In the first paragraphs I don't see reference 
to population control, but I would hope that 
topic shows up later in the story. If girls 
were not having children at 14, we could
maybe get a handle on food and environmental
problems.

SAVING THE WORLD'S WOMEN

http://bit.ly/17KEZb

How changing the lives of
women and girls in the developing
world can change everything

The New York Times Sunday Magazine

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF and SHERYL WuDUNN
Published: August 17, 2009

IN THE 19TH CENTURY, the paramount moral challenge was slavery. In the 20th 
century, it was totalitarianism. In this century, it is the brutality inflicted 
on so many women and girls around the globe: sex trafficking, acid attacks, 
bride burnings and mass rape.

Yet if the injustices that women in poor countries suffer are of paramount 
importance, in an economic and geopolitical sense the opportunity they 
represent is even greater. "Women hold up half the sky," in the words of a 
Chinese saying, yet that's mostly an aspiration: in a large slice of the world, 
girls are uneducated and women marginalized, and it's not an accident that 
those same countries are disproportionately mired in poverty and riven by 
fundamentalism and chaos. There's a growing recognition among everyone from the 
World Bank to the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff to aid organizations 
like CARE that focusing on women and girls is the most effective way to fight 
global poverty and extremism. That's why foreign aid is increasingly directed 
to women. The world is awakening to a powerful truth: Women and girls aren't 
the problem; they're the solution.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/magazine/23Women-t.html?hp

Reply via email to