[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. Why are you such a denier? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: If you want to play the anecdotal evidence game, take a gander at the following. Look, Bongo, nobody believes the global warming propaganda anymore: temperature statistics fudged, lying about Himalayan glaciers melting, bullshitting about sea levels. The phoney evidence has been exposed for all to see. You should be celebrating the fact that millions won't die, John. Instead you are miserable about it. Why is that? http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ Storm WatchHistoric snowstorm winds down later today Chris Dolce, Lead Meteorologist, The Weather Channel Feb. 6, 2010 12:05 pm ET Snow, heavy in some locations, continues to fall from West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania eastward to the Mid-Atlantic Coast. Look for the snow to wind down from west to east late this afternoon and early evening putting the final touches on this historic event. Widespread totals of a foot to over two feet have been reported in portions of southern Pennsylvania, West Virginia, northern Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, southern New Jersey and the District of Columbia. Localized amounts have topped 30 inches. As the low pushes off the coast it will continue to strengthen which will result in very strong winds near and along the coast. Gusts of 40 to 50 miles per hour will be likely along the coasts from the Tidewater of Virginia north to the Jersey shore. Snow and gusty winds will contribute to low visibilities and near-blizzard conditions in some areas. The winds will also serve up high surf which will lead to beach erosion and areas of coastal flooding from Atlantic City southward to the Carolina coast.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. He's referring to, among other examples, the record-setting storm that just hit Washington--you know, the one you cited in the post he was responding to.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. He's referring to, among other examples, the record-setting storm that just hit Washington--you know, the one you cited in the post he was responding to. That was one extreme weather fluctuation. Are there MORE extreme weather fluctuations since the advent of global warming compared to before the advent of global warming or is there less or about the same?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. He's referring to, among other examples, the record-setting storm that just hit Washington--you know, the one you cited in the post he was responding to. That was one extreme weather fluctuation. Are there MORE extreme weather fluctuations since the advent of global warming compared to before the advent of global warming or is there less or about the same? Global warming may be responsible in part for some trends in natural disasters such as extreme weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather . [File:Trends in natural disasters.jpg] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Trends_in_natural_di\ sasters.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Trends_in_natural_disasters.jpg Extreme weather includes weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather phenomena that are at the extremes of the historical distribution, especially severe or unseasonal weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_weather .[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-0 The World Meteorological Organization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Meteorological_Organization [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-1 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Environmental_Protection_Agency [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-2 have linked increasing extreme weather events to global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming , as have Hoyos et al. (2006), writing that the increasing number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes is directly linked to increasing temperatures.[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-3 Similarly, Kerry Emmanuel in Nature writes that hurricane power dissipation is highly correlated with temperature, reflecting global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming . Hurricane modeling has produced similar results, finding that hurricanes, simulated under warmer, high CO2 conditions, are more intense than under present-day conditions. Thomas Knutson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Knutson and Robert E. Tuleya of the NOAA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOAA greenhouse gas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas may lead to increasing occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms.[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-4 Vecchi and Soden find that wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear , the increase of which acts to inhibit tropical cyclones http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclones , also changes in model-projections of global warming. There are projected increases of wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear in the tropical Atlantic and East Pacific associated with the deceleration of the Walker circulation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_circulation , as well as decreases of wind shear in the western and central Pacific.[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather Extreme Weather Fits Global Warming Pattern Drought, Flooding, Heavy Storms May Become More Frequent and Extreme as Climate ChangesIt seems to make no sense: Record drought, right next to downpours. Just this week, for example, swaths of Arizona have been on fire and there have been flash floods in Texas. [flood] (ABCNEWS.com) But to scientists, it does make sense. The simple reason is that the air is getting warmer, and warmer air holds more moisture -- so when the warmer winds sweep across wet farmlands, they suck up more moisture drying the farms out. And when the winds finally dump that moisture out as rain, the downpours are much heavier. Suddenly you've got a gully-washer, says Kevin Trenberth, a scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research, part of a research collaboration among universities. You've got too much water. And then at other times you've got drier conditions, potential for drought -- associated with global warming because of this increase of water vapor in the atmosphere. That can translate into more rain or more snow -- as was the case this winter in the western mountains. Normally, more snow is good news for farms and towns below the mountains, because three-fourths of the West's water comes from snow pack. But a warming trend over the past 30 years means snows often melt out
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
The more interesting chart is the inner one because it shows relatively little or no significant difference in cyclones and earthquakes. Floods, of course, will only be of concern in populated areas...and populated areas increased with the increase of world population. Also interesting is the explanation for what is included in the definition of disasters. A lot of that stuff can be ascribed to other factors than global temperatures. Anyway, none of these figures have any meaning whatsoever because: 1)it only goes back to 1900; 2) we don't know the breakdown of all the disasters except for the ones in the inner box; and 3) no one trusts ANY figures anymore from the fraudulent pro-global warming crowd. Everything must be recalculated because all data is tainted. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. He's referring to, among other examples, the record-setting storm that just hit Washington--you know, the one you cited in the post he was responding to. That was one extreme weather fluctuation. Are there MORE extreme weather fluctuations since the advent of global warming compared to before the advent of global warming or is there less or about the same? Global warming may be responsible in part for some trends in natural disasters such as extreme weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather . [File:Trends in natural disasters.jpg] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Trends_in_natural_di\ sasters.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Trends_in_natural_disasters.jpg Extreme weather includes weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather phenomena that are at the extremes of the historical distribution, especially severe or unseasonal weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_weather .[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-0 The World Meteorological Organization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Meteorological_Organization [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-1 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Environmental_Protection_Agency [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-2 have linked increasing extreme weather events to global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming , as have Hoyos et al. (2006), writing that the increasing number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes is directly linked to increasing temperatures.[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-3 Similarly, Kerry Emmanuel in Nature writes that hurricane power dissipation is highly correlated with temperature, reflecting global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming . Hurricane modeling has produced similar results, finding that hurricanes, simulated under warmer, high CO2 conditions, are more intense than under present-day conditions. Thomas Knutson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Knutson and Robert E. Tuleya of the NOAA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOAA greenhouse gas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas may lead to increasing occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms.[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-4 Vecchi and Soden find that wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear , the increase of which acts to inhibit tropical cyclones http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclones , also changes in model-projections of global warming. There are projected increases of wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear in the tropical Atlantic and East Pacific associated with the deceleration of the Walker circulation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_circulation , as well as decreases of wind shear in the western and central Pacific.[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather Extreme Weather Fits Global Warming Pattern Drought, Flooding, Heavy Storms May Become More Frequent and Extreme as Climate ChangesIt seems to make no sense: Record drought, right next to downpours. Just this week, for example, swaths of Arizona have been on fire and there have been flash floods in Texas. [flood] (ABCNEWS.com) But to scientists, it does make sense. The simple reason is that
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: The more interesting chart is the inner one because it shows relatively little or no significant difference in cyclones and earthquakes. Floods, of course, will only be of concern in populated areas...and populated areas increased with the increase of world population. Also interesting is the explanation for what is included in the definition of disasters. A lot of that stuff can be ascribed to other factors than global temperatures. Anyway, none of these figures have any meaning whatsoever because: 1)it only goes back to 1900; 2) we don't know the breakdown of all the disasters except for the ones in the inner box; and 3) no one trusts ANY figures anymore from the fraudulent pro-global warming crowd. Everything must be recalculated because all data is tainted. The evidence for AGW is undeniable on the basis of thousands of peer-reviewed research papers and simple human observation. Like I've suggested before, either you're a willfully blind supporter of the profiteer corporate polluters, you're stupid or you're trolling. My bet is that it's a little of all three. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. ...but there ARE NO extreme weather fluctuations. It was all made up. He's referring to, among other examples, the record-setting storm that just hit Washington--you know, the one you cited in the post he was responding to. That was one extreme weather fluctuation. Are there MORE extreme weather fluctuations since the advent of global warming compared to before the advent of global warming or is there less or about the same? Global warming may be responsible in part for some trends in natural disasters such as extreme weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather . [File:Trends in natural disasters.jpg] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Trends_in_natural_di\ sasters.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Trends_in_natural_disasters.jpg Extreme weather includes weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather phenomena that are at the extremes of the historical distribution, especially severe or unseasonal weather http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_weather .[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-0 The World Meteorological Organization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Meteorological_Organization [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-1 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Environmental_Protection_Agency [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-2 have linked increasing extreme weather events to global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming , as have Hoyos et al. (2006), writing that the increasing number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes is directly linked to increasing temperatures.[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-3 Similarly, Kerry Emmanuel in Nature writes that hurricane power dissipation is highly correlated with temperature, reflecting global warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming . Hurricane modeling has produced similar results, finding that hurricanes, simulated under warmer, high CO2 conditions, are more intense than under present-day conditions. Thomas Knutson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Knutson and Robert E. Tuleya of the NOAA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOAA greenhouse gas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas may lead to increasing occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms.[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_weather#cite_note-4 Vecchi and Soden find that wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear , the increase of which acts to inhibit tropical cyclones http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclones , also changes in model-projections of global warming. There are projected increases of wind shear http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear in the tropical Atlantic and East Pacific associated with the deceleration of the Walker circulation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_circulation , as well as decreases of wind shear in the western and central Pacific.[6]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
If you want to play the anecdotal evidence game, take a gander at the following. Look, Bongo, nobody believes the global warming propaganda anymore: temperature statistics fudged, lying about Himalayan glaciers melting, bullshitting about sea levels. The phoney evidence has been exposed for all to see. You should be celebrating the fact that millions won't die, John. Instead you are miserable about it. Why is that? http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ Storm WatchHistoric snowstorm winds down later today Chris Dolce, Lead Meteorologist, The Weather Channel Feb. 6, 2010 12:05 pm ET Snow, heavy in some locations, continues to fall from West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania eastward to the Mid-Atlantic Coast. Look for the snow to wind down from west to east late this afternoon and early evening putting the final touches on this historic event. Widespread totals of a foot to over two feet have been reported in portions of southern Pennsylvania, West Virginia, northern Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, southern New Jersey and the District of Columbia. Localized amounts have topped 30 inches. As the low pushes off the coast it will continue to strengthen which will result in very strong winds near and along the coast. Gusts of 40 to 50 miles per hour will be likely along the coasts from the Tidewater of Virginia north to the Jersey shore. Snow and gusty winds will contribute to low visibilities and near-blizzard conditions in some areas. The winds will also serve up high surf which will lead to beach erosion and areas of coastal flooding from Atlantic City southward to the Carolina coast.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
Have those renegade icebergs reached Australia yet!! Ha, ha --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: If you want to play the anecdotal evidence game, take a gander at the following. Look, Bongo, nobody believes the global warming propaganda anymore: temperature statistics fudged, lying about Himalayan glaciers melting, bullshitting about sea levels. The phoney evidence has been exposed for all to see. You should be celebrating the fact that millions won't die, John. Instead you are miserable about it. Why is that? http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ Storm WatchHistoric snowstorm winds down later today Chris Dolce, Lead Meteorologist, The Weather Channel Feb. 6, 2010 12:05 pm ET Snow, heavy in some locations, continues to fall from West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania eastward to the Mid-Atlantic Coast. Look for the snow to wind down from west to east late this afternoon and early evening putting the final touches on this historic event. Widespread totals of a foot to over two feet have been reported in portions of southern Pennsylvania, West Virginia, northern Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, southern New Jersey and the District of Columbia. Localized amounts have topped 30 inches. As the low pushes off the coast it will continue to strengthen which will result in very strong winds near and along the coast. Gusts of 40 to 50 miles per hour will be likely along the coasts from the Tidewater of Virginia north to the Jersey shore. Snow and gusty winds will contribute to low visibilities and near-blizzard conditions in some areas. The winds will also serve up high surf which will lead to beach erosion and areas of coastal flooding from Atlantic City southward to the Carolina coast.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tibet temperature 'highest since records began'
This is simple and basic. Part of the scientific realities of AGW is that the consequences include the abnormal and extreme weather fluctuations that we see as the trend of increasing global temperatures continues upward. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: If you want to play the anecdotal evidence game, take a gander at the following. Look, Bongo, nobody believes the global warming propaganda anymore: temperature statistics fudged, lying about Himalayan glaciers melting, bullshitting about sea levels. The phoney evidence has been exposed for all to see. You should be celebrating the fact that millions won't die, John. Instead you are miserable about it. Why is that? http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ http://www.weather.com/newscenter/stormwatch/ Storm WatchHistoric snowstorm winds down later today Chris Dolce, Lead Meteorologist, The Weather Channel Feb. 6, 2010 12:05 pm ET Snow, heavy in some locations, continues to fall from West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania eastward to the Mid-Atlantic Coast. Look for the snow to wind down from west to east late this afternoon and early evening putting the final touches on this historic event. Widespread totals of a foot to over two feet have been reported in portions of southern Pennsylvania, West Virginia, northern Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, southern New Jersey and the District of Columbia. Localized amounts have topped 30 inches. As the low pushes off the coast it will continue to strengthen which will result in very strong winds near and along the coast. Gusts of 40 to 50 miles per hour will be likely along the coasts from the Tidewater of Virginia north to the Jersey shore. Snow and gusty winds will contribute to low visibilities and near-blizzard conditions in some areas. The winds will also serve up high surf which will lead to beach erosion and areas of coastal flooding from Atlantic City southward to the Carolina coast.
