Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-04 Thread Bhairitu
sparaig wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

TurquoiseB wrote:



Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he 
 

  

DOES consider important? 
   



Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
 

  

In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's 
box 
with this more esoteric stuff, who knows, I may not be a meditator now 
if he did. He wants to broden his appeal not lessen it, afterall.I 
don't hold it against him, although it would be reassuring if he did 
explain it from our (TM) point of view.  :-)
   



Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
know anything about them.

If you want to know about such things, go to
the spiritual traditions that have studied them
for centuries. His obviously didn't. 

  

No because chakras are pretty basic stuff in Indian philosophy and MMY 
would have had to grow up in Topeka if he didn't know about them.   
Besides Ingegerd already said he talked about them in the early days.  
However in teaching meditation you usually don't deal with the chakras 
unless someone has one blocked.




And the concept of Chakra, at least within the texts I've already mentioned, 
doesn't go into  
details such as unblocking them anyway.

  

Shaktipat is used to unblock them.

Techniques dealing with Chakras as Chakras don't appear in Indian literature 
and tradition 
until 1200 years ago if that.

How about in the oral traditions?  :)



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-03 Thread Peter


--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
 sparaig@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
 noozguru@ wrote:
  
Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff.  For
 instance, creative 
intelligence for shakti.
   
   
   I don't think he uses creative intelligence as
 a translation of
  shakti. I think it's more a 
   translation of brhama.
  
  I agree with Bhairitu: Its Shakti. Think of this
 SCI lecture, where he
  speaks about, when Awareness becomes aware of
 itself, then
  intelligence becomes creative. Here Intelligence
 is Shiva and
  Creativity is Shakti. Brahma is more like an
 executive function, but
  he can only create because he has Shakti.
 
 
 Actually, it's when conscousness becomes conscious,
 intelligence becomes intelligent, 
 but I agree, shakti appears to be the sanskrit he
 translates as creative intelligence.

I agree. Shiva is the infinite silence of pure
consciousness and Shakti is the movement of That
infinity within its own silence. You could also argue
that creative intelligence = devas (which in its
totality is shakti).




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-03 Thread Peter


--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
 he gave me an 
  advanced technique which involves paying attention
 to the mantra in a 
  particular location. Being in India, with an
 Indian, in an Indian 
  ashram, I asked him if he meant in the vicinity of
 the soso chakra, 
  but he soon made it very clear he had no patience
 for any mention of 
  chakras and left it at that. He did not say why,
 but I suspect it is 
  for the very reasons that Turq gives, that it was
 off his map (which 
  is a very good reason not to embark on a
 dissertation about them).
  
 
 Sounds to me like projection. I remember quite
 explicitly the exact wording of  my 
 advanced technique instruction (acting traing comes
 in handy at times) and there wasn't 
 anything like pay attention to the mantra in a
 certain location. I can certainly see why, if 
 you were expecting something chakra-ish, you would
 misremember what you were told, 
 but it is certainly not what I was told and I doubt
 if you were told that either.

It was thinking the mantra in a certain area of the
body. It is one of the last advanced techniques. I can
see why the term chakra was not used because chakra
for most people is just a concept that could confuse
things.





 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
 no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
 no_reply@ wrote:
   
  Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on
 after the vedic 
  stuff he DOES consider important? 
  Maharishi mentions marmas, and not
 chakras.
 
 In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he
 wanted to open 
 a pandora's box with this more esoteric
 stuff, who knows, 
 I may not be a meditator now if he did. He
 wants to broden 
 his appeal not lessen it, afterall.I
 don't hold it 
 against him, although it would be reassuring
 if he did 
 explain it from our (TM) point of view.  :-)

Haven't any of you guys considered the
 obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he
 doesn't
know anything about them.
   
If you want to know about such things, go to
the spiritual traditions that have studied
 them
for centuries. His obviously didn't.
   
   Before anyone freaks out and considers this 
   anti-TM, it's not. I honestly think that
   1) he doesn't discuss this particular subject
   (chakras) and many others (the mechanics of
   what happens between incarnations, how to 
   transmit shakti, how to perceive auras, etc.)
   because he doesn't know anything about them,
   2) that it is *fine* and *appropriate* that 
   he doesn't know anything about them, and
   3) that it's a *good idea* that he doesn't
   say anything about them. Why spread ignorance
   when so many people are going to listen to
   it and assume that it's knowledge?
   
   Maharishi grew up in a very conservative and
   mainstream Hindu tradition. They had a lot of
   things they were knowledgable about, and when
   he discusses those things, he is on safe ground
   and is doing his students a service to pass
   along what he might have learned. But to stray
   into areas that he never studied (because his
   tradition didn't study them or consider them 
   important) would be a *disservice* to his 
   students.
   
   If you think I'm wrong about this, try to 
   remember when he *has* talked about other spir-
   itual traditions, like the times he's conveyed
   complete and total misinformation about Subud,
   about Scientology, and about Christianity. In 
   every case, one or more of his students cornered
   him into talking about something he knew nothing
   about except some misinformation that he'd heard
   along the way, and he passed along that
 misinfor-
   mation as if it were true.
   
   In my opinion, when you know nothing about a 
   subject, it's better to say nothing about it
 than
   to spout a buncha bullshit and *prove* that you
   know nothing about it. Some posters here, who 
   feel compelled to act as if they know all about
   things they've never studied (the Google-it-for-
   five-minutes-and-pretend-you're-an-expert
 approach)
   would IMO do better to follow their teacher's 
   example and just stay away from subjects they
   know nothing about.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-03 Thread Bhairitu
TurquoiseB wrote:

Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he 
  

DOES consider important? 


Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
  

In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's 
box 
with this more esoteric stuff, who knows, I may not be a meditator now 
if he did. He wants to broden his appeal not lessen it, afterall.I 
don't hold it against him, although it would be reassuring if he did 
explain it from our (TM) point of view.  :-)



Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
know anything about them.

If you want to know about such things, go to
the spiritual traditions that have studied them
for centuries. His obviously didn't. 

No because chakras are pretty basic stuff in Indian philosophy and MMY 
would have had to grow up in Topeka if he didn't know about them.   
Besides Ingegerd already said he talked about them in the early days.  
However in teaching meditation you usually don't deal with the chakras 
unless someone has one blocked.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-03 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?





on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
 He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
 of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
 know anything about them.
 
 If you want to know about such things, go to
 the spiritual traditions that have studied them
 for centuries. His obviously didn't. 
 
 No because chakras are pretty basic stuff in Indian philosophy and MMY 
 would have had to grow up in Topeka if he didn't know about them. 
 Besides Ingegerd already said he talked about them in the early days. 
 However in teaching meditation you usually don't deal with the chakras 
 unless someone has one blocked.

Ill bet Maharishi knows plenty about the chakras and has had clear experiences of them, but he tended to avoid talking about physiological things that couldnt be explored by Western scientists. Like the dual nervous system idea which he used to talk about, but dropped around 1970.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-03 Thread Peter


--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Haven't any of you guys considered the
 obvious?
   He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
   of other spiritual subjects) because he
 doesn't
   know anything about them.
   
   If you want to know about such things, go to
   the spiritual traditions that have studied
 them
   for centuries. His obviously didn't.
   
   No because chakras are pretty basic stuff in
 Indian philosophy and MMY
   would have had to grow up in Topeka if he
 didn't know about them.
   Besides Ingegerd already said he talked about
 them in the early days.
   However in teaching meditation you usually
 don't deal with the chakras
   unless someone has one blocked.
  
 I¹ll bet Maharishi knows plenty about the chakras
 and has had clear
 experiences of them, but he tended to avoid talking
 about physiological
 things that couldn¹t be explored by Western
 scientists. Like the dual
 nervous system idea which he used to talk about, but
 dropped around 1970.

On my TTC (LaAntilla, 1972) someone asked MMY about
chakras and he laughed and said they go round and
round. He talked a little about kundalini yoga and
said it was a legitimate path but required a lot of
personal attention from a master. He concluded with
saying with TM we don't have to worry about chakras.
Now, my take: Chakras are just part of the subtle
nervous system along with nadis. You can experience
energy flowing through various nadis when you're very
still. Also attention enlivens various chakras. TMer's
have huge ajna chakras probably from all the mental
techniques we do. If you want to go on a fun trip,
place your attention on your ajna chakra (third eye)
and your attention will be pulled through it into
different lokas (worlds). I sh*t you not. 




 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
wmurphy77 wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has 


risen) 
  

as a sign of enlightenment.




And what does MMY say?
  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the chakras.  
It's not that the information isn't important though.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Peter


--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
  wrote:
   Not sure I understand all of what you said- 
   
   all I can say is that when the third eye opens
 (a very weird 
   expression by the way...) the ability is gained
 to see all manner of 
   things without the optic machinery of the eyes,
 although such sights 
   are still like any other picture, with
 dimension, shape, color, etc.
  
  
  Jim-The 'third' or all seeing eye opens up the
 'vision' and conscious 
  awareness of God immanent in creation as the
 Creator, not bad, wouldn't 
  you sa. But like you said, without the optic
 machinery of the eyes, 
  remember what Christ said, no man cometh unto the
 Father (Brahman) but 
  thru meie. thur the all seeing 'third' eye.
 
 
 Yep, I'm sure that is what Christ meant: me = 3rd
 eye.

me=3rd eye=Kevin Bacon



 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
wmurphy77 wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  

And what does MMY say?
 

  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the 


chakras.  
  

It's not that the information isn't important though.



I'm not sure why MMY does not mention opening of the spiritual 
astral/causal third eye, but it might be because it smacks of Religion 
and Hinduism, and of course, we all know TM isn't a Religion, God 
forbid.

Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff.  For instance, creative 
intelligence for shakti.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
jim_flanegin wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

wmurphy77 wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 

  

Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has 
   



risen) 
 

  

as a sign of enlightenment.
   



And what does MMY say?
 

  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the 


chakras.  
  

It's not that the information isn't important though.



I have to say that it may be important, but not essential.

I don't think you're going to have enlightenment without the opening of 
the third eye.  So it is rather essential BUT happens due to practicing 
meditation.  :)



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
sparaig wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

wmurphy77 wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:



 

  

And what does MMY say?


 

  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the 
   



chakras.  
 

  

It's not that the information isn't important though.
   



I'm not sure why MMY does not mention opening of the spiritual 
astral/causal third eye, but it might be because it smacks of Religion 
and Hinduism, and of course, we all know TM isn't a Religion, God 
forbid.

  

Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff.  For instance, creative 
intelligence for shakti.




I don't think he uses creative intelligence as a translation of shakti. I 
think it's more a 
translation of brhama.


  

I think you're wrong there or don't know what shakti is.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
jim_flanegin wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

jim_flanegin wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 

  

wmurphy77 wrote:

   



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ 
  

wrote:
  

 

  

Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has 
  

   



risen) 


 

  

as a sign of enlightenment.
  

   



And what does MMY say?


 

  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the 
   



chakras.  
 

  

It's not that the information isn't important though.

   



I have to say that it may be important, but not essential.

  

I don't think you're going to have enlightenment without the 


opening of 
  

the third eye.  So it is rather essential BUT happens due to 


practicing 
  

meditation.  :)



I agree opening of the third eye is essential- I was referring to 
knowledge of the chakras. I know virtually nothing about them, 
though I do recall being clearly aware of when they opened- 
(especially the crown- Wow!)

You'll find an overview of the chakras here on the fourth video:
http://realtantrasolutions.com/videos.htm

It is ashamed that MMY didn't provide the rest of the teaching.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread Bhairitu
sparaig wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

jim_flanegin wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 

  

wmurphy77 wrote:

   



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:


 

  

Indians in general speak of the third eye open (kundalini has 
  

   



risen) 


 

  

as a sign of enlightenment.
  

   



And what does MMY say?


 

  

Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the 
   



chakras.  
 

  

It's not that the information isn't important though.

   



I have to say that it may be important, but not essential.

  

I don't think you're going to have enlightenment without the opening of 
the third eye.  So it is rather essential BUT happens due to practicing 
meditation.  :)




What the hell is this third eye and why do you think it is important?

Sounds like you need to do some homework.  ;-)



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/