Not physical, as if birth and death are not physical? Souls are proly just measurable in experience by tools at this point such as nervous systems at less than the planck but I feel based on my own research and data that even the physical scientific community will evolve and find that their souls are entangled existing in or as a simultaneity both here embodied in a portion experiencing life in this realm as mortal dimension while also (simultaneously) existing in some larger portion at the same moment elsewhere. Like an over-soul dipping its toe in to life using the life of a human nervous system. Is marvelous really. Physical scientists will like it when they find it. Even Hagelin in his mortal coil as he sits with it more. -JaiGuruYou
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_...@yahoo.com> wrote : Doug, Physicists are in the business of studying natural phenomena and typically stay away from philosophical and spiritual arguments. But as they delve deeper into the subatomic particles, they are realizing that they may not have the technology to measure particles near or below the Planck length. The best thing that they have now is to have the String Theory or variation thereof to explain the theoretical dynamics of the immeasurable realm. But Hagelin is now carrying the torch that MMY was trying to prove to the world-- that the world is based on consciousness. He may or may not succeed in this endeavor. IMO, conservative physicists will most likely make a statement saying that particles below a certain length cannot be measured and thus are out of bounds for further study to uphold the scientific method. As discussed in the video, scientists have made similar statements in the study of quantum entanglements. Specifically,they are trying to uphold Einstein's theory that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. As such, they are saying that entangled particles cannot be used to send messages across vast distances in the universe. But, at the same time, they are saying that entangled particles simultaneously affect each other over vast distances in the universe. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote : Good video, jr. Thanks. But, how does physics explain what evidently is of a divine construct as soul(s) in the life of human beings? Does physics have much to say about the incarnational implications of such energetic light-body structure within the human form as souls? What does physics say of Divine virtues in energetic vector, such as love exhibited as given and experienced? Souls, jivans, or virtues as vibrational form.. these kind of larger spirituality seems a little different than just calculating saying a Pure Consciousness as Transcendental Consciousness is the Unified Field. The Upanishads say quite a lot about Souls in life. TM and Maharishi had not much to say about souls. What does physics navigate about this practical aspect of imperishable souls in life, while we have life to live? Do physicists talk more particularly about this, or do they not have much experience with it? Just wondering, -JaiGuruYou ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_...@yahoo.com> wrote : This is a fairly new presentation with updates on the current developments in physics. I'm not sure if the audience actually understood what he was saying--or even the watchers of this video. Entanglement, Space-Time Wormholes, and the Brain - John Hagelin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvVDYQoGWyk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvVDYQoGWyk Entanglement, Space-Time Wormholes, and the Brain -... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvVDYQoGWyk We present an extraordinary breakthrough from String theory that explains the “spooky action-at-a-distance” nature of quantum entanglement, and ties this lon... View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvVDYQoGWyk Preview by Yahoo
