To the extent other posters were
 drowned out, we'd be left talking to ourselves.
 And unlike some other posters here, the three of
 us don't often initiate threads or spam the group
 with reams of copy-and-paste material. We're
 interested in *conversation*.
 
 And the numbers themselves squash Barry's drown
 out theory. Just for example, in October 2006
 there was a total of 5,152 posts in the group. If
 the three of us made 30 percent of them, it means
 there were around 3,606 posts made by others--so
 they were hardly drowned out. And my 50 posts
 from Friday through Monday this past week were out
 of a total of 410 posts for that period. Again,
 nobody got drowned out.
 
 The number of posts an individual makes has to do
 with their interest, energy, and time, not with how
 many posts anybody else makes--except that if others
 are posting a lot, the individual has more posts to
 respond to and might well therefore make *more posts
 than s/he would otherwise*.
 
 In other words, it works exactly the opposite from
 what Barry claims.
 
   It was not uncommon for them 
   to make hundreds of posts per week.
 
 False (unless Barry is speaking of the three of us
 collectively). I often made more than 100 posts per
 week, but never more than 150 or so and usually many
 fewer. I doubt Shemp or Willytex ever went over 150
 a week either.
 
  When 
   asked to voluntarily 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- do the math

2010-02-20 Thread mainstream20016
The 50 post/week limit wonderfully frustrates the sixth grader in the body of a 
senior citizen and minimizes her opportunity to suck on the oxygen of our 
attention to feed her juvenile neuroses.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  The 50 post / week limit has the potential to improve post
  quality and thereby maximize the utilization of one's
  attention.
 
 I disagree, but that isn't what I was discussing.
 I was simply pointing out that Barry's notion
 of prolific posters trying to drown out other
 posters was nonsense (among several other nitwit
 things he said).
 
 
 
  I far prefer seeing your name attached to 1 of 8 posts -
  50 out of 412 of last week's total FFL posts;
  as opposed to seeing your name attached to only 1 of 10+ posts -  
  482 out of 5,152 of Oct., '06's total FFL posts, the last month FFL went 
  without posting limits.
  
  
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   Let's see if this analysis of posting frequency holds
   up under examination.
   
   After Barry had made his first post, one (or more)
   of his pals got to him quickly to let him know the
   arithmetic he wanted us to let him do for us (because
   we weren't smart enough to do it ourselves, you see)
   wasn't quite on the up-and-up. He hastily got out in
   front of that embarrassing situation, so there's no
   need for me to go over it again. A narrow escape, that!
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:

 Just in case anyone is incapable of doing the
 math and realizing what the result would be
 of getting rid of the posting limits, I'll do
 the math for you.

Ooopsie. :-) Even though it would be fun to
see THE CORRECTOR waste five posts correcting
my math, I'll do it myself.
   
   Actually one would have been more than sufficient.
   Would've been fun, but there's plenty to correct
   besides Barry's arithmetic.
   
 This week one of the people *for whom the post-
 ing limits were originally created* got her
 panties in a bunch over Curtis and managed to
 make 50 posts in slightly less than 75 hours.
   
   Only 10 of them in the brawl with Curtis.
   
   Note what Barry doesn't mention--and what Curtis
   won't tell you either: the brawl erupted because
   Curtis got *his* panties in a bunch over an 11-word
   one-liner of mine. He also made 10 posts in that
   brawl over the same period.
   
 That's basically 1.5 posts per hour, average.

Really . posts per hour. Assuming that she
slept at least 24 of those 75 hours, that's an
average of 1 post per waking hour.

 If she were free to do what she used to do, 
 that means she would be making an estimated
 252 posts per week.

More like 112 posts per week. Mea culpa.
   
   Even this, of course, isn't right. Only if I'd
   continued posting at the same rate would I have
   been making 112 posts that week.
   
   In the case of the fight with Curtis, as he has
   noted (to Barry, so Barry is aware of this), 
   Curtis pursued the fight so assiduously because
   was snowed in over the weekend and had time on
   his hands; and I usually make most of my posts
   on the weekend. It's highly unlikely the fight
   would have continued at the same rate into the
   rest of the week.
   
Which, interestingly, is pretty much on the
money given actual past history. During the 
month of October 2006 (the pre-posting limits
Bad Old Days), FFL's top 3 posters (accounting 
for almost a third of all posts) were:

1. shempmcgurk -- 541 (11.6%)
2. sparaig -- 533 (11.4%)
3. authfriend -- 482 (10.3%)
   
   From Barry's earlier post:
   
 I would remind people WHY the posting
 limits were created in the first place.
 Three posters -- two still present, one
 now gone -- were essentially Out Of 
 Control and using their ability to post 
 as much as they wanted to drown out 
 others here.
   
   This is just silly. Nobody makes posts to drown
   out other posters. It's impossible on the face
   of it, not to mention undesirable (fewer posts to
   respond to). To the extent other posters were
   drowned out, we'd be left talking to ourselves.
   And unlike some other posters here, the three of
   us don't often initiate threads or spam the group
   with reams of copy-and-paste material. We're
   interested in *conversation*.
   
   And the numbers themselves squash Barry's drown
   out theory. Just for example, in October 2006
   there was a total of 5,152 posts in the group. If
   the three of us made 30 percent of them, it means
   there were around 3,606 posts made by others--so
   they were hardly drowned out. And my 50 posts
   from Friday through Monday

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- do the math

2010-02-20 Thread mainstream20016
A 50 post limit frustrates the sixth grader in the body of a senior citizen, 
and minimizes her sucking the oxygen of our attention to feed her juvenile 
neuroses.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  The 50 post / week limit has the potential to improve post
  quality and thereby maximize the utilization of one's
  attention.
 
 I disagree, but that isn't what I was discussing.
 I was simply pointing out that Barry's notion
 of prolific posters trying to drown out other
 posters was nonsense (among several other nitwit
 things he said).
 
 
 
  I far prefer seeing your name attached to 1 of 8 posts -
  50 out of 412 of last week's total FFL posts;
  as opposed to seeing your name attached to only 1 of 10+ posts -  
  482 out of 5,152 of Oct., '06's total FFL posts, the last month FFL went 
  without posting limits.
  
  
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   Let's see if this analysis of posting frequency holds
   up under examination.
   
   After Barry had made his first post, one (or more)
   of his pals got to him quickly to let him know the
   arithmetic he wanted us to let him do for us (because
   we weren't smart enough to do it ourselves, you see)
   wasn't quite on the up-and-up. He hastily got out in
   front of that embarrassing situation, so there's no
   need for me to go over it again. A narrow escape, that!
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:

 Just in case anyone is incapable of doing the
 math and realizing what the result would be
 of getting rid of the posting limits, I'll do
 the math for you.

Ooopsie. :-) Even though it would be fun to
see THE CORRECTOR waste five posts correcting
my math, I'll do it myself.
   
   Actually one would have been more than sufficient.
   Would've been fun, but there's plenty to correct
   besides Barry's arithmetic.
   
 This week one of the people *for whom the post-
 ing limits were originally created* got her
 panties in a bunch over Curtis and managed to
 make 50 posts in slightly less than 75 hours.
   
   Only 10 of them in the brawl with Curtis.
   
   Note what Barry doesn't mention--and what Curtis
   won't tell you either: the brawl erupted because
   Curtis got *his* panties in a bunch over an 11-word
   one-liner of mine. He also made 10 posts in that
   brawl over the same period.
   
 That's basically 1.5 posts per hour, average.

Really . posts per hour. Assuming that she
slept at least 24 of those 75 hours, that's an
average of 1 post per waking hour.

 If she were free to do what she used to do, 
 that means she would be making an estimated
 252 posts per week.

More like 112 posts per week. Mea culpa.
   
   Even this, of course, isn't right. Only if I'd
   continued posting at the same rate would I have
   been making 112 posts that week.
   
   In the case of the fight with Curtis, as he has
   noted (to Barry, so Barry is aware of this), 
   Curtis pursued the fight so assiduously because
   was snowed in over the weekend and had time on
   his hands; and I usually make most of my posts
   on the weekend. It's highly unlikely the fight
   would have continued at the same rate into the
   rest of the week.
   
Which, interestingly, is pretty much on the
money given actual past history. During the 
month of October 2006 (the pre-posting limits
Bad Old Days), FFL's top 3 posters (accounting 
for almost a third of all posts) were:

1. shempmcgurk -- 541 (11.6%)
2. sparaig -- 533 (11.4%)
3. authfriend -- 482 (10.3%)
   
   From Barry's earlier post:
   
 I would remind people WHY the posting
 limits were created in the first place.
 Three posters -- two still present, one
 now gone -- were essentially Out Of 
 Control and using their ability to post 
 as much as they wanted to drown out 
 others here.
   
   This is just silly. Nobody makes posts to drown
   out other posters. It's impossible on the face
   of it, not to mention undesirable (fewer posts to
   respond to). To the extent other posters were
   drowned out, we'd be left talking to ourselves.
   And unlike some other posters here, the three of
   us don't often initiate threads or spam the group
   with reams of copy-and-paste material. We're
   interested in *conversation*.
   
   And the numbers themselves squash Barry's drown
   out theory. Just for example, in October 2006
   there was a total of 5,152 posts in the group. If
   the three of us made 30 percent of them, it means
   there were around 3,606 posts made by others--so
   they were hardly drowned out. And my 50 posts
   from Friday through Monday this past week were out

[FairfieldLife] Re: Yahoo! News Photo - U.S. President Barack Obama bows to Tampa Mayor Pam Iori

2010-02-01 Thread mainstream20016
I suppose you'd recommend to Obama that he not bow occasionally, but yet  bend 
completely forward repeatedly, as you do for Bush and Cheney.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@... wrote:

 Mike Dixon (mdixon.6...@...) has sent you a news photo. (Email address has 
 not been verified.)
 
 Personal message:
 
 Obama bows again, LOL!
 
 U.S. President Barack Obama bows to Tampa Mayor Pam Iorio at ... - Yahoo! 
 News Photos
 http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/President-Barack-Obama/photo//100128/480/b07861589f354ce698c3bf88b741d692/
 
 
 Yahoo! News http://news.yahoo.com/





[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count

2010-02-01 Thread mainstream20016
There is a God.  Only more 8 posts, and peace for 10 days

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@... wrote:

 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): Sat Jan 30 00:00:00 2010
 End Date (UTC): Sat Feb 06 00:00:00 2010
 291 messages as of (UTC) Tue Feb 02 00:10:06 2010
 
 43 authfriend jst...@...
 28 curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
 25 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 18 Rick Archer r...@...
 17 WillyTex willy...@...
 13 ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@...
 13 Hugo richardhughes...@...
 12 Vaj vajradh...@...
 12 do.rflex do.rf...@...
 11 Joe geezerfr...@...
 10 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 10 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.r...@...
 10 Irmeli irmeli.matts...@...
 10 Bhairitu noozg...@...
  8 wayback71 waybac...@...
  8 Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@...
  6 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  6 John jr_...@...
  5 raunchydog raunchy...@...
  4 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  4 Doug dhamiltony...@...
  3 mainstream20016 mainstream20...@...
  3 Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@...
  3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@...
  2 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@...
  2 Duveyoung no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  2 BillyG wg...@...
  1 shukra69 shukr...@...
  1 guyfawkes91 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  1 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Posters: 30
 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
 =
 Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
 US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
 Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
 Standard Time (Winter):
 US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
 Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
 For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com





[FairfieldLife] Re: Our nostalgia for Bush and Cheney

2010-01-31 Thread mainstream20016
The perpetual war constituency stokes fears repeatedly to justify the highly 
profitable military excursions throughout the world. 

Obama placates these interests knowing JFK paid the highest price for trying to 
dismantle the CIA post Bay of Pigs.

Even Eisenhower probably couldn't envision the military / industrial complex of 
 the 
Cheney /Bush/and now Obama era and the greatly expanded the role of private 
contractors who supplant the traditional armed services in all things military. 
 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 From Glenn Greenwald today:
 
 ...There is clearly a bipartisan and institutional 
 craving for a revival...of the core premise of 
 Bush/Cheney radicalism:  that because we're at 
 war with Terrorists, our standard precepts of 
 justice and due process do not apply and, indeed, 
 must be violated
 
 We collectively pretended for a little while to 
 regret the excesses of the Bush/Cheney approach to 
 such matters.  But it's now crystal clear that the 
 country, especially its ruling elite, is either too 
 petrified of Terrorism and/or too enamored of the 
 powers which that fear enables to accept any real 
 changes from the policies that were supposedly such 
 a profound violation of our values.
 
 ...What was once the most basic and defining
 American principle -- the State must charge someone
 with a crime and give them a fair trial in order to
 imprison them -- has been magically transformed into
 Leftist extremismRead the official policy of
 the Reagan Administration...:
 
 Another important measure we have developed in our 
 overall strategy is applying the rule of law to 
 terrorists. Terrorists are criminals. They commit 
 criminal actions like murder, kidnapping, and 
 arson, and countries have laws to punish criminals. 
 So a major element of our strategy has been to 
 delegitimize terrorists, to get society to see them 
 for what they are -- criminals -- and to use 
 democracy's most potent tool, the rule of law 
 against them
 
 How much clearer evidence can there be of how 
 warped and extremist we've become on these matters? 
 The express policies of the right-wing Ronald 
 Reagan...are now considered...the exclusive 
 province of civil liberties extremists.
 
 In those rare cases when Obama does what Reagan's 
 policy demanded...he is attacked as being Soft on 
 Terror by Democrats and Republicans alike.  And 
 the mere notion that we should prosecute torturers 
 (as Reagan bound the U.S. to do) -- or even hold 
 them accountable in ways short of criminal 
 proceedings -- is now the hallmark of a Far Leftist 
 Purist.  That's how far we've fallen, how extremist 
 our political consensus has become.
 
 Read more:
 
 http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/31/nostalgia/index.html
 
 http://tinyurl.com/ybnxfyu





[FairfieldLife] Re: Yogastah Kuru Karmani

2010-01-30 Thread mainstream20016
 
 John jr_esq@ wrote:
 
  Your ideas in this discussion are well intentioned.  But there must be a 
  reason why MMY insisted on practicing these siddhi techniques.  No one in 
  this forum has even entertained the possibility that MMY himself has 
  experienced all of the Patanjali siddhis, including levitation.  Perhaps, 
  he has shared this secret to only a few of his closest disciples.  They 
  could come out in the future to attest this fact about MMY.

Nablusoss wrote:
 It will happen, perhaps. For example the tape from Seelisberg where the 
 videoguy in the bus outside Kulm who had the tape running and was waiting for 
 Maharishi to come. He did, slowly from the celing above and settled on the 
 couch. 
 Sooner or later it will be shown, I suppose. :-)


Nabby,
The story was most likely a spicy ingredient of the hype program that 
surrounded the introduction of the Sidhis, and nothing more. I'm surprised the 
story has not yet faded from your memory.  Have you, Nabby, seen this tape, or 
have you only heard of it?   Would you mind sharing more of your understanding 
about this occasion ?  

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Fwd: Vote for Consciousness-Based Education at Change.org

2010-01-28 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo richardhughes...@... wrote:

 Don't get me started. I think yagyas are a criminal rip-off. I know
 so many people who have spent so much on thses prayers to the gods.
 I wouldn't mind if they'd admit that's what they were but no, it's a 
 technology of natural law. Bullshit.


The TMO Yagya program,  highest profit margin product of the TMO ( the number 
and scale of yagyas recommended determined much more by the financial resources 
of the applicant than his birth chart ) is the antithesis of the idea of 
personal evolution through personal experience.  It seems that the long-term 
plan of the TMO at the time of MMY's passing was to maximize the yagya program 
as opposed to maximizing the teaching of the TM technique to individuals. 
The TMO's continued commitment to the development of the Brahmasthan of India's 
vast landscape of thousands of partially completed buildings necessarily limits 
the TMO's meager effort to teach the TM technique. The Brahmasthan of India's 
present and future drain of resources will send the TMO into obscurity.
  
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Sinclair Lewis's It Can't Happen Hear

2009-11-13 Thread mainstream20016




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:

 I've read the first few chapters of the book so far and all I can say is 
 they had the same kind of fathead conservatives back in the 1930's as we 
 do today who didn't want the rich taxed.And of course many these so 
 called conservatives aren't rich but just useful idiots for the rich.  
 Worth a read and you even should be able to find a copy at a used book 
 store (I had to ask as they put it in the classics section).


Bhairitu,
Thanks for  your recommendation  of Sinclair Lewis's 1930's book, and your take 
on the rich then and now.  The dismantling of the progressive taxation system 
over the past 45 years is destroying the Middle Class in America, which is 
dimming the hopes of the 3rd world for America as a model to emulate.
Last May, as hearings were planned on Health Care Reform,  I called the office 
of Senator Baucus, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, to object to the 
concept of paying for health reform through revenue generated from taxes on 
existing Cadillac health plans.  I was referred to a Senate Finance Committee 
staffer  who kindly spent considerable  time  hearing my opinion  (this was 
well before the subject hit a fever-pitch level of the late Summer).
At one  point in the conversation, I inquired of the Senate Finance Committee 
staffer's  knowledge of  America's 20th century personal income rates.  
Although the  Finance committee staffer know of the concept of a Progressive 
Tax system, he was surprised to learn of the Progressive Taxation rates on 
personal income from the 1930s to the 1960s.  Progressive Taxation is so far 
removed from the awareness of even our best and brightest.  This must change, 
and the Progressive Tax system must return fully to prevent America's descent 
back into the historical norm of either extreme wealth or extreme poverty, and 
a scant few middle class.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Sinclair Lewis's It Can't Happen Hear

2009-11-13 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 
 
 mainstream wrote:
  The dismantling of the progressive taxation 
  system over the past 45 years is destroying 
  the Middle Class in America...
 
 So, you're in favor of a progressive tax, a 
 tax by which the tax rate increases as the 
 taxable amount of income increases.
 
 And, you're not in favor of a regressive tax, 
 where the tax rate decreases as the amount 
 subject to taxation increases. 
 
 Then, you're not in favor of individual rights 
 and equality under the law.
 
 And, you're not in favor of a flat tax where 
 a fixed amount of tax is paid per individual 
 in accordance with the census.
 
 But, where in the U.S. Constitution does it 
 say anything about Americans paying a federal
 income tax?
 
 Ron Paul on Tax Reform:
 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Tax_Reform.htm


W.T.'s well-informed knowledge base is unfortunately  encased in a mortal coil 
afflicted by oppressive Lone Star State heat suffocating any capacity for his 
or anyone else's contentment.  



[FairfieldLife] Re: Interesting MUM Developments

2009-10-20 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii...@... wrote:

  (snip)
   Seeking benefits is stupid.
   Meditate and enjoy, that is Maharishi's advice.
  
  No need to seek, but it's good to be aware.
 
 When one become aware, that the 'Outside World' is delusionary, then one 
 becomes a 'Seeker of the Spiritual Realm'...
 Until that happens, one will be 'Looking for Results'...in the 'Material 
 World'...
 
 It is obvious that the students, which inhabit the campus, have nothing to do 
 with the 'Original M.I.U.
 
 M.I.U. was started by a group of 'Spiritual Seekers' who in coordination with 
 Maharishi, decided to start a school, which would integerate the knowledge of 
 the 'West' with the Vedic knowledge of the 'East', with 'Like Minded 
 People'...gathered together...
 
 This generation, has been so brain-washed by the 'International Corporate 
 Take-over'...
 That it is hard for them, to imagine, anything, not related to the 'Corporate 
 Material World of Illusion'...
 
 These students have a different intention, than the original students...that 
 of spiritual seekers...
 These students are seeking the kind of material success that can be found at 
 any various schools throughout the country...
 They are wasting time and resources, being in Fairfield, and should be 
 expelled immediately...
 
 Don't expect Bevan Morris to come to the rescue, anytime soon, or later, 
 either...
 He sucked all the energy from Maharishi, that he could, and chased away any 
 fun, and free-spiritedness, that would have kept the 'Movement of Seeking' 
 alive...
 
 Bevan contributed to the death of this college, and now that his work is 
 done, he is off, who knows where?
 
 R.J.G.



When an institution  formerly  based on Subjective Inner Experience has  
long-since abandoned its uniqueness through  diversifying its product line by 
creating excessively high-profit-margin products marketed to every field of  
the Objective Outer world,  are you surprised that the idealistic young might 
poke a stick into the eye of said institution ?







[FairfieldLife] Re: My Radio Show

2009-10-18 Thread mainstream20016
May you have much good fortune via your radio program, Rick.  I initially was 
tempted to paraphrase a saying regarding the suspect validity of a public 
statement implying one's own state of full realization.   While trying to 
locate an exact quote, I found this instead: 

(From 'Be Here Now', page 96, The Course of Sadhana) -
Doing sadhana can be as much of a trap as any other melodrama.  It is useful 
to have some perspective about the path in order to keep yourself from getting 
too caught up in the stage in which you are working.  These pointers might help:
1.  Each stage that one can label must pass away.  Even the labeling will 
ultimately pass.
 A person who says, I'm enlightened probably isn't. endquote



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 OK Gang. It's getting rather dull around here. Time to stir things up. I'm
 starting a radio show. I've taped the pilot. If it gets approved, which it
 should it will be broadcast on the local radio station -
 http://www.kruufm.com/ - and streamed on the web. It will be a live call-in
 show. It will also be videoed and broadcast on the local public access TV
 station. I started a YouTube channel where I'll post all the videos. I'll
 post the first one this afternoon and post a link here. Stay tuned.
  
 Show Script:
 Music: 30 seconds.
 Intro: Hi, my name is Rick Archer and you're listening to AWAKENINGS, right
 here on KRUU-LP 100.1 FM, 'The Voice of Fairfield, Iowa... and Beyond,'
 independent, open source, listener-supported, solar-powered, grassroots
 community radio, broadcasting from the cultural district in Fairfield, Iowa.
 
 Many of us here in Fairfield feel that we live in a special community. If
 you ask us what makes it special, we'll probably recite a list of events and
 accomplishments, such as concerts, the Art Walk, MUM and its activities, the
 Arts and Convention Center, the Roosevelt Recreation Center, the Loop Trail,
 KRUU-FM, ecological initiatives, various awards, and so on. 
 This show is about something just as wonderful as all those things, but less
 obvious: dozens, if not hundreds, of people in this town are undergoing a
 shift to a radically different state of consciousness which is transforming
 their understanding of themselves and the world. For some, this shift has
 been abrupt and dramatic. For others, it has been so gradual that they may
 not have realized it has occurred. The purpose of this show will be to
 enable these people to tell their stories.
 Such shifts, or Awakenings, are not new: Christ spoke of the Kingdom of
 Heaven within, Buddhists speak of Nirvana, Zen masters of Satori, Hindus of
 Moksha, psychologist Abraham Maslow coined the phrase self-actualization,
 and millions of people around the world, including many without religious or
 spiritual inclinations, report having experienced peak or mystical
 experiences. So we're talking about something timeless and universal.
 Something which hopefully will interest a broad spectrum of our listeners,
 rather than just the local meditating community.
 Those of us who did learn to meditate two, three, or four decades ago were
 told that after 5-8 years we could expect to reach a state called Cosmic
 Consciousness. Most people feel that prediction didn't pan out. They think
 maybe Maharishi was overly optimistic, giving us a sales pitch, or trying
 not to discourage us. In fact, I once heard Maharishi say, speaking
 metaphorically, that if you meet a man in a desert, you should tell him that
 water is just a mile away, even though you know it's 10 miles away, because
 if you tell him the truth, he'll be too discouraged to go on. 
 Some people in Fairfield have become discouraged, and have abandoned
 spiritual aspirations. Others still meditate for various reasons, but are
 skeptical of claims of higher states of consciousness. When I started
 telling friends about my intention to do this show, many were enthusiastic,
 but some said, (sarcastically) Right. You're going to interview people who
 think they're enlightened. I guess some people find it hard to believe that
 apparently ordinary friends and neighbors might be experiencing something
 extraordinary. Maybe they expect Enlightenment to look as remarkable on the
 outside as it is reputed to be on the inside.
 As Christ put it, A prophet is not without honor except in his hometown and
 in his own household. This is not to imply that the guests on this show
 will be prophets, or that they should be honored, but I think the point is
 apt. 
 This show will attempt to dispel skepticism and misconceptions by week after
 week, allowing otherwise ordinary people in our community and elsewhere to
 relate their experience of spiritual awakening. The terminology is tricky,
 because there are no universally agreed upon definitions to describe this
 experience. So please forgive us if we use some unfamiliar terms. We'll try
 to clarify our definitions as we go along.
 I hope that after a 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Gallup: Hillary Clinton Now More Popular Than Barack Obama

2009-10-16 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of raunchydog
 Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 8:57 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gallup: Hillary Clinton Now More Popular Than
 Barack Obama
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com ]
  On Behalf Of raunchydog
  Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:13 AM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Gallup: Hillary Clinton Now More Popular Than
  Barack Obama
  
  
  Hillary Clinton lost the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination to Barack
  Obama, but in one respect she now ranks ahead of Obama. The president's
  current favorable rating of 56% is down 22 percentage points since
 January.
  Over the same time span, Clinton's favorable rating has changed little,
 and
  now, at 62%, it exceeds Obama's. 
  Probably because Obama has been on the firing line and Hillary has been
 more
  in the background. If she had become President and Obama had become
  Secretary of State, her popularity would have tanked and his would be much
  higher.
 
 
 Don't be so sure. Perhaps it's comforting for Obots to think Hillary's
 approval would have tanked had she been president, because they can't
 believe anyone could possibly like her. But, we'll never know.
 
 The other day Hillary said that had she won the presidency she would have
 asked Obama to serve in her cabinet. I doubt she would have chosen him for
 Secretary of State. Such a position requires work not window dressing. Let's
 face it, the reason Hillary has a higher favorability rating compared to
 Obama is that people see her as the workhorse and Obama as the show pony.
  
 In your dreams. Hillary has always attracted criticism like a lightening
 rod, and she would be getting ripped to shreds as president. She's just not
 in a position now to attract much criticism. She's not making controversial
 decisions and is largely out of the public eye. Your comment above implies
 that Obama is not working hard. I'll bet you would take a week to recover
 from having to live through one of his days.


Rick,   raunchy is advocating HIllary's abilities, not her own.  Contrasting 
HIllary's approval ratings with Obama's is an irrelevant exercise, except to 
salve the perpetually open-wounds of Hillary supporters.   The idea that 
Hillary is still publicly commenting on how she would have dealt with Obama had 
she won says so much about Hillary's continuing sense of entitlement. 
 Hillary's performance and high approval ratings as Obama's Sec. of State is 
aided by Obama's outstanding level of support internationally.  Obama's 
handling of Hillary has been, and continues to be masterful.  



[FairfieldLife] Re: Gallup: Hillary Clinton Now More Popular Than Barack Obama

2009-10-16 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
  
  Rick, raunchy is advocating HIllary's abilities, not her own.  Contrasting 
  HIllary's approval ratings with Obama's is an irrelevant exercise, except 
  to salve the perpetually open-wounds of Hillary supporters.   
 
 Apparently the folks at Gallup think contrasting Hillary's approval with 
 Obama's IS relevant or they would not have taken the poll.
 
 It's interesting how agitated the Obots on FFLife become whenever I post 
 ANYTHING that puts Hillary in a favorable light. Their knee-jerk need to 
 smack her down at every turn boarders on a clinical phobia of all things 
 Hillary. Why is it so difficult to admit that people actually like her?

Because the favorable-to-Hillary  posts sound like we're listening to the 
Jaimini Sutras:
On the Other Hand. followed by a put-down of Obama.  Got it ???   
 
  The idea that Hillary is still publicly commenting on how she would have 
  dealt with Obama had she won says so much about Hillary's continuing sense 
  of entitlement. 
 
 In ABC News' Cynthia McFadden's interview with Hillary in Moscow, Oct. 14, 
 2009 Cynthia ASKED if Hillary would have picked Obama to serve as a member of 
 her cabinet. Sorry, to break the news to you but your Hillary's entitlement 
 meme falls apart. Here's the transcript:
 
 http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/International/transcript-hillary-clinton-interview/story?id=8826956
 
   Hillary's performance and high approval ratings as Obama's Sec. of State 
  is aided by Obama's outstanding level of support internationally.  Obama's 
  handling of Hillary has been, and continues to be masterful.
 
 
 Hillary's approval rating was based on polling Americans and has nothing to 
 do with Obama's support internationally. What do you mean by handling 
 Hillary?  Is she so wild, powerful and deceptive that she must be controlled 
 by Obama? What the hell are you talking about?


from FFL #158920  (and YouTube):
See the most memorable one-liner of the campaign. Barak Obama put Hillary in
his rear-view mirror with this one. Hillary got what she had coming. This is 
from the
Dec. 13th (2007)debate in Des Moines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhPxSm9Es0wfeature=related



[FairfieldLife] Re: Elizabeth Clare Prophet Dies

2009-10-16 Thread mainstream20016


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@... 
wrote:

 I googled Michael Weinless about a year ago and got a hit on this successor 
 group, or at least the group claiming to carry the mantle of the Saint 
 Germain teaching.  I sent them an e-mail and they responded in a very 
 friendly way letting me know that Michael was basically their IT person.  
 They suggested I contact him via e-mail to say hello.  I did not, but I was 
 glad to see that he found someplace to settle.  I of course was fascinated by 
 him and thought he was a genius.  Looking back I don't know if that was an 
 accurate assesment, or just part of the idealistic way I tended to view 
 movement people at that time.  
 
 I'd enjoy hearing about any other comments people had about Michael Weinless.


He was a huge St. Louis fan :  he would go on and on about very large 
Cardinals.  ;)



 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  CHURCH UNIVERSAL AND TRIUMPHANT LEADER DIES
  AP
  October 16, 2009
  
  http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5itY7UfJtKYgsCaDxnWyocfTcfg
  LQD9BCD1U01
  
  BOZEMAN, MONTANA - Church Universal and Triumphant leader Elizabeth Clare
  Prophet has died in Bozeman. She was 70.
  
  Prophet's legal guardian, Murray Steinman, says she suffered from advanced
  Alzheimer's disease and died at her apartment Thursday night.
  
  Prophet was the spiritual leader for a church that at one time boasted
  50,000 members. In the late 1980s, assault rifles and armored vehicles were
  amassed in preparation for a nuclear missile strike that Prophet predicted
  was on the way.
  
  The sect combined icons from the world's major religions, mixing western
  philosophy and mysticism.
  
  
  
  Wikipedia On Elizabeth Clare Prophet:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Clare_Prophet
  
  Official Church Universal  Triumphant Website:
  http://www.tsl.org/
  
  
  
  NHNE Wavemaker News List:
  
  Send Some Green Love To NHNE:
  http://www.nhne.org/DONATE/tabid/398/Default.aspx
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  nhnenews-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:nhnenews-subscribe%40yahoogroups.com 
  
  To unsubscribe, send a message to:
  nhnenews-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:nhnenews-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com 
  
  To review current posts:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages
  http://www.nhne.org/tabid/1044/Default.aspx
  
  NHNE's Mother Ship:
  http://www.nhne.org/
  
  NHNE Pulse:
  http://nhne-pulse.org/
  
  Sunfellow  NHNE on Twitter:
  http://twitter.com/sunfellow
  
  Integral NHNE:
  http://integralnhne.ning.com/
  
  Published by David Sunfellow
  NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
  eMail: nhne@ mailto:nhne%40nhne.org 
  Phone: (928) 257-3200
  Fax: (815) 642-0117
  
  P.O. Box 2242
  Sedona, AZ 86339
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The FFL Posting Limit Get Out Of Jail Free Card (Was: Post Count)

2009-09-27 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 Bhairitu wrote:
  Just say the free week expires with 
  the six-month period.  No rollover... 
 
 Screw you and your silly TMO rules. I can
 go to Usenet and post anything I want to
 as many times as I want to. 
snip

Please, would you mind posting non-stop on Usenet ?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Baucus Plan is Bullshit

2009-09-21 Thread mainstream20016
Baucus Bullshit  - that's right.  Baucus is a Dem in name only - he represents 
the status quo.  His Baucus Bullshit Senate Finance Committee healthcare reform 
bill deserves to be IGNORED. There are No Amendments that can put lipstick on 
that pig of a bill- the Baucus Bullshit bill is the creation of the insurance 
industry. 
Baucus ignored Single Payer advocates.  As early as July, the Finance Committee 
threw the public option overboard. Baucus's legacy rides on the outcome of the 
Baucus Bullshit Senate Finance Committee bill.   The Senate shouldn't waste 
time amending the Baucus Bullshit bill.   


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:

 Last week at the AFL-CIO convention, it was reported that AFSCME President 
 Gerald McEntee led the crowd in a derogatory chant about Max Baucus's Senate 
 Finance Committee bill.  But the video was nowhere to be found.
 
 We found it:
 
 The Senate Finance Committee is getting ready to debate a health care 
 bill.  That bill does not meet  the test of this resolution.
 
 As a matter of fact, it doesn't even come close. And it does not meet 
 President Obma's standards either.  There is no employer mandate, no public 
 option, no help for retirees.  The finance committee bill imposes substantial 
 costs on the states, weakens state insurance regulation and taxes our health 
 plan.
 
 (audience starts to boo)
 
 That's right here...boo, boo come on.  It's all bullshit.
 
 Come on, what's the word?
 
 It's bullshit!
 
 The speed with which all the videos were yanked from YouTube etc. indicates 
 that there was unhappiness with Mr. McEntee's speech in some sectors.  But 
 the AFSCME page inviting you to tell the Senate Finance Committee how you 
 feel about the bill is still up.
 
 Fuckin' AFSCME.
 
 Firedoglake Jane Hamsher
 http://snipurl.com/s0x6k





[FairfieldLife] Re: Glenn Beck's ideas are really not that original

2009-09-21 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 John wrote:
  Which one actually got murdered, Shremp?
  
 What was the name of that radical left-winger 
 that married a Russian woman,and then murdered 
 the President?

   Patsy



[FairfieldLife] was:Mike Love-Iowa Public Radio now: how was BB Fairfield show ?

2009-09-08 Thread mainstream20016
Well, how was the Fairfield Beach Boys concert yesterday ?




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 Mike Love of the Beach Boys will be interviewed on Iowa Public Radio, WSUI
 910 AM, Wednesday 10:36-10:565 a.m., CT. Listeners will be able to call in
 and ask Mike questions at 866-780-9100. The Beach Boys will wind up their
 Endless Summer Fun Tour at the Fairfield Middle School grounds this Labor
 Day, with The Nadas opening up the show at 12:30 - 1:30 pm. For tickets,
 directions, and parking information, call (641) 472-2787. Read this great
 article, Beach Boys bringing green concert to tiny Fairfield,
 http://tinyurl.com/llrswq.
 
 ***
 
 DOME ANNOUNCEMENTS is a moderated list that distributes announcements to the
 Maharishi University of Management community. Send your announcements to
 owner-dom...@...
 
 Encourage your friends to sign up for DOME ANNOUNCEMENTS. Send an e-mail
 message to dome-l-requ...@..., and put the word subscribe (without the
 quotation marks) in the body of the message.
 
 To stop receiving DOME ANNOUNCEMENTS, send an e-mail message to:
 dome-l-requ...@..., and type the word unsubscribe (without the
 quotation marks) in the body of the message.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Pressure Builds Up For Cheney Probe.

2009-07-12 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:

 I hope Eric Holder goes for it.  Nothing I would love to see better than 
 Cheney to get his just due.  However there is the meme being circulated 
 that we need to move on and that the country has to many problems to 
 spend time on this.  I disagree and indeed it is possible that the CIA 
 itself could be circulating that meme.  Definitely the Republicans would 
 be suspect too.  I think we can have an investigation and work on the 
 nations problems at the same time.  But there are those who fear that it 
 will dig up the buried bodies and they'll be indicted.  I say good and 
 time for their karma to catch up.


I suspect Obama encouraged Holder to proceed.  The administration must demand 
accountability, and prosecution of Cheney and his cohorts will bring great 
benefit to resolving the injustice of the past and as a caution to future 
arrogant U.S. leaders.  



[FairfieldLife] Re: Questions and answers about the Star

2009-04-20 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:

 Hey Nabs, 
  
 On a scale of 1-10, how sure are you that all these predictions are 
 going to
 come true?

10

Heaven will walk on earth, in this generation
- Maharishi
   
   
   According to Benjamin Creme, Maitreya arrived in London in 1977 after 
   having created a Mahavirupta-body in the Himalayas, two years after 
   Maharishi made His historic proclamation on Lake Lucerne; The Dawn of the 
   Age of Enlightenment.
   
   The arrival of Maitreya in a physical body, for the first time in 100.000 
   years on this planet is perhaps the most far-reaching effects of the work 
   of Maharishi; the most remarkable Master of Masters mankind has seen 
   since Brahmananda Saraswathi.
  
  
  
  Since the early 80s, Benjamin Creme has been singing Any Day Now 
  (Maitreya will be reveal himself very publicly).  I will make a prediction 
  - Benjamin Creme will die before Maitreya appears in the flesh.
 
 Maitreya are in flesh already since 1977. The first interview has simply 
 not happened yet. And it won't before mankind is ready.


Benjamin Creme will die before mankind is Ready; as will you, Nabby. 
IOW, it won't happen.  I hope you have a Plan B, Nabby - Life without Maitreya 
as the revealed and physically present Master.  
May you adjust to that reality well.  Peace.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adiraja Rajaram speaks about religion and teaching etc

2009-04-19 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukra69@ wrote:
 
  He speaks very directly about the kind of issues that some people are 
  concerned about here, is TM a religion, what is the relationship with 
  Hinduism, does a TM teacher have to represent the tradition all the time 
  24/7 etc. currently repeating often on the Maharishi Channel and you can 
  find your time on the schedule.
  
  www.maharishichannel.in
 
 The schedule doesn't say which of the five channels any
 particular program is on. I'd watch it only if it were
 on Channel 3, because I have no intention of installing
 the plug-in.
 
 But I'd really be interested in hearing what he has to
 say. Any clues what channel it's being shown on?



A replay of the talk was on Maharishi Global Chat, Channel 3, last week; the 
event was April 3rd, in Fairfield,  ( the day before DLF benefit concert with 
Sir Paul and Ringo ).  





[FairfieldLife] Re: Questions and answers about the Star

2009-04-19 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
  
   Hey Nabs, 

   On a scale of 1-10, how sure are you that all these predictions are going 
   to
   come true?
  
  10
  
  Heaven will walk on earth, in this generation
  - Maharishi
 
 
 According to Benjamin Creme, Maitreya arrived in London in 1977 after having 
 created a Mahavirupta-body in the Himalayas, two years after Maharishi made 
 His historic proclamation on Lake Lucerne; The Dawn of the Age of 
 Enlightenment.
 
 The arrival of Maitreya in a physical body, for the first time in 100.000 
 years on this planet is perhaps the most far-reaching effects of the work of 
 Maharishi; the most remarkable Master of Masters mankind has seen since 
 Brahmananda Saraswathi.



Since the early 80s, Benjamin Creme has been singing Any Day Now (Maitreya 
will be reveal himself very publicly).  I will make a prediction - Benjamin 
Creme will die before Maitreya appears in the flesh.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adiraja Rajaram speaks about religion and teaching etc

2009-04-19 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukra69@ wrote:
 
  He speaks very directly about the kind of issues that some people are 
  concerned about here, is TM a religion, what is the relationship with 
  Hinduism, does a TM teacher have to represent the tradition all the time 
  24/7 etc. currently repeating often on the Maharishi Channel and you can 
  find your time on the schedule.
  
  www.maharishichannel.in
 
 The schedule doesn't say which of the five channels any
 particular program is on. I'd watch it only if it were
 on Channel 3, because I have no intention of installing
 the plug-in.
 
 But I'd really be interested in hearing what he has to
 say. Any clues what channel it's being shown on?


It will be shown again -
Channel  3
Tuesday, April 21  
6:55 PM  U.S. Central Time   ( 7:55 PM  U.S. Eastern Time )  
Maharaja Adhiraj Raja Raam's address at Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome on 
April 3, 2009 (1 hr).



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adiraja Rajaram speaks about religion and teaching etc

2009-04-19 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Doughney m...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukra69@ wrote:
  
   He speaks very directly about the kind of issues that some people are 
   concerned about here, is TM a religion, what is the relationship with 
   Hinduism, does a TM teacher have to represent the tradition all the time 
   24/7 etc. currently repeating often on the Maharishi Channel and you can 
   find your time on the schedule.
   
   www.maharishichannel.in
  
  
  *
  
  King Tony spoke very well, saying TM is not Hinduism, because religion is a 
  belief system, and we work from experience only, no belief required -- 
  truly Vedic Science.
 
 Sounds like His Highness Tony would be quite at home in an American 
 Pentecostal church - 'cause they claim pretty much the same thing, saying 
 it's not a religion it's a relationship or somesuch bunk.
 
 It's really easy to engage in misdirection like this if you're not afraid to 
 defy both common sense and ethical behavior by completely redefining your 
 terms into meaningless mush as you go along.
 
 It appears that King Tony's latest spiel is in the Maharishi Channel archive, 
 look under Global Family Chats for April 8, 10 and 11 - though I haven't 
 yet downloaded and viewed these files to check for sure. Be careful not to 
 trip over that completely irreligious Full Moon Celebration!



Thanks to Mike D,  Judy won't have to wait until Tuesday.

Here's a link: http://212.178.154.22/gfc-archive.html







[FairfieldLife] Re: The restoration of the world, Share International Magazine, April 2009

2009-04-06 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:

 Anyone got the info about who would be doing all this teaching and for what 
 salary?  I mean, really, how many re-certs are there out there, and what 
 percentage of them can be put to this task?
 
 I'm thinking they'll use mass initiation tactics (phone technique)  and the 
 TMO will make the initiators pay for their own travel, food and motel for the 
 privilege of getting all those pujas under one's belt.  If they don't make 
 that offer, then I'll be surprised.  Maybe they'll give a small per diem and 
 put out a distress call to the local meditating community to put up a teacher 
 when he's visiting that local.  
 
 If they do it one student at a time, that's maybe 20 students per day tops 
 per teacher, but that's for only one teaching day...how can 20/day be 
 maintained if three days checking must be done by the same teacher? -- (who 
 must be there to at least be available to check mantras now and then on the 
 first day.)
 
 A teacher should be compensated, say, $3500 a month plus a per diem if he's 
 away from home.  If a teacher teaches, say, 50 students a week, that's 600 x 
 50 = 30,000 x 4 weeks = $120,000 bucks for Lynch to pay out and Girish gets 
 it all minus the teacher's salary.  But, even though the salary cost is so 
 insignificant, I look to the teachers being screwed out of anything like a 
 windfall profit situation for them.  They'll be coming home in the same rust 
 buckets they're driving today.  
 
 Does Lynch get it that the $600 will be mostly going directly to Girish?
 
 Edg
 


Quality instruction is the key to a sustainable demand for TM. The earliest 
DLF-sponsored
whole-school TM instruction was apparently superb: it included first 
instructing willing administrators and  teachers, followed by the remaining 
faculty and staff, well prior to instructing the students. Apparently lots of 
TM-teacher on-site follow-up to all.

   David Lynch negotiated heavily to reduce the fee to $600 per student for 
whole-school TM instruction.  I believe that fee amount is necessary to sustain 
quality instruction. My heavy woe befall  anyone who advocates mass-initiation 
bum's rush treatment shortcuts to meet a surge in demand. 




 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
  
  On Apr 6, 2009, at 2:45 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@  
   wrote:
  
   Dream on brother.
  
   But thanks for posting those links to the youtube clips
   from the David Lynch Foundation Conscert for teaching
   1 million children Transcendental Meditation.
  
   Speaking of dream on, Nabby, you DO realize
   that as well-intentioned as this fund-raising
   concert was, it only raised enough money to
   teach 5,000 kids to meditate, right?
  
   $3,000,000 / $600 = 5,000
  
   Wouldn't it be a magnanimous gesture for the
   TM organization, if it believes so strongly
   in this project and its stated goal, to lower
   the price to what other introductory meditation
   courses cost in the United States?
  
   $3,000,000 / $60 = 50,000
  
  
  OR if they're REALLY interested in getting a million kids cogitating  
  mantras:
  
  $3,000,000 / $3 =  1,000,000
  
  Problem solved!
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The restoration of the world, Share International Magazine, April 2009

2009-04-06 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:

 Anyone got the info about who would be doing all this teaching and for what 
 salary?  I mean, really, how many re-certs are there out there, and what 
 percentage of them can be put to this task?
 
 I'm thinking they'll use mass initiation tactics (phone technique)  and the 
 TMO will make the initiators pay for their own travel, food and motel for the 
 privilege of getting all those pujas under one's belt.  If they don't make 
 that offer, then I'll be surprised.  Maybe they'll give a small per diem and 
 put out a distress call to the local meditating community to put up a teacher 
 when he's visiting that local.  
 
 If they do it one student at a time, that's maybe 20 students per day tops 
 per teacher, but that's for only one teaching day...how can 20/day be 
 maintained if three days checking must be done by the same teacher? -- (who 
 must be there to at least be available to check mantras now and then on the 
 first day.)
 
 A teacher should be compensated, say, $3500 a month plus a per diem if he's 
 away from home.  If a teacher teaches, say, 50 students a week, that's 600 x 
 50 = 30,000 x 4 weeks = $120,000 bucks for Lynch to pay out and Girish gets 
 it all minus the teacher's salary.  But, even though the salary cost is so 
 insignificant, I look to the teachers being screwed out of anything like a 
 windfall profit situation for them.  They'll be coming home in the same rust 
 buckets they're driving today.  
 
 Does Lynch get it that the $600 will be mostly going directly to Girish?
 
 Edg


Quality instruction is the key to a sustainable demand for TM. The earliest
DLF-sponsored whole-school TM instruction was apparently superb: it included 
first instructing willing administrators and teachers, followed by the 
remaining faculty and
staff, well prior to instructing the students. Apparently lots of TM-teacher
on-site follow-up to all.

David Lynch negotiated heavily to reduce the fee to $600 per student for
whole-school TM instruction. I believe that fee amount is necessary to sustain
quality instruction. May heavy woe befall anyone who advocates mass-initiation
bum's rush treatment shortcuts to meet a surge in demand







 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
  
  On Apr 6, 2009, at 2:45 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@  
   wrote:
  
   Dream on brother.
  
   But thanks for posting those links to the youtube clips
   from the David Lynch Foundation Conscert for teaching
   1 million children Transcendental Meditation.
  
   Speaking of dream on, Nabby, you DO realize
   that as well-intentioned as this fund-raising
   concert was, it only raised enough money to
   teach 5,000 kids to meditate, right?
  
   $3,000,000 / $600 = 5,000
  
   Wouldn't it be a magnanimous gesture for the
   TM organization, if it believes so strongly
   in this project and its stated goal, to lower
   the price to what other introductory meditation
   courses cost in the United States?
  
   $3,000,000 / $60 = 50,000
  
  
  OR if they're REALLY interested in getting a million kids cogitating  
  mantras:
  
  $3,000,000 / $3 =  1,000,000
  
  Problem solved!
 





[FairfieldLife] N Y Times' glowing review of DLF Concert

2009-04-05 Thread mainstream20016
Congrats to all for great publicity surrounding the remaining Beatles' support 
for TM in the schools. Here's the Times report on the concert :

http://tiny.cc/LNCXC




[FairfieldLife] Re: N Y Times' glowing review of DLF Concert

2009-04-05 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20...@... 
wrote:

 Congrats to all for great publicity surrounding the remaining Beatles' 
 support for TM in the schools. Here's the Times report on the concert :
 
 http://tiny.cc/LNCXC



and this glowing review could have been written by Bobby Roth himself:

http://tiny.cc/AAMZe



[FairfieldLife] Re: N Y Times' glowing review of DLF Concert

2009-04-05 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  Congrats to all for great publicity surrounding the remaining Beatles' 
  support for TM in the schools. Here's the Times report on the concert :
  
  http://tiny.cc/LNCXC
 
 
 
 and this glowing review could have been written by Bobby Roth himself:
 
 http://tiny.cc/AAMZe


...and Reuter's -  McCartney and Starr reunite in NYC for meditation  

http://tiny.cc/SDn9Z




[FairfieldLife] Re: N Y Times' glowing review of DLF Concert

2009-04-05 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
  wrote:
  
   Congrats to all for great publicity surrounding the remaining Beatles' 
   support for TM in the schools. Here's the Times report on the concert :
   
   http://tiny.cc/LNCXC
  
  
  
  and this glowing review could have been written by Bobby Roth himself:
  
  http://tiny.cc/AAMZe
 
 
 Both news reports emphasized the line-up for the performance and said very 
 little about TM or teaching kids to meditate. It is not true and pure snark 
 that this glowing review could have been written by Bobby Roth himself. The 
 concert sounded like a lot of fun and they raised $3 million for DLF. It was 
 a huge success. Sour grapes, much?


Stop picking a fight, raunchy.  ...could have been written by B. Roth himself 
 is a compliment to Bobby Roth and the DLF.






[FairfieldLife] was: Times' glowing review; now: DLF Concert highlights

2009-04-05 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 mainstream20016@ 
  wrote:
  
   Congrats to all for great publicity surrounding the remaining Beatles' 
   support for TM in the schools. Here's the Times report on the concert :
   
   http://tiny.cc/LNCXC
  
  
  
  and this glowing review could have been written by Bobby Roth himself:
  
  http://tiny.cc/AAMZe
 
 
 ...and Reuter's -  McCartney and Starr reunite in NYC for meditation  
 
 http://tiny.cc/SDn9Z



Thanks to  'Music Fan ', here are songs from last night,  via the NY Times -
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhRWfMfN5U0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXVSbIVZrYM 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr87zHjBeKM 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08AQY_0cAcc 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ziLU-PPDR8 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wd57k-HqCU



[FairfieldLife] Re: Public Webcast of the Press Conference for the David Lynch Foundation Benefi

2009-04-03 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
 
  I wonder:  if all these celebrities came together to do a 
  charity-entertainment for, say, raising public awareness of 3rd world 
  travail, don't we all know that they could fill a stadium with folks who 
  paid serious bucks for the tickets? Lots of baby boomers out there. 
  
  Instead, all we get is 6,000 seats filled? 
 
 Ringo and Paul play together for charity and this is the number? WTF?  
 

Sir Paul has yet to wear a cream-colored suit. McCartney wears dark-colored 
suits. At today's press conference, Hagelin sported a SIMS-like Navy-colored 
suit, as did nearly everyone who strutted onto the stage.






  
  
  To me, knowing the history of the TMO, it is a sore thumb flagging us to 
  note that they were so lacking in confidence that they could get even 6,000 
  warm bodies to fill the space that they couldn't imagine renting a larger 
  venue.  If they thought they could get more response, we all know they 
  would have rented the Orange Bowl (most satvic fruit) and glorified to the 
  world that they had so many followers.  
  
  And don't give me the argument that the TV showings of this event will be 
  reaching a larger audiencecuz, if it were held in the Orange Bowl, 
  there'd be an even larger audience tuning into it on TV.
  
  Nope, these are the latter day saints of the TMO gathering for one last hit 
  of personal satisfaction that they done the world such a solid.  
  
  And the fun part is: they're messing with a money milking machine that's a 
  tar baby they know not of -- these rich folks think the TMO is getting the 
  word out to the world by riding their celebrity coattails, but the truth is 
  that the TMO is getting the word INTO the minds of these easy marks, and 
  soon enough they'll be fully prepped to be shamed into a large donation for 
  some TM cause (Girish is hungry.)
  
  Edg
  
  
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, michael vedamerlin@ wrote:
  
   On Friday, April 3, 2009 there will be a press conference at the Radio 
   City Music Hall in New York City regarding the program to teach one 
   million students the Transcendental Meditation technique. David Lynch, 
   Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr will make statements as to why they are 
   supporting this initiative. All of the other performing musicians will 
   also make statements of support.

   
   http://www.davidlynchfoundation.org/press-conference.html



   
   
   




   To register to watch the webcast of the press conference for the David 
   Lynch Foundation Benefit Concert, please visit 
   http://www.davidlynchfoundation.org/new-york-press-conference-registration.html.


   Here some more interesting points:

   David Lynch recently edited a two-minute video showing the Beatles in 
   India with Maharishi. When he showed it to Paul McCartney there were 
   tears in his eyes. People in Paul's office said they haven't seen him 
   this happy in 20 years.

   After the concert, Paul is going to auction a signed guitar, Ringo will 
   auction signed drum skins, and Donovan a guitar that he said was George 
   Harrison's favorite.

   During the concert Jerry Seinfeld is also going to speak for 3 minutes; 
   he has been meditating since the age of 19.

   Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager Ray Dalio is paying for 130 people to 
   attend the concert. He is encouraging all his guests to donate 
   generously. He will speak at the end of the concert, indicating that TM 
   has been instrumental to his success.
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Public Webcast of the Press Conference for the David Lynch Foundation Benefi

2009-04-03 Thread mainstream20016
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
   curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:

 I wonder:  if all these celebrities came together to do a 
 charity-entertainment for, say, raising public awareness of 3rd world 
 travail, don't we all know that they could fill a stadium with folks 
 who paid serious bucks for the tickets? Lots of baby boomers out 
 there. 
 
 Instead, all we get is 6,000 seats filled? 

Ringo and Paul play together for charity and this is the number? WTF?  

 

   
   
   Er at $500-$1000 per ticket, not counting the $100 grand packages for 
   donors at  the afterparty.
  
  I don't know what it is like in your city but when Paul comes to DC alone, 
  people pay these prices and higher for the good seats without the charity 
  angle. And two Beatles together? I think the public smells something.
  
  Ticket prices for him at the Hard Rock in Vegas this month:
  
  http://www.coasttocoasttickets.com/buy/paulmccartney_tickets.htm?pid=1013066
  
  http://tinyurl.com/d3yxe2
  
  
  Don't forget that we are saying that out of the millions initiated,this is 
  how many still believe in TM's value in schools this much.
  
  
 
 
 Eh, the goal is to raise $600 million.. Shrugs.
 
 L.



The goal is to pretend the TMO is SIMS, which assured that
TM 20 X 2 is all you do for full effectiveness of the technique.

Until a Western-style SIMS organization arises, one independent of confiscatory 
constraints of the Indian TMO, success will be very limited.  

 




  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >