[FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status
while it is true that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi should really be referred to as Brahmarishi Mahesha Yogi , he was never interested in focusing on the individual rather than the message and preferring to always credit his Guru Dev. Please read the full entry in wikipedia about Vishvamitra if you are indeed pretty much ignorant of the Vedic tradition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishvamitra The question would be better put to Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth. Ask him why there are Maharishis who are not Brahmarishis and why a Kshatriya is necessary to change the Yuga in one generation. (gibberish)... was a real Hindu and believed in the dharma thing, and if he was indeed part of the Shankara tradition, isn't it interesting that he was performing the dharma of a Brahmin, rather than that of a Kshatriya?
Re: [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status
Srijau baby - Perhaps you should focus more on the story of Vishwamitra rather than make delusional statements like Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth You can clearly see the battles or the odds Vishwamitra fought to overcome his Kshatriya samskaaras - his samskaaras with power, sex. Compare Vishwamitra against Vasishtha - for whom it very naturally - the Brahmin Samskaraas made it easy for him. Vishwamitra's story is definitely an inspiration, a real good metaphor - to quote him in the context of MMY who couldn't overcome his lust for money, power and sex is delusional. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:01 PM, sri...@ymail.com no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** while it is true that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi should really be referred to as Brahmarishi Mahesha Yogi , he was never interested in focusing on the individual rather than the message and preferring to always credit his Guru Dev. Please read the full entry in wikipedia about Vishvamitra if you are indeed pretty much ignorant of the Vedic tradition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishvamitra The question would be better put to Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth. Ask him why there are Maharishis who are not Brahmarishis and why a Kshatriya is necessary to change the Yuga in one generation. (gibberish)... was a real Hindu and believed in the dharma thing, and if he was indeed part of the Shankara tradition, isn't it interesting that he was performing the dharma of a Brahmin, rather than that of a Kshatriya?
Re: [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status
It is true he gave praise to Guru Dev early on, but by the time he dropped his mortal coil, it was Maharishi's picture that adorned every corner and wall of the TMO - that was by his design in my opinion. Also: It is said in Padma Purana that Dharma proceeds from continence, truthfulness, austerity, charity, self-control, forbearance, purity, non-violence, serenity and non-thieving and that one should recognize Dharma by these ten factors. According to this Purana, bestowing gifts on deserving persons, fixing one’s thoughts on Lord Krishna, adoration of one’s parents, offering a portion of the daily meal to all creatures and giving a morsel of food to a cow are the characteristics of Dharma. According to Matsya Purana, freedom from malice, absence of covetousness, control of the senses, austerity, celibacy, compassion, truthfulness, forbearance and fortitude constitute the fundamentals of Sanatana Dharma. from the site: http://www.hinduism.co.za/dharma.htm Marshy told a lot of lies, he did not practice self control or celibacy, he certainly did not practice non-thieving - but all who think he was a saint will go on thinking so. From: sri...@ymail.com sri...@ymail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 8:01 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status while it is true that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi should really be referred to as Brahmarishi Mahesha Yogi , he was never interested in focusing on the individual rather than the message and preferring to always credit his Guru Dev. Please read the full entry in wikipedia about Vishvamitra if you are indeed pretty much ignorant of the Vedic tradition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishvamitra The question would be better put to Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth. Ask him why there are Maharishis who are not Brahmarishis and why a Kshatriya is necessary to change the Yuga in one generation. (gibberish)... was a real Hindu and believed in the dharma thing, and if he was indeed part of the Shankara tradition, isn't it interesting that he was performing the dharma of a Brahmin, rather than that of a Kshatriya?
Re: [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: Srijau baby - Perhaps you should focus more on the story of Vishwamitra rather than make delusional statements like Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth You can clearly see the battles or the odds Vishwamitra fought to overcome his Kshatriya samskaaras - his samskaaras with power, sex. Compare Vishwamitra against Vasishtha - for whom it very naturally - the Brahmin Samskaraas made it easy for him. Vishwamitra's story is definitely an inspiration, a real good metaphor - to quote him in the context of MMY who couldn't overcome his lust for money, power and sex is delusional. So Vishwamitra clearly deserved to be a Rishi based upon his efforts, his struggles, his battles to overcome his samskaras whereas Maharishi was a fraud. To even put in the context of the metaphor of Vishwamitra is delusional. So Srijau - shut the fuck up you idiot - you have no clue what you are saying. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:01 PM, sri...@ymail.com no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** while it is true that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi should really be referred to as Brahmarishi Mahesha Yogi , he was never interested in focusing on the individual rather than the message and preferring to always credit his Guru Dev. Please read the full entry in wikipedia about Vishvamitra if you are indeed pretty much ignorant of the Vedic tradition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishvamitra The question would be better put to Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth. Ask him why there are Maharishis who are not Brahmarishis and why a Kshatriya is necessary to change the Yuga in one generation. (gibberish)... was a real Hindu and believed in the dharma thing, and if he was indeed part of the Shankara tradition, isn't it interesting that he was performing the dharma of a Brahmin, rather than that of a Kshatriya?
Re: [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status
Anyway with the help of the idiot Srijau we can conclude that - neither could Maharishi acquire Brahmin samskaraas(needed to be a moral, ethical purveyor of knowledge) by birth nor could he like Vishwamitra acquire it through hard work, dedication, persistence. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.comwrote: ** It is true he gave praise to Guru Dev early on, but by the time he dropped his mortal coil, it was Maharishi's picture that adorned every corner and wall of the TMO - that was by his design in my opinion. Also: It is said in Padma Purana that Dharma proceeds from continence, truthfulness, austerity, charity, self-control, forbearance, purity, non-violence, serenity and non-thieving and that one should recognize Dharma by these ten factors. According to this Purana, bestowing gifts on deserving persons, fixing one’s thoughts on Lord Krishna, adoration of one’s parents, offering a portion of the daily meal to all creatures and giving a morsel of food to a cow are the characteristics of Dharma. According to Matsya Purana, freedom from malice, absence of covetousness, control of the senses, austerity, celibacy, compassion, truthfulness, forbearance and fortitude constitute the fundamentals of Sanatana Dharma. from the site: http://www.hinduism.co.za/dharma.htm Marshy told a lot of lies, he did not practice self control or celibacy, he certainly did not practice non-thieving - but all who think he was a saint will go on thinking so. -- *From:* sri...@ymail.com sri...@ymail.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, February 1, 2013 8:01 PM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] BrahMahrishi's SatGuru Status while it is true that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi should really be referred to as Brahmarishi Mahesha Yogi , he was never interested in focusing on the individual rather than the message and preferring to always credit his Guru Dev. Please read the full entry in wikipedia about Vishvamitra if you are indeed pretty much ignorant of the Vedic tradition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishvamitra The question would be better put to Maharishi Shukadeva, who reveals Maharishi Mahesh Yogi thousands of years previous to his birth. Ask him why there are Maharishis who are not Brahmarishis and why a Kshatriya is necessary to change the Yuga in one generation. (gibberish)... was a real Hindu and believed in the dharma thing, and if he was indeed part of the Shankara tradition, isn't it interesting that he was performing the dharma of a Brahmin, rather than that of a Kshatriya?
