RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

[Rick Archer]

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of eingegerd
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 9:49 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

 

  

I wander if you have read the last book from Conny Larsson "The Beatles,
Maharishi och Jag" - give som inside information about MMY and hos life
behind the screen.
Ingegerd

I don't think the English translation is out yet.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

[Bhairitu]

My tantric guru was raised Sikh and they're very democratic.  A king is 
served along side a begger in their world.

What exactly is your experience with Ananda Marga?  I've known people in 
that movement.  There are some very interesting if not funny FOIA 
documents available written by presumably bored FBI agents realizing 
they weren't doing anything but teaching yoga.

Also for the record I don't see anything wrong with Marx's ideas.  The 
industrialists and oligarchs just couldn't have it though and programmed 
the public against it.  The Soviet Union was a bad implementation of 
those concepts which of course way precede Marx.

Nothing wrong with recognizing the world as an illusion or dream.  
That's reality anyway.

emptybill wrote:
> Not Marxism but Neo-Humanism, whatever they mean by that. They espouse
> egalitarian "tantra".
>
> Their tantric symbol is a Mogen-David with a rising sun in the middle
> and a swastika inside the rising sun.
>
> A Judean-Davidic symbol whose real essence is a rising sun swastika.
> Hmmm, what does that remind me of nowadays. Doesn't sound too Marxist to
> me.
>
> As for entertainment, illusion will do. This world is the measure of the
> immeasurable, so it's all illusion. Doesn't sound too Tantric does it?
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>   
>> It's more about reality and economics than Marxism.  I'll amend it
>> somewhat to being we're all either whores or pimps.  Still probably
>> 
> too
>   
>> cynical to ya though.
>>
>> Like everyone else I have to sell myself or something I do.  That's
>> whoring or pimping broadly defined outside the narrow definition with
>> regard to sex workers.  IOW, I was not excluding myself in any way.
>> That was just an illusion you entertained.
>>
>> As for tantrics and Marxism, what about Ananda Marga?
>>
>> emptybill wrote:
>> 
>>> Nice Neo-Marxist stab.
>>>
>>> However does this mean you don't work for a living? Are you just a
>>> play-whore rather than a work-whore. You don't work for money do
>>>   
> you? If
>   
>>> you do then I assume you do it just to show solidarity with us
>>>   
> little
>   
>>> people.
>>>
>>> Or maybe you just give it all to your guru. Is he a Neo-Marxist too?
>>>   
> But
>   
>>> that can hardly be true. Indian Marxists don't believe in all that
>>> mindless Hindoo shit, Tantrika or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
>>>
>>>   
 In a capitalist society everybody is a whore.

 Peter wrote:

 
> Is a work whore like a play whore?
>
>
>
>   
>>>
>>>   
>
>
>   

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

[Rick Archer]

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 1:16 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

 

  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 , "Rick Archer"  wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 ]
> On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 

> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'
> 
> 
> 
> I see that Rick Archer refuses to see the book as anything but a concotion
> of thoughts from a "pshycic reader" who probably have a bit of a problem
> with the difference between reality, wishful thinking and "pshycic
> influences".
> 
> I see that Nabby continues to comment on a book he hasn't read.

Unlike you I don't read books by self-proclaimed "pshycic readers"
channeling nonsense and wishful thinking.

 

Do you read books by Benjamin Crème? Judith’s book is not channeled.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

[Rick Archer]

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 12:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

 

I see that Rick Archer refuses to see the book as anything but a concotion
of thoughts from a "pshycic reader" who probably have a bit of a problem
with the difference between reality, wishful thinking and "pshycic
influences".

I see that Nabby continues to comment on a book he hasn't read.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'I want to apologize to the group...'

[Bhairitu]

It's more about reality and economics than Marxism.  I'll amend it 
somewhat to being we're all either whores or pimps.  Still probably too 
cynical to ya though.

Like everyone else I have to sell myself or something I do.  That's 
whoring or pimping broadly defined outside the narrow definition with 
regard to sex workers.  IOW, I was not excluding myself in any way.  
That was just an illusion you entertained.

As for tantrics and Marxism, what about Ananda Marga?

emptybill wrote:
> Nice Neo-Marxist stab.
>
> However does this mean you don't work for a living? Are you just a
> play-whore rather than a work-whore. You don't work for money do you? If
> you do then I assume you do it just to show solidarity with us little
> people.
>
> Or maybe you just give it all to your guru. Is he a Neo-Marxist too? But
> that can hardly be true. Indian Marxists don't believe in all that
> mindless Hindoo shit, Tantrika or not.
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
>   
>> In a capitalist society everybody is a whore.
>>
>> Peter wrote:
>> 
>>> Is a work whore like a play whore?
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>
>
>