[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. I supported Obama for President. You supported Obama only AFTER Ron Paul was out of the running Nope. Ron Paul was still in the running at the time. I supported Ron Paul for leader of the Republican party because he was far better than all those idiots and criminals that you supported Shemp. But you warmongers pushed him out and smeared him, so that an old idiot warmonger could shuffle around with some bimbo ,making complete fools of you and your warmongering hateful ant-social archaic neandhethal friends Shemp. I was the first on FFL life to support Obama for President. (and that fact just makes you so mad doesn't it Shemp.) OffWorld That you supported Obama? Nope, it confirms to me that you shouldn't have been in Ron Paul's camp in the first place. They are both against the Iraq war and Guantanomo. They are both against against corporate control of government. They are both for science over religious Neocon fanaticism. They are more alike than anybody. I HOPE Ron Paul gets the Republican candidacy, so that you will see Obama and Ron Paul debate and agree on almost everything.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. I supported Obama for President. You have nothing in common with Ron Paul Shemp. Why do you keep kidding yourself? I told you a million times. You are nothing like him, and you don't understand any of his points. You are a warmonger, he is a peacenik. Why do you keep kidding yourself? Ron Paul is all about charities too. ie. Giving. He believes that helping others comes naturally. He just doesn't understand that in an age of ignorance, with ignoramouses such as you, there needs to be an organized effort to help others in a way that the consensus in society feels is best (rather than your ignorant inefficient ideas) -- and that is called socialism. Socialism is the wave of the future. Peace and love. OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. I supported Obama for President. You supported Obama only AFTER Ron Paul was out of the running. Don't try and weasel out of it. You have nothing in common with Ron Paul Shemp. Why do you keep kidding yourself? I told you a million times. You are nothing like him, and you don't understand any of his points. You are a warmonger, he is a peacenik. Why do you keep kidding yourself? Ron Paul supported the war in Afghanistan. I don't think a peacenik would do that. Ron Paul was also in the military for years. Ron Paul is all about charities too. ie. Giving. He believes that helping others comes naturally. He just doesn't understand that in an age of ignorance, with ignoramouses such as you, there needs to be an organized effort to help others in a way that the consensus in society feels is best (rather than your ignorant inefficient ideas) -- and that is called socialism. Socialism is the wave of the future. Ron Paul is 180 degrees opposite of you. Peace and love. OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. I supported Obama for President. You supported Obama only AFTER Ron Paul was out of the running Nope. Ron Paul was still in the running at the time. I supported Ron Paul for leader of the Republican party because he was far better than all those idiots and criminals that you supported Shemp. But you warmongers pushed him out and smeared him, so that an old idiot warmonger could shuffle around with some bimbo ,making complete fools of you and your warmongering hateful ant-social archaic neandhethal friends Shemp. I was the first on FFL life to support Obama for President. (and that fact just makes you so mad doesn't it Shemp.) OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. I supported Obama for President. You supported Obama only AFTER Ron Paul was out of the running Nope. Ron Paul was still in the running at the time. I supported Ron Paul for leader of the Republican party because he was far better than all those idiots and criminals that you supported Shemp. But you warmongers pushed him out and smeared him, so that an old idiot warmonger could shuffle around with some bimbo ,making complete fools of you and your warmongering hateful ant-social archaic neandhethal friends Shemp. I was the first on FFL life to support Obama for President. (and that fact just makes you so mad doesn't it Shemp.) OffWorld That you supported Obama? Nope, it confirms to me that you shouldn't have been in Ron Paul's camp in the first place. There is not now nor was there before the election anything about Obama that I much liked.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Who on FFL disagrees with this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ShempMcGurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: One of Raj Patel's main themes is that the new capital for the 21st century is going to be the capital of 'giving'. ie. He is saying that true wealth in the future will come from giving. Who on FairfieldLife would say 'no' to that philosophy for the 21st century? In essence, do you agree with this idea or not? If not, state in one sentence your alternative approach. OffWorld I say no to that philosophy. The best way to allocate the scarce resources of the world in the fairest and most efficient way -- in particular and disproportionately in favor of the poorest of the world -- is through the selfishness and me, firstness of the unfettered free market. Thanks for the honest answer, but your method will not work in the 21st century. Your method allocates resources to the biggest army only, and a few of their citizens and not to the most successful businesses as your free-market philosophy champions. Your method also fuels and perpetuates terrorism worldwide. And the problem is, many people have the biggest army now, its called a nuclear bomb. So your greed will come back to bite you and leave the world devastated. So, no, your methods are the methods of the dark ages, not the 21st century. Next please. (move along now Shemp, your kind are history, not part of the future.) OffWorld Again, the person who you supported for president, Ron Paul, agrees with me and disagrees with you. Did you even bother to find out what he stood for before you became the fanatical supporter of his that you were?
