[FairfieldLife] Re: unsubscribe

2014-11-06 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Please unsubscribe me from this news group. Thank you.
 

 No, once you've joined you can never leave, bwuhaha!
 

 You're making me laugh.
 

 Don Allen
 

 



 Sat Oct 4, 2014 2:32 pm (PDT) . Posted by: 
(Message over 64 KB, truncated) 















[FairfieldLife] Re: unsubscribe

2014-11-06 Thread nablusoss1008
From where did he get the idea that this is a news group ?

[FairfieldLife] Re: unsubscribe

2014-11-06 Thread nablusoss1008

From where did he get the idea that this is a news group, this is a 
"bash-TM-group".

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Please unsubscribe me from this news group. Thank you.
 

 No, once you've joined you can never leave, bwuhaha!
 

 Don Allen
 

 



 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 8:16 PM, "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
 wrote:
 
 

 Fairfield Life 
 Fairfield Life Group 
 
 
 15 Messages Digest #22766 
 
 
 
 1.1 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.2 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 
 1.3 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Share Long" sharelong60 
 
 
 1.4 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.5 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.6 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Michael Jackson" mjackson74 
 
 
 1.7 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.8 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.9 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.10 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 
 2a 
 Re: Coup d'Etat in North Korea? by "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 
 
 3a 
 Re: What's On Your Mind? by "Share Long" sharelong60 
 
 
 
 4.1 
 Re: Bye Bye Dan and Jedi by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 4.2 
 Re: Bye Bye Dan and Jedi by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 
 5 
 Post Count Sun 05-Oct-14 00:15:06 UTC by "FFL PostCount" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Messages 1.1 Re: Rick: about your rule 
 
 Sat Oct 4, 2014 1:32 pm (PDT) . Posted by: "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 On 10/4/2014 11:53 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 >
 > two birds, one stone.
 >
 >
 /That's one solution - stone the victim complaining; remove the 
 offending message; and then ban the informant so he can't post a 
 rebuttal.//Go figure./
 >
 >
 >
 > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 >
 > Booting off jedi for what appears merely to be expressing a view of 
 > Judaism seems absurd to me. It has often been said that the God of the 
 > Old Testament is, shall we say, a less than attractive character: 
 > jealous, vindictive, vengeful, cruel. That's not anti-Semitism. It's 
 > mere literary criticism. Yet on this board Little Mickey Jackson is 
 > allowed to spew forth his hate speech against MMY and the TMO every 
 > single day, full of crude insults and libelous accusations—and that's 
 > considered perfectly okay. There are some very curious double 
 > standards operating here.
 >
 >
 > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 >
 > On 10/3/2014 11:36 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
 >> H, Rick -- not sure but seems to me there's been plenty
 >> of anti-religion to go around -- not just against the Jews.
 >> If someone says TM is of the devil etc. with ALL CAPS
 >> etcwill you give equal warnings?
 > >
 > Everyone makes mistakes. It looks like Rick considered Spock's
 > message as /"anti- Semetic" /, when in fact it was just Spock's
 > opinion about the Jewish religion. It looks like Rick panicked
 > and got really scared when Dan threatened to file a report to
 > the ADL, so Rick deleted Spock's message and put a ban on him
 > posting. /
 >
 > Now we don't even know what jedi_spock posted because it's
 > been deleted. This should be notice to you: you could be
 > banned from FFL for expressing your opinion and all you
 > messages deleted forever. Go figure./
 >
 > P.S. When you change the subject title, Edg, you make it
 > difficult to follow the conversation, and when you fail to
 > click on Show message history, other informants don't even
 > know what Rick's rule is about posting messages.
 >
 >
 > 
 
 
 
 
 
 Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (89) . 
Top ^ 
 
 
 
 
 1.2 Re: Rick: about your rule 
 
 Sat Oct 4, 2014 1:37 pm (PDT) . Posted by: "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 The semitic race includes Arabs, so if we blast Saudi Arabia are we 
 being anti-semitics? And someone said to bash Zionism is being 
 anti-Jewish. That's like saying all Christians are Republicans. 
 Zionists are a right wing political faction.
 
 As far as Dan goes I had him in my Dangeon anyway for being an abusive 
 poster and only replied to comments he started indirectly about TV or 
 movies.
 
 On 10/04/2014 12:07 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
 >
 > Let's face it, Rick is being practical. The Jews are very aggressive 
 > about any antisemitism and could get someone at Yahoo freaked enough 
 > to close FFL down. It may not be right to surrender, but it does 
 > avoid the danger not yet come.
 >
 > If Yahoo closed FFL, the lost would be significant, but if Rick bans 
 > antisemitism, the lost to "the world's ability to have free speech" 
 > would be hardly noticed. An easy call for Rick, methinks.
 >
 > Now if the various communities around the world got as aggressively 
 > defensive, hoo boy, who could then say anything 

[FairfieldLife] Re: unsubscribe

2014-11-06 Thread salyavin808



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Please unsubscribe me from this news group. Thank you.
 

 No, once you've joined you can never leave, bwuhaha!
 

 Don Allen
 

 



 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 8:16 PM, "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
 wrote:
 
 

 Fairfield Life 
 Fairfield Life Group 
 
 
 15 Messages Digest #22766 
 
 
 
 1.1 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.2 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 
 1.3 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Share Long" sharelong60 
 
 
 1.4 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.5 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.6 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Michael Jackson" mjackson74 
 
 
 1.7 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.8 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.9 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 1.10 
 Re: Rick: about your rule by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 
 2a 
 Re: Coup d'Etat in North Korea? by "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 
 
 3a 
 Re: What's On Your Mind? by "Share Long" sharelong60 
 
 
 
 4.1 
 Re: Bye Bye Dan and Jedi by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 4.2 
 Re: Bye Bye Dan and Jedi by "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 
 
 5 
 Post Count Sun 05-Oct-14 00:15:06 UTC by "FFL PostCount" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Messages 1.1 Re: Rick: about your rule 
 
 Sat Oct 4, 2014 1:32 pm (PDT) . Posted by: "Richard J. Williams" pundit_sir 
 
 On 10/4/2014 11:53 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 >
 > two birds, one stone.
 >
 >
 /That's one solution - stone the victim complaining; remove the 
 offending message; and then ban the informant so he can't post a 
 rebuttal.//Go figure./
 >
 >
 >
 > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 >
 > Booting off jedi for what appears merely to be expressing a view of 
 > Judaism seems absurd to me. It has often been said that the God of the 
 > Old Testament is, shall we say, a less than attractive character: 
 > jealous, vindictive, vengeful, cruel. That's not anti-Semitism. It's 
 > mere literary criticism. Yet on this board Little Mickey Jackson is 
 > allowed to spew forth his hate speech against MMY and the TMO every 
 > single day, full of crude insults and libelous accusations—and that's 
 > considered perfectly okay. There are some very curious double 
 > standards operating here.
 >
 >
 > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 >
 > On 10/3/2014 11:36 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
 >> H, Rick -- not sure but seems to me there's been plenty
 >> of anti-religion to go around -- not just against the Jews.
 >> If someone says TM is of the devil etc. with ALL CAPS
 >> etcwill you give equal warnings?
 > >
 > Everyone makes mistakes. It looks like Rick considered Spock's
 > message as /"anti- Semetic" /, when in fact it was just Spock's
 > opinion about the Jewish religion. It looks like Rick panicked
 > and got really scared when Dan threatened to file a report to
 > the ADL, so Rick deleted Spock's message and put a ban on him
 > posting. /
 >
 > Now we don't even know what jedi_spock posted because it's
 > been deleted. This should be notice to you: you could be
 > banned from FFL for expressing your opinion and all you
 > messages deleted forever. Go figure./
 >
 > P.S. When you change the subject title, Edg, you make it
 > difficult to follow the conversation, and when you fail to
 > click on Show message history, other informants don't even
 > know what Rick's rule is about posting messages.
 >
 >
 > 
 
 
 
 
 
 Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (89) . 
Top ^ 
 
 
 
 
 1.2 Re: Rick: about your rule 
 
 Sat Oct 4, 2014 1:37 pm (PDT) . Posted by: "Bhairitu" bhairitu 
 
 The semitic race includes Arabs, so if we blast Saudi Arabia are we 
 being anti-semitics? And someone said to bash Zionism is being 
 anti-Jewish. That's like saying all Christians are Republicans. 
 Zionists are a right wing political faction.
 
 As far as Dan goes I had him in my Dangeon anyway for being an abusive 
 poster and only replied to comments he started indirectly about TV or 
 movies.
 
 On 10/04/2014 12:07 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
 >
 > Let's face it, Rick is being practical. The Jews are very aggressive 
 > about any antisemitism and could get someone at Yahoo freaked enough 
 > to close FFL down. It may not be right to surrender, but it does 
 > avoid the danger not yet come.
 >
 > If Yahoo closed FFL, the lost would be significant, but if Rick bans 
 > antisemitism, the lost to "the world's ability to have free speech" 
 > would be hardly noticed. An easy call for Rick, methinks.
 >
 > Now if the various communities around the world got as aggressively 
 > defensive, hoo boy, who could then say anything about anything? Think 
 > of all the downtrodden folks who could equally claim the world has 
 > smacked them as badly as were the Jews.