[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

>
> 
> 
> >
> > Yep, if you are going to be visiting and 
> > having a meal alongside tru-believers you
> > might want to learn both the English and
> > sanskrit of this hymn.  It gets said a lot
> > out loud as a meal or desert as a benediction.
> 
> It's true.  Effectively it's the TM-movement's (Bevan's camp) working 
> criteria in TM allegiance.  It is not just that someone is a practitioner or 
> not.  In the middle it is about a faith and belief in the Knowledge and 
> Maharishi.  Pointed questioning clearly demonstrates 'negativity' in their 
> minds.
>

Question authority?  In TM, no way.

It's interesting.  I've known Bevan from way back in the 1970's.  In watching 
him all these years this is how he has administrated the TM-movement.Those 
last two lines in particular.  Culturally he has ruled completely using those 
two lines all along the way to the point where he has only a few hundreds 
'loyal' people by his standard left in the TM-movement.  It's been a stunning 
thing to witness.  He and Maharishi have downsized the whole thing all along 
essentially using this hymn.

"Never shall we denounce anyone
Never entertain negativity."

 
> Practically, if someone wants to stick around then it's "Don't ask, don't 
> tell".  Run silent, run deep.
> 
> Anyone seen or heard demonstrating 'negativity' proly should prepare to pack 
> their bags.  "Never entertain negativity". 
> 
> 
> The Sanskrit:
> 
> Saha nav avatu
> Saha nav bhunaktu
> Saha Viryam karava yahai
> Tejasvi na vadhitam a stu
> Ma vidisavahai
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > fealty in English:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > "Let us be together
> > > > > > > > Let us eat together
> > > > > > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > > > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > > > > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > > > > > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > > > > > > Never entertain negativity."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > >Saha Nav Avatu
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Saha Nav Bhunaktu
> > >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

>
> Yep, if you are going to be visiting and 
> having a meal alongside tru-believers you
> might want to learn both the English and
> sanskrit of this hymn.  It gets said a lot
> out loud as a meal or desert as a benediction.

It's true.  Effectively it's the TM-movement's (Bevan's camp) working criteria 
in TM allegiance.  It is not just that someone is a practitioner or not.  In 
the middle it is about a faith and belief in the Knowledge and Maharishi.  
Pointed questioning clearly demonstrates 'negativity' in their minds.

Practically, if someone wants to stick around then it's "Don't ask, don't 
tell".  Run silent, run deep.

Anyone seen or heard demonstrating 'negativity' proly should prepare to pack 
their bags.  "Never entertain negativity". 


The Sanskrit:

Saha nav avatu
Saha nav bhunaktu
Saha Viryam karava yahai
Tejasvi na vadhitam a stu
Ma vidisavahai



> 
> >
> > 
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > fealty in English:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "Let us be together
> > > > > > > Let us eat together
> > > > > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > > > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > > > > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > > > > > Never entertain negativity."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > >Saha Nav Avatu
> > > > 
> > > 
> > Saha Nav Bhunaktu
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[m 13]

Sweetness
more of this pleaselovelyfull of love happiness hope beauty
this is Truth
...~* .
Daisy Award
commendation for offerings of love and true beauty


thank you 

-M


  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Vaj]

On Apr 3, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Peter wrote:

> Intention is more powerful than any prayer.


The problem is, most people don't train themselves to be mindful of their root 
intention, and therefore they act from discursiveness.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Peter]

Intention is more powerful than any prayer.

--- On Sun, 4/3/11, Buck  wrote:

> From: Buck 
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011, 5:57 AM
> Yep, if you are going to be visiting
> and 
> having a meal alongside tru-believers you
> might want to learn both the English and
> sanskrit of this hymn.  It gets said a lot
> out loud as a meal or desert benediction.
> 
> >
> > 
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > in fealty:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The inner TM movement's
> cultural test,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "Let us be together
> > > > > > > Let us eat together
> > > > > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > > > > Let us Be radiating the light
> of life
> > > > > > > Never shall we denounce
> anyone
> > > > > > >     
>    Never entertain negativity."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > >Saha Nav Avatu
> > > > 
> > > 
> > Saha Nav Bhunaktu
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>     fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 


  

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

Yep, if you are going to be visiting and 
having a meal alongside tru-believers you
might want to learn both the English and
sanskrit of this hymn.  It gets said a lot
out loud as a meal or desert benediction.

>
> 
> >
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > in fealty:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "Let us be together
> > > > > > Let us eat together
> > > > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > > > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > > > > Never entertain negativity."
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > >Saha Nav Avatu
> > > 
> > 
> Saha Nav Bhunaktu
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

>
> >
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, 
> > > > > > > > thinking has to
> > > > > > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > > > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > > > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are 
> > > > > > > > truthful in our
> > > > > > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be 
> > > > > > > > pleasing, soft,
> > > > > > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies 
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and 
> > > > > > > > kindness of
> > > > > > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. 
> > > > > > > > ... Blessed
> > > > > > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If X then Y.
> > > > > > > If not X then not Y.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If harmonious, then... 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well yes, 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If inharmonious, then...
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> > > > > 
> > > > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > > > 
> > > > > "Let us be together
> > > > > Let us eat together
> > > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > > > Never entertain negativity."
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > >Saha Nav Avatu
> > 
> 
Saha Nav Bhunaktu

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking 
> > > > > > > has to
> > > > > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful 
> > > > > > > in our
> > > > > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, 
> > > > > > > soft,
> > > > > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and 
> > > > > > > kindness of
> > > > > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... 
> > > > > > > Blessed
> > > > > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If X then Y.
> > > > > > If not X then not Y.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If harmonious, then... 
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well yes, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > If inharmonious, then...
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> > > > 
> > > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > > 
> > > > "Let us be together
> > > > Let us eat together
> > > > Let us be vital together
> > > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > > Never entertain negativity."
> > > >
> > > 
> >Saha Nav Avatu
> 
Saha Nav

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

>
> 
> 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking 
> > > > > > has to
> > > > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in 
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, 
> > > > > > soft,
> > > > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and 
> > > > > > kindness of
> > > > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... 
> > > > > > Blessed
> > > > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If X then Y.
> > > > > If not X then not Y.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If harmonious, then... 
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Well yes, 
> > > > 
> > > > If inharmonious, then...
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> > > 
> > > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > > 
> > > "Let us be together
> > > Let us eat together
> > > Let us be vital together
> > > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > > Never entertain negativity."
> > >
> > 
>Saha Nav Avatu
Saha

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

>
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > > 
> > > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has 
> > > > > to
> > > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in 
> > > > > our
> > > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness 
> > > > > of
> > > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... 
> > > > > Blessed
> > > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > > 
> > > > If X then Y.
> > > > If not X then not Y.
> > > > 
> > > > If harmonious, then... 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Well yes, 
> > > 
> > > If inharmonious, then...
> > >
> > 
> > Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> > 
> > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > 
> > "Let us be together
> > Let us eat together
> > Let us be vital together
> > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > Never entertain negativity."
> >
> 
Saha Nav

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

> 
> 
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > 
> > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > 
> > > If X then Y.
> > > If not X then not Y.
> > > 
> > > If harmonious, then... 
> > >
> > 
> > Well yes, 
> > 
> > If inharmonious, then...
> >
> 
> Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> 
> The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> 
> "Let us be together
> Let us eat together
> Let us be vital together
> Let us be Radiating Truth
> Let us Be radiating the light of life
> Never shall we denounce anyone
> Never entertain negativity."
>
Saha

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[WillyTex]

Buck:
> ...ad hominid pickering between these 
> alt.meditation freaks who have come 
> over and piled on.
>
Just shoot me, it's all my fault. They followed 
me over here to continue their bickering and ad
hominids. One guy from alt.m.t tried to post on
alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! Can you believe that?

Subject: Re: The Heart of the Master
From: zenworm
Newsgroups: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, 
alt.zen
Date: March 31, 2011
http://tinyurl.com/3o4h6sa

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[WillyTex]

So, it's all about Judy.

turquoiseb:
> ...the fascination of mature adults with 
> decades of spiritual life, a few of the 
> 64 posts they made during the first 30 
> hours of this FFL posting week, during 
> which they were indulging in a bit of a 
> "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL 
> posters, all of whom are coincidentally 
> often described by Judy Stein as "TM
> critics"...

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[WillyTex]

> > It's been rather interesting observing the 
> > McRishi Mahesh, whom the Shankaracharya of 
> > the south observed had a busy supermarket 
> > mind with no silence...
> > 
Ravi Yogi:
> Go back to your discourses on Parama Vakra 
> Gita...
> 
It is very doubtful that Vaj got an audience 
with the Shankaracharya of the South. 

But in fact, the Sringeri Shankaracharya seems 
to approve of the work that was being done by 
MMY and Swami Shantanand of Jyotie Matha! 

Apparenty Paul van Oyen went to see Sringeri
Shankaracharya and actually met him in person. 
Paul posted this report in the Kosmopolis 
Newsletter in April - August 2000:

Dear readers, 

As you know Dorine and I have had the grace 
bestowed upon us of an audience with HH Shrî 
Bhâratî Tîrtha, Shankarâcârya of Shringeri 
Matha. Kosmopolis is presenting herewith to 
its readers the report of this visit... 

With best wishes, 
Paul G. van Oyen 

Shri Bharati Tirtha: 

"He also emphatically confirmed that in 
his opinion - and in the opinion of Shringeri 
Matha - Shrî Shantânanda Sarasvatî had been 
the lawful and respected Pîthapati of 
Jyotirmath. In their view Shrî Shantânanda 
Sarasvatî had been a disciple of Shrî 
Shantânanda Sarasvatî, maybe even a rather 
disobedient and naughty disciple. 

In a later conversation with another member 
of the Shringeri Matha staff we were 
reminded of the fact that when Shrî 
Svarûpânanda was challenging the position of 
Shrî Shantânanda as Pîthapati of Jyotir Matha 
the then Shankarâcârya of Shringeri (Shrî 
Vidyatîrtha Svamijî) had offered to anoint 
Svarûpânanda as Shankarâcârya of Dvaraka when 
that seat fell vacant. 

The one condition was that he would drop his 
claim for Jyotir Matha. This was agreed and 
Svarûpânanda was anointed as Pîthapati of 
Dvâraka Matha. However when the ceremony was 
over Svarûpânanda refused to honour his 
commitment and did not step down as claimant 
to the Jyotir Matha seat." 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Ravi Yogi]

A parrot's a parrot's a parrot, seriously do you have to parrot my words
and phrases too - you one trick pony or is it one trick parrot..LOL.. Go
back to your discourses on Parama Vakra Gita and your daily choking
routines of parroted vomit - you sound cute, :-)


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj  wrote:
>
> Nice collection of raves from the Bhava Rave Pimp and Maha-Narcissus
> Jimbo. Hilarious.
>
> It's interesting since all this comes from their own mentations and
> is part and parcel of the vibe they're putting out to their
> environment. It's not a sweet vibe or even sweet-and-sour, but more
> bitter and overheated. No insight.
>
> It's been rather interesting observing the McRishi Mahesh, whom the
> Shankaracharya of the south observed had a busy supermarket mind with
> no silence -- and a life filled with greed, envy, vanity and
> acquisitiveness -- and then observing his students.
>
> They don't seem to fall far from the same tree. Really rather sad how
> darkness begets more darkness even when clothed in the finest silk.
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Ravi Yogi]

Your snippet doesn't do justice to my post Steveji. Anyway I don't want
to descend anywhere, thank you..:-). I love and respect both you and
Peter for the kindness you have shown me in the past, I made my point
and let's leave it at that. Communism was a failure for the outer but it
best describes the interior, lovers are many - beloved is one. Whether
you are any one of the Pandavas - Yudhistira, Bheema, Arjuna, Nakula or
Sahadeva - Draupadi is the beloved or you be Brahmana, Vasishya,
Kshatriya or Sudra - Krishna is the beloved - that is Bhagwad Gita not
the Param Vakra Gita of the Vaj.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote:
>
> > You have definitely piqued my interest. I don't want to spoil this
> game,
> > obviously you guys have devoted your whole lives and invested a lot
of
> > energy in comparison of balls.. Not sure what Jim would have said,
but
> > he posted out anyway so it doesn't matter. So what do you suggest
> > Peterji and Steveji - do I need to send in a picture of my balls,
> shaven
> > or unshaven, you must have some specimen of Maharishi's balls I
> assume.
> > And then what are the rules, you must be the judges and then you
> declare
> > a winner right? Ok please send me all the details before Friday when
I
> > can post freely again, OMG I'm so excited .
>
>
> Ravi, the only thing to really be concerned with is if the testicles
> have not descended.  But this is normally addressed shortly after
birth.
> Once you verify that the testicles have descended, then I would not
> worry much about.  It is just the normal, natural process.
>
> Now this is how we will discuss things, easily, morning and evening.
> (from the TM checking notes, for Ravi's benefit)
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Ravi Yogi]

Excellent suggestion and one more - a classic from Indian lore - "danDou
danDati hara".

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> Dear Rick, this being Fairfield, could we add this statement from
below to the FFL guidelines:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> >
> > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has
>to
> > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ...
>
> >Blessed
> > are they who speak sweet words."
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Ravi Yogi]

OMG !!! No wonder I call you Turqster, the trickster, the master of
deception. You are barking at the wrong tree er goon. You know I have
been supporting your efforts to get rid of PTMSD(Post TM Stress
disorder) and you have stopped making idiotic posts on comparing TMO/MMY
with Facebook,Mormons, Catholics, Scientologists. I really appreciate
your efforts and I like having you here, but now your SPC(Small Penis
Complex) (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/266255
 )  is
acting up and it is the natural consequence of addressing PTMSD. You are
yet again indulging your whore(intellect) - remember the original
dictum?




Anyway here's a mantra for you to calm your SPC -




Original Goon Mantra™




Dhyana Sloka: Om Sri Ravi Yogi Divine Motherasya Gangsteraaya(or
Goonaya) Namah

Translation: I bow down to Ravi Yogi the gangster or goon of the divine
mother




Concentrate on the pictures of Ravi Yogi and repeat the following 108
times

Na Aham Pimpati, Na Whoreyna Fascinataha

Translation: Not I am the pimp(ego), not (I am) fascinated by the
whore(intellect)



Let the mantra reverberate through your entire being which is verily
vibrating with millions of lives of intellectual deception. As you
finish chanting the mantra visualize the silence filling in and wiping
away all your paranoid delusional thoughts of TMO/MMY/Sri Sri Jim
Flanegin/Sri Sri Ravi Yogi.




Have faith this mantra has been perfected and is sure to get rid of the
demons caused by SPC, Small Ball Syndrome, and/or Intellectile
Dysfunction disorder.




Good luck !!! Keep me posted




Love - Ravi Yogi.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> Well, we're down to the Two Goons next week. Unless
> the other two take the "Hmmm...I've been called on
> my bullshit...maybe I should lay low for a while and
> hope that other posters' memories are as self-servingly
> bad as mine are" approach next week as well. :-)
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" whynotnow7@ wrote:
> >
> > Fair enough Turq - Glad to see you are well on your way to
> > examining behavior in the context of Maharishi's words. Oh
> > wait, or are you just using this as a cynical exercise to
> > insult me? Hmm...
>
> I used Maharishi's quote to see whether you would do
> exactly what wayback described in her post on scientific
> findings about cognitive dissonance. That is, change
> your beliefs rather than change your behavior. You did.
> Funny how Maharishi is such a role model and wise sage
> for you until he describes behavior that you can't even
> *begin* to live up to, eh?  :-)
>
> > Addressing what Maharishi said, I like it as a guideline
> > and find it helpful to remember. As an absolute edict
> > though, I give it about as much credence as you do.
>
> And yet he, being at least as enlightened as you are,
> could not possibly say anything wrong or incorrect. All
> of his words -- including these -- were dictated by the
> three gunas because he was so enlightened and all, so
> they *had* to have been in accord with the Laws Of
> Nature. So, of course, are all of *your* words. You
> are enlightened because you SAY you are, and that's
> the end of it. Did I get that right?  :-)
>
> > Since this is my last post 'til at least April 9...
>
> Or longer. My bet is that you'll do what you did the last
> three times someone called you on your bullshit here at
> FFL and beat feet for a lot longer than that. They you'll
> reappear, probably with a new screen name, and try to
> pretend that nothing that happened in the past ever
> happened. :-)
>
> > ...I'll also add that I enjoy talking about my spiritual
> > experiences. And besides just enjoying it I still think
> > it is helpful to let others know that liberation is
> > something anyone can accomplish. It is no longer something
> > mystical and far off.
>
> And they're supposed to WANT this "liberation" you speak
> of, based on YOUR example? Get real.
>
> > As for my progress, it continues of course - the beauty of
> > liberation is that it is a process that never ends. How
> > could it end? It wouldn't be called liberation otherwise.
>
> So you're saying that you've moved *beyond* mere CC now? :-)
>
> > When I first mentioned it a few years ago, I was naive,
> > aghast and pissed off at the sarcasm and disbelief that
> > greeted my words.
>
> As opposed to now. Right?  :-)
>
> > It turned out though to be a Divine intervention in spurring
> > me from CC onward.
>
> Guess I was right above, eh? You're now claiming to be in
> some state *beyond* CC.
>
> > Very, very helpful and I applaud all of those who acting
> > by the grace of God challenged my words at the time. In
> > retrospect I have nothing but thanks.
>
> Alstublieft. You're welcome.
>
> > Nowadays I have lost my thirst for any insistence on my
> > part of my state of consciousness...
>
> And just where did this "thirst" you speak of come from
> *before*? Cou

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[tartbrain]

Great Balls of Fire -- Jerry Lee Lewis

You shake my nerves and you rattle my brain
Too much love drives a man insane
You broke my will, oh what a thrill
Goodness gracious great balls of fire

(Sounds like a typical weekend retreat with SSRS and/or others)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter  wrote:
>
> Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are smaller!
> 
> --- On Thu, 3/31/11, turquoiseb  wrote:
> 
> From: turquoiseb 
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] The sweet speech of the enlightened
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 7:27 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at work that 
> disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
> 
> Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding why some 
> here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and enlightenment, I just 
> thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from Maharishi on the subject of the 
> speech of the enlightened, and 2) go back to look at only the first few words 
> (the ones that appear in Yahoo's Message View) of a few of the 64 posts they 
> made during the first 30 hours of this FFL posting week, during which they 
> were indulging in a bit of a "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters, 
> all of whom are coincidentally often described by Judy Stein as "TM critics" 
> or "anti-TMers," and all of whom (again coincidentally) are among the most 
> highly-placed on her own personal Enemies List and subjects of her own "sweet 
> speech." 
> 
> Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24 posts 
> she made during the this "feeding frenzy" period, even though some of it is 
> of the same ilk, because after all, she has never made any claims of being 
> enlightened. Nor have any of the TM critics being talked about so sweetly 
> below. Jim and Ravi, on the other hand, both claim to be enlightened. You 
> decide.
> 
> From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> 
> "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to be 
> clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best, life-supporting 
> to the whole of the environment. ... This is the technique of the art of 
> speaking: that, although we are truthful in our thinking and speaking, the 
> words that come out must be pleasing, soft, and of good quality. ... The 
> habit of speaking pleasingly lies in cultivating that nature, that 
> politeness, that softness and kindness of heart that will not at any time 
> produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed are they who speak sweet words."
> 
> Quotes by Sri Sri Jim Flanegin (whynotnow7@):
> 
> Re Turq: "Turq, you must be wetting your pants with excitement - Curtis is 
> back and Judy is about to be!!! Do they have Depends (adult diapers) in 
> Amsterdam?"
> 
> Re Turq: "Turq just cannot deal with the fact that adults allow themselves to 
> post at any time in a 24 hour day." (posted at 2:21 AM his time)
> 
> Re Turq: "Ravi, Joe has a similar control freak nature as Turq in this case - 
> no drinking on-line and get to bed on time dammit! These things are 
> important." (posted at 2:42 AM his time)
> 
> Re Turq: "Paleeze respond to this guy Judy! He is practically begging you - 
> he needs the sharp crack of your crop on his exposed buttocks - lives for 
> it..." (posted at 2:48 AM his time)
> 
> Re enlightenment: "Also, how can a *theory* ever be true? Either the reality 
> is lived, or it isn't." (posted at 2:52 AM his time, included for its Irony 
> Factor)
> 
> Re Vaj: "F*ck statistics and research dude - You proclaim yourself the Big 
> Buddhist here, so didn't the Buddha say something like believe nothing that 
> you hear and only..." (posted at 4:39 AM his time)
> 
> Re Vaj: "Careful Vajrah-doodah, you just tipped your hand - frightened of 
> liberation, eh? LOL - Seems as translucent as toilet tissue to me, but others 
> may have bought..." (posted at 7:27 AM his time)
> 
> Re Vaj: "Ha-ha, yeah the grotesque nature of spiritual fakers cracks me up - 
> such a bizarre phenomenon when the isolated ego co-opts the process of 
> sadhana." (posted at 7:28 AM his time, again included for its Irony Factor)
> 
> Quotes by Sri Sri Ravi Yogi (raviyogi@):
> 
> Re Turq, et al: "Barry's got this right - retards like him, Mike and Curtis 
> lead such pathetic lives that their lives revolve around attacking TM. Its 
> quite obvious..."
> 
> Re Turq, et al: "He can't, he knows there is something but he didn't get it 
> when the Guru was alive. Now he feels like a jilted lover - pathetic retards 
> - Barry, Curtis and now..."
> 
> Re Turq: "...pussies are just not tolerated here, learn from Barry. Take your 
> shit elsewhere..."
> 
> Re Mike: "...shutdown your whorehouse(blogs attacking Gurus) and go home to 
> your beloved(Self)"
> 
> Re Mike: "Let go of the mental masturbation, just f

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

> > >
> > > Dear Rick, this being Fairfield, could we add this statement from below 
> > > to the FFL guidelines:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > 
> > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has >to
> > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ...  
> > > 
> > > >Blessed
> > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Om Dear Rick, I certainly know you're very busy doing much more
> > important work than policing FFL, so I would
> > be glad to help you keep a handle on inharmonious
> > speech on FFL.  Like, I know we should just say "no" to
> > negative people and kick them out of the group.
> > It would be better for everyone.   
> > What could the inharmonious negative here possibly have to say if they can't
> > be sweet about it?
> > 
> > I'd be glad to help, just give me the passwords to FFL.
> > 
> > POE
> > Yours in purity, 
> > -Buck
> >
> 
> Dear Rick,
> 
> You know, it pisses me off here on FFL.  A few people not even from Fairfield 
> clog this place.
> If I were a moderator on this thread in particular, I'd delete some 
> memberships of people who have beeen mean and vitriolic of Turqb and then I'd 
> delete Turqb for causing it.  Jeesus fuc'ing christ folks.  I'd also drop the 
> minimum number of posting to FFL per week to 40 if not 30.  Posting to FFL is 
> a fucking privilege not a fucking right.  I'm an Iowan farmer and we talk 
> this way amongst ourselves this way.  People were much more effective and 
> poetic when the limit was lower. Like 40 or even 30 per week.  Rick, give me 
> the fucking password and I'll drop the fucking posting limit to 30 and let's 
> cut this stupid ad hominid pickering between these alt.meditation freaks who 
> have come over and piled on.  They bring most nothing to Fairfield.  I could 
> help.
> 
> You know, me and Bevan goe way back.  I have a lot of sympathy for the way he 
> thinks.  I'd like to bring that over to FFL.  I think it could improve the 
> purity of the place.   Just give me the password. Silas?  
> 
> -Buck in FF
>

You know, I don't even care if you are just or not a practitioner of TM or the 
TMSP.  It's about faith and belief in Maharishi.  I don't want to hear no 
negativity neither from you, you or you neither.

-Buck

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Rick, this being Fairfield, could we add this statement from below to 
> > the FFL guidelines:
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > 
> > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has >to
> > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ...  
> > 
> > >Blessed
> > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> Om Dear Rick, I certainly know you're very busy doing much more
> important work than policing FFL, so I would
> be glad to help you keep a handle on inharmonious
> speech on FFL.  Like, I know we should just say "no" to
> negative people and kick them out of the group.
> It would be better for everyone.   
> What could the inharmonious negative here possibly have to say if they can't
> be sweet about it?
> 
> I'd be glad to help, just give me the passwords to FFL.
> 
> POE
> Yours in purity, 
> -Buck
>

Dear Rick,

You know, it pisses me off here on FFL.  A few people not even from Fairfield 
clog this place.
If I were a moderator on this thread in particular, I'd delete some memberships 
of people who have beeen mean and vitriolic of Turqb and then I'd delete Turqb 
for causing it.  Jeesus fuc'ing christ folks.  I'd also drop the minimum number 
of posting to FFL per week to 40 if not 30.  Posting to FFL is a fucking 
privilege not a fucking right.  I'm an Iowan farmer and we talk this way 
amongst ourselves this way.  People were much more effective and poetic when 
the limit was lower. Like 40 or even 30 per week.  Rick, give me the fucking 
password and I'll drop the fucking positing limit to 30 and let's cut this 
stupid ad hominid pickering between these alt.meditation freaks who have come 
over and piled on.  They bring most nothing to Fairfield.  I could help.

You know, me and Bevan goe way back.  I have a lot of sympathy for the way he 
thinks.  I'd like to bring that over to FFL.  I think it could improve the 
purity of the place.   Just give me the password. Silas?  

-Buck in FF 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Yifu]

http://mychinaconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/wolf_in_sheeps_clothing1.jpg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > > 
> > > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has 
> > > > > to
> > > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in 
> > > > > our
> > > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness 
> > > > > of
> > > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... 
> > > > > Blessed
> > > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > > 
> > > > If X then Y.
> > > > If not X then not Y.
> > > > 
> > > > If harmonious, then... 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Well yes, 
> > > 
> > > If inharmonious, then...
> > >
> > 
> > Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> > 
> > The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> > 
> > "Let us be together
> > Let us eat together
> > Let us be vital together
> > Let us be Radiating Truth
> > Let us Be radiating the light of life
> > Never shall we denounce anyone
> > Never entertain negativity."
> >
> 
> 
> And, we'll hear no criticism from you, you and you.
> Especially you on FFL and some other places.
> 
> Jai Guru Dev,
> 
> -Buck
> Conservative Meditator
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

> 
> 
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > > 
> > > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> > > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> > > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> > > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> > > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > > 
> > > If X then Y.
> > > If not X then not Y.
> > > 
> > > If harmonious, then... 
> > >
> > 
> > Well yes, 
> > 
> > If inharmonious, then...
> >
> 
> Bevan's estimation of fealty:
> 
> The inner TM movement's cultural test,
> 
> "Let us be together
> Let us eat together
> Let us be vital together
> Let us be Radiating Truth
> Let us Be radiating the light of life
> Never shall we denounce anyone
> Never entertain negativity."
>


And, we'll hear no criticism from you, you and you.
Especially you on FFL and some other places.

Jai Guru Dev,

-Buck
Conservative Meditator

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

> > >
> > > 
> > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > > 
> > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> > > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> > > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> > > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> > > are they who speak sweet words."
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> > 
> > If X then Y.
> > If not X then not Y.
> > 
> > If harmonious, then... 
> >
> 
> Well yes, 
> 
> If inharmonious, then...
>

Bevan's estimation of fealty:

The inner TM movement's cultural test,

"Let us be together
Let us eat together
Let us be vital together
Let us be Radiating Truth
Let us Be radiating the light of life
Never shall we denounce anyone
Never entertain negativity."

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > 
> > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> > technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> > thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> > and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> > cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> > heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> > are they who speak sweet words."
> > 
> 
> 
> Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.
> 
> If X then Y.
> If not X then not Y.
> 
> If harmonious, then... 
>

Well yes, 

If inharmonious, then...

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> Dear Rick, this being Fairfield, could we add this statement from below to 
> the FFL guidelines:
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > 
> > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has >to
> > be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> > life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ...  
> 
> >Blessed
> > are they who speak sweet words."
> >
>


Om Dear Rick, I certainly know you're very busy doing much more
important work than policing FFL, so I would
be glad to help you keep a handle on inharmonious
speech on FFL.  Like, I know we should just say "no" to
negative people and kick them out of the group.
It would be better for everyone.   
What could the inharmonious negative here possibly have to say if they can't
be sweet about it?

I'd be glad to help, just give me the passwords to FFL.

POE
Yours in purity, 
-Buck

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

Dear Rick, this being Fairfield, could we add this statement from below to the 
FFL guidelines:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> 
> From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> 
> "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has >to
> be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ...  

>Blessed
> are they who speak sweet words."
> 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[cardemaister]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj  wrote:
>
> 
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Peter wrote:
> 
> >
> > Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are  
> > smaller!
> 
> "kai ou qauma autoV gar o satanaV metaschmatizetai eiV aggelon fwtoV"
> 
> "And this is no marvel for Satan himself is transformed into an angel  
> of light."
> 
> - Paul of Tarsus, 2 Corinthians 11:14
> 
> "I have known some very enlightened children who, upon meeting  
> [Maharishi] Mahesh [Yogi], would comment that what they saw was an  
> evil demon in disguise. At the time I thought they were unstressing.  
> But now I see what was really happening. Mahesh puts on this guise of  
> being a warm and loving spiritual master when in reality he is after  
> money, power and control. These children would actually see his real  
> form, a form most of us are not able to see."
> 
> -Earl Kaplan
> 
> "Sometime Satan comes as a man of peace".
> 
> -Bob Dylan
>

So, MMY "april-fooled" SBS?  ;-)

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Buck]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> 
> From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> 
> "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> are they who speak sweet words."
> 


Well yes, the TM-Movement's sweet truth.

If X then Y.
If not X then not Y.

If harmonious, then... 

Om, towards this Maharishi quote's end is that
transcribed correctly as pleasingly 'lies' or 'lays'?
How should we read that?  Which sweet truth?

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[seventhray1]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi"  wrote:

> You have definitely piqued my interest. I don't want to spoil this
game,
> obviously you guys have devoted your whole lives and invested a lot of
> energy in comparison of balls.. Not sure what Jim would have said, but
> he posted out anyway so it doesn't matter. So what do you suggest
> Peterji and Steveji - do I need to send in a picture of my balls,
shaven
> or unshaven, you must have some specimen of Maharishi's balls I
assume.
> And then what are the rules, you must be the judges and then you
declare
> a winner right? Ok please send me all the details before Friday when I
> can post freely again, OMG I'm so excited .


Ravi, the only thing to really be concerned with is if the testicles
have not descended.  But this is normally addressed shortly after birth.
Once you verify that the testicles have descended, then I would not
worry much about.  It is just the normal, natural process.

Now this is how we will discuss things, easily, morning and evening. 
(from the TM checking notes, for Ravi's benefit)

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[John]

Ravi Yogi,

You made my day!  This post is hilarious.  Now we know why certain individuals 
in this forum act the way they do.

JR

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are
> > smaller!
> >
> > kind of like cracker balls (from the fireworks store) I am guessing
> >
> >
> > >
> 
> Wow, the fascination of mature adults with decades of spiritual life,
> with containers or balls in this case..LOL, it's a never ending quest.
> That's why I keep repeating ad nauseam the pimp("ego") is ever
> fascinated with the whore("intellect") or balls. The pimps almost always
> have the Small Ball Syndrome and the conditions get aggravated by
> someone they think are challenging them. (Dr. Ravi Yogi, Psy.D ,UC
> Berekeley's research paper available and will be released soon, the
> paper concludes how the pimp can't accept the notion of dependence on
> the wore and the possibility of a life outside the 'hood).
> 
> 
> 
> You have definitely piqued my interest. I don't want to spoil this game,
> obviously you guys have devoted your whole lives and invested a lot of
> energy in comparison of balls.. Not sure what Jim would have said, but
> he posted out anyway so it doesn't matter. So what do you suggest
> Peterji and Steveji - do I need to send in a picture of my balls, shaven
> or unshaven, you must have some specimen of Maharishi's balls I assume.
> And then what are the rules, you must be the judges and then you declare
> a winner right? Ok please send me all the details before Friday when I
> can post freely again, OMG I'm so excited .
> 
> 
> 
> The rest of the message for is for Barry.
> 
> 
> 
> Barry - I was saving my 50th message for you. You know how much I
> appreciate your work in transforming your dependence on dead gurus and
> scriptures into attachment for jivanmuktas. I'm so glad you have stopped
> posting your idiotic messages on comparing TMO/MMY with Facebook,
> Mormons, Catholics, Scientologists, Economic Psychology or whatever new
> thoery that comes up in the leading newspapers.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm actually glad Jim posted out. I was strongly against your focus on
> Three goons. I'm hoping Judy posts out but even if she didn't she hasn't
> declared herself to be awakened so no worries. This is your chance to
> focus completely on me. You know how much I appreciate you consistently
> making a fool of yourself here, it has greatly helped me compile a wide
> variety of research articles to help you - Small Penis Complex, PTMSD. I
> agree, its not easy but you can do it and I'm here to support your work.
> Checkout my Yahoo profile, there are a sample of photos that will help
> you concentrate more.
> 
> 
> 
> Keep up the good work - focus on the original goon, the original gangsta
> of the divine mother.
> 
> 
> 
> Love - Ravi Yogi.
> 
> > > --- On Thu, 3/31/11, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> > >
> > > From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] The sweet speech of the enlightened
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 7:27 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at
> work
> > that disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
> > >
> > > Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding
> > why some here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and
> > enlightenment, I just thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from
> > Maharishi on the subject of the speech of the enlightened, and 2) go
> > back to look at only the first few words (the ones that appear in
> > Yahoo's Message View) of a few of the 64 posts they made during the
> > first 30 hours of this FFL posting week, during which they were
> > indulging in a bit of a "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters,
> > all of whom are coincidentally often described by Judy Stein as "TM
> > critics" or "anti-TMers," and all of whom (again coincidentally) are
> > among the most highly-placed on her own personal Enemies List and
> > subjects of her own "sweet speech."
> > >
> > > Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24
> > posts she made during the this "feeding frenzy" period, even though
> some
> > of it is of the same ilk, because after all, she has never made any
> > claims of being enlightened. Nor have any of the TM critics being
> talked
> > about so sweetly below. Jim and Ravi, on the other hand, both claim to
> > be enlightened. You decide.
> > >
> > > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> > >
> > > "For speech to be harmonious, appropr

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Peter]

The classic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXSyzeVWueI&feature=related

--- On Thu, 3/31/11, Ravi Yogi  wrote:

From: Ravi Yogi 
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 5:43 PM

















 















--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
> >
> > Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are
> smaller!
> 
> kind of like cracker balls (from the fireworks store) I am guessing
> 
> 
> >

Wow, the fascination of mature adults with decades of spiritual life, with 
containers or balls in this case..LOL, it's a never ending quest. That's why I 
keep repeating ad nauseam the pimp("ego") is ever fascinated with the 
whore("intellect") or balls. The pimps almost always have the Small Ball 
Syndrome and the conditions get aggravated by someone they think are 
challenging them. (Dr. Ravi Yogi, Psy.D ,UC Berekeley's research paper 
available and will be released soon, the paper concludes how the pimp can't 
accept the notion of dependence on the wore and the possibility of a life 
outside the 'hood).
 
You have definitely piqued my interest. I don't want to spoil this game, 
obviously you guys have devoted your whole lives and invested a lot of 
energy in comparison of balls.. Not sure what Jim would have said, but he 
posted out anyway so it doesn't matter. So what do you suggest Peterji and 
Steveji - do I need to send in a picture of my balls, shaven or unshaven, you 
must have some specimen of Maharishi's balls I assume. And then what are the 
rules, you must be the judges and then you declare a winner right? Ok please 
send me all the details before Friday when I can post freely again, OMG I'm so 
excited .
 
The rest of the message for is for Barry.
 
Barry - I was saving my 50th message for you. You know how much I appreciate 
your work in transforming your dependence on dead gurus and scriptures into 
attachment for jivanmuktas. I'm so glad you have stopped posting your idiotic 
messages on comparing TMO/MMY with Facebook, Mormons, Catholics, 
Scientologists, Economic Psychology or whatever new thoery that comes up in the 
leading newspapers.
 
I'm actually glad Jim posted out. I was strongly against your focus on Three 
goons. I'm hoping Judy posts out but even if she didn't she hasn't declared 
herself to be awakened so no worries. This is your chance to focus completely 
on me. You know how much I appreciate you consistently making a fool of 
yourself here, it has greatly helped me compile a wide variety of research 
articles to help you - Small Penis Complex, PTMSD. I agree, its not easy but 
you can do it and I'm here to support your work. Checkout my Yahoo profile, 
there are a sample of photos that will help you concentrate more.
 
Keep up the good work - focus on the original goon, the original gangsta of the 
divine mother.
 
Love - Ravi Yogi.
> > --- On Thu, 3/31/11, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> >
> > From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] The sweet speech of the enlightened
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 7:27 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at work
> that disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
> >
> > Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding
> why some here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and
> enlightenment, I just thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from
> Maharishi on the subject of the speech of the enlightened, and 2) go
> back to look at only the first few words (the ones that appear in
> Yahoo's Message View) of a few of the 64 posts they made during the
> first 30 hours of this FFL posting week, during which they were
> indulging in a bit of a "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters,
> all of whom are coincidentally often described by Judy Stein as "TM
> critics" or "anti-TMers," and all of whom (again coincidentally) are
> among the most highly-placed on her own personal Enemies List and
> subjects of her own "sweet speech."
> >
> > Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24
> posts she made during the this "feeding frenzy&q

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[Ravi Yogi]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
> >
> > Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are
> smaller!
>
> kind of like cracker balls (from the fireworks store) I am guessing
>
>
> >

Wow, the fascination of mature adults with decades of spiritual life,
with containers or balls in this case..LOL, it's a never ending quest.
That's why I keep repeating ad nauseam the pimp("ego") is ever
fascinated with the whore("intellect") or balls. The pimps almost always
have the Small Ball Syndrome and the conditions get aggravated by
someone they think are challenging them. (Dr. Ravi Yogi, Psy.D ,UC
Berekeley's research paper available and will be released soon, the
paper concludes how the pimp can't accept the notion of dependence on
the wore and the possibility of a life outside the 'hood).



You have definitely piqued my interest. I don't want to spoil this game,
obviously you guys have devoted your whole lives and invested a lot of
energy in comparison of balls.. Not sure what Jim would have said, but
he posted out anyway so it doesn't matter. So what do you suggest
Peterji and Steveji - do I need to send in a picture of my balls, shaven
or unshaven, you must have some specimen of Maharishi's balls I assume.
And then what are the rules, you must be the judges and then you declare
a winner right? Ok please send me all the details before Friday when I
can post freely again, OMG I'm so excited .



The rest of the message for is for Barry.



Barry - I was saving my 50th message for you. You know how much I
appreciate your work in transforming your dependence on dead gurus and
scriptures into attachment for jivanmuktas. I'm so glad you have stopped
posting your idiotic messages on comparing TMO/MMY with Facebook,
Mormons, Catholics, Scientologists, Economic Psychology or whatever new
thoery that comes up in the leading newspapers.



I'm actually glad Jim posted out. I was strongly against your focus on
Three goons. I'm hoping Judy posts out but even if she didn't she hasn't
declared herself to be awakened so no worries. This is your chance to
focus completely on me. You know how much I appreciate you consistently
making a fool of yourself here, it has greatly helped me compile a wide
variety of research articles to help you - Small Penis Complex, PTMSD. I
agree, its not easy but you can do it and I'm here to support your work.
Checkout my Yahoo profile, there are a sample of photos that will help
you concentrate more.



Keep up the good work - focus on the original goon, the original gangsta
of the divine mother.



Love - Ravi Yogi.

> > --- On Thu, 3/31/11, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> >
> > From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] The sweet speech of the enlightened
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 7:27 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at
work
> that disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
> >
> > Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding
> why some here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and
> enlightenment, I just thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from
> Maharishi on the subject of the speech of the enlightened, and 2) go
> back to look at only the first few words (the ones that appear in
> Yahoo's Message View) of a few of the 64 posts they made during the
> first 30 hours of this FFL posting week, during which they were
> indulging in a bit of a "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters,
> all of whom are coincidentally often described by Judy Stein as "TM
> critics" or "anti-TMers," and all of whom (again coincidentally) are
> among the most highly-placed on her own personal Enemies List and
> subjects of her own "sweet speech."
> >
> > Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24
> posts she made during the this "feeding frenzy" period, even though
some
> of it is of the same ilk, because after all, she has never made any
> claims of being enlightened. Nor have any of the TM critics being
talked
> about so sweetly below. Jim and Ravi, on the other hand, both claim to
> be enlightened. You decide.
> >
> > From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> >
> > "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has
> to be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in
our
> thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness
of
> heart tha

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[turquoiseb]

Well, we're down to the Two Goons next week. Unless 
the other two take the "Hmmm...I've been called on 
my bullshit...maybe I should lay low for a while and
hope that other posters' memories are as self-servingly
bad as mine are" approach next week as well. :-)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7"  wrote:
>
> Fair enough Turq - Glad to see you are well on your way to 
> examining behavior in the context of Maharishi's words. Oh 
> wait, or are you just using this as a cynical exercise to 
> insult me? Hmm...

I used Maharishi's quote to see whether you would do
exactly what wayback described in her post on scientific
findings about cognitive dissonance. That is, change 
your beliefs rather than change your behavior. You did.
Funny how Maharishi is such a role model and wise sage
for you until he describes behavior that you can't even 
*begin* to live up to, eh?  :-)

> Addressing what Maharishi said, I like it as a guideline 
> and find it helpful to remember. As an absolute edict 
> though, I give it about as much credence as you do.

And yet he, being at least as enlightened as you are,
could not possibly say anything wrong or incorrect. All
of his words -- including these -- were dictated by the
three gunas because he was so enlightened and all, so
they *had* to have been in accord with the Laws Of
Nature. So, of course, are all of *your* words. You
are enlightened because you SAY you are, and that's
the end of it. Did I get that right?  :-)

> Since this is my last post 'til at least April 9...

Or longer. My bet is that you'll do what you did the last
three times someone called you on your bullshit here at
FFL and beat feet for a lot longer than that. They you'll
reappear, probably with a new screen name, and try to 
pretend that nothing that happened in the past ever
happened. :-)

> ...I'll also add that I enjoy talking about my spiritual 
> experiences. And besides just enjoying it I still think 
> it is helpful to let others know that liberation is 
> something anyone can accomplish. It is no longer something 
> mystical and far off. 

And they're supposed to WANT this "liberation" you speak
of, based on YOUR example? Get real.

> As for my progress, it continues of course - the beauty of 
> liberation is that it is a process that never ends. How 
> could it end? It wouldn't be called liberation otherwise. 

So you're saying that you've moved *beyond* mere CC now? :-)

> When I first mentioned it a few years ago, I was naive, 
> aghast and pissed off at the sarcasm and disbelief that 
> greeted my words. 

As opposed to now. Right?  :-)

> It turned out though to be a Divine intervention in spurring 
> me from CC onward. 

Guess I was right above, eh? You're now claiming to be in
some state *beyond* CC. 

> Very, very helpful and I applaud all of those who acting 
> by the grace of God challenged my words at the time. In 
> retrospect I have nothing but thanks. 

Alstublieft. You're welcome. 

> Nowadays I have lost my thirst for any insistence on my 
> part of my state of consciousness...

And just where did this "thirst" you speak of come from
*before*? Couldn't possibly have come from ego and attach-
ment, still present in a person claiming enlightenment and 
thus claiming to be beyond such things, could it?  :-)

> ...and mention it matter-of-factly from time to time just 
> because IT IS, completely OK with what anyone else comes 
> back with. 

So completely OK with it that you're going to run off and
hide for a week, right?  :-)

> As for the timestamps of my posts all I can do is repeat 
> that adults allow themselves to post whenever they want. 
> I am sorry that you remain horribly scarred by your 
> parents' past insistence on a "proper bedtime". I'll 
> also add something for you to wonder about regarding my 
> timestamps: I travel sometimes.

Yeah, right. My point was that both you and Ravi opened 
this posting week by staying up pretty much all night
compulsively posting to FFL every few minutes for seem-
ingly no other purpose than to "get" TM critics. And that
is true no matter where you were, if you were in the US.
I pointed it out to see if I could get you to be all
defensive about it, and because *both* you and your fag
hag have tried to make the same point with some of the
people you try to demonize. 

> See you in a week and some!
> (51)

Yeah, right. 
(36)

And now to the real purpose of my reply, addressed to
those who are still around at the end of the week. 
Doncha find yourself amused at the ability of long-term 
TMers to on the one hand hold Maharishi's words up as 
gospel or Truth and at the same time disavow them 
completely the moment they describe something that they 
can't live up to? Doncha find it amusing when people 
claim to be enlightened, cite various spiritual teachers 
from the past as "authorities" that they believe in, and 
then when someone points out those very teachers' words 
*about* enlightenment and point out that their lives 
emb

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[whynotnow7]

Fair enough Turq - Glad to see you are well on your way to examining behavior 
in the context of Maharishi's words. Oh wait, or are you just using this as a 
cynical exercise to insult me? Hmm...

Addressing what Maharishi said, I like it as a guideline and find it helpful to 
remember. As an absolute edict though, I give it about as much credence as you 
do.

Since this is my last post 'til at least April 9, I'll also add that I enjoy 
talking about my spiritual experiences. And besides just enjoying it I still 
think it is helpful to let others know that liberation is something anyone can 
accomplish. It is no longer something mystical and far off. As for my progress, 
it continues of course - the beauty of liberation is that it is a process that 
never ends. How could it end? It wouldn't be called liberation otherwise. 

When I first mentioned it a few years ago, I was naive, aghast and pissed off 
at the sarcasm and disbelief that greeted my words. It turned out though to be 
a Divine intervention in spurring me from CC onward. Very, very helpful and I 
applaud all of those who acting by the grace of God challenged my words at the 
time. In retrospect I have nothing but thanks. 

Nowadays I have lost my thirst for any insistence on my part of my state of 
consciousness and mention it matter-of-factly from time to time just because IT 
IS, completely OK with what anyone else comes back with. 

As for the timestamps of my posts all I can do is repeat that adults allow 
themselves to post whenever they want. I am sorry that you remain horribly 
scarred by your parents' past insistence on a "proper bedtime". I'll also add 
something for you to wonder about regarding  my timestamps: I travel sometimes.

See you in a week and some!
(51)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at work
> that disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
> 
> Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding why
> some here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and enlightenment,
> I just thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from Maharishi on the
> subject of the speech of the enlightened, and 2) go back to look at only
> the first few words (the ones that appear in Yahoo's Message View) of a
> few of the 64 posts they made during the first 30 hours of this FFL
> posting week, during which they were indulging in a bit of a "feeding
> frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters, all of whom are coincidentally
> often described by Judy Stein as "TM critics" or "anti-TMers," and all
> of whom (again coincidentally) are among the most highly-placed on her
> own personal Enemies List and subjects of her own "sweet speech."
> 
> Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24
> posts she made during the this "feeding frenzy" period, even though some
> of it is of the same ilk, because after all, she has never made any
> claims of being enlightened. Nor have any of the TM critics being talked
> about so sweetly below. Jim and Ravi, on the other hand, both claim to
> be enlightened. You decide.
> 
> From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
> 
> "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has to
> be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
> life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
> technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
> thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
> and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
> cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
> heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
> are they who speak sweet words."
> 
> Quotes by Sri Sri Jim Flanegin (whynotnow7@):
> 
> Re Turq: "Turq, you must be wetting your pants with excitement - Curtis
> is back and Judy is about to be!!! Do they have Depends (adult diapers)
> in Amsterdam?"
> 
> Re Turq: "Turq just cannot deal with the fact that adults allow
> themselves to post at any time in a 24 hour day." (posted at 2:21 AM his
> time)
> 
> Re Turq: "Ravi, Joe has a similar control freak nature as Turq in this
> case - no drinking on-line and get to bed on time dammit! These things
> are important." (posted at 2:42 AM his time)
> 
> Re Turq: "Paleeze respond to this guy Judy! He is practically begging
> you - he needs the sharp crack of your crop on his exposed buttocks -
> lives for it..." (posted at 2:48 AM his time)
> 
> Re enlightenment: "Also, how can a *theory* ever be true? Either the
> reality is lived, or it isn't." (posted at 2:52 AM his time, included
> for its Irony Factor)
> 
> Re Vaj: "F*ck statistics and research dude - You proclaim yourself the
> Big Buddhist here, so didn't the Buddha say something like believe
> nothing that you hear and only..." (posted at 4:39 AM his time)
> 
> Re Vaj: "Careful Vajrah-do

[FairfieldLife] Re: The sweet speech of the enlightened

[seventhray1]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter  wrote:
>
> Maharishi was a Blazing Ball of Brahman. Jim's and Ravi's balls are
smaller!

kind of like cracker balls (from the fireworks store) I am guessing


>
> --- On Thu, 3/31/11, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] The sweet speech of the enlightened
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 7:27 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The following post is Turq taking advantage of a power outage at work
that disallows any work to have some fun. Be warned. :-)
>
> Since both Jim and Ravi seem to be having some trouble understanding
why some here don't quite buy their claims of egolessness and
enlightenment, I just thought I'd 1) provide a short quote from
Maharishi on the subject of the speech of the enlightened, and 2) go
back to look at only the first few words (the ones that appear in
Yahoo's Message View) of a few of the 64 posts they made during the
first 30 hours of this FFL posting week, during which they were
indulging in a bit of a "feeding frenzy" by dissing other FFL posters,
all of whom are coincidentally often described by Judy Stein as "TM
critics" or "anti-TMers," and all of whom (again coincidentally) are
among the most highly-placed on her own personal Enemies List and
subjects of her own "sweet speech."
>
> Naturally, I will not include any of Judy's own language from the 24
posts she made during the this "feeding frenzy" period, even though some
of it is of the same ilk, because after all, she has never made any
claims of being enlightened. Nor have any of the TM critics being talked
about so sweetly below. Jim and Ravi, on the other hand, both claim to
be enlightened. You decide.
>
> From Maharishi's The Science of Being and Art of Living:
>
> "For speech to be harmonious, appropriate and suitable, thinking has
to be clear, sharp, and at the least, harmless -- and at the best,
life-supporting to the whole of the environment. ... This is the
technique of the art of speaking: that, although we are truthful in our
thinking and speaking, the words that come out must be pleasing, soft,
and of good quality. ... The habit of speaking pleasingly lies in
cultivating that nature, that politeness, that softness and kindness of
heart that will not at any time produce harshness of speech. ... Blessed
are they who speak sweet words."
>
> Quotes by Sri Sri Jim Flanegin (whynotnow7@):
>
> Re Turq: "Turq, you must be wetting your pants with excitement -
Curtis is back and Judy is about to be!!! Do they have Depends (adult
diapers) in Amsterdam?"
>
> Re Turq: "Turq just cannot deal with the fact that adults allow
themselves to post at any time in a 24 hour day." (posted at 2:21 AM his
time)
>
> Re Turq: "Ravi, Joe has a similar control freak nature as Turq in this
case - no drinking on-line and get to bed on time dammit! These things
are important." (posted at 2:42 AM his time)
>
> Re Turq: "Paleeze respond to this guy Judy! He is practically begging
you - he needs the sharp crack of your crop on his exposed buttocks -
lives for it..." (posted at 2:48 AM his time)
>
> Re enlightenment: "Also, how can a *theory* ever be true? Either the
reality is lived, or it isn't." (posted at 2:52 AM his time, included
for its Irony Factor)
>
> Re Vaj: "F*ck statistics and research dude - You proclaim yourself the
Big Buddhist here, so didn't the Buddha say something like believe
nothing that you hear and only..." (posted at 4:39 AM his time)
>
> Re Vaj: "Careful Vajrah-doodah, you just tipped your hand - frightened
of liberation, eh? LOL - Seems as translucent as toilet tissue to me,
but others may have bought..." (posted at 7:27 AM his time)
>
> Re Vaj: "Ha-ha, yeah the grotesque nature of spiritual fakers cracks
me up - such a bizarre phenomenon when the isolated ego co-opts the
process of sadhana." (posted at 7:28 AM his time, again included for its
Irony Factor)
>
> Quotes by Sri Sri Ravi Yogi (raviyogi@):
>
> Re Turq, et al: "Barry's got this right - retards like him, Mike and
Curtis lead such pathetic lives that their lives revolve around
attacking TM. Its quite obvious..."
>
> Re Turq, et al: "He can't, he knows there is something but he didn't
get it when the Guru was alive. Now he feels like a jilted lover -
pathetic retards - Barry, Curtis and now..."
>
> Re Turq: "...pussies are just not tolerated here, learn from Barry.
Take your shit elsewhere..."
>
> Re Mike: "...shutdown your whorehouse(blogs attacking Gurus) and go
home to your beloved(Self)"
>
> Re Mike: "Let go of the mental masturbation, just feel and you will
know why I called him a pussy..."
>
> Re Joe: "No Joeyji I'm drunk on the bottle of divine Vodka that my
divine mother gave me. I'm hanging out at the FFL Pub ready to engage in
a brawl."
>
> Re Mike: "...the mental masturbation, just feel and you will know why
I called him a pussy." (posted at 3:32 AM his time)