Share tries her hardest to create confusion:
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to
read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example
she gave.
No, I gave no example, Share. Rather, I quoted a post of mine that you had
said false things about, for the purpose of showing that they were false. And
there is no I think about whether I used qualifiers in that post. I did use
qualifiers in that post (not example), contrary to your claims in your post
on Sunday about that post of mine.
Emily quoted my post quoting your Sunday post, and the post of mine your
Sunday post was about, below if you need to refresh your memory, but it
couldn't have been clearer.
What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues
to write to and about me. All
that outweighs that example she posted.
No, no, Share. You are obfuscating.
The post of mine I quoted from September 9, 2012, was the one you were
referring to in your own post on Sunday. That post of yours from Sunday said
things that were not true about that post of mine.
The post of mine that you referred to and said false things about was my
initial response to your own post of September 9, 2012, about your kerfuffle
with Robin.
You claimed in your post Sunday that my September 9, 2012, post was the first
time I had run [my] game on you. It isn't true that that was the first time
we clashed, but I'm not going into that for now.
The issue of concern to me is the false things you said about that post on
Sunday, and your refusal to take responsibility for doing so, including your
attempt to obfuscate the whole business in your post that I'm responding to
now. The notion that there was some example post is a deliberate obfuscation;
so is your apparent claim that there was some initial post different from the
one you said false things about. We are talking about one single post of mine,
not three or more.
I don't think we are ever going to agree about all this.
There is no issue of agreement, only of facts as reflected in the FFL
archives. You said things that were not true about a post of mine; I proved
they were not true. It isn't a matter of anybody's opinion. Each of us created
the respective posts in question by typing the words we wanted to say in them
with our own fingers on our own keyboards.
In that light, I think it's more beneficial for everyone to simply move on
to more interesting topics and let all
that go.
Here's how we do that, Share: You admit that you said things that were
false--factually false--about that post of mine of September 9. (It would be
nice if you'd also apologize for saying those false things, but I don't believe
you're capable of it.) Once you've taken responsibility for your own words, we
can let all that go.
I also recognize that Judy doesn't intend to do this and I'll deal with that
as best as I can from day to day.
There's no need for you to deal with it from day to day. You only have to deal
with it once, as I just outlined. Whatever may go on from day to day will be a
function of your not having dealt with it.
IT'S JUST A CHAT ROOM!
False and derogatory things said about other people in chat rooms are just
as false, and just as morally and ethically reprehensible, as false and
derogatory things said about other people anywhere else. We don't get excused
from the responsibility to speak the truth just because we're in a chat room.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: Share, do
you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you
specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I
have copied to this one?
Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't take it any further, I promise. I'm
paying attention to the feedback I'm getting on how I have been unfairly
critiquing you, and even worse, I am doing this as a non-TM'er!
It is true. I am, in fact, the only person posting here currently who has no
affiliation with TM, past or present. I am checking the akashic records to
make sure that past really means past. I will consult with a fortune
teller to determine whether this may be part of my future. In the meantime, I
am filling out an application for resident alien status and I will get my
jyotish astrological chart read to glean the most fortuitous time to submit it.
Why would I go to all this trouble? Well, there is a reason. I think God may
have something to do with it, but I will do a little prayer and meditation on
the whole affair before I get back to Bhairitu and Emptybill on their very
astute questions; I have been here for between 2-3 years now. I *have* been
thinking about it, but I'm not that impressed with my mind, honestly. The