[FairfieldLife] Re: More Christmas Stories

2012-12-13 Thread obbajeeba
Heh. Hit the nail on the head (no sexual pun intended, unless you want it to 
be.) haha

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote:

 No madam, it's quite healthy for males to have periodical sexual thoughts
 and fantasies but Barry shows abnormally unhealthy levels of these - his
 whole philosophy, shtick seems to be based on that - very stunted, twisted
 and sick almost - it doesn't look like he had any meaningful, healthy
 relationships with women, quite disrespectful - he makes me wanna throw up.
 
 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@...wrote:
 
  **
 
 
  Typical males - obsessed with their own organs, the functionality and
  size of these organs, whether women are faking it or not, and how they can
  get a virgin.  Wait, am I reading too little into this?
 
--
  *From:* turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
  *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  *Sent:* Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:09 AM
  *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] More Christmas Stories
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Wow that poster in NYC proved it really IS the Age of
   Enlightenment. Thanks for posting that.
 
  Thought you'd like it. :-)
 
  snippus interruptus, cutting to the...uh...climax)
 
   Speaking of that [the mythology of Christmas] I was
   considering how consensual the whole Holy Ghost hook-up
   was back in the day...I mean if a boss comes on to an
   employee we cry foul and bust him for coercion. I think
   the whole Mary story is ripe for a feminist retelling
   as a tragedy. What choice did she really have when the
   creepy uncle of the Triune God made a play for her? Did
   he during what must have been a fairly clumsy seduction
   remind her of what he did to the dinosaurs, or was it
   like the greatest Justin Bieber concert display but in
   the end he takes her back to the dressing room? Did he
   at least let her finish or was it just a typical wham
   bam thank you mam? Did she feel obliged to fake it to
   sooth his monstrous ego. Oh baby, that was divine!
  
   These are the questions that swirl around my head as I
   gaze on my nativity. Did Mary know what he son was
   headed for when she signed up her uterus for this
   project, or was it presented like a Hollywood script
   with a lot of pages at the end with TBD at the top? Did
   her youth and inexperience, her cultural deference to men
   limit her ability to ask how it all ends before she signed
   on? What if she had told him she had a headache that night,
   would he have been a gentleman?
  
   And having been around a few babies in my time, when Mary
   changed his diaper did even the Oxen rear up their heads
   and lumber out of the manger grunting damn that holy
   guacamole is nasty!
 
  While your version of the Christmas Story is far more
  entertaining than most, I have to log in as saying that
  it still sets off my inner Occam's Razor Detector a tad
  too much. The reason is that it riffs off of, but still
  relies on, Mary's version of the Immaculate Conception.
  That is, that there actually *was* a human-ghost get-it-on.
 
  While there may be some anecdotal evidence of women who
  said that they were raped by non-physical beings, there
  is not a lot of evidence of anyone getting knocked up
  as the result of such an astral assignation. So Occam's
  Razor tells me that there must be a simpler -- and thus
  more likely -- explanation for her pregnancy.
 
  My theory revolves around the somewhat curious fact that
  Mary is continually referred to as a virgin. This despite
  the fact that she's married to this older guy, Joseph.
 
  What's up with that?
 
  Are we to assume that Joseph didn't diddle Mary because
  he was psychically seeing Jesus coming and didn't want to
  mess with a good myth? Or is it more likely that Joseph,
  as nice a guy as he may have been, was a little weak in
  the willy. A bit of erectile dysfunction, if you get what
  I mean. Voila. The problem of Mary's lingering virginity
  is solved -- Joe just couldn't get it up.
 
  So what's a young married babe (and you've seen the paint-
  ings of Mary...she *was* a babe) to do? She's stuck in what
  was probably an arranged marriage with this old fuck, and
  because he can't get it up she's deprived of even the
  sensual benefits of marriage.
 
  At this point Lem, the dim-witted but handsome and hunky
  stableboy next door starts looking better and better. So
  one day, while carpenter Joseph is off cutting wood instead
  of springing it, Mary sneaks next door and gets it on with
  Lem. You may assume that this indiscretion repeated itself
  or that it was a one-afternoon stand, depending on how
  religious you are, but eventually it resulted in Mary
  getting good and knocked up.
 
  So she's gotta tell Joe. What to do, what to do? Should
  Mary tell him the truth, and make him feel even shittier
  about his wilted 

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Christmas Stories

2012-12-12 Thread curtisdeltablues
I think you were writing this as I was riffing on a similar thing.  In Catholic 
theology the immaculate conception is not about Mary being a virgin, but being 
uniquely born without original sin and therefor able to bear Jesus.  So the 
jury is still out on Joseph's mojo.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  Wow that poster in NYC proved it really IS the Age of 
  Enlightenment.  Thanks for posting that.
 
 Thought you'd like it. :-)
 
 snippus interruptus, cutting to the...uh...climax)
 
  Speaking of that [the mythology of Christmas] I was 
  considering how consensual the whole Holy Ghost hook-up 
  was back in the day...I mean if a boss comes on to an 
  employee we cry foul and bust him for coercion. I think 
  the whole Mary story is ripe for a feminist retelling 
  as a tragedy. What choice did she really have when the 
  creepy uncle of the Triune God made a play for her? Did 
  he during what must have been a fairly clumsy seduction 
  remind her of what he did to the dinosaurs, or was it 
  like the greatest Justin Bieber concert display but in 
  the end he takes her back to the dressing room? Did he 
  at least let her finish or was it just a typical wham 
  bam thank you mam?  Did she feel obliged to fake it to 
  sooth his monstrous ego. Oh baby, that was divine!
  
  These are the questions that swirl around my head as I 
  gaze on my nativity.  Did Mary know what he son was 
  headed for when she signed up her uterus for this 
  project, or was it presented like a Hollywood script 
  with a lot of pages at the end with TBD at the top?  Did 
  her youth and inexperience, her cultural deference to men 
  limit her ability to ask how it all ends before she signed 
  on? What if she had told him she had a headache that night, 
  would he have been a gentleman?
  
  And having been around a few babies in my time, when Mary 
  changed his diaper did even the Oxen rear up their heads 
  and lumber out of the manger grunting damn that holy 
  guacamole is nasty! 
 
 While your version of the Christmas Story is far more
 entertaining than most, I have to log in as saying that
 it still sets off my inner Occam's Razor Detector a tad
 too much. The reason is that it riffs off of, but still
 relies on, Mary's version of the Immaculate Conception. 
 That is, that there actually *was* a human-ghost get-it-on. 
 
 While there may be some anecdotal evidence of women who
 said that they were raped by non-physical beings, there
 is not a lot of evidence of anyone getting knocked up
 as the result of such an astral assignation. So Occam's 
 Razor tells me that there must be a simpler -- and thus 
 more likely -- explanation for her pregnancy. 
 
 My theory revolves around the somewhat curious fact that
 Mary is continually referred to as a virgin. This despite
 the fact that she's married to this older guy, Joseph. 
 
 What's up with that?
 
 Are we to assume that Joseph didn't diddle Mary because
 he was psychically seeing Jesus coming and didn't want to
 mess with a good myth? Or is it more likely that Joseph,
 as nice a guy as he may have been, was a little weak in
 the willy. A bit of erectile dysfunction, if you get what
 I mean. Voila. The problem of Mary's lingering virginity 
 is solved -- Joe just couldn't get it up. 
 
 So what's a young married babe (and you've seen the paint-
 ings of Mary...she *was* a babe) to do? She's stuck in what
 was probably an arranged marriage with this old fuck, and
 because he can't get it up she's deprived of even the
 sensual benefits of marriage. 
 
 At this point Lem, the dim-witted but handsome and hunky
 stableboy next door starts looking better and better. So
 one day, while carpenter Joseph is off cutting wood instead
 of springing it, Mary sneaks next door and gets it on with
 Lem. You may assume that this indiscretion repeated itself
 or that it was a one-afternoon stand, depending on how 
 religious you are, but eventually it resulted in Mary 
 getting good and knocked up. 
 
 So she's gotta tell Joe. What to do, what to do? Should
 Mary tell him the truth, and make him feel even shittier
 about his wilted willy than he already does? So she thinks,
 Maybe I'll spare him all that pain and just make up some
 outlandish story about getting knocked up by God. Voila,
 Mary's version of the Immaculate Conception. 
 
 I like this theory because it kinda leaves Joseph a nice,
 if cuckolded, guy and Mary is easy to develop compassion
 for because she was trying to spare his feelings. Plus, it
 suits the Occam's Razor the simplest explanation is the
 most likely explanation criterion. 
 
 The only problem with this theory is that now we've got
 to develop a whole mythology around Lem. It was *his* 
 genes that went on to become Jesus and change the world,
 after all. Isn't it time Lem had his own church?





[FairfieldLife] Re: More Christmas Stories

2012-12-12 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... 
wrote:

 I think you were writing this as I was riffing on a 
 similar thing.  

That's just SO Woo Woo. Maybe what Jimbo meant when
he talked about things we send each other privately
was that we're in constant psychic communication. 

Either that or that our senses of humor are similarly
warped. :-)

 In Catholic theology the immaculate conception is not 
 about Mary being a virgin, but being uniquely born 
 without original sin and therefor able to bear Jesus.  
 So the jury is still out on Joseph's mojo.

Catholic theology strikes me as a little light in
the loafers there, dude. They're overlooking how easy
it is for a person to be born without original sin.

All they have to do is not be born Catholic, and thus
become prey to all that guilt indoctrination. :-)


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Wow that poster in NYC proved it really IS the Age of 
   Enlightenment.  Thanks for posting that.
  
  Thought you'd like it. :-)
  
  snippus interruptus, cutting to the...uh...climax)
  
   Speaking of that [the mythology of Christmas] I was 
   considering how consensual the whole Holy Ghost hook-up 
   was back in the day...I mean if a boss comes on to an 
   employee we cry foul and bust him for coercion. I think 
   the whole Mary story is ripe for a feminist retelling 
   as a tragedy. What choice did she really have when the 
   creepy uncle of the Triune God made a play for her? Did 
   he during what must have been a fairly clumsy seduction 
   remind her of what he did to the dinosaurs, or was it 
   like the greatest Justin Bieber concert display but in 
   the end he takes her back to the dressing room? Did he 
   at least let her finish or was it just a typical wham 
   bam thank you mam?  Did she feel obliged to fake it to 
   sooth his monstrous ego. Oh baby, that was divine!
   
   These are the questions that swirl around my head as I 
   gaze on my nativity.  Did Mary know what he son was 
   headed for when she signed up her uterus for this 
   project, or was it presented like a Hollywood script 
   with a lot of pages at the end with TBD at the top?  Did 
   her youth and inexperience, her cultural deference to men 
   limit her ability to ask how it all ends before she signed 
   on? What if she had told him she had a headache that night, 
   would he have been a gentleman?
   
   And having been around a few babies in my time, when Mary 
   changed his diaper did even the Oxen rear up their heads 
   and lumber out of the manger grunting damn that holy 
   guacamole is nasty! 
  
  While your version of the Christmas Story is far more
  entertaining than most, I have to log in as saying that
  it still sets off my inner Occam's Razor Detector a tad
  too much. The reason is that it riffs off of, but still
  relies on, Mary's version of the Immaculate Conception. 
  That is, that there actually *was* a human-ghost get-it-on. 
  
  While there may be some anecdotal evidence of women who
  said that they were raped by non-physical beings, there
  is not a lot of evidence of anyone getting knocked up
  as the result of such an astral assignation. So Occam's 
  Razor tells me that there must be a simpler -- and thus 
  more likely -- explanation for her pregnancy. 
  
  My theory revolves around the somewhat curious fact that
  Mary is continually referred to as a virgin. This despite
  the fact that she's married to this older guy, Joseph. 
  
  What's up with that?
  
  Are we to assume that Joseph didn't diddle Mary because
  he was psychically seeing Jesus coming and didn't want to
  mess with a good myth? Or is it more likely that Joseph,
  as nice a guy as he may have been, was a little weak in
  the willy. A bit of erectile dysfunction, if you get what
  I mean. Voila. The problem of Mary's lingering virginity 
  is solved -- Joe just couldn't get it up. 
  
  So what's a young married babe (and you've seen the paint-
  ings of Mary...she *was* a babe) to do? She's stuck in what
  was probably an arranged marriage with this old fuck, and
  because he can't get it up she's deprived of even the
  sensual benefits of marriage. 
  
  At this point Lem, the dim-witted but handsome and hunky
  stableboy next door starts looking better and better. So
  one day, while carpenter Joseph is off cutting wood instead
  of springing it, Mary sneaks next door and gets it on with
  Lem. You may assume that this indiscretion repeated itself
  or that it was a one-afternoon stand, depending on how 
  religious you are, but eventually it resulted in Mary 
  getting good and knocked up. 
  
  So she's gotta tell Joe. What to do, what to do? Should
  Mary tell him the truth, and make him feel even shittier
  about his wilted willy than he already does? So she thinks,
  Maybe I'll spare him all that pain 

[FairfieldLife] Re: More Christmas Stories

2012-12-12 Thread doctordumbass
My theory revolves around the somewhat curious fact that
Mary is continually referred to as a virgin. This despite
the fact that she's married to this older guy, Joseph.

What's up with that?

Are we to assume that Joseph didn't diddle Mary because
he was psychically seeing Jesus coming and didn't want to
mess with a good myth? Or is it more likely that Joseph,
as nice a guy as he may have been, was a little weak in
the willy. A bit of erectile dysfunction, if you get what
I mean. Voila. The problem of Mary's lingering virginity
is solved -- Joe just couldn't get it up.

So what's a young married babe (and you've seen the paint-
ings of Mary...she *was* a babe) to do? She's stuck in what
was probably an arranged marriage with this old fuck, and
because he can't get it up she's deprived of even the
sensual benefits of marriage.

This is what I mean, Barry, you are full of your fantasies. You, a perennially 
single guy, mention marriage *four times* in the imaginings above. You, who 
cannot sustain lasting relationships with women, are commenting on...MARRIAGE?! 

This is just like your fantasies on TM, which you abstained from quite a while 
ago. 

My (unasked for) advice? Stick to what'cha know. Otherwise, you just come 
across as a phony.

Oh, wait. You already do. Anyway, clean up your act, and we'll all get along 
fine. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 wrote:
 
  Wow that poster in NYC proved it really IS the Age of 
  Enlightenment.  Thanks for posting that.
 
 Thought you'd like it. :-)
 
 snippus interruptus, cutting to the...uh...climax)
 
  Speaking of that [the mythology of Christmas] I was 
  considering how consensual the whole Holy Ghost hook-up 
  was back in the day...I mean if a boss comes on to an 
  employee we cry foul and bust him for coercion. I think 
  the whole Mary story is ripe for a feminist retelling 
  as a tragedy. What choice did she really have when the 
  creepy uncle of the Triune God made a play for her? Did 
  he during what must have been a fairly clumsy seduction 
  remind her of what he did to the dinosaurs, or was it 
  like the greatest Justin Bieber concert display but in 
  the end he takes her back to the dressing room? Did he 
  at least let her finish or was it just a typical wham 
  bam thank you mam?  Did she feel obliged to fake it to 
  sooth his monstrous ego. Oh baby, that was divine!
  
  These are the questions that swirl around my head as I 
  gaze on my nativity.  Did Mary know what he son was 
  headed for when she signed up her uterus for this 
  project, or was it presented like a Hollywood script 
  with a lot of pages at the end with TBD at the top?  Did 
  her youth and inexperience, her cultural deference to men 
  limit her ability to ask how it all ends before she signed 
  on? What if she had told him she had a headache that night, 
  would he have been a gentleman?
  
  And having been around a few babies in my time, when Mary 
  changed his diaper did even the Oxen rear up their heads 
  and lumber out of the manger grunting damn that holy 
  guacamole is nasty! 
 
 While your version of the Christmas Story is far more
 entertaining than most, I have to log in as saying that
 it still sets off my inner Occam's Razor Detector a tad
 too much. The reason is that it riffs off of, but still
 relies on, Mary's version of the Immaculate Conception. 
 That is, that there actually *was* a human-ghost get-it-on. 
 
 While there may be some anecdotal evidence of women who
 said that they were raped by non-physical beings, there
 is not a lot of evidence of anyone getting knocked up
 as the result of such an astral assignation. So Occam's 
 Razor tells me that there must be a simpler -- and thus 
 more likely -- explanation for her pregnancy. 
 
 My theory revolves around the somewhat curious fact that
 Mary is continually referred to as a virgin. This despite
 the fact that she's married to this older guy, Joseph. 
 
 What's up with that?
 
 Are we to assume that Joseph didn't diddle Mary because
 he was psychically seeing Jesus coming and didn't want to
 mess with a good myth? Or is it more likely that Joseph,
 as nice a guy as he may have been, was a little weak in
 the willy. A bit of erectile dysfunction, if you get what
 I mean. Voila. The problem of Mary's lingering virginity 
 is solved -- Joe just couldn't get it up. 
 
 So what's a young married babe (and you've seen the paint-
 ings of Mary...she *was* a babe) to do? She's stuck in what
 was probably an arranged marriage with this old fuck, and
 because he can't get it up she's deprived of even the
 sensual benefits of marriage. 
 
 At this point Lem, the dim-witted but handsome and hunky
 stableboy next door starts looking better and better. So
 one day, while carpenter Joseph is off cutting wood instead
 of springing it, Mary sneaks next door and gets it on with
 Lem. You