[FairfieldLife] Re: Umpires needed: Does this answer Shemp's questions?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on: the same credentials. Shemp, take away health care for a moment. What is it you find to be so objectionable about Obama's presidency so far? Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit. Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt. That represents about $700 per person per year. That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts for the rich because of this scenario? That would have made this figure smaller per person, and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by all legal means, would hardly notice any significant difference if those tax cuts were repealled. Problem solved, debt paid. Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war costs put on the books properly. So what's your point again Shemp? I don't get it. OffWorld Off, it's time for you to come clean on your false representations on Ron Paul. You never responded to my previous posts on this subject. Time for you to come clean to me and everyone here. You can't keep misrepresenting yourself without being called on it. I responded to your questionso on this many times, You never read the responses, because you do not like facts. Go back and find the responses yourself. I am not answering this AGAIN! OffWolrd No, you didn't. Your response to post #243274, in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's stance on embryonic stem cell research was the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what you represented it to be, didn't address anything. And where was your respone to post #243273 in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's position on two of today's biggest issues -- global warming and abortion -- are completely opposite of what you believe? Umpires needed. Shemp has completely gone off the rails. Does this below answer Shemp's questions? In answer to your poorly argued attention seeking BS, I already answered them in these posts. You may not LIKE the answers (you NEVER will), but I DID answer your dumbass questions. Post 243282 - embryonic research Wrong. He is against government funding of it. ...BUT THAT IS THE NEOCON'S POSITION!! LOOK, THE WHOLE ISSUE ON EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH VIS A VIS THE GOVERNMENT IS WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS PROVIDING GOVERNMENT FUNDS. OBAMA IS FOR GIVING FUNDS FOR IT; THE NEOCONS AND RON PAUL ARE AGAINST IT. Post 243271 - Scientific evidence They (he and Obama) are both for science over religious Neocon fanaticism. EVERYONE IS AGAINST FANATICISM BUT RON PAUL IS ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE NEOCONS IN THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE. Post 243233 - Support for socialist healthcare: Ron Paul is all about charities too. ie. Giving. He believes that helping others comes naturally. He just doesn't understand that in an age of ignorance, with ignoramouses such as you, there needs to be an organized effort to help others in a way that the consensus in society feels is best (rather than your ignorant inefficient ideas) -- and that is called socialism. Socialism is the wave of the future. AND RON PAUL IS AGAINST SOCIALIZED MEDICINE AND OBAMA IS FOR IT. AND RON PAUL IS THE ANTITHESIS OF SOCIALISM. Post 243241 - Ron Paul more like Obama than anybody (Like I explained to you in the past Shemp, Ron Paul just doesn't KNOW that he is pretty much the same. That is where Ron Paul fails. He, like Sarah Palin, DOESN'T EVEN REALISE THAT HE IS PRO-CHOICE !He said it in interviews. He wants no punishment for the woman or doctor. THAT IS PRO-CHOICE you MORON! ) (a big Al Gore-like sigh here) CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU WRITE IMMEDIATELY ABOVE,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Umpires needed: Does this answer Shemp's questions?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on: the same credentials. Shemp, take away health care for a moment. What is it you find to be so objectionable about Obama's presidency so far? Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit. Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt. That represents about $700 per person per year. That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts for the rich because of this scenario? That would have made this figure smaller per person, and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by all legal means, would hardly notice any significant difference if those tax cuts were repealled. Problem solved, debt paid. Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war costs put on the books properly. So what's your point again Shemp? I don't get it. OffWorld Off, it's time for you to come clean on your false representations on Ron Paul. You never responded to my previous posts on this subject. Time for you to come clean to me and everyone here. You can't keep misrepresenting yourself without being called on it. I responded to your questionso on this many times, You never read the responses, because you do not like facts. Go back and find the responses yourself. I am not answering this AGAIN! OffWolrd No, you didn't. Your response to post #243274, in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's stance on embryonic stem cell research was the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what you represented it to be, didn't address anything. And where was your respone to post #243273 in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's position on two of today's biggest issues -- global warming and abortion -- are completely opposite of what you believe? Umpires needed. Shemp has completely gone off the rails. Does this below answer Shemp's questions? In answer to your poorly argued attention seeking BS, I already answered them in these posts. You may not LIKE the answers (you NEVER will), but I DID answer your dumbass questions. Post 243282 - embryonic research Wrong. He is against government funding of it. ...BUT THAT IS THE NEOCON'S POSITION!! No they want it outlawed. Ron Paul is all for the scientific research. LOOK, THE WHOLE ISSUE ON EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH VIS A VIS THE GOVERNMENT IS WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS PROVIDING GOVERNMENT FUNDS. OBAMA IS FOR GIVING FUNDS FOR IT; THE NEOCONS AND RON PAUL ARE AGAINST IT. Post 243271 - Scientific evidence They (he and Obama) are both for science over religious Neocon fanaticism. EVERYONE IS AGAINST FANATICISM BUT RON PAUL IS ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE NEOCONS IN THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE. Post 243233 - Support for socialist healthcare: Ron Paul is all about charities too. ie. Giving. He believes that helping others comes naturally. He just doesn't understand that in an age of ignorance, with ignoramouses such as you, there needs to be an organized effort to help others in a way that the consensus in society feels is best (rather than your ignorant inefficient ideas) -- and that is called socialism.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Umpires needed: Does this answer Shemp's questions?
If you are going to misrepresent Ron Paul's position on issues, such as you do below with the abortion issue, AND AT THE SAME TIME CUT OUT THE LINK I PROVIDED IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU MISREPRESENTED HIS POSITION, I cannot continue this exercise: http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm Not only is your blatant misrepresentation dishonest, your elimination of the link is, I believe, completely deceitful and lacking in integrity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on: the same credentials. Shemp, take away health care for a moment. What is it you find to be so objectionable about Obama's presidency so far? Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit. Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt. That represents about $700 per person per year. That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts for the rich because of this scenario? That would have made this figure smaller per person, and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by all legal means, would hardly notice any significant difference if those tax cuts were repealled. Problem solved, debt paid. Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war costs put on the books properly. So what's your point again Shemp? I don't get it. OffWorld Off, it's time for you to come clean on your false representations on Ron Paul. You never responded to my previous posts on this subject. Time for you to come clean to me and everyone here. You can't keep misrepresenting yourself without being called on it. I responded to your questionso on this many times, You never read the responses, because you do not like facts. Go back and find the responses yourself. I am not answering this AGAIN! OffWolrd No, you didn't. Your response to post #243274, in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's stance on embryonic stem cell research was the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what you represented it to be, didn't address anything. And where was your respone to post #243273 in which I demonstrated to you that Ron Paul's position on two of today's biggest issues -- global warming and abortion -- are completely opposite of what you believe? Umpires needed. Shemp has completely gone off the rails. Does this below answer Shemp's questions? In answer to your poorly argued attention seeking BS, I already answered them in these posts. You may not LIKE the answers (you NEVER will), but I DID answer your dumbass questions. Post 243282 - embryonic research Wrong. He is against government funding of it. ...BUT THAT IS THE NEOCON'S POSITION!! No they want it outlawed. Ron Paul is all for the scientific research. LOOK, THE WHOLE ISSUE ON EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH VIS A VIS THE GOVERNMENT IS WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS PROVIDING GOVERNMENT FUNDS. OBAMA IS FOR GIVING FUNDS FOR IT; THE
[FairfieldLife] Re: Umpires needed: Does this answer Shemp's questions?
Your link says nothing about which punishment he would give to doctors or women, but in an interview he said he would not punish them. Case closed. He is pro-choice and he doesn't even know it. This is where he is weak, and has not thought this issue through, although he is right on many other issues, and on the one he holds most dear - anti-war. OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: If you are going to misrepresent Ron Paul's position on issues, such as you do below with the abortion issue, AND AT THE SAME TIME CUT OUT THE LINK I PROVIDED IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU MISREPRESENTED HIS POSITION, I cannot continue this exercise: http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm Not only is your blatant misrepresentation dishonest, your elimination of the link is, I believe, completely deceitful and lacking in integrity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on: the same credentials. Shemp, take away health care for a moment. What is it you find to be so objectionable about Obama's presidency so far? Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit. Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt. That represents about $700 per person per year. That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts for the rich because of this scenario? That would have made this figure smaller per person, and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by all legal means, would hardly notice any significant difference if those tax cuts were repealled. Problem solved, debt paid. Bush left us with a national debt of 11.3 trillion dollars, plus he hid the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The national debt clock today shows 12.5 trillion, and Obama had the war costs put on the books properly. So what's your point again Shemp? I don't get it. OffWorld Off, it's time for you to come clean on your false representations on Ron Paul. You never responded to my previous posts on this subject. Time for you to come clean to me and everyone here. You can't keep misrepresenting yourself without being called on it. I responded to your questionso on this
[FairfieldLife] Re: Umpires needed: Does this answer Shemp's questions?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: Your link says nothing about which punishment he would give to doctors or women, but in an interview he said he would not punish them. Case closed. This is getting ridiculous. Of course he said they should be punished. Didn't you read the link? From the link: Q: If abortion becomes illegal and a woman obtains an abortion anyway, what should she be charged with? What about the doctor who performs the abortion? A: The first thing we have to do is get the federal government out of it. We don't need a federal abortion police. That's the last thing that we need. There has to be a criminal penalty for the person that's committing that crime. And I think that is the abortionist. As for the punishment, I don't think that should be up to the president to decide. He is pro-choice and he doesn't even know it. This is where he is weak, and has not thought this issue through, although he is right on many other issues, and on the one he holds most dear - anti-war. OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: If you are going to misrepresent Ron Paul's position on issues, such as you do below with the abortion issue, AND AT THE SAME TIME CUT OUT THE LINK I PROVIDED IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU MISREPRESENTED HIS POSITION, I cannot continue this exercise: http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm Not only is your blatant misrepresentation dishonest, your elimination of the link is, I believe, completely deceitful and lacking in integrity. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him the White House based on: the same credentials. Shemp, take away health care for a moment. What is it you find to be so objectionable about Obama's presidency so far? Pretty much the same thing I found objectionable about Bush: the deficit. Two years ago with about $10 trillion in National Debt, the United States paid about $230 billion in interest on its National Debt. That represents about $700 per person per year. That's peanuts. Am I right you are therefore against the Bush tax cuts for the rich because of this scenario? That would have made this figure smaller per person, and the rich, who are experts at avoiding taxes by all legal means, would hardly
