[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"  wrote:

> I appreciate both yours and Turq's contributions to FFL;
> you're both good guys in my estimation.

Interesting that a lawyer--particularly a public
defender--would characterize someone who chronically
and maliciously lies about folks he doesn't like as
a "good guy."

(Not referring to Edg, BTW.)

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Marek Reavis]

Edg, thank you for the kind words.  You have a raw honesty that is wholly 
admirable.  And as you've pointed out in earlier posts, it takes some time to 
become accustomed to the personalities that populate this forum.  Some of my 
own early impressions of posters have softened over time.  It's relatively easy 
for me to accept people on their own terms and to learn how it is that they 
wish to be perceived.  

Most folks want to be liked and esteemed.  I look for what's estimable and 
likable and validate that.  I don't value discord and cavil, and I avoid 
argument for it's own sake.  

I appreciate both yours and Turq's contributions to FFL; you're both good guys 
in my estimation.

Marek

**



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
>
> Marek,
> 
> Aw, Marek, I'm such a sucker for your equanimity. Honestly, I swoon at your 
> clarity. Ya makes my good parts vibrate like puppy tails.
> 
> You've had to gently grab my elbow more than once here, and you're good at it.
> 
> Confession: Turq's "energy" triggers me.  I just don't like his way of 
> slapping anyone's face anytime he wants to and then running away from the 
> discussion and putting his fingers in his ears.  Not that he does it every 
> time, not that I don't do this too, but that he has done it often enough -- 
> such that I should have, by now had a forehead slapping epiphany and learned 
> to simply stay away from him.
> 
> And there's the rub, I don't -- he still can say things which trigger me. I 
> give him that power. That's a tell that I'm still attempting to resolve my 
> inner roilings that can find me indulging in sublimating and projecting the 
> negativity of my past into some real life situation in hopes that an outer 
> resolution will give hints at how to handle the inner conflicts.  In effect, 
> I toss it out there so that I can get it off my front burner in here.
> 
> Not that I haven't confessed as much previously, and not that anyone will 
> consider my past in any way that is as balanced as your perusals of me, but 
> it sure would do me some personal good if folks would take my concepts 
> instead of my barbs as their talking points.  But, yeah, my acidity can make 
> it almost impossible to do just that.
> 
> When I snark about Turq's predatory ways, I'm pointing to something in his 
> life that I see in almost everyone's life -- including my own.  
> 
> Not that we're all cafe droolers, but that we are all capable of wearing 
> masks to the detriment of others.  
> 
> If I am projecting my own predatory dynamics upon a 
> "Turq-who-is-almost-wholly-innocent-of-such-charges," what of it?  That's 
> something I should deal with, yes, but what of the issue of predation in 
> general?
> 
> As a writer, I fail at delivering the concepts if I am dressing them up with 
> an untoward specificity that doesn't jive with the readers. I'm seen to be 
> not only trying to discuss an issue, but I'm also pandering to some personal 
> attack agenda.  So, instead of trying to get a good discussion going, my 
> striking out with such ridiculous overkill burdens the discussion such that 
> responders cannot avoid handling my excesses instead of the concepts I've 
> hyped. Yeah, I get it.
> 
> I could write about George Bush's marauding, but there's thousands of 
> bloggers with great insight and writing skills who have adequately 
> deconstructed his brand of evil.  But try to find bloggers who see in 
> themselves that same evil.  Easy to just attack Bush and ignore "how it is" 
> that we are so certain he has erred stupendously.
> 
> It would be incredible if most folks could easily see their inner Bush, but I 
> think it is much easier to imagine folks seeing that they are not unlike the 
> scoundrel aspects of Turq's personality.  Smaller sins make the burden of 
> recognizing resonance lighter.  
> 
> With 2/3rds of the world getting less than two dollars a day, it's hard to 
> get someone to say, "I'm part of that.  My mind has abetted that crime."  But 
> the same folks will have an easier time seeing themselves more clearly when 
> they pass by a homeless person asking for donations with a wave of a rusty 
> coffee can. Harder, then, to slip into some rationalization.
> 
> Ten years ago, I was so humbled by this young boy I read about in the news.
> 
> This kid was with his father, and they saw some homeless person, and the kid 
> asked his dad about the situation.  At some point, the kid cut to the chase 
> in a way that, to my thinking, had the power to humble the haught of most 
> elitists.  He simply asked his father if he could go home and get that extra 
> blanket out of the closet and give it to this shivering man on the streets.  
> It melted his father's heart on the spot.  The kid was saying, "This I can 
> do.  This will help. This is easy. This is simple. I have the power to help 
> someone in an immediate and significant way."
> 
> Well, the father, what could he do?  Here was a guy who had probably p

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Duveyoung]

Ah, good stuff.  Good writing.  Ya melts me.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> In café light computer glow
> A spider weaves his web
> To snag a tasty boy or girl
> And trap them in his thread
> 
> Suspended tethered by his wits
> In trance are they before him
> The shallow dishpan of his love
> Preys on forever grim
> 
> A one night stand a piper's dance 
> Lovers leaving ever
> His empty net a wisp of wind
> Scattered dust and severed
> 
> Twilight moon in Sitges waning 
> Youthful bloom a-fading
> Cruising beaches wrinkled, naked
> Reaper's cloak evading
> 
> raunchydog
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Duveyoung]

Marek,

Aw, Marek, I'm such a sucker for your equanimity. Honestly, I swoon at your 
clarity. Ya makes my good parts vibrate like puppy tails.

You've had to gently grab my elbow more than once here, and you're good at it.

Confession: Turq's "energy" triggers me.  I just don't like his way of slapping 
anyone's face anytime he wants to and then running away from the discussion and 
putting his fingers in his ears.  Not that he does it every time, not that I 
don't do this too, but that he has done it often enough -- such that I should 
have, by now had a forehead slapping epiphany and learned to simply stay away 
from him.

And there's the rub, I don't -- he still can say things which trigger me. I 
give him that power. That's a tell that I'm still attempting to resolve my 
inner roilings that can find me indulging in sublimating and projecting the 
negativity of my past into some real life situation in hopes that an outer 
resolution will give hints at how to handle the inner conflicts.  In effect, I 
toss it out there so that I can get it off my front burner in here.

Not that I haven't confessed as much previously, and not that anyone will 
consider my past in any way that is as balanced as your perusals of me, but it 
sure would do me some personal good if folks would take my concepts instead of 
my barbs as their talking points.  But, yeah, my acidity can make it almost 
impossible to do just that.

When I snark about Turq's predatory ways, I'm pointing to something in his life 
that I see in almost everyone's life -- including my own.  

Not that we're all cafe droolers, but that we are all capable of wearing masks 
to the detriment of others.  

If I am projecting my own predatory dynamics upon a 
"Turq-who-is-almost-wholly-innocent-of-such-charges," what of it?  That's 
something I should deal with, yes, but what of the issue of predation in 
general?

As a writer, I fail at delivering the concepts if I am dressing them up with an 
untoward specificity that doesn't jive with the readers. I'm seen to be not 
only trying to discuss an issue, but I'm also pandering to some personal attack 
agenda.  So, instead of trying to get a good discussion going, my striking out 
with such ridiculous overkill burdens the discussion such that responders 
cannot avoid handling my excesses instead of the concepts I've hyped. Yeah, I 
get it.

I could write about George Bush's marauding, but there's thousands of bloggers 
with great insight and writing skills who have adequately deconstructed his 
brand of evil.  But try to find bloggers who see in themselves that same evil.  
Easy to just attack Bush and ignore "how it is" that we are so certain he has 
erred stupendously.

It would be incredible if most folks could easily see their inner Bush, but I 
think it is much easier to imagine folks seeing that they are not unlike the 
scoundrel aspects of Turq's personality.  Smaller sins make the burden of 
recognizing resonance lighter.  

With 2/3rds of the world getting less than two dollars a day, it's hard to get 
someone to say, "I'm part of that.  My mind has abetted that crime."  But the 
same folks will have an easier time seeing themselves more clearly when they 
pass by a homeless person asking for donations with a wave of a rusty coffee 
can. Harder, then, to slip into some rationalization.

Ten years ago, I was so humbled by this young boy I read about in the news.

This kid was with his father, and they saw some homeless person, and the kid 
asked his dad about the situation.  At some point, the kid cut to the chase in 
a way that, to my thinking, had the power to humble the haught of most 
elitists.  He simply asked his father if he could go home and get that extra 
blanket out of the closet and give it to this shivering man on the streets.  It 
melted his father's heart on the spot.  The kid was saying, "This I can do.  
This will help. This is easy. This is simple. I have the power to help someone 
in an immediate and significant way."

Well, the father, what could he do?  Here was a guy who had probably passed 
hundreds of homeless folks out there street begging and never had the thought, 
"I can at least help in some small way."  So he took his kid home, they got the 
blanket, and, hey, the kid made a couple sandwiches also, and back they went 
and gave the guy the stuff.  The kid seemingly then and there had found his 
calling.

So, bang, the kid, with a twelve year old's purity and innocence, started 
knocking on his neighbors' doors and asking if they would help him somehow to 
help "these homeless folks downtown."  I can only imagine how those neighbors 
felt in the presence of a pure spiritual intent.  I cannot imagine any of them 
resisting the kid's intent -- surely all of them had an extra blanket or 
sandwich.

The kid went on to amass such a following that a foundation had to manifest to 
structure all the activities he'd managed to inspire.  Can't remember the kid's 
name, city, etc., but I'

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[enlightened_dawn11]

4 questions for you, regarding your statement below:

1. Is it true?

2. Can you absolutely know that it's true?

3. How do you react, what happens, when you believe that thought?

4. Who would you be without the thought?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
>
> You're just upset because you pretend to 
> have a cunt but don't. When someone calls
> *you* a cunt, it is clear that they're
> invoking the British definition of the
> term (a person who is thoroughly disliked), 
> not the American one. Either that, or they
> are mistaking you for the 3rd full-length 
> album by the Australian grindcore band 
> Blood Duster. :-)
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11  wrote:
> >
> > you are crackin' me up!!!
> >  
> > here are a few quotes from YOUR HERO Barry Wright, NOT included 
> > in your precious list of "the few nasties on this list":
> > 
> > "All three of them deserved to be called that
> > because they were acting like cunts."
> > 
> > "You're just a cunt."
> > 
> > "That said, Palin really IS a bimbo and a cunt"
> > 
> > "Hell hath no fury like a cunt ignored."
> > 
> > "Ah, I get it now. It's that time of year again,
> > that week when the Who Can Be The Most Argumentative
> > Cunt On Fairfield Life Contest rolls around."
> > 
> > LOL! what a bone head you are!
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[enlightened_dawn11]

excellent! one of your best i've seen...

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
>
> In café light computer glow
> A spider weaves his web
> To snag a tasty boy or girl
> And trap them in his thread
> 
> Suspended tethered by his wits
> In trance are they before him
> The shallow dishpan of his love
> Preys on forever grim
> 
> A one night stand a piper's dance 
> Lovers leaving ever
> His empty net a wisp of wind
> Scattered dust and severed
> 
> Twilight moon in Sitges waning 
> Youthful bloom a-fading
> Cruising beaches wrinkled, naked
> Reaper's cloak evading
> 
> raunchydog
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[TurquoiseB]

You're just upset because you pretend to 
have a cunt but don't. When someone calls
*you* a cunt, it is clear that they're
invoking the British definition of the
term (a person who is thoroughly disliked), 
not the American one. Either that, or they
are mistaking you for the 3rd full-length 
album by the Australian grindcore band 
Blood Duster. :-)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11  wrote:
>
> you are crackin' me up!!!
>  
> here are a few quotes from YOUR HERO Barry Wright, NOT included 
> in your precious list of "the few nasties on this list":
> 
> "All three of them deserved to be called that
> because they were acting like cunts."
> 
> "You're just a cunt."
> 
> "That said, Palin really IS a bimbo and a cunt"
> 
> "Hell hath no fury like a cunt ignored."
> 
> "Ah, I get it now. It's that time of year again,
> that week when the Who Can Be The Most Argumentative
> Cunt On Fairfield Life Contest rolls around."
> 
> LOL! what a bone head you are!

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[off_world_beings]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , grate.swan 
wrote:
>
>> One of the reasons I strayed away (and stayed away) from the Movement
was its cliqueness. ... No one saw me again - for years. I knew almost
no one in the real world outside the clique 'cough, "cult"' but over
time I got established ... said the arrogant fuck.

> I raise this, because FFL seems like deja vu all over again. Little
petty cliques. I like most everyone here, to a degree, Most have
something to contribute. And a quick scan of nothingness ... said the
arrogant fuck,  and I am on to the next post.

> But the incessant "me good, you bad" neanderthal attitude ... said the
arrogant fuck, of some is just astonishing.  >>

> A not-TM mentor I like ... said the arrogant fuck, said once,
something like, "if you can't love or appreciate the people around you,
how are you ever going to experience the Unity of all creation" ... said
the arrogant fuck.

The more bickering, bitterness, baiting and borisjness -- the more
darkness ... said the arrogant fuck.Maybe TM produces darkness in
some people ... said the fascist fuck.Who knows. The data appears to
support the hypothesis ... said the arrogant fuck.



OffWorld


>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , enlightened_dawn11 
wrote:
> >
> > ha-ha- laugh of the day-- get this, Turq says that Edg isn't worth
reading, while devoting HIS 7TH POST OF THE DAY to him! the irony is
priceless.
> >
> > ignore Turq, Edg, there are plenty of us supporting you.
> >
> > As authfriend said, Turq takes this place far more SERIOUSLY than
the rest of us do (so it is impossible for him to admit that he is the
entertainment clown on here, not all of those he points his wizened,
shaky finger at).
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , TurquoiseB  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , Duveyoung  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post
> > > > about my being over the top and completely whacked about
> > > > "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept,
> > > > i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.
> > >
> > > You ignore the possibility that most people
> > > have already put you in the same class as
> > > Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> > > of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[off_world_beings]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , "raunchydog" 
wrote:
>
> In café light computer glow
> A spider weaves his web
> To snag a tasty boy or girl
> And trap them in his thread
>
> Suspended tethered by his wits
> In trance are they before him
> The shallow dishpan of his love
> Preys on forever grim
>
> A one night stand a piper's dance
> Lovers leaving ever
> His empty net a wisp of wind
> Scattered dust and severed
>
> Twilight moon in Sitges waning
> Youthful bloom a-fading
> Cruising beaches wrinkled, naked>>

Is this a poem about Turq?

( good poem by the way. Poor subject - TurquoiseB - you chose though.  )

OffWorld


> Reaper's cloak evading>>>
>
> raunchydog
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[off_world_beings]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , grate.swan 
wrote:
>
> One of the reasons I strayed away (and stayed away) from the Movement
was its cliqueness. I found even the "most profound" and experienced
meditators and teachers all hung out together, and basically looked down
on everyone else.>>

I totally agree, I could not stand those people. That is why I left the
movement. And now all those arrogant fucks have also left the movement,
and are now here on FFL as the TM-ex crowd.   Its ironic.The only
constant is their arrogance (Turq, Vaj, Curtis etc.)

OffWorld



  << but over time I got established. Even go the nerve to 
date non-Movement girls. Talk about walking over the borderline, and
taking a walk on the wild side.
>
> I raise this, because FFL seems like deja vu all over again. Little
petty cliques. I like most everyone here, to a degree, Most have
something to contribute. And a quick scan of nothingness and I am on to
the next post.
>
> But the incessant "me good, you bad" neanderthal attitude of some is
just astonishing. I don't need a random, double blind, large
multi-variate controlled study to tell me that if this is what the long
term practice of TM, or Mindfulness, or exotic, wierd-shit-of-the-day
produces, its not working. And not worth much. At least as a global
thing. Some seem to benefit from it. I like it. I like other things too.
I would not pass the Movement bookshelf test. (an believe me, once upon
a time, I did give a rats ass about that.)
>
> A not-TM mentor I like said once, something like, "if you can't love
or appreciate the people around you, how are you ever going to
experience the Unity of all creation". The more bickering, bitterness,
baiting and borisjness -- the more darkness. Maybe TM produces darkness
in some people. Who knows. The data appears to support the hypothesis.
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , enlightened_dawn11 
wrote:
> >
> > ha-ha- laugh of the day-- get this, Turq says that Edg isn't worth
reading, while devoting HIS 7TH POST OF THE DAY to him! the irony is
priceless.
> >
> > ignore Turq, Edg, there are plenty of us supporting you.
> >
> > As authfriend said, Turq takes this place far more SERIOUSLY than
the rest of us do (so it is impossible for him to admit that he is the
entertainment clown on here, not all of those he points his wizened,
shaky finger at).
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , TurquoiseB  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , Duveyoung  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post
> > > > about my being over the top and completely whacked about
> > > > "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept,
> > > > i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.
> > >
> > > You ignore the possibility that most people
> > > have already put you in the same class as
> > > Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> > > of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[raunchydog]

In café light computer glow
A spider weaves his web
To snag a tasty boy or girl
And trap them in his thread

Suspended tethered by his wits
In trance are they before him
The shallow dishpan of his love
Preys on forever grim

A one night stand a piper's dance 
Lovers leaving ever
His empty net a wisp of wind
Scattered dust and severed

Twilight moon in Sitges waning 
Youthful bloom a-fading
Cruising beaches wrinkled, naked
Reaper's cloak evading

raunchydog

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[grate . swan]

One of the reasons I strayed away (and stayed away) from the Movement was its 
cliqueness. I found even the "most profound" and experienced meditators and 
teachers all hung out together, and basically looked down on everyone else. No 
one else admitted. I was at a beach outing  one day with them and it just 
became so clear. "There is something more to life than living within a TM 
clique". That day, I just dropped out. No one saw me again - for years. I knew 
almost no one in the real world outside the clique  but over 
time I got established. Even go the nerve to  date non-Movement girls. Talk 
about walking over the borderline, and taking a walk on the wild side. 

I raise this, because FFL seems like deja vu all over again. Little petty 
cliques. I like most everyone here, to a degree, Most have something to 
contribute. And a quick scan of nothingness and I am on to the next post. 

But the incessant "me good, you bad" neanderthal attitude of some is just 
astonishing. I don't need a random, double blind, large multi-variate 
controlled study to tell me that if this is what the long term practice of TM, 
or Mindfulness, or exotic, wierd-shit-of-the-day produces, its not working. And 
not worth much. At least as a global thing. Some seem to benefit from it. I 
like it. I like other things too. I would not pass the Movement bookshelf test. 
(an believe me, once upon a time, I did give a rats ass about that.) 

A not-TM mentor I like said once, something like, "if you can't love or 
appreciate the people around you, how are you ever going to experience the 
Unity of all creation". The more bickering, bitterness, baiting and borisjness 
-- the more darkness. Maybe TM produces darkness in some people. Who knows. The 
data appears to support the hypothesis.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11  wrote:
>
> ha-ha- laugh of the day-- get this, Turq says that Edg isn't worth reading, 
> while devoting HIS 7TH POST OF THE DAY to him! the irony is priceless.
> 
> ignore Turq, Edg, there are plenty of us supporting you. 
> 
> As authfriend said, Turq takes this place far more SERIOUSLY than the rest of 
> us do (so it is impossible for him to admit that he is the entertainment 
> clown on here, not all of those he points his wizened, shaky finger at).
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post 
> > > about my being over the top and completely whacked about 
> > > "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept, 
> > > i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.  
> > 
> > You ignore the possibility that most people
> > have already put you in the same class as
> > Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> > of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[enlightened_dawn11]

you are crackin' me up!!!
 
here are a few quotes from YOUR HERO Barry Wright, NOT included in your 
precious list of "the few nasties on this list":

"All three of them deserved to be called that
because they were acting like cunts."

"You're just a cunt."

"That said, Palin really IS a bimbo and a cunt"

"Hell hath no fury like a cunt ignored."

"Ah, I get it now. It's that time of year again,
that week when the Who Can Be The Most Argumentative
Cunt On Fairfield Life Contest rolls around."

LOL! what a bone head you are!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine  wrote:
> >
> > On May 5, 2009, at 2:19 PM, do.rflex wrote:
> > 
> > >>> I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post about my  
> > >>> being over the top and completely whacked about "predation," I'm  
> > >>> going with the "silent majority" concept, i.e., the silence means  
> > >>> I'm being supported.  As if, but, hey, better I claim the silent  
> > >>> majority vote before this bastard tries to characterize it as a  
> > >>> deafening roar of giggles at Edg's expense.
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of mental  
> > >> instability on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the  
> > >> kind of comment you're looking for?
> > 
> > Well put, flex and satvadude.
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> Turq is apparently quite successful at hitting the sensitive nerves of the 
> few nasties on this list.
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Sal Sunshine]

On May 5, 2009, at 3:02 PM, satvadude108 wrote:

In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of  
mental

instability on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the
kind of comment you're looking for?


Well put, flex and satvadude.
But I gotta admit to thoroughly enjoying
these periodic meltdowns of Edg's.  Am
I the only sicko here who does?  :)



Do you stay home and watch NASCAR on
Saturdays Sal?

I'm just sayin' :-)


Who needs nascar when we got
our very own train wrecks?

Sal

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"  wrote:

> Turq is apparently quite successful at hitting the
> sensitive nerves of the few nasties on this list.

HAHAHA!!

Like, you're not one of them? Like *Barry* isn't one
of them?

Give me a freaking break.

Barry sure did a good job of hitting *your* sensitive
nerves back when you were in suck-up-to-Judy mode.

Incidentally, I wouldn't want to pass judgment on
Edg's emotional health, and I think his "predator"
kick is kinda silly, but he's just *nailed* Barry's
transparent phoniness in several of his recent posts.

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[do.rflex]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine  wrote:
>
> On May 5, 2009, at 2:19 PM, do.rflex wrote:
> 
> >>> I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post about my  
> >>> being over the top and completely whacked about "predation," I'm  
> >>> going with the "silent majority" concept, i.e., the silence means  
> >>> I'm being supported.  As if, but, hey, better I claim the silent  
> >>> majority vote before this bastard tries to characterize it as a  
> >>> deafening roar of giggles at Edg's expense.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of mental  
> >> instability on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the  
> >> kind of comment you're looking for?
> 
> Well put, flex and satvadude.

---


Turq is apparently quite successful at hitting the sensitive nerves of the few 
nasties on this list.




> But I gotta admit to thoroughly enjoying
> these periodic meltdowns of Edg's.  Am
> I the only sicko here who does?  :)
> C'mon, admit it...so do  you.
> 
> (Pete would probably call this classic
> projection, and I'm not going to argue!)
> 
> Sal
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[satvadude108]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine  wrote:
>
> On May 5, 2009, at 2:19 PM, do.rflex wrote:
> 
> >>> I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post about my  
> >>> being over the top and completely whacked about "predation," I'm  
> >>> going with the "silent majority" concept, i.e., the silence means  
> >>> I'm being supported.  As if, but, hey, better I claim the silent  
> >>> majority vote before this bastard tries to characterize it as a  
> >>> deafening roar of giggles at Edg's expense.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of mental  
> >> instability on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the  
> >> kind of comment you're looking for?
> 
> Well put, flex and satvadude.
> But I gotta admit to thoroughly enjoying
> these periodic meltdowns of Edg's.  Am
> I the only sicko here who does?  :)


Do you stay home and watch NASCAR on
Saturdays Sal? 

I'm just sayin' :-)


> C'mon, admit it...so do  you.
> 
> (Pete would probably call this classic
> projection, and I'm not going to argue!)
> 
> Sal
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Sal Sunshine]

On May 5, 2009, at 2:19 PM, do.rflex wrote:

I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post about my  
being over the top and completely whacked about "predation," I'm  
going with the "silent majority" concept, i.e., the silence means  
I'm being supported.  As if, but, hey, better I claim the silent  
majority vote before this bastard tries to characterize it as a  
deafening roar of giggles at Edg's expense.


---

In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of mental  
instability on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the  
kind of comment you're looking for?


Well put, flex and satvadude.
But I gotta admit to thoroughly enjoying
these periodic meltdowns of Edg's.  Am
I the only sicko here who does?  :)
C'mon, admit it...so do  you.

(Pete would probably call this classic
projection, and I'm not going to argue!)

Sal

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[nablusoss1008]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11  wrote:
>
> ha-ha- laugh of the day-- get this, Turq says that Edg isn't worth reading, 
> while devoting HIS 7TH POST OF THE DAY to him! the irony is priceless.
> 
> ignore Turq, Edg, there are plenty of us supporting you. 
> 
> As authfriend said, Turq takes this place far more SERIOUSLY than the rest of 
> us do (so it is impossible for him to admit that he is the entertainment 
> clown on here, not all of those he points his wizened, shaky finger at).

HaHa, so true !  :-)


> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post 
> > > about my being over the top and completely whacked about 
> > > "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept, 
> > > i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.  
> > 
> > You ignore the possibility that most people
> > have already put you in the same class as
> > Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> > of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[do.rflex]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:



> I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post about my being over 
> the top and completely whacked about "predation," I'm going with the "silent 
> majority" concept, i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.  As if, but, 
> hey, better I claim the silent majority vote before this bastard tries to 
> characterize it as a deafening roar of giggles at Edg's expense.  

---

In my view, you've consistently displayed a clear history of mental instability 
on this forum ever since I've been here. Is that the kind of comment you're 
looking for?

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[enlightened_dawn11]

ha-ha- laugh of the day-- get this, Turq says that Edg isn't worth reading, 
while devoting HIS 7TH POST OF THE DAY to him! the irony is priceless.

ignore Turq, Edg, there are plenty of us supporting you. 

As authfriend said, Turq takes this place far more SERIOUSLY than the rest of 
us do (so it is impossible for him to admit that he is the entertainment clown 
on here, not all of those he points his wizened, shaky finger at).

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
> >
> > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post 
> > about my being over the top and completely whacked about 
> > "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept, 
> > i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.  
> 
> You ignore the possibility that most people
> have already put you in the same class as
> Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
>

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Duveyoung]

TurquoiseB wrote: 
> You ignore the possibility that most people
> have already put you in the same class as
> Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...


Well, if folks have indeed put me into such a class, then they have an onus to 
notify me of that.  Why?  Because, I'm here, and I'm listening, and I'm 
approachable, and if I'm wrong, and they know it, and yet they do not point it 
out to me, then, hey, they're allowing me to be laughable in the future when a 
word or two might correct my thinking. Seems to me they'd want me to stop being 
a FFL irritant.

Let me handle your next argument: "They don't have to post anything about Edg 
being laughable, because Turq has already completely laid out the case against 
Edg's concepts such that their additional voicings would be merely redundant."

The issue is predation, Turq, not "let's imagine up what the non-posters are 
thinking about Edg."

Of course, as a narcissist, let me remind everyone, that, in my eyes, any 
attention on me is like receiving the benefits of a yagya or at least a mitzva. 
 Hee heeeven narcissism has its upsides.  

Are you talking to me?  Are you talking to me?  You are?  Alrght!

No such thing as bad press.  Maybe I'll go really over the top on Turq's ass 
and get even more Sals to pipe up.  I'll bask in itsomeone hand me the 
tanning lotion.

Edg

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[Richard J. Williams]

> > I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood 
> > of folks post about my being over the top and 
> > completely whacked about "predation," I'm going 
> > with the "silent majority" concept, i.e., the 
> > silence means I'm being supported.  
> >
TurquoiseB wrote:
> You ignore the possibility that most people
> have already put you in the same class as
> Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
> of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...
>
According to Judy, silence indicates agreement.

From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: MMY - Tyrant Crackpot!
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: Nov 11, 2005 11:18:10
http://tinyurl.com/7twmh

Where I come from silence signals agreement.

[FairfieldLife] Get out the vote! (Re: Sexy Time)

[TurquoiseB]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung  wrote:
>
> I'm ashamed to admit it, but unless a flood of folks post 
> about my being over the top and completely whacked about 
> "predation," I'm going with the "silent majority" concept, 
> i.e., the silence means I'm being supported.  

You ignore the possibility that most people
have already put you in the same class as
Willytex, Jim, and Judy, and thus not worthy
of reading, much less replying to. Just sayin'...