Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Beatles review from London Times, 1963

2014-02-15 Thread Bhairitu
I'm sure the Beatles were amused with the review.  Whether they 
themselves knew what the reviewer was talking about would be another 
matter.  There is this tendency for record company PR people to cover up 
any formal training.  I do seem to recall that both George and Paul had 
some music lessons. Back in that time period they may have even listened 
a bit to jazz and picked up some tips from teachers and fellow 
musicians.  Going from the tonic to the flatted 6th key works nicely and 
provides a refreshing sounding modulation plus you can just return back 
to the tonic without it being jarring.  Modes were also being played 
with by jazz musicians and rock musicians would sometimes experiment 
with jazz elements to come up with new ideas.


On 02/14/2014 07:32 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


Remarkably prescient review for a band that had only just started to 
make waves. Makes a salutary contrast to my many dismissals of new 
bands over the years that later became huge! But even I had my 
moments. I loved this track from Hotlegs the pre-10cc name chosen 
by Godley and Creme. I saw these guys showed promise though everyone 
else said the song was crap . . .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN5m2nppq8Qamp;list=FLJad8vN225Nr5hDIzlEOYMA





[FairfieldLife] RE: Beatles review from London Times, 1963

2014-02-14 Thread s3raphita
Remarkably prescient review for a band that had only just started to make 
waves. Makes a salutary contrast to my many dismissals of new bands over the 
years that later became huge! But even I had my moments. I loved this track 
from Hotlegs the pre-10cc name chosen by Godley and Creme. I saw these guys 
showed promise though everyone else said the song was crap . . . 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN5m2nppq8Qamp;list=FLJad8vN225Nr5hDIzlEOYMA 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN5m2nppq8Qamp;list=FLJad8vN225Nr5hDIzlEOYMA