"However, clearly Science does not yet have a measurement handle on shakti in 
the human psycho spiritual body. MRI’s, EEG’s, blood chemistry and such as 
tools are yet way too coarse"
 

 People can have lots of shakti and not be enlightened. Measuring shakti is not 
the primary objective. fMRIs can measure remarkably subtle brain activity. Many 
related and other technologies and methods are emerging. While there may be 
subtle changes and phenomenon that are currently beyond measurement, there 
clearly are a vast number of factors that can be measured and studied. Advanced 
states of awakening clearly must have neurophysiological correlates, for 
example, new or more developed brain networks which can be "viewed" and studied 
with fMRIs. Much can be learned from comprehensive studies on practitioners, in 
deep meditation and during active tasks, who have cultivated their nervous 
systems to sustain such states. Clear models of enlightened neurophysiology do 
not yet exist, but will emerge and become clearer over time. However, there are 
a number of markers common in advanced practitioners. Beyond neurophysiological 
studies, in-depth cognitive studies should identify a myriad of changes in 
performance tasks, memory, sensory acuity, fluid intelligence, etc. 
 

 Relying on a teachers' followers for evaluations has serious limitations. 
Followers tend to be biased, both in the evaluation of their progress, their 
teacher's capabilities and what they share with others. 

Reply via email to