[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-13 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
  wrote:
snip
   Bet you anything  who the private email was from...
  
  Sal, you really should refrain from betting on
  your intuitions, 'cause your intuition muscle
  is awfully flabby.
  
  I hereby give Rick permission to announce it
  publicly here if I emailed him about raunchydog.
  
  Over to you, Sal. Do you have the guts to ask
  him?

 Feeling threatened by strong woman Sal Judy? Certainly
 sounds like it.

No, actually I sometimes feel guilty for pounding
on Sal, because she's so pathetically helpless.
It's like beating up on a cripple. It's just that
she's such an *obnoxious* cripple.

She should stick to her bons mots. She's pretty
good at those.

Notice that she hasn't dared to ask Rick whether
I emailed him about raunchydog. She *hasn't* got
the guts. Nor does she have the guts to admit she
was wrong, much less to apologize.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

snip
 Since posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an
 idiot, accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of
 being a cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman
 who has a strong opinions can't possibly be a woman.

You nailed it. Barry (TurquoiseB) has a very, very
long history here of feeling threatened by women
with strong opinions. He also has a long history of
trying to run newbies--women in particular--off the
forum. He's one terrified dude.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:50 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
 
  I say a warning to a newbie is a nice welcome gesture.
  Even old hands here have had some adjustment troubles
  with the limits.  I am enjoying disagreeing with the
  most of the posts and don't think a time-out is the
  right vibe for a new person.
 
 For this new person it's exactly the right vibe, Curtis.  IMO.
 Her vibe has been almost bloodthirsty.  (Dancing on
 someone's grave because they knocked your heroine
 off her pedestal?)  Good riddance.

Yes, let's revise the posting rules to stipulate
that they be applied especially strictly to anyone
whose posts Sal thinks give off the wrong vibe.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:46 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  What pissed me off enough to get involved is her
  and her sister in PUMAhood claiming to be concerned
  about the Democratic Party while ACTING LIKE
  REPUBLICANS. Their strategy is the same as McCain's
  and Rove's -- every time someone here brings up one
  of the actual issues, they try to pull the discussion
  off into a diversion about misogyny.
 
 A common tactic these days, when that's all that's left.

Except, of course, that isn't what we do.
Sal is hallucinating along with Barry--
folie a deux, I believe it's called.

 What got me was the almost threat-like tone of one
 of her posts, which of course Judy agreed with whole-
 heartedly.

Oh, which one was that, Sal?

 I think she should be gone for a week, too,
 but Rick has the final say.
 
 Bet you anything  who the private email was from...

Sal, you really should refrain from betting on
your intuitions, 'cause your intuition muscle
is awfully flabby.

I hereby give Rick permission to announce it
publicly here if I emailed him about raunchydog.

Over to you, Sal. Do you have the guts to ask
him?




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ 
 wrote:
 
 snip
  Since posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an
  idiot, accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of
  being a cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman
  who has a strong opinions can't possibly be a woman.
 
 You nailed it. Barry (TurquoiseB) has a very, very
 long history here of feeling threatened by women
 with strong opinions. He also has a long history of
 trying to run newbies--women in particular--off the
 forum. He's one terrified dude.

Thanks for your last three posts. It gets lonely in the echo chamber. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:46 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   What pissed me off enough to get involved is her
   and her sister in PUMAhood claiming to be concerned
   about the Democratic Party while ACTING LIKE
   REPUBLICANS. Their strategy is the same as McCain's
   and Rove's -- every time someone here brings up one
   of the actual issues, they try to pull the discussion
   off into a diversion about misogyny.
  
  A common tactic these days, when that's all that's left.
 
 Except, of course, that isn't what we do.
 Sal is hallucinating along with Barry--

Hey share the drugs guys!

 Sal, you really should refrain from betting on
 your intuitions, 'cause your intuition muscle
 is awfully flabby.

But really fit and buff elsewise.

 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ 
wrote:
 
  http://tinyurl.com/6nvl5b
  How many psychoanalysts does it take to change to light bulb?
  Only one but it can take from seven to ten years.
 
 How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
 does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
 posting limit and have to sit out next week?
 
 Only two or three.

How threatened by strong women do you have to be
to waste your own posts trying (unsuccessfully)
to get rid of them, instead of just not reading
their posts (which is what you boasted you were
going to do to start with)?

Man, you want to see Borderline Personality
Disorder, this is it. (Actually it's probably
not borderline at all; it's well over the line
into full-blown gynophobia.)




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread Richard J. Williams
  Since posting the last few days I have been called 
  stupid, an idiot, accused of wallowing in negativity, 
  and suspected of being a cross-dressing man(very 
  funny). That's right, a woman who has a strong 
  opinions can't possibly be a woman.
 
Judy wrote:
 You nailed it. Barry (TurquoiseB) has a very, very
 long history here of feeling threatened by women
 with strong opinions. He also has a long history of
 trying to run newbies--women in particular--off the
 forum. He's one terrified dude.

Yeah, Barry and John once tried to run 
off Delia, one of the most articulate,
off the Google Groups. These two are not
sexist bigots, to say the least. These two
Neanderthal shouldn't even be allowed out
in public if women are present. All you have
to do is read their uninformed opinions on
this forum. Apparently they think all women
want is to act as a fulcrum for their weak
thrusting.

From: Delia
Subject: Re: Jesus kills
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2004-03-24 15:16:01 PST 
http://tinyurl.com/3vx78g

Maybe you need to learn to read, John.

You regularly go spouting complete BS
on topics about which you know nothing.
You should not be surprised that this
makes you look very, very stupid.

First you started to suggest that pagans
never achieved anything significant in
the world - when, in fact, civilization
for the first few thousand years was
entirely pagan. Then you actually bother
to look up the word 'pagan' and you're
suprised to find out that it means, well,
*pagan*.  (Duh.)

I mean, seriously. Even if you are very,
very dumb, I'd guess that you're coming
across as even dumber than you are, just
because you talk first and think later.

So either you can't read, John, or else
you're a glutton for punishment and abuse.
Why else do you regularly come here and
post BS that is so *easily* proven false?

You are truly, truly, an *idoit*.

 I'm not so dumb. I just don't wish to 
 kill people like you do. 

 I think you're totally fucked up in that
 department; not much different than the 
 Taliban or 'christian' fundies. 

 But I understand your need to hate the 
 concepts that he presented so you can 
 live happily with your extremely 
 defensive chosen and *totally* 
 unverifiable 'gods'.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ 
wrote:
 
  Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 
 
 Whine about the unfair treatment of Hillary.
 
 Whine about the unfair treatment of herself.

Are hallucinations characteristic of BPD, or
only of more severe pathologies?

 The only way Borderline Personality Disorder
 victims can learn to control their outbursts
 is to be sat in the corner for a time unable
 to make any.

Long past time for you to occupy that
corner for a while, Barry.
 
 I say follow the rules that she should have
 read if she'd had any respect for anyone here,
 and we'll see her again on September 20.

EEEK!!! She's b-a-a-a-a-a-c-k, despite
Barry's best efforts. Run! Run away!




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ 
  wrote:
  
  snip
   Since posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an
   idiot, accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of
   being a cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman
   who has a strong opinions can't possibly be a woman.
  
  You nailed it. Barry (TurquoiseB) has a very, very
  long history here of feeling threatened by women
  with strong opinions. He also has a long history of
  trying to run newbies--women in particular--off the
  forum. He's one terrified dude.
 
 Thanks for your last three posts. It gets lonely in the
 echo chamber.

I know, I'd been holding the fort here all by
myself until you and Tom came along!

What's funny is how *threatened* they are by you
and me especially. They have to paint us as
identical twins (if not the same person) even though
we have distinctly different perspectives.

And Tom? He's a *guy*, see, so they just sort of
pretend they don't see him at all. Too embarrassing.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread Richard J. Williams
Judy wrote: 
 Man, you want to see Borderline Personality
 Disorder, this is it. (Actually it's probably
 not borderline at all; it's well over the line
 into full-blown gynophobia.)

Those who have been at a.m.t a few 
years may recall the DHMO health 
scare from a few years ago, when it 
was unclear whether the TM org was 
making use of dihydrogen monoxide 
in their Puja ceremony...

Read more:

From: Delia
Subject: DHMO update
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: Tues, Mar 16 2004 4:07 pm 
http://tinyurl.com/3lhxbd

From: John Manning
Subject: Re: DHMO update
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: Tues, Mar 16 2004 5:53 pm 

I've done hundreds of TM Pujas. The only 
'ingredients' used are water, incense, 
fruit, flowers, a candle, a white 
handkerchief and camphor.

From: Uncle Tantra
Subject: Re: DHMO update
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: Wed, Mar 17 2004 2:42 am 

It's pure, unadulterated, 100% sandalwood 
powder, babe.  If you weren't too much of 
an alarmist hoping to suck attention to ask, 
you might actually find *out* rather than 
guess.  :-) 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread geezerfreak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ 
 wrote:
 
 snip
  Since posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an
  idiot, accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of
  being a cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman
  who has a strong opinions can't possibly be a woman.
 
 You nailed it. Barry (TurquoiseB) has a very, very
 long history here of feeling threatened by women
 with strong opinions. He also has a long history of
 trying to run newbies--women in particular--off the
 forum. He's one terrified dude.

You are quite insane woman.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-12 Thread geezerfreak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:46 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   What pissed me off enough to get involved is her
   and her sister in PUMAhood claiming to be concerned
   about the Democratic Party while ACTING LIKE
   REPUBLICANS. Their strategy is the same as McCain's
   and Rove's -- every time someone here brings up one
   of the actual issues, they try to pull the discussion
   off into a diversion about misogyny.
  
  A common tactic these days, when that's all that's left.
 
 Except, of course, that isn't what we do.
 Sal is hallucinating along with Barry--
 folie a deux, I believe it's called.
 
  What got me was the almost threat-like tone of one
  of her posts, which of course Judy agreed with whole-
  heartedly.
 
 Oh, which one was that, Sal?
 
  I think she should be gone for a week, too,
  but Rick has the final say.
  
  Bet you anything  who the private email was from...
 
 Sal, you really should refrain from betting on
 your intuitions, 'cause your intuition muscle
 is awfully flabby.
 
 I hereby give Rick permission to announce it
 publicly here if I emailed him about raunchydog.
 
 Over to you, Sal. Do you have the guts to ask
 him?
Feeling threatened by strong woman Sal Judy? Certainly sounds like it.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I will never forgive NBC, for letting these two disgusting
 women-hating Obama strokers launch daily characters assassination 
 on Hillary and now another woman, Palin.

I try to ignore this turkey, but seeing her name
in the From line is like standing by the railroad
tracks and seeing them broken and hearing a train
in the distance. Part of you wants to watch the
latest train wreck.

'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
woman could be this stupid.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread raunchydog
TurquoiseB This one is for you http://tinyurl.com/6cbdmy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
 
  I will never forgive NBC, for letting these two disgusting
  women-hating Obama strokers launch daily characters assassination 
  on Hillary and now another woman, Palin.
 
 I try to ignore this turkey, but seeing her name
 in the From line is like standing by the railroad
 tracks and seeing them broken and hearing a train
 in the distance. Part of you wants to watch the
 latest train wreck.
 
 'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
 I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
 woman could be this stupid.





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:41 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

 

'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
woman could be this stupid.

I am honor-bound to protect the anonymity of FFL members, and unless I am
adequately bribed, I will continue to do so.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread frosty . mage
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
 Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:41 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
 
  
 
 'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
 I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
 woman could be this stupid.
 
 I am honor-bound to protect the anonymity of FFL members, and 
unless I am
 adequately bribed, I will continue to do so.


How many ardent Hillary supporters do you have email contact with?



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread raunchydog
Ardent Hillary supporters are out there but not here for obvious
reasons. Do you really think Rick would out Hillary supporters on this
site? If my privacy isn't secure, neither is yours. Since posting the
last few days I have been called stupid, an idiot, accused of
wallowing in negativity, and suspected of being a cross-dressing
man(very funny). That's right, a woman who has a strong opinions can't
possibly be a woman. Give me a break. My favorite was like watching a
trainwreck which is actually a complement, meaning my posts are
compelling enough to read even though it is uncomfortable to do so. 

As for myself I didn't come here expecting to popular for bursting
anyone's bubble. But since this is an echo chamber for Obama, a few
wee opposing voices does add some color to the place. Free speech,
right? Just a Spoon Full of Sugar Makes the Medicine go Down. Open wide.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, frosty.mage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
   
  
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
  Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:41 AM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
  
   
  
  'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
  I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
  woman could be this stupid.
  
  I am honor-bound to protect the anonymity of FFL members, and 
 unless I am
  adequately bribed, I will continue to do so.
 
 
 How many ardent Hillary supporters do you have email contact with?





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread TurquoiseB
Classic Borderline Personality Disorder,
compounded with sexual identity issues.
It (don't want to presume about gender
and be accused of misogyny) deserves an 
entire chapter in the DSM-IV.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ardent Hillary supporters are out there but not here for obvious
 reasons. Do you really think Rick would out Hillary supporters on 
 this site? If my privacy isn't secure, neither is yours. Since 
 posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an idiot, 
 accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of being a 
 cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman who has a 
 strong opinions can't possibly be a woman. Give me a break. My 
 favorite was like watching a trainwreck which is actually a 
 complement, meaning my posts are compelling enough to read even 
 though it is uncomfortable to do so. 
 
 As for myself I didn't come here expecting to popular for bursting
 anyone's bubble. But since this is an echo chamber for Obama, a few
 wee opposing voices does add some color to the place. Free speech,
 right? Just a Spoon Full of Sugar Makes the Medicine go Down. 
 Open wide.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread raunchydog
http://tinyurl.com/6nvl5b
How many psychoanalysts does it take to change to light bulb?
Only one but it can take from seven to ten years.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Classic Borderline Personality Disorder,
 compounded with sexual identity issues.
 It (don't want to presume about gender
 and be accused of misogyny) deserves an 
 entire chapter in the DSM-IV.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
 
  Ardent Hillary supporters are out there but not here for obvious
  reasons. Do you really think Rick would out Hillary supporters on 
  this site? If my privacy isn't secure, neither is yours. Since 
  posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an idiot, 
  accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of being a 
  cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman who has a 
  strong opinions can't possibly be a woman. Give me a break. My 
  favorite was like watching a trainwreck which is actually a 
  complement, meaning my posts are compelling enough to read even 
  though it is uncomfortable to do so. 
  
  As for myself I didn't come here expecting to popular for bursting
  anyone's bubble. But since this is an echo chamber for Obama, a few
  wee opposing voices does add some color to the place. Free speech,
  right? Just a Spoon Full of Sugar Makes the Medicine go Down. 
  Open wide.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://tinyurl.com/6nvl5b
 How many psychoanalysts does it take to change to light bulb?
 Only one but it can take from seven to ten years.

How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
posting limit and have to sit out next week?

Only two or three.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Classic Borderline Personality Disorder,
  compounded with sexual identity issues.
  It (don't want to presume about gender
  and be accused of misogyny) deserves an 
  entire chapter in the DSM-IV.
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@
wrote:
  
   Ardent Hillary supporters are out there but not here for obvious
   reasons. Do you really think Rick would out Hillary supporters on 
   this site? If my privacy isn't secure, neither is yours. Since 
   posting the last few days I have been called stupid, an idiot, 
   accused of wallowing in negativity, and suspected of being a 
   cross-dressing man(very funny). That's right, a woman who has a 
   strong opinions can't possibly be a woman. Give me a break. My 
   favorite was like watching a trainwreck which is actually a 
   complement, meaning my posts are compelling enough to read even 
   though it is uncomfortable to do so. 
   
   As for myself I didn't come here expecting to popular for bursting
   anyone's bubble. But since this is an echo chamber for Obama, a few
   wee opposing voices does add some color to the place. Free speech,
   right? Just a Spoon Full of Sugar Makes the Medicine go Down. 
   Open wide.
 





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of frosty.mage
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:09 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com  
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com ]
 On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
 Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:41 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
 
 
 
 'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
 I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
 woman could be this stupid.
 
 I am honor-bound to protect the anonymity of FFL members, and 
unless I am
 adequately bribed, I will continue to do so.


How many ardent Hillary supporters do you have email contact with?

I have email contact with all sorts of people. As moderator, I don't have
privileged access to the identities of FFL members, but I know who many of
them are, through friendships, email contact outside FFL, etc. I also know
quite a few who lurk and never post - some of whom have never joined. But
regardless of whether I agree or disagree with these folks on political or
other matters, I respect and will protect their right to remain anonymous.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
posting limit and have to sit out next week?

Only two or three.


Over by two!

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread raunchydog
Thanks Rick. Dr. TurquoiseB doesn't like Lucy?
http://tinyurl.com/6nvl5b Now he wants me banned? I thought he would
appreciate a little laugh at himself.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of frosty.mage
 Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:09 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
 
  
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
 
  
  
  From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com  
 [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com ]
  On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
  Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:41 AM
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
  
  
  
  'Fess up, Rick. raunchydog is really a male wish-
  I'd-been-born-a-woman crossdresser, right? No real
  woman could be this stupid.
  
  I am honor-bound to protect the anonymity of FFL members, and 
 unless I am
  adequately bribed, I will continue to do so.
 
 
 How many ardent Hillary supporters do you have email contact with?
 
 I have email contact with all sorts of people. As moderator, I don't
have
 privileged access to the identities of FFL members, but I know who
many of
 them are, through friendships, email contact outside FFL, etc. I
also know
 quite a few who lurk and never post - some of whom have never
joined. But
 regardless of whether I agree or disagree with these folks on
political or
 other matters, I respect and will protect their right to remain
anonymous.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread raunchydog
Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
  does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
  posting limit and have to sit out next week?
 
  Only two or three.
 
 Over by two!
 
 Sal





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 

Whine about the unfair treatment of Hillary.

Whine about the unfair treatment of herself.

The only way Borderline Personality Disorder
victims can learn to control their outbursts
is to be sat in the corner for a time unable
to make any. 

I say follow the rules that she should have
read if she'd had any respect for anyone here,
and we'll see her again on September 20.





RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Rick Archer
The rules are emailed out to all new members, and discussed here often. What
do you say, group? Shall we give her a break 'cause she didn't know the
rule, or give her a week's hiatus?

 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of raunchydog
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:39 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

 

Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
  does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
  posting limit and have to sit out next week?
 
  Only two or three.
 
 Over by two!
 
 Sal


 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1664 - Release Date: 9/10/2008
6:00 AM



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The rules are emailed out to all new members, and discussed here
often. What
 do you say, group? Shall we give her a break 'cause she didn't know the
 rule, or give her a week's hiatus?

I say a warning to a newbie is a nice welcome gesture.  Even old hands
here have had some adjustment troubles with the limits.  I am enjoying
disagreeing with the most of the posts and don't think a time-out is
the right vibe for a new person.


 
  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of raunchydog
 Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:39 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
 
  
 
 Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
 wrote:
 
  On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
   does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
   posting limit and have to sit out next week?
  
   Only two or three.
  
  Over by two!
  
  Sal
 
 
  
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1664 - Release Date:
9/10/2008
 6:00 AM





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:39 AM, raunchydog wrote:


Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve?


Didn't you get an email about it when you first joined?

Sal




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Rick Archer wrote:

The rules are emailed out to all new members, and discussed here  
often. What do you say, group? Shall we give her a break ‘cause she  
didn’t know the rule, or give her a week’s hiatus?


Rick, don't pull that one, please.  She got a copy of the
rules just like everyone else.  Are we all adults here
or not?

Sal




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:50 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:


I say a warning to a newbie is a nice welcome gesture.  Even old hands
here have had some adjustment troubles with the limits.  I am enjoying
disagreeing with the most of the posts and don't think a time-out is
the right vibe for a new person.


For this new person it's exactly the right vibe, Curtis.  IMO.
Her vibe has been almost bloodthirsty.  (Dancing on
someone's grave because they knocked your heroine
off her pedestal?)  Good riddance.

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:50 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
 
  I say a warning to a newbie is a nice welcome gesture. Even 
  old hands here have had some adjustment troubles with the 
  limits.  I am enjoying disagreeing with the most of the 
  posts and don't think a time-out is the right vibe for 
  a new person.
 
 For this new person it's exactly the right vibe, Curtis.  IMO.
 Her vibe has been almost bloodthirsty.  (Dancing on
 someone's grave because they knocked your heroine
 off her pedestal?)  Good riddance.

I didn't even want to get involved, but since
she has all these fantasies about playing hard-
ball and giving us low-lives what she thinks we
deserve, I thought I'd show her what hardball was
really all about -- playing by the rules.

The fantasy here is all too familiar. This person
actually believes that we're taking her seriously,
and that her words *wound* those who dare to dis-
agree with her. In other words, she's a nutcase.

I think a little time on the bench might make her
realize that she rolled in here with an enormous
and laughter-inspiring chip on her shoulder. If
she wants to stay and teach us all our comeupance,
that is what she'll do come September 20th. If
she can lighten up a little, maybe she'll even-
tually be able to have a conversation with some-
one as if the other person is on her level. We'll
see.

What pissed me off enough to get involved is her
and her sister in PUMAhood claiming to be concerned
about the Democratic Party while ACTING LIKE
REPUBLICANS. Their strategy is the same as McCain's
and Rove's -- every time someone here brings up one
of the actual issues, they try to pull the discussion
off into a diversion about misogyny. 

It makes me sick when the Repubs do it, and it makes
me sicker when human beings who've never done much
with their lives but still manage to look down upon
almost everyone they interact with do it.

It's time for a little Get real! action here IMO.
A few wannabee pundits are acting as if they're
somehow important enough to be paid attention to.
Let's put that in perspective, shall we?

The guy I posted the news URL about the other day 
got all over the American mainstream News media the 
other day for eating 26,000 Big Macs. My bet is that 
he got more face time in the press than any of these 
three BPD wannabees ever have or will ever have in 
their entire lifetimes, and yet they act as if we 
should TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY?

Not gonna happen. 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 11, 2008, at 12:46 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:


What pissed me off enough to get involved is her
and her sister in PUMAhood claiming to be concerned
about the Democratic Party while ACTING LIKE
REPUBLICANS. Their strategy is the same as McCain's
and Rove's -- every time someone here brings up one
of the actual issues, they try to pull the discussion
off into a diversion about misogyny.


A common tactic these days, when that's all that's left.
What got me was the almost threat-like tone of one
of her posts, which of course Judy agreed with whole-
heartedly.  I think she should be gone for a week, too,
but Rick has the final say.

Bet you anything  who the private email was from...

Sal




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread Richard J. Williams
Rick Archer wrote:
 The rules are emailed out to all new members, 
 and discussed here often. What do you say, 
 group? Shall we give her a break 'cause she 
 didn't know the rule, or give her a week's 
 hiatus?
 
Well, I vote to kick Sal and Turq off the
forum for being trollish - that's my vote.

According to to the rules, respondents here
aren't supposed to be posting personal attacks
of a sexual nature. Sal and Turq are obviously
out-of-line on this one.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-11 Thread lurkernomore20002000
I say a break.  After thatsubject to sanctions.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The rules are emailed out to all new members, and discussed here 
often. What
 do you say, group? Shall we give her a break 'cause she didn't 
know the
 rule, or give her a week's hiatus?
 
  
 
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of raunchydog
 Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:39 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman
 
  
 
 Ooops. Sorry, I didn't know the rules. When do I get a reprieve? 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine 
salsunshine@
 wrote:
 
  On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:07 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   How many snarky replies to the new BPD poster
   does it take to get him/her/it to go over the
   posting limit and have to sit out next week?
  
   Only two or three.
  
  Over by two!
  
  Sal
 
 
  
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1664 - Release Date: 
9/10/2008
 6:00 AM





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-10 Thread raunchydog
The media has been completely in the tank for Obama for months, and
nothing more than a mouthpiece for their corporate and government
allies.  But, with the pick of Palin as VP the Obama campaign went
into hyperdrive, spewing the vile misogynistic hatred they usually
reserved for Hillary. 

Olbermann and Matthews have been having tingling mental sex with
Barack Obama the entire year.  Now they will step down from anchoring
election news, after they let these two jerks run wild throughout the
entire primary season, helping the DNC to select a loser for the
Democratic Party.

I will never forgive NBC, for letting these two disgusting
women-hating Obama strokers launch daily characters assassination on
Hillary and now another woman, Palin.

Other employees of NBC find them embarrassing enough to speak out,
even accusing MSNBC, the sexist biased Obama network, of acting like
heroin addicts. http://tinyurl.com/5l54r3


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Let's see if we can change this...Olberman was recently downgraded
(censored)
 for his political commentary on MSNBC. Let's show Keith that we
appreciate
 his standing up for democracy and common sense during the Bush years.
 
 At http://siouxcityjournal.com there is a vote going on for Keith
Olberman,
 Like him or Don't Like him.
 
 Scroll down the page to see it and vote.
 
 He had gained in popularity since I first received the post to 40%
positive 60% negative.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Vote for Keith Olberman

2008-09-10 Thread off_world_beings

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Let's see if we can change this...Olberman was recently downgraded
(censored)
 for his political commentary on MSNBC. Let's show Keith that we
appreciate
 his standing up for democracy and common sense during the Bush years.

 At http://siouxcityjournal.com http://siouxcityjournal.com  there is
a vote going on for Keith Olberman,
 Like him or Don't Like him.

 Scroll down the page to see it and vote.

I can't see the voting thingy. He still has his show -   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odb09esH8z4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odb09esH8z4

OffWorld