[FairfieldLife] Much Ado About Nothing

2013-11-07 Thread TurquoiseB

No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily squabbles.
It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but have been
unable to because it won't be officially released either in France or in
the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath come to the
rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished watching it.

To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about the
making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by Joss
Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers during a
contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially if they were
in the middle of making the film that would go on to become the
highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax during those
two weeks.

Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former
actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12
days. In his house.

This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea in
that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were hosting
Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held cameras and
found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east and set in the
west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way of having fun,
one aspect of the production he described as terrifying. He wrote the
music, along the way scoring two of the songs that Shakespeare wrote for
the play. The songs were recorded by Joss' brother Jed and his wife
Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife kinda ran both the production and
the household as her house was invaded by a host of actors and film crew
for two weeks. So it was a real family affair.

That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed.

Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so
there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, as
no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this with one
scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more (insert
Zip it! sketch here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8 ),
except to say that this one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's
play into something infinitely more understandable in our era, and
renders the interplay between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis
Denisof) more believable in a more sexually liberated era.

I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this
retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short
cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history.
The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from Joss'
other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun.

I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1)
Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of the 
Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will only be
increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in looks like,
and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered one of
Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and with
abundant humor.

Think about it. The entire movie was done by A Group Of Friends On
Vacation, doing all of this for FUN. There is a certain magic in this.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Much Ado About Nothing

2013-11-07 Thread Bhairitu
It's been available at Redbox for a few weeks but I was vested in a 31 
days of horror fest so haven't gotten to it yet.


On 11/07/2013 02:07 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:



No, this is not a cafe rap about Fairfield Life and its daily 
squabbles. It's a review of a film that I have been dying to see, but 
have been unable to because it won't be officially released either in 
France or in the Netherlands until January. But the pirateverse hath 
come to the rescue -- I scored a 1080p version, and just finished 
watching it.


To fully appreciate the film, it really helps to know a little about 
the making of the film. It was produced, directed, shot, and scored by 
Joss Whedon, while on leave from the filming of The Avengers 
during a contractually-forced two week hiatus. Some guys, especially 
if they were in the middle of making the film that would go on to 
become the highest-grossing film in history, would kick back and relax 
during those two weeks.


Joss made a movie instead. He paid for it himself, recruited former 
actors he'd worked with before to appear in it, and shot it all in 12 
days. In his house.


This last bit is important, because Joss first conceived of the idea 
in that house (designed by his wife) years earlier when they were 
hosting Shakespeare readings at the house. He shoots using hand-held 
cameras and found lighting -- Our lighting package rose in the east 
and set in the west. And while making the movie itself was Joss' way 
of having fun, one aspect of the production he described as 
terrifying. He wrote the music, along the way scoring two of the 
songs that Shakespeare wrote for the play. The songs were recorded by 
Joss' brother Jed and his wife Maurissa Tancharoen, while Joss' wife 
kinda ran both the production and the household as her house was 
invaded by a host of actors and film crew for two weeks. So it was a 
real family affair.


That said, the play's afoot...let us proceed.

Suffice it to say that this is a film adaptation by Joss Whedon, so 
there has to be a *twist*, some way of seeing the Bard's words anew, 
as no one else has ever seen them before. Joss manages all of this 
with one scene, shown in silence before the credits. I can say no more 
(insert Zip it! sketch here 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32C0eKRQVt8), except to say that this 
one scene *completely* transforms Shakespeare's play into something 
infinitely more understandable in our era, and renders the interplay 
between Beatrice (Amy Acker) and Benedick (Alexis Denisof) more 
believable in a more sexually liberated era.


I am a *serious* fan of Amy Acker, and she doth not disappoint in this 
retelling of the Bard's tale. Nathan Fillion is charming in a short 
cameo as Dogberry, one of the most inept cops in playwriting history. 
The other cast (many of them faces, if not names, you'll know from 
Joss' other works) are equally up to their task of Having Fun.


I really liked Much Ado About Nothing, and recommend it highly to 1) 
Shakespeare fans -- you'll never see a more creative adaptation of 
the  Bard's work, 2) Joss Whedon fans -- your love for the man will 
only be increased by your knowledge of what the place he lives in 
looks like, and 3) lovers of great comedy -- this play is considered 
one of Shakespeare's best comedies -- produced lovingly, well, and 
with abundant humor.


Think about it. The entire movie was done by A Group Of Friends On 
Vacation, doing all of this for FUN. There is a certain magic in this.







[FairfieldLife] Much Ado About Nothing

2013-03-19 Thread PaliGap
No longer can you take your seats for Krauss v Albert
- the Rumble In the Ontological Jungle.

http://tinyurl.com/cmx9dfw

Among the speakers will be several leading physicists, 
including Lawrence M. Krauss, whose book A Universe from 
Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing became a 
cause célèbre in the scientific blogosphere last spring after 
a scathing review in the New York Times Book Review by the 
philosopher David Z. Albert.

But Mr. Albert will not be onstage, having been abruptly 
disinvited by the museum several months after he agreed to 
take part.

The tone of the dustup between Mr. Albert and Mr. Krauss — 
summed up by one blogger as an ongoing cosmological street 
fight that had broken out broad media daylight — would have 
certainly left those who saw both men's names on early 
publicity material anticipating something closer to a 
wrestling match than dispassionate scholarly discussion.

In his review Mr. Albert, who also has a Ph.D. in theoretical 
physics, mocked Mr. Krauss's cocksure claim to have found in 
the laws of quantum mechanics a definitive answer to the 
vexing question of the ultimate origins of the universe. (So 
where did those laws come from? he asked.) Mr. Krauss 
countered with a pugnacious interview in The Atlantic, in 
which he called Mr. Albert moronic and dismissed the 
philosophy of science as worthless.