Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote: If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be barred to the sentimental? Because the sentimental cling to preferences...otherwise they wouldn't be sentimental...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj
But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao! From: Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote: If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be barred to the sentimental? Because the sentimental cling to preferences...otherwise they wouldn't be sentimental...
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Share Long wrote: But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao! Perhaps charm is in the eyes of the beholder?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj
Perhaps the Tao too?! Very crowded eye ball (-: From: Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Share Long wrote: But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao! Perhaps charm is in the eyes of the beholder?
[FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao! I think Vaj means that the sentimental don't get the Tao, not that the Tao doesn't get them. Of course, this implies that *Vaj* gets the Tao, so one might want to apply a few grains of salt to his premise. One thing you can say about Vaj is that he makes no bones about having preferences. From: Vaj vajradhatu@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi to Vaj  On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote: If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be barred to the sentimental? Because the sentimental cling to preferences...otherwise they wouldn't be sentimental...
