[FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread salyavin808


Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP trade 
deal.  

 I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care about 
obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our beloved leaders 
listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our best interests at heart. 
 

 My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. Foreign 
companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them practise 
business however they want, they will be able to disregard environmental and 
employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much power doesn't bode 
well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
 

 I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware that 
most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet about it, 
which surprises me considering the amount of opposition there is to the EU 
having control over UK law and here we are giving it away to people whose main 
concern is making money out of us.
 

This puzzles me though:
 

 Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national 
cuisine.
 Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?
 

 
 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading 
 Europe and what else it brings with it:
 
 http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV




 
 

 
 

 
  





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
 Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them 
practise business however they want, they will be able to disregard 
environmental and employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much 
power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.

  From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 1:14 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe
   
    
Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP trade 
deal. 
I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care about 
obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our beloved leaders 
listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our best interests at heart. 
My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. Foreign 
companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them practise 
business however they want, they will be able to disregard environmental and 
employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much power doesn't bode 
well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware that most 
had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet about it, which 
surprises me considering the amount of opposition there is to the EU having 
control over UK law and here we are giving it away to people whose main concern 
is making money out of us.

This puzzles me though:
Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national 
cuisine.Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading 
Europe and what else it brings with it:

http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV




   #yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989 -- #yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp #yiv7042669989hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp #yiv7042669989ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp .yiv7042669989ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp .yiv7042669989ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989ygrp-mkp .yiv7042669989ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv7042669989ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989ygrp-sponsor #yiv7042669989ygrp-lc #yiv7042669989hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989ygrp-sponsor #yiv7042669989ygrp-lc .yiv7042669989ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7042669989
 #yiv7042669989activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7042669989 
#yiv7042669989activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7042669989 #yiv7042669989activity span 
.yiv7042669989underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7042669989 
.yiv7042669989attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv7042669989 .yiv7042669989attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 .yiv7042669989attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7042669989 .yiv7042669989attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7042669989 .yiv7042669989attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv7042669989 .yiv7042669989bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7042669989 
.yiv7042669989bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 dd.yiv7042669989last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7042669989 dd.yiv7042669989last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7042669989 
dd.yiv7042669989last p span.yiv7042669989yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989file-title a, #yiv7042669989 
div.yiv7042669989file-title a:active, #yiv7042669989 
div.yiv7042669989file-title a:hover, #yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989photo-title a, 
#yiv7042669989 div.yiv7042669989photo-title a:active, #yiv7042669989 
div.yiv7042669989photo-title a:hover, #yiv7042669989 
div.yiv7042669989photo-title

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Or Bubble n Squeak .
  From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 10:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe
   
    
Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP trade 
deal. 
I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care about 
obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our beloved leaders 
listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our best interests at heart. 
My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. Foreign 
companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them practise 
business however they want, they will be able to disregard environmental and 
employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much power doesn't bode 
well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware that most 
had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet about it, which 
surprises me considering the amount of opposition there is to the EU having 
control over UK law and here we are giving it away to people whose main concern 
is making money out of us.

This puzzles me though:
Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national 
cuisine.Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading 
Europe and what else it brings with it:

http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV




   #yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970 -- #yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp #yiv2045993970hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp #yiv2045993970ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp .yiv2045993970ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp .yiv2045993970ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970ygrp-mkp .yiv2045993970ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2045993970ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970ygrp-sponsor #yiv2045993970ygrp-lc #yiv2045993970hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970ygrp-sponsor #yiv2045993970ygrp-lc .yiv2045993970ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2045993970
 #yiv2045993970activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2045993970 
#yiv2045993970activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2045993970 #yiv2045993970activity span 
.yiv2045993970underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2045993970 
.yiv2045993970attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv2045993970 
.yiv2045993970bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 dd.yiv2045993970last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2045993970 dd.yiv2045993970last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2045993970 
dd.yiv2045993970last p span.yiv2045993970yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970file-title a, #yiv2045993970 
div.yiv2045993970file-title a:active, #yiv2045993970 
div.yiv2045993970file-title a:hover, #yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970photo-title a, 
#yiv2045993970 div.yiv2045993970photo-title a:active, #yiv2045993970 
div.yiv2045993970photo-title a:hover, #yiv2045993970 
div.yiv2045993970photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2045993970 
div#yiv2045993970ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2045993970ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv2045993970yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv2045993970 
.yiv2045993970green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv2045993970 .yiv2045993970MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv2045993970 o {font-size:0

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

This sentence stood out for me:
/
//Many European critics also are taking aim at other aspects of the deal 
— with the most strident opponents insisting it could usher in an era of 
American-style capitalism to Europe that puts corporations and 
consumerism above all else./


America has really become a fascist country where corporations rule the 
government and the people have less and less say.


On 12/06/2014 10:14 AM, salyavin808 wrote:


Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP 
trade deal.


I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care 
about obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our 
beloved leaders listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our 
best interests at heart.


My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. 
Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them 
practise business however they want, they will be able to disregard 
environmental and employment law for instance. Giving corporations 
this much power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a dangerous 
future I think.


I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware 
that most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very 
quiet about it, which surprises me considering the amount of 
opposition there is to the EU having control over UK law and here we 
are giving it away to people whose main concern is making money out of us.



This puzzles me though:

Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its 
national cuisine.

Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading
Europe and what else it brings with it:

http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV










Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

On 12/6/2014 12:14 PM, salyavin808 wrote:

I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care 
about obviously so it might galvanise more into action.


So, what happened to the science?

/There is broad scientific consensus that food on the market derived 
from GM crops poses no greater risk to human health than conventional 
food./


Works cited:

The American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2012.

American Medical Association. 2012.

World Health Organization. 2012.

United States Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2004.

Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. European Union. 2010.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]


Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them 
practise business however they want, they will be able to disregard 
environmental and employment law for instance. Giving corporations 
this much power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a dangerous 
future I think.


On 12/6/2014 12:47 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:


This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.


/So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't understand 
why you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or cannabis in 
Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you think 
GMOs are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. ///You're 
not even making any sense. Do you ever think these things through before 
you press Send?


///Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the 
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 
1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime 
Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each 
responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially 
signed it.//

//
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement/






*From:* salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Saturday, December 6, 2014 1:14 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe


Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP 
trade deal.


I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care 
about obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our 
beloved leaders listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our 
best interests at heart.


My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. 
Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them 
practise business however they want, they will be able to disregard 
environmental and employment law for instance. Giving corporations 
this much power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a dangerous 
future I think.


I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware 
that most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very 
quiet about it, which surprises me considering the amount of 
opposition there is to the EU having control over UK law and here we 
are giving it away to people whose main concern is making money out of us.



This puzzles me though:

Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its 
national cuisine.

Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading
Europe and what else it brings with it:

http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread salyavin808

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 This sentence stood out for me:
 
 Many European critics also are taking aim at other aspects of the deal — with 
the most strident opponents insisting it could usher in an era of 
American-style capitalism to Europe that puts corporations and consumerism 
above all else.
 
 America has really become a fascist country where corporations rule the 
government and the people have less and less say.
 

 For some reason our beloved leaders think that's a great idea. And we get it 
smuggled in without any debate by them distracting us with a bit of flag waving 
at the royal family while they sell the country from under our feet. Most of it 
is already owned by nameless foreign companies that will no doubt be stripped 
and sold at a profit to other nameless companies and stripped again. Someone 
must be getting rich is all I can think of!
 
 On 12/06/2014 10:14 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
 
   
 
 Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP trade 
deal.  
 
 I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care about 
obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our beloved leaders 
listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our best interests at heart. 
 
 
 My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. Foreign 
companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them practise 
business however they want, they will be able to disregard environmental and 
employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much power doesn't bode 
well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
 
 
 I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware that 
most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet about it, 
which surprises me considering the amount of opposition there is to the EU 
having control over UK law and here we are giving it away to people whose main 
concern is making money out of us.
 
 
 This puzzles me though:
 

 Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national 
cuisine.
 Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?
 

 
 

 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading 
 Europe and what else it brings with it:
 
 http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV




 
 

 
 

 
  




 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
On 12/06/2014 01:10 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:



Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting 
them practise business however they want, they will be able to 
disregard environmental and employment law for instance. Giving 
corporations this much power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a 
dangerous future I think.


On 12/6/2014 12:47 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:


This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.


/So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't 
understand why you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or 
cannabis in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you 
think GMOs are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. 
///You're not even making any sense. Do you ever think these things 
through before you press Send?


///Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the 
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 
1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime 
Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each 
responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, ceremonially 
signed it.//

//
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement/



Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H Ross 
Perot warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was right!  
Libertarians hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade agreements.  
They aren't about free trade either.  It's all about big corporate 
trade.  Get a grip, Willie.  You aren't making any sense.  Go figure.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware 
that most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet 
about it, which surprises me considering the amount of opposition there 
is to the EU having control over UK law and here we are giving it away 
to people whose main concern is making money out of us.


On 12/6/2014 1:49 PM, Mike Dixon wrote:


Or Bubble n Squeak .


Can you believe this, Mike: a guy that loves eating Fish and Chips  is 
concerned about food quality. Go figure.


/The average wining margin in the last ten Intelligence Squared U.S. 
debates was around 18 percentage points. The final vote also contrasts 
with what national polls say about how American feel about GM foods./


*In A Face-To-Face GMO Debate, The For Side Wins*
Popular Science:
http://www.popsci.com/head-head-gmo-debate-win-gm-foods


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

On 12/6/2014 2:51 PM, Bhairitu wrote:


This sentence stood out for me:
/
//Many European critics also are taking aim at other aspects of the 
deal — with the most strident opponents insisting it could usher in an 
era of American-style capitalism to Europe that puts corporations and 
consumerism above all else./


Oh my Gawd - American-style capitalism where somebody might earn some 
money so they can pay their bills and get fuel this winter. What is this 
world coming to? It's just fucking outrageous!


America has really become a fascist country where corporations rule 
the government and the people have less and less say.


God damn America! ISIS has a billion dollars in cash and it's all George 
W. Bush's fault.




On 12/06/2014 10:14 AM, salyavin808 wrote:


Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid 
TTIP trade deal.


I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care 
about obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our 
beloved leaders listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have 
our best interests at heart.


My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. 
Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting 
them practise business however they want, they will be able to 
disregard environmental and employment law for instance. Giving 
corporations this much power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a 
dangerous future I think.


I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware 
that most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very 
quiet about it, which surprises me considering the amount of 
opposition there is to the EU having control over UK law and here we 
are giving it away to people whose main concern is making money out 
of us.



This puzzles me though:

Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its 
national cuisine.

Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading
Europe and what else it brings with it:

http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]



Michael Jackson wrote:


This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.


/So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't 
understand why you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or 
cannabis in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you 
think GMOs are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. 
///You're not even making any sense. Do you ever think these things 
through before you press Send?


///Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the 
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 
1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime 
Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each 
responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, 
ceremonially signed it.//

//
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement/


On 12/6/2014 3:29 PM, Bhairitu wrote:

Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H Ross 
Perot warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was right!  
Libertarians hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade agreements. 
They aren't about free trade either.  It's all about big corporate 
trade.  Get a grip, Willie.  You aren't making any sense.  Go figure.


Opponents like Alex Jones and Ross Perot rely on anecdotes to make their 
case, and when they use statistics, they are very selective. In the 
battle of sound bites and bumper stickers, NAFTA has become the short 
cut for venting anger about the alleged misdeeds of globalization. Go 
figure.


According to what I've read, most economists regard NAFTA as a 
tremendous success, contributing to better jobs and higher income in the 
three partner countries, Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.

/
//Trade among the North American partners is up more than threefold 
since the pact entered into force in 1994, and now totals about $900 
billion annually. Canada and Mexico account for almost 30 percent of 
U.S. two-way merchandise trade. A rough calculation suggests that NAFTA 
has added about $60 billion annually to U.S. national income, about $200 
per American./




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
On 12/06/2014 02:33 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:





Michael Jackson wrote:


This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.


/So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't 
understand why you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or 
cannabis in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you 
think GMOs are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. 
///You're not even making any sense. Do you ever think these things 
through before you press Send?


///Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the 
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 
17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian 
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, 
each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, 
ceremonially signed it.//

//
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement/


On 12/6/2014 3:29 PM, Bhairitu wrote:

Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H 
Ross Perot warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was 
right!  Libertarians hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade 
agreements.  They aren't about free trade either.  It's all about big 
corporate trade. Get a grip, Willie.  You aren't making any sense. Go 
figure.


Opponents like Alex Jones and Ross Perot rely on anecdotes to make 
their case, and when they use statistics, they are very selective. In 
the battle of sound bites and bumper stickers, NAFTA has become the 
short cut for venting anger about the alleged misdeeds of 
globalization. Go figure.


According to what I've read, most economists regard NAFTA as a 
tremendous success, contributing to better jobs and higher income in 
the three partner countries, Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Those economists wouldn't happen to hold court on FOX News, would they? 
You so often seem to support the status quo.  What have they done for you?





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
One of the effects of NAFTA was that United Parcel Service sued the government 
of Canada, specifically the Canada Post, stating unfair business practices. 

In other words, the Canadians run their post much more efficiently as a parcel 
service than UPS does, so UPS tried to force them to stop doing parcel 
deliveries so UPS would get more business. 

Ultimately Canada Post won the decision, but any law that allows a private 
company to attempt to do some crap like that is absurd. And Willy Tex in beyond 
an idiot. I'm glad his posts go automatically to my trash can. 
  From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 4:29 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe
   
 On 12/06/2014 01:10 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
  
  
  
     Foreign companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them 
practise business however they want, they will be  able to disregard 
environmental and employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much 
power doesn't bode well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.  
 
 On 12/6/2014 12:47 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 
  This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.
   
 
 So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't understand why 
you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or cannabis in  Canada, the 
U.S. and Mexico. 
 
 Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you think GMOs 
are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. You're not even 
making any sense. Do you ever think these things through before you press Send?
 
 Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three 
nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign 
NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney 
and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and 
promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement
 
  
 
 Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H Ross Perot 
warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was right!  Libertarians 
hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade agreements.  They aren't about free 
trade either.  It's all about big corporate trade.  Get a grip, Willie.  You 
aren't making any sense.  Go figure.
 
  #yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203 -- #yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp #yiv4200539203hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp #yiv4200539203ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp .yiv4200539203ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp .yiv4200539203ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203ygrp-mkp .yiv4200539203ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4200539203ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203ygrp-sponsor #yiv4200539203ygrp-lc #yiv4200539203hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203ygrp-sponsor #yiv4200539203ygrp-lc .yiv4200539203ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4200539203
 #yiv4200539203activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4200539203 
#yiv4200539203activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4200539203 #yiv4200539203activity span 
.yiv4200539203underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4200539203 
.yiv4200539203attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4200539203 .yiv4200539203attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4200539203 .yiv4200539203attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4200539203 .yiv4200539203attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4200539203 .yiv4200539203attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4200539203 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4200539203 .yiv4200539203bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4200539203 
.yiv4200539203bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4200539203 dd.yiv4200539203last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4200539203 dd.yiv4200539203last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4200539203 
dd.yiv4200539203last p

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Just one example:
Within the last 30 years, the 2,000-mile border between theUnited States and 
Mexico has become what the American Medical Associationcalls, a virtual 
cesspool and breeding ground for infectious disease(Public Citizen, 2000).� 
Thecauses of this unfortunate observation are the more than 3,000 
manufacturingplants that cover the Mexican border known as the �maquiladoras.�� 
The maquiladoras are the mostlyAmerican-owned factories along the Mexican 
border that assemble products forexport to U.S. markets (Nation�s Health, 
1998).  TheMexican maquiladora program, implemented in 1965, created a free 
tradeagreement for foreign companies to bring materials into the country 
formanufacturing.� The goal of the programwas to provide Mexico�s northern 
cities with a better job market while alsoproviding foreign manufacturers with 
cheap labor.� The maquiladoras do provide Mexican border cities with a 
greatnumber of jobs, but at the expense of low wages, terrible working 
conditions,low job security, and high exposure to toxic chemicals (EHC, 1998).  
TheNorth American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented by the 
Mexican,U.S., and Canadian governments in 1993.�NAFTA proponents promised that 
the agreement would help to alleviatemany of the current border problems caused 
by the existing free-tradezone.� NAFTA would also help to improveworking 
conditions, better enforce environmental laws, and decrease the highmaquiladora 
concentration along the border (Public Citizen, 2000).�  Unfortunately,NAFTA 
did not have the effect that its proponents had talked of.� In 1995, two years 
after NAFTA wasimplemented, the maquiladora work force increased by 20%.� The 
agreement also did little to helpdisperse the plants further from the border 
areas.� In 1995, 85% of all maquiladora workers were employed in one ofthe six 
Mexican Border States (Public Citizen, 2000).� Another downfall of NAFTA was 
the disposal of toxic waste fromthe foreign-owned factories.� Under theoriginal 
maquiladora program, foreign manufactures were required to return allwaste to 
the country of origin, however NAFTA allows all goods imported to 
themaquiladoras to remain in Mexico, including the waste products (EHC, 2000).
From this source:Environmental Justice Case Study: Maquiladoras
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Environmental Justice Case Study: MaquiladorasEnvironmental Justice Case 
Study: Maquiladora Workers and Border Issues By: Elyse 
Bolterstein���  Table ... |
|  |
| View on www.umich.edu | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |


  From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 8:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe
   
 On 12/06/2014 02:33 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
  
  
  
 
  Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 
  This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.
   
 
 So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't understand why 
you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or cannabis in Canada, the 
U.S. and Mexico. 
 
 Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you think GMOs 
are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a liar. You're not even 
making any sense. Do you ever think these things through before you press Send?
 
 Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the three 
nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 17, 1992, to sign 
NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney 
and Mexican President  Carlos Salinas, each responsible for spearheading and 
promoting the agreement, ceremonially signed it.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement
  
  
 
 On 12/6/2014 3:29 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
 
 
   Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H Ross Perot 
warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was right!  Libertarians 
hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade agreements.  They aren't about free 
trade either.  It's all about big corporate trade.  Get a grip, Willie.  You 
aren't making any sense.  Go figure.

 
 Opponents like Alex Jones and Ross Perot rely on anecdotes to make their case, 
and when they use statistics, they are very selective. In the battle of sound 
bites and bumper stickers, NAFTA has become the short cut for venting anger 
about the alleged misdeeds of globalization. Go figure.
 
 According to what I've read, most economists regard NAFTA as a tremendous 
success, contributing to better jobs and higher income in the three partner 
countries, Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. 
  
 
 Those economists wouldn't happen to hold court on FOX News, would they? You so 
often seem to support the status quo.  What have they done for you?
 
 
  #yiv3246631068 #yiv3246631068 -- #yiv3246631068ygrp

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote :

 Or Bubble n Squeak .
 

 I love bubble and squeak (fried leftover vegetables - the main ingredients 
being potato and cabbage) but it has to be over-fried and so slightly burnt to 
be really appreciated.

 

 The warning: contains GMO ingredients wouldn't put me off eating something. 
There is no *essential* difference between a genetically modified plant and one 
that has been altered over a long time thanks to selective breeding and 
splicing methods - methods that have been used by our venerable ancestors for 
millennia. We're just saving time - and saving lives if disease-resistant crops 
like rice (even crops that can be harvested twice in a year instead of just the 
once) could be adopted in the Third World. Most of those who object to GMO 
foods are emoting rather than thinking - always a bad way of evaluating 
progress.
 

 A list of ingredients that included mechanically recovered meat always has 
me returning the item to the shelf - it conjures up images of gristle and 
unmentionable parts of animals being put into a mincer to be added to the 
minimum amount of recognizable cuts of meat the makers think they can get away 
with.
 

 


 From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 10:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe
 
 
   
 

Thanks for that Bhairitu, it's another reason to hate this stupid TTIP trade 
deal.  

 I hadn't considered the effect on food but it's something people care about 
obviously so it might galvanise more into action. Not that our beloved leaders 
listen to us, they are clearly convinced they have our best interests at heart. 
 

 My biggest worry about it has been the proposed effects on law. Foreign 
companies will be able to sue governments for not letting them practise 
business however they want, they will be able to disregard environmental and 
employment law for instance. Giving corporations this much power doesn't bode 
well, we are heading into a dangerous future I think.
 

 I am heartened that a large majority oppose it though, I wasn't aware that 
most had even heard of it as the government are keeping very quiet about it, 
which surprises me considering the amount of opposition there is to the EU 
having control over UK law and here we are giving it away to people whose main 
concern is making money out of us.
 

This puzzles me though:
 

 Even in Britain — a nation hardly known for the glories of its national 
cuisine.
 Are they suggesting there's something wrong with boiled ham and cabbage?
 

 
 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 Good article in the Washington Post about US frankenfoods invading 
 Europe and what else it brings with it:
 
 http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV http://wapo.st/1BiKlzV




 
 

 
 

 
  




 


 











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

On 12/06/2014 05:40 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote :

Or Bubble n Squeak .

I love bubble and squeak (fried leftover vegetables - the main 
ingredients being potato and cabbage) but it has to be over-fried and 
so slightly burnt to be really appreciated.


The warning: contains GMO ingredients wouldn't put me off eating 
something. There is no *essential* difference between a genetically 
modified plant and one that has been altered over a long time thanks 
to selective breeding and splicing methods - methods that have been 
used by our venerable ancestors for millennia. We're just saving time 
- and saving lives if disease-resistant crops like rice (even crops 
that can be harvested twice in a year instead of just the once) could 
be adopted in the Third World. Most of those who object to GMO foods 
are emoting rather than thinking - always a bad way of evaluating 
progress.


GMO is not just modifying or hybridizing a crop. That's been going on 
for ages.  But doing things like making them contain glyphosates to make 
them pest resistant.  Would you like a little RoundUp on that potato?





A list of ingredients that included mechanically recovered meat 
always has me returning the item to the shelf - it conjures up images 
of gristle and unmentionable parts of animals being put into a mincer 
to be added to the minimum amount of recognizable cuts of meat the 
makers think they can get away with.


I call that pre-chewed meat.  However in some ways nothing new much 
like British Bangers or other sausages but carried to an extreme 
nowadays.  Chicken tenders are no longer breast tenderloin but 
pre-chewed scraps.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 On 12/06/2014 05:40 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Or Bubble n Squeak .
 

 I love bubble and squeak (fried leftover vegetables - the main ingredients 
being potato and cabbage) but it has to be over-fried and so slightly burnt to 
be really appreciated.
 
 
 
 The warning: contains GMO ingredients wouldn't put me off eating something. 
There is no *essential* difference between a genetically modified plant and one 
that has been altered over a long time thanks to selective breeding and 
splicing methods - methods that have been used by our venerable ancestors for 
millennia. We're just saving time - and saving lives if disease-resistant crops 
like rice (even crops that can be harvested twice in a year instead of just the 
once) could be adopted in the Third World. Most of those who object to GMO 
foods are emoting rather than thinking - always a bad way of evaluating 
progress.




 
 GMO is not just modifying or hybridizing a crop. That's been going on for 
ages.  But doing things like making them contain glyphosates to make them pest 
resistant.  Would you like a little RoundUp on that potato? I'll pass on that. 
The GM technology can of course be used in harmful ways. But also in beneficial 
ways!
 
 A list of ingredients that included mechanically recovered meat always has 
me returning the item to the shelf - it conjures up images of gristle and 
unmentionable parts of animals being put into a mincer to be added to the 
minimum amount of recognizable cuts of meat the makers think they can get away 
with.







 
 I call that pre-chewed meat.  However in some ways nothing new much like 
British Bangers or other sausages but carried to an extreme nowadays.  Chicken 
tenders are no longer breast tenderloin but pre-chewed scraps. British bangers 
are banned from being imported into Germany - the manufacturers tend to go 
overboard on the mechanically recovered methodology and Krauts don't like 
eating the sweepings from the abattoir floor. At the moment my favourite 
sausages are German bockwurst from the cut-price (German) store Lidl. They are 
both ridiculously cheap and very tasty - perfect with mash and beans or fried 
onions*. And don't get me started on British bacon. Heating it up always 
produces this disgusting white gunge. I buy American bacon if I can find it.  
*Aren't onions one of the foods that MMY didn't approve of? 
 
 
  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Americanizing of Europe

2014-12-06 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

Michael Jackson wrote:


This has already been going on in the US courtesy of NAFTA.


/So, you're opposed to free trade? For the life of me I can't 
understand why you'd be opposed to the free trade of tobacco and/or 
cannabis in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


Talk about cognitive dissonance - MMY thought GMO's were bad; you 
think GMOs are bad, but you also think MMY is bad and he was a 
liar. ///You're not even making any sense. Do you ever think these 
things through before you press Send?


///Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1986 among the 
three nations, the leaders met in San Antonio, Texas, on December 
17, 1992, to sign NAFTA. U.S. President George H. W. Bush, Canadian 
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas, 
each responsible for spearheading and promoting the agreement, 
ceremonially signed it.//

//
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement/


On 12/6/2014 3:29 PM, Bhairitu wrote:

Your peers including Alex Jones hate NAFTA.  Don't you remember H 
Ross Perot warning us about it in the Presidential Debates?  He was 
right!  Libertarians hate NAFTA.  They also hate these new trade 
agreements.  They aren't about free trade either.  It's all about 
big corporate trade. Get a grip, Willie.  You aren't making any 
sense.  Go figure.


Opponents like Alex Jones and Ross Perot rely on anecdotes to make 
their case, and when they use statistics, they are very selective. In 
the battle of sound bites and bumper stickers, NAFTA has become the 
short cut for venting anger about the alleged misdeeds of 
globalization. Go figure.


According to what I've read, most economists regard NAFTA as a 
tremendous success, contributing to better jobs and higher income in 
the three partner countries, Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.


On 12/6/2014 7:09 PM, Bhairitu wrote:


Those economists wouldn't happen to hold court on FOX News, would they?


No, I don't watch Fox News on TV, I read it on online.

http://newswise.com/articles/view/541349/

http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/hufbauer-schott0808.pdf


You so often seem to support the status quo.  What have they done for you?


There have been huge gains for the majority of U.S consumers through 
lower prices and increased variety.


/NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I 
didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement./ - President 
Bill Clinton