Monday, June 19, 2006 10:27 a.m. EDT
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 2004 Voter Theft Theory Debunked


 
Cleveland's leading newspaper has checked out a new article by 
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claiming that Republicans "stole" the 2004 
presidential election in Ohio, and concluded that Kennedy's story 
is "nonsense."

In the June 15 issue of Rolling Stone, under the headline "Was the 
2004 Election Stolen?" Kennedy writes: "A review of the available 
data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the 
overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from 
casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004 -- more 
than enough to shift the results of an election decided by 118,601 
votes."

But the Cleveland Plain Dealer – regarded as anything but a 
conservative newspaper – headlines a June 18 article: "Rest assured, 
we checked out Election 2004 thoroughly," and states: "There was no 
shortage of mistakes made in vote counting. There were voters who 
should have been registered but weren't, polling places with lines 
that were too long and without enough voting machines, and decisions 
from [Secretary of State Ken] Blackwell that appeared to be partisan.

"All these mistakes and misjudgments took votes from both 
candidates, but probably more from Kerry. But they didn't add up to 
nearly enough votes to swing Ohio from Bush to Kerry. "The mistakes 
were … bipartisan in nature and not a result of Republican 
chicanery."

The Plain Dealer article by Ted Diadiun points to several instances 
when Kennedy "ignored" the facts, including:

"In his online footnotes, Kennedy refers no less than a half-dozen 
times to a five-month-long post-election investigation commissioned 
by the Democratic National Committee called `Democracy at Risk.'
"Somehow he never gets around to quoting the DNC investigative 
team's conclusion that `The statistical study of precinct-level data 
does not suggest the occurrence of widespread fraud that 
systemically misallocated votes from Kerry to Bush."

The newspaper also notes: "Kennedy saw conspiracy in a Franklin 
County foul-up that resulted in far too few voting machines at a 
polling place in a heavily black area that would presumably vote 
mainly for Kerry.

"But he didn't tell his readers that the chairman of the Franklin 
County elections board, who oversaw the county's voting machine 
allocation, was a black man who also chairs the county Democratic 
Party. Not a likely candidate to steal votes for Bush."

Plain Dealer Metro Editor Jean Dubail said this about the Kennedy 
article: "My first reaction after reading the thing was how little 
actual news there was in it."


Carl Weiser, government and public affairs editor for the Cincinnati 
Enquirer, expressed similar sentiments: "I read it and nothing in 
there was really new. The folks who know Ohio elections best checked 
into it and found there was no conspiracy."
And a story by Farhad Manjoo on the Web site Salon.com – another 
news source that's far from conservative – states: "If you do read 
Kennedy's article, be prepared to machete your way through numerous 
errors of interpretations and his deliberate omission of key bits of 
data."

The Plain Dealer concludes: "The less somebody knows about the 2004 
Ohio election and the father away from Ohio he is, the more likely 
he is to find merit in that Rolling Stone piece. And since our 
audience is right here in Northeast Ohio, I'm sure that most of you 
have already figured out that it's nonsense."






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mDk17A/lOaOAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to