[FairfieldLife] Re: More for Willitex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Angela, (and Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis) . . . I wonder if we could get, say, ten decent folks here out of the above list -- folks who post a lot of good stuff, good decent folks -- to go on strike until Rick bans him. There's only about 25 regulars here, so maybe Rick's pride in having a hot message board would come to the fore and he'd dump the War Monger for the greater good. Let's put it this way. If you don't stop this mob rule horseshit, Edg, I would consider joining a movement to ban YOU. This is the same mentality in you that you tried on me a while back, and I laughed at you for it. You, of course, got angry and defensive and went insane for a while, as you are wont to do. What I said then applies now: YOU HAVE NEITHER THE WISDOM NOR THE RIGHT TO MAKE DECLARATIONS ABOUT ANOTHER HUMAN BEING'S MORAL STATUS, OR DECLARE WHAT HE CAN OR CANNOT DO, ON THIS FORUM OR IN HIS LIFE. THE FACT THAT YOU TRY MAKES YOU A WANNABE FASCIST, NOT A GOOD GUY. Willytex is easily ignored. So are you. I usually ignore you both, him a little more than you. So far. In all these years I have learned that nothing will ever be gained by reading *any* of Willytex's posts, so I Next past them the moment I see his name in the header. Yours I give one or two lines of reading before I hit Next. I estimate that fewer than 5% of your posts hold my interest enough to read any further. Keep this fascist shit up and you've lost that 5% and been classed in EXACTLY the same category as the person you want to ban.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More for Willitex
Like most I just ignore Willy unless occasionally I want to toss a few basket balls or softballs or a pie at him. I only read the exchange yesterday because I notice what was going on between Angela and Willy. Willy has never defined what winning the war is so I challenged him on that and of course he can't answer because he doesn't have one. Now that's funny and something you can try out the next time you face one of the bumps that thinks the war is a good thing. Duveyoung wrote: Angela, (and Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis) Thanks, Angela, for smacking the War Monger with a bucket of truth. I've lost my motivation -- he's got his shields on red alert, fully blinkered, and if he lived next door to me, I'd move. With his denial, he's merely going to come back at you with some other issue or a quote from the Vedas or some smarmy crap. As I've been repeatedly told about this troll, his only goal is to get others riled up, and he's shooting fish in a barrel, because, what with the likes of you and I displaying our values, he knows what targets to shotgun. If we were worshiping the War Monger's mother, he'd say something negative about her. He's insentient to his own heart and smug about this numbness. He's never written a single word of love, wholeness, or compassion. I wonder if we could get, say, ten decent folks here out of the above list -- folks who post a lot of good stuff, good decent folks -- to go on strike until Rick bans him. There's only about 25 regulars here, so maybe Rick's pride in having a hot message board would come to the fore and he'd dump the War Monger for the greater good. Sorry, Rick, you have a lot of wisdom, but I think you've made a bad call to allow this particular marauder to post here with such relentless intent to harm us. His whacks are NOT Zen whacks -- they're simply whackings for whackings' sake. It does nothing for us that we expose ourselves to such attacks on our values. There's no profit in this exercising our restraint. I've got my restraint muscle nicely pumped up, thank you, don't need more weights to lift. So I feel a daily pressure on myself for what this means for my integrity. Who here would watch a child being abused in the street, probably not even the War Monger, but my babe-in-arms values are stomped by this fucking shitheel, and no one blinks except to say, ignore him. As it is, our values become the babies he rapes, the children he dismembers, the puppies he throws over cliffs -- just to see our hearts filled with the dismay that the War Monger cannot feel. He's using us to see his pain. Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Angela, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis -- please, I don't need another lecture about turning a cheek, ignoring, or growing up, just at least, right now, spend one post and simply say to this wad of dung, I'm not a war monger, I don't espouse raping countries and people for oil, and I don't appreciate your posts that support such marauding. Boom done. That would be 18 people hammering the War Monger's ego -- if that doesn't get the message through to him, then, finally, maybe Rick will see the poisonous drool that the War Monger drips into the party's fruit punch with a malevolent leering intent. Edg
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More for Willitex
Hey, Curtis, I never said anything about not enjoying Willitex's posts. I do not agree with Dove that he should be banned--I don't think anybody should be banned. I'm just getting to know Willitex through my recent conversation with him, and I like getting to know him. I don't agree with him at all, but that's got nothing to do with it. Anyway, this is my last post for the week, and if you don't like my conversation with Willitex, just don't read it. a --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Angela, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis -- please, I don't need another lecture about turning a cheek, ignoring, or growing up, just at least, right now, spend one post and simply say to this wad of dung, I'm not a war monger, I don't espouse raping countries and people for oil, and I don't appreciate your posts that support such marauding. So you want me to parrot back a phrase that you have given me? And all this without nipple clips or nurse's outfits? Are you confusing a YP for a MP? (your problem for my problem) Ganging up on a person and attempting to limit their posting because I disagree with the content of their contribution is probably the best description of the opposite of every value I stand for. The opposite. It is uncool. I already told you that Richard contributes posts I enjoy. Not everyone, but I'm sure I show up on some people's block list. Do you really know Rick so little by now that you think he would consider such a scheme? I remember when you tried the same thing with Turq? It was a shitty trick IMO. It took a while to see you as a person rather than just an angry attacker with an intellectual boundaries problem. You aren't going to lead any mob with torches here Edg. Haven't you figured that out? Once you've see Frankenstein take the flowers from the little girl by the river, you stop seeing a monster. I went through that process with you. and I have done it with Richard. There is no going back to the one dimensional for me about either of you. Nobody gets banned unless they try to spam the board and sell us a bunch of shit. (Imminent CD releases exempt of course!) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Angela, (and Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis) Thanks, Angela, for smacking the War Monger with a bucket of truth. I've lost my motivation -- he's got his shields on red alert, fully blinkered, and if he lived next door to me, I'd move. With his denial, he's merely going to come back at you with some other issue or a quote from the Vedas or some smarmy crap. As I've been repeatedly told about this troll, his only goal is to get others riled up, and he's shooting fish in a barrel, because, what with the likes of you and I displaying our values, he knows what targets to shotgun. If we were worshiping the War Monger's mother, he'd say something negative about her. He's insentient to his own heart and smug about this numbness. He's never written a single word of love, wholeness, or compassion. I wonder if we could get, say, ten decent folks here out of the above list -- folks who post a lot of good stuff, good decent folks -- to go on strike until Rick bans him. There's only about 25 regulars here, so maybe Rick's pride in having a hot message board would come to the fore and he'd dump the War Monger for the greater good. Sorry, Rick, you have a lot of wisdom, but I think you've made a bad call to allow this particular marauder to post here with such relentless intent to harm us. His whacks are NOT Zen whacks -- they're simply whackings for whackings' sake. It does nothing for us that we expose ourselves to such attacks on our values. There's no profit in this exercising our restraint. I've got my restraint muscle nicely pumped up, thank you, don't need more weights to lift. So I feel a daily pressure on myself for what this means for my integrity. Who here would watch a child being abused in the street, probably not even the War Monger, but my babe-in-arms values are stomped by this fucking shitheel, and no one blinks except to say, ignore him. As it is, our values become the babies he rapes, the children he dismembers, the puppies he throws over cliffs -- just to see our hearts filled with the dismay that the War Monger cannot feel. He's using us to see his pain. Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Angela, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis -- please, I don't need another lecture about turning a cheek, ignoring,
[FairfieldLife] Re: More for Willitex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Curtis, I never said anything about not enjoying Willitex's posts. I do not agree with Dove that he should be banned--I don't think anybody should be banned. I'm just getting to know Willitex through my recent conversation with him, and I like getting to know him. I don't agree with him at all, but that's got nothing to do with it. Anyway, this is my last post for the week, and if you don't like my conversation with Willitex, just don't read it. a Angela, I wasn't responding about your posts with Richard, I was only directing my post to Edg's suggestion. I was completely unaware of any exchanges you are having with him. I don't agree with him at all, but that's got nothing to do with it. Exactly how I feel. --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Angela, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis -- please, I don't need another lecture about turning a cheek, ignoring, or growing up, just at least, right now, spend one post and simply say to this wad of dung, I'm not a war monger, I don't espouse raping countries and people for oil, and I don't appreciate your posts that support such marauding. So you want me to parrot back a phrase that you have given me? And all this without nipple clips or nurse's outfits? Are you confusing a YP for a MP? (your problem for my problem) Ganging up on a person and attempting to limit their posting because I disagree with the content of their contribution is probably the best description of the opposite of every value I stand for. The opposite. It is uncool. I already told you that Richard contributes posts I enjoy. Not everyone, but I'm sure I show up on some people's block list. Do you really know Rick so little by now that you think he would consider such a scheme? I remember when you tried the same thing with Turq? It was a shitty trick IMO. It took a while to see you as a person rather than just an angry attacker with an intellectual boundaries problem. You aren't going to lead any mob with torches here Edg. Haven't you figured that out? Once you've see Frankenstein take the flowers from the little girl by the river, you stop seeing a monster. I went through that process with you. and I have done it with Richard. There is no going back to the one dimensional for me about either of you. Nobody gets banned unless they try to spam the board and sell us a bunch of shit. (Imminent CD releases exempt of course!) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote: Angela, (and Turq, Judy, Marek, Bhairitu, Lurk, Robert, Kirk, Sal, Do.rflex, Vaj, Dhamiltony2k5, Wayback71, Matrixmonitor, Stu, Hagen J. Holtz, and Curtis) Thanks, Angela, for smacking the War Monger with a bucket of truth. I've lost my motivation -- he's got his shields on red alert, fully blinkered, and if he lived next door to me, I'd move. With his denial, he's merely going to come back at you with some other issue or a quote from the Vedas or some smarmy crap. As I've been repeatedly told about this troll, his only goal is to get others riled up, and he's shooting fish in a barrel, because, what with the likes of you and I displaying our values, he knows what targets to shotgun. If we were worshiping the War Monger's mother, he'd say something negative about her. He's insentient to his own heart and smug about this numbness. He's never written a single word of love, wholeness, or compassion. I wonder if we could get, say, ten decent folks here out of the above list -- folks who post a lot of good stuff, good decent folks -- to go on strike until Rick bans him. There's only about 25 regulars here, so maybe Rick's pride in having a hot message board would come to the fore and he'd dump the War Monger for the greater good. Sorry, Rick, you have a lot of wisdom, but I think you've made a bad call to allow this particular marauder to post here with such relentless intent to harm us. His whacks are NOT Zen whacks -- they're simply whackings for whackings' sake. It does nothing for us that we expose ourselves to such attacks on our values. There's no profit in this exercising our restraint. I've got my restraint muscle nicely pumped up, thank you, don't need more weights to lift. So I feel a daily pressure on myself for what this means for my integrity. Who here would watch a child being abused in the street, probably not even the War Monger, but my babe-in-arms values are stomped by this fucking shitheel, and no
