[FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
Not all groups need to be open to everyone. Not every person needs to belong to every group. Groups have a right to protect themselves for the benefit of their membership. As we come together in this community group it is fine that we do not let spammers on to FFL as a moderation policy. Sincerely, -Buck Sure seems like it was dropped in here like some spam to dilute out the flow of the interest of this list here. Yes, on FairfieldLIfe most any topic goes related to the interest of seekers (and finders) of truth and liberation everywhere. This post coming without any attempt at context related to Fairfieldlife clearly did not seem to relate to anything here, just like spam. On Fairfieldlife we often discuss the trials and tribulations of the TM Movement. Discussions also draw from diverse teachers such as Ammachi, Eckhart Tolle, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Byron Katie, Dalai Lama, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi, Shankara, etc. Yes we all have delete keys, however towards the higher levels of our subject integrity on this Fairfieldlife list we do keep moderators on hand to guard and protect us as a community from spammers. We all should be on guard to report spam like that post to the Moderation here to keep track of. Thank you for your concern, -Buck authfriend writes: GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only post spiritual stuff. Is this drive-by Spam? What exactly does this have to do with the Spiritual Regeneration and FairfieldLife? -Buck raunchydog@... wrote : Email to Tom.Wheeler@... supporting net neutrality by Sandy Dockendorff: I sent an email to the FCC chairman expressing my concern about losing net neutrality. I have to give him kudos for responding - though I am not naive enough to think he sent a personal response... or that he had anything to do with sending the response. I AM concerned that this means that there are very few people actually contacting the FCC about this issue. There is very little that is more sacred to a robust democratic society than the free exchange of ideas and information. In the US today, our broadcast and print news media is owned by a mere handful of people. This, in and of itself, is wrong. Please do not compound that error by giving another handful of people the means by which to stifle communications and creativity through control of the internet. Strong voices for good are not always well funded and those who need to hear words of encouragement and knowledge most are seldom those with the means to pay to find them. Public schools and libraries are underfunded in much of the country and these are the access points for many people who do not have any other means to access the internet. Putting content behind corporate pay-walls will further erode the ability of these institutions to meet the needs of those people. In rural areas where we continue to fight to provide even the most basic access to the internet, allowing corporate entities to provide faster access to those who can pay more means many of those who cannot pay more simply cannot access content at all. This is not a free market issue. Further, the FCC is not supposed to be an advocate for corporate entities, but for the people of our country. There is nothing good to be gained by taking this action. It will not increase jobs, it will not increase access to information so people might create their own jobs, it will not promote economic growth. All it will do is decrease access to internet content for a great deal of our population, decrease competition, siphon more money from the poorer to the richer, and one more foundation of our democratic society will have been demolished. How to bring net neutrality back from the dead by Cannonfire: Contact the Commissioners via E-mail Chairman Tom Wheeler: Tom.Wheeler@... Commissioner Mignon Clyburn: Mignon.Clyburn@... Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel: Jessica.Rosenworcel@... Commissioner Ajit Pai: Ajit.Pai@... Commissioner Michael O’Rielly: Mike.O’Rielly@... To call and contact commissioner’s offices, call 1-888-225-5322. In addition, call your elected representatives. Tell them if net neutrality is ended, you will hold them accountable by withholding your vote. Both parties hope to control the senate after the mid-term elections, so you have more power than usual to let them know they are losing your vote if they fail to take action to stop the FCC proposal. The number for Congress is 202-224-3121. There's also a petition. http://www.popularresistance.org/internet-for-the-wealthy/ http://www.popularresistance.org/internet-for-the-wealthy/ Is this drive-by Spam? What exactly does
[FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
http://youtu.be/nGeKSiCQkPw http://youtu.be/nGeKSiCQkPw
[FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
Buckster, Richard is rubbing off on you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote : Not all groups need to be open to everyone. Not every person needs to belong to every group. Groups have a right to protect themselves for the benefit of their membership. As we come together in this community group it is fine that we do not let spammers on to FFL as a moderation policy. Sincerely, -Buck Sure seems like it was dropped in here like some spam to dilute out the flow of the interest of this list here. Yes, on FairfieldLIfe most any topic goes related to the interest of seekers (and finders) of truth and liberation everywhere. This post coming without any attempt at context related to Fairfieldlife clearly did not seem to relate to anything here, just like spam. On Fairfieldlife we often discuss the trials and tribulations of the TM Movement. Discussions also draw from diverse teachers such as Ammachi, Eckhart Tolle, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Byron Katie, Dalai Lama, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi, Shankara, etc. Yes we all have delete keys, however towards the higher levels of our subject integrity on this Fairfieldlife list we do keep moderators on hand to guard and protect us as a community from spammers. We all should be on guard to report spam like that post to the Moderation here to keep track of. Thank you for your concern, -Buck authfriend writes: GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only post spiritual stuff. Is this drive-by Spam? What exactly does this have to do with the Spiritual Regeneration and FairfieldLife? -Buck raunchydog@... wrote : Email to Tom.Wheeler@... supporting net neutrality by Sandy Dockendorff: I sent an email to the FCC chairman expressing my concern about losing net neutrality. I have to give him kudos for responding - though I am not naive enough to think he sent a personal response... or that he had anything to do with sending the response. I AM concerned that this means that there are very few people actually contacting the FCC about this issue. There is very little that is more sacred to a robust democratic society than the free exchange of ideas and information. In the US today, our broadcast and print news media is owned by a mere handful of people. This, in and of itself, is wrong. Please do not compound that error by giving another handful of people the means by which to stifle communications and creativity through control of the internet. Strong voices for good are not always well funded and those who need to hear words of encouragement and knowledge most are seldom those with the means to pay to find them. Public schools and libraries are underfunded in much of the country and these are the access points for many people who do not have any other means to access the internet. Putting content behind corporate pay-walls will further erode the ability of these institutions to meet the needs of those people. In rural areas where we continue to fight to provide even the most basic access to the internet, allowing corporate entities to provide faster access to those who can pay more means many of those who cannot pay more simply cannot access content at all. This is not a free market issue. Further, the FCC is not supposed to be an advocate for corporate entities, but for the people of our country. There is nothing good to be gained by taking this action. It will not increase jobs, it will not increase access to information so people might create their own jobs, it will not promote economic growth. All it will do is decrease access to internet content for a great deal of our population, decrease competition, siphon more money from the poorer to the richer, and one more foundation of our democratic society will have been demolished. How to bring net neutrality back from the dead by Cannonfire: Contact the Commissioners via E-mail Chairman Tom Wheeler: Tom.Wheeler@... Commissioner Mignon Clyburn: Mignon.Clyburn@... Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel: Jessica.Rosenworcel@... Commissioner Ajit Pai: Ajit.Pai@... Commissioner Michael O’Rielly: Mike.O’Rielly@... To call and contact commissioner’s offices, call 1-888-225-5322. In addition, call your elected representatives. Tell them if net neutrality is ended, you will hold them accountable by withholding your vote. Both parties hope to control the senate after the mid-term elections, so you have more power than usual to let them know they are losing your vote if they fail to take action to stop the FCC proposal. The number for Congress is 202-224-3121. There's also a petition. http://www.popularresistance.org/internet-for-the-wealthy/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
You're full of it, Buck. You don't even seem to know what spam is. FFLers post things like it all the time here, on a range of different subjects. Net neutrality is a big issue for folks who use the Internet; it's not as if it had never been mentioned or discussed here before. Ask Bhairitu. And as I said, you know who raunchydog is--she isn't some stranger who busted in here trying to advertise a product or service. You just felt like throwing your weight around without any good reason. Sure seems like it was dropped in here like some spam to dilute out the flow of the interest of this list here. Yes, on FairfieldLIfe most any topic goes related to the interest of seekers (and finders) of truth and liberation everywhere. This post coming without any attempt at context related to Fairfieldlife clearly did not seem to relate to anything here, just like spam. On Fairfieldlife we often discuss the trials and tribulations of the TM Movement. Discussions also draw from diverse teachers such as Ammachi, Eckhart Tolle, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Byron Katie, Dalai Lama, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi, Shankara, etc. Yes we all have delete keys, however towards the higher levels of our subject integrity on this Fairfieldlife list we do keep moderators on hand to guard and protect us as a community from spammers. We all should be on guard to report spam like that post to the Moderation here to keep track of. Thank you for your concern, -Buck authfriend writes: GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only post spiritual stuff. Is this drive-by Spam? What exactly does this have to do with the Spiritual Regeneration and FairfieldLife? -Buck raunchydog@... wrote : Email to Tom.Wheeler@... supporting net neutrality by Sandy Dockendorff:
[FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
This wasn't spam, and raunchydog is not a spammer. Alex gets rid of actual spammers in short order. You're just being a jerk. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote : Not all groups need to be open to everyone. Not every person needs to belong to every group. Groups have a right to protect themselves for the benefit of their membership. As we come together in this community group it is fine that we do not let spammers on to FFL as a moderation policy. Sincerely, -Buck Sure seems like it was dropped in here like some spam to dilute out the flow of the interest of this list here. Yes, on FairfieldLIfe most any topic goes related to the interest of seekers (and finders) of truth and liberation everywhere. This post coming without any attempt at context related to Fairfieldlife clearly did not seem to relate to anything here, just like spam. On Fairfieldlife we often discuss the trials and tribulations of the TM Movement. Discussions also draw from diverse teachers such as Ammachi, Eckhart Tolle, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Byron Katie, Dalai Lama, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi, Shankara, etc. Yes we all have delete keys, however towards the higher levels of our subject integrity on this Fairfieldlife list we do keep moderators on hand to guard and protect us as a community from spammers. We all should be on guard to report spam like that post to the Moderation here to keep track of. Thank you for your concern, -Buck authfriend writes: GET OFF IT, BUCK. You know who raunchy is; you know it isn't spam; and you know we're free to post anything here that others may find of interest, and that most certainly includes net neutrality Stop trying to intimidate would-be posters who don't know any better into thinking they can only post spiritual stuff. Is this drive-by Spam? What exactly does this have to do with the Spiritual Regeneration and FairfieldLife? -Buck raunchydog@... wrote : Email to Tom.Wheeler@... supporting net neutrality by Sandy Dockendorff:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Spam, Spammers and Spamming the FFL list
On 5/6/2014 8:23 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Buckster, Richard is rubbing off on you. So, it's all about Buck and Richard. Go figure. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
