Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
Mark wrote: sad that things so simple need to be done upstream while fedora patches away anything that might give them patent issues. lust look at normal codecs that work for everyone (mpeg, mp3 you name it). In many cases, we don't need to patch anything or we can upstream the patches where the functionality gets separated as plugins. This is the case with gstreamer plugins as an example. A longer explanation is available at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream Rahul Ps: I still think that the themed dialog should be the default but that is a different argument. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Amateur Radio Banner: Rough Sketch B+W
Frank Murphy wrote: Thought I would look for some feedback first, Both will be sourced in Blender and or Wings http://www.frankly3d.com/wip/wip.html B\G on (2) will be Sky + Fedora Blue If neither is suitable, we'll go again For this banner your primary customer is the Amateur Radio SIG and Bob, the requester. He is the one that should give you a thumb up, just ask Michael about how he worked [1] on the Fonts SIG banner :p My advice is to focus on the logo, you will use exactly the same logo for the banner and probably a simplified version of it for the icon. [1] - http://michaelbox.net/blog/?p=16 -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: New Designer
Macky Jo Ruiz wrote: Hello all, my name is Macky Ruiz, and I'm a graphic designer. I've just graduated from Brooks College in December. I don't have much experience, but my website portfolio speaks for itself. Hi Macky and welcome! Take a look at our open tasks queue and see if you find something interesting to work on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Self Introduction: Ryan Lerch
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 10:37 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: ryan lerch wrote: Hi All, Just a little time ago Frank published some sketches for the Amaterur Radio SIG, too bad he didn't update the status on the DesignService page: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-April/msg00306.html My bad, trying to rectify now, blame the meds. Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Self Introduction: Ryan Lerch
ryan lerch wrote: Hi All, Hi Ryan, I am glad to see you here. My name is Ryan Lerch, and would like to contribute to fedora via the Art Team. I am an amateur graphic designer, and willing to help out basically anywhere that i am needed. Other projects i contribute to are Inkscape and the Open Clip Art Library. Any suggestions / ideas for a I worked with Ryan for a long time, both on Inkscape and OCAL, we collaborated on tutorials and more. He is a valuable addition on our team. good starting out task are appreciated. I scanned the list and thought this one may be suitable: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#head-1d57965f144d16a3c1c4cdbfda053e0fc8e3987f Just a little time ago Frank published some sketches for the Amaterur Radio SIG, too bad he didn't update the status on the DesignService page: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-April/msg00306.html -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Wiki -Editing, I'm stuck
Frank Murphy wrote: I would like to change the status of Amateur Radio to taken. But I need to sign the CLA (no problems here) But under the new art rules: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork#head-78d3710853ccb74e8b65c36d515052321c3860f2 Have to finish task and have it accepted before proceeding to step 2 (cla) No, you got the process wrong: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EditGroupQueue 1. sign the CLA 2. get wiki edit rights 3. request membership in the Art group in FAS The task is required only for the last step, which is in addition to CLA and wiki editing. With that being said, seeing your recently activity on the list, I think it may be considered enough to get FAS membership of the group. So any advice appreciated, currently cannot change status. Unless I cheat by signing cla, which am very reluctant to do, as it breaches above progression. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. But *not* making a prettier dialog just because it's not the default seems very silly to me. After all, I work on maintaining packages that aren't installed by default. If everyone felt that doing something not installed by default was not worth the effort, it would be a pretty lame distro! -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Wiki -Editing, I'm stuck
I would like to change the status of Amateur Radio to taken. But I need to sign the CLA (no problems here) But under the new art rules: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork#head-78d3710853ccb74e8b65c36d515052321c3860f2 Have to finish task and have it accepted before proceeding to step 2 (cla) So any advice appreciated, currently cannot change status. Unless I cheat by signing cla, which am very reluctant to do, as it breaches above progression. Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Wiki -Editing, I'm stuck
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:19 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: 1. sign the CLA 2. get wiki edit rights 3. request membership in the Art group in FAS Will do it as soon as get the child from dentist, Thanks for the patience Nicu. Frank signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. +1 To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. +1 true.. I personally think we should enable lock-screen-dialog theme by default but leave the splash screen off. ( with the new gdm look it looks out of place + my laptop is so fast loading I just see for very short time :) ) Not enabling it puts the lock screen out of place with the overall theme. I also think the lock screen dialog should look closer to the gdm look. ( as in the frame/look where the user choose his login account ) We could move the password and the buttons beneath the picture and the display name. ( having that above the user picture and DN seems out of place ) And drop the login name and the hostname I don't see the purpose of having that at all. Best regards Johann B. begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Dunhagi 5;;Taeknigardur;Reykavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:http://www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. +1 To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. +1 true.. I personally think we should enable lock-screen-dialog theme by default but leave the splash screen off. ( with the new gdm look it looks out of place + my laptop is so fast loading I just see for very short time :) ) Not enabling it puts the lock screen out of place with the overall theme. I also think the lock screen dialog should look closer to the gdm look. ( as in the frame/look where the user choose his login account ) Hum skip the lock-screen-waves looking more like the gdm login box. I always end up with conclusion that the gdm login box is out of place. We could move the password and the buttons beneath the picture and the display name. ( having that above the user picture and DN seems out of place ) And drop the login name and the hostname I don't see the purpose of having that at all. If what I mention above is done I think lock-screen-waves would look even better :). Best regards Johann B. begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Dunhagi 5;;Taeknigardur;Reykavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:http://www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
Nicu Buculei wrote: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: I personally think we should enable lock-screen-dialog theme by default but leave the splash screen off. ( with the new gdm look it looks out of place + my laptop is so fast loading I just see for very short time :) ) The GNOME splash *is* off by default. As I thought. Best regards Johann B. begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Dunhagi 5;;Taeknigardur;Reykavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:http://www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: I also think the lock screen dialog should look closer to the gdm look. ( as in the frame/look where the user choose his login account ) One of the things that the new gdm architecture should allow us to do (in theory, at least) is to _use_ the login screen for unlocking a locked session. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
2008/4/15, Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. Just for the record, I don't disagree at all with wanting to have a prettier lock dialog, I just haven't felt particularly burdened by it. I'd say, lobby the desktop guys about this and work something out. :-) This isn't the first time (or the only subproject) ;-) where we start talking about these changes too late in the release cycle, but maybe we can get a permanent, mutually acceptable solution for Fedora 10. However, it ought to be just that, a *solution*, rather than simply advocating for switching a default without knowing why it hasn't been that way before. I'm cc'ing some of the desktop guys personally just because we want to get their attention -- hopefully they can explain what the usability factors are, and how we can have a design that meets those requirements for the future while looking prettier. Now that's going better. But why is it so hard to adjust one gconf value by default? Fedora does that with firefox and i'm sure with others as well. So why is it so hard to change one gconf value by default? Isn't there a global conf package in fedora that manages the gconf changes? And if you read the reply's here everyone wants to have it on by default, even you said that, so.. what's the point in ignoring that? Don't tell me that making it themed can confuse users (something like that was said when i requested it in the F8 development cycle). Btw i saw the lock dialog now and it's height is a bit overdone for just a lock dialog if you ask me. I will make a mockup of what i like later today. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. Just for the record, I don't disagree at all with wanting to have a prettier lock dialog, I just haven't felt particularly burdened by it. I'd say, lobby the desktop guys about this and work something out. :-) This isn't the first time (or the only subproject) ;-) where we start talking about these changes too late in the release cycle, but maybe we can get a permanent, mutually acceptable solution for Fedora 10. However, it ought to be just that, a *solution*, rather than simply advocating for switching a default without knowing why it hasn't been that way before. I'm cc'ing some of the desktop guys personally just because we want to get their attention -- hopefully they can explain what the usability factors are, and how we can have a design that meets those requirements for the future while looking prettier. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgp4gwvr58x0t.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:55:12PM +0200, Mark wrote: 2008/4/15, Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. Just for the record, I don't disagree at all with wanting to have a prettier lock dialog, I just haven't felt particularly burdened by it. I'd say, lobby the desktop guys about this and work something out. :-) This isn't the first time (or the only subproject) ;-) where we start talking about these changes too late in the release cycle, but maybe we can get a permanent, mutually acceptable solution for Fedora 10. However, it ought to be just that, a *solution*, rather than simply advocating for switching a default without knowing why it hasn't been that way before. I'm cc'ing some of the desktop guys personally just because we want to get their attention -- hopefully they can explain what the usability factors are, and how we can have a design that meets those requirements for the future while looking prettier. Now that's going better. Yet I failed to CC the people in question, sorry. Taking care of that with this message. But why is it so hard to adjust one gconf value by default? Fedora does that with firefox and i'm sure with others as well. So why is it so hard to change one gconf value by default? Isn't there a global conf package in fedora that manages the gconf changes? It's not hard, we just try to minimize it. Working with upstream is the Fedora mantra. And if you read the reply's here everyone wants to have it on by default, even you said that, so.. what's the point in ignoring that? Don't tell me that making it themed can confuse users (something like that was said when i requested it in the F8 development cycle). That's not what I said -- please reread. I said I wouldn't object to having a better lock dialog, but that needs to be done in concert with upstream and whatever usability standards apply. Btw i saw the lock dialog now and it's height is a bit overdone for just a lock dialog if you ask me. I will make a mockup of what i like later today. I'm glad you're now interested in doing this. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpWH2nIayXfJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 14:55 +0200, Mark wrote: 2008/4/15, Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Paul W. Frields wrote: The lock dialog defaults to the plain version for usability reasons -- that's something that's been decided upstream by GNOME and we probably won't be changing it any time soon. While I understand the point about usability (and appreciate you did the work and submitted a design - IIRC this in not the first time you do that), don't you think the root of the problem has to be addressed? If we think a feature is that bad for usability reasons, shouldn't we just drop it? Or make the themed dialog more usable or the simple dialog prettier? There *must* be a way to have something both usable and pleasant looking. To me, shipping two dialogs, one that is usable and another that is pretty is like knowingly ship something broken and just papering over it a temporary solution. And I learned sometime you have to break the temporary solution to get the problem solved properly. Just for the record, I don't disagree at all with wanting to have a prettier lock dialog, I just haven't felt particularly burdened by it. I'd say, lobby the desktop guys about this and work something out. :-) This isn't the first time (or the only subproject) ;-) where we start talking about these changes too late in the release cycle, but maybe we can get a permanent, mutually acceptable solution for Fedora 10. However, it ought to be just that, a *solution*, rather than simply advocating for switching a default without knowing why it hasn't been that way before. I'm cc'ing some of the desktop guys personally just because we want to get their attention -- hopefully they can explain what the usability factors are, and how we can have a design that meets those requirements for the future while looking prettier. Now that's going better. But why is it so hard to adjust one gconf value by default? Fedora does that with firefox and i'm sure with others as well. So why is it so hard to change one gconf value by default? Isn't there a global conf package in fedora that manages the gconf changes? Maybe you don't realize that _we_ were the ones who added the code for themed lock dialogs in the first place ? We tried it, and consider it a bit of a failed experiment. If it causes the art team heartburn, we should probably just rip it out again... ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
hi. I was looking the Fedora Design Service request and made some draft. This came out. Maybe it could work. Salutex! -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else attachment: FedoraEvent.png___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 08:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 11:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: I also think the lock screen dialog should look closer to the gdm look. ( as in the frame/look where the user choose his login account ) One of the things that the new gdm architecture should allow us to do (in theory, at least) is to _use_ the login screen for unlocking a locked session. Now, *that* would be great! We only need to make the gdm a little prettier. I myself think that it's a good idea to use plain gtk in there against standard background, but there's one thing that's kinda missing - window manager. The window in the dialog looks a little strange, because it does not have any borders and it's just plain rectangle. Rounded corners and simple border (note, that I mean border only - no window caption) wouldn't hurt IMHO. Generally, I dislike themed lock dialogue (but don't like the look of the unthemed one either), usually it gets a little too fancy and not much usable. I don't think themes are well fit for such dialogues... Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
María Leandro wrote: I was looking the Fedora Design Service request and made some draft. This came out. Maybe it could work. Clever move, this graphic is important, very soon we will hold release parties, those parties will be listed in the Events page and the Events page does not have a banner yet. Please post the image in the wiki and let the requester (Fabian Affolter) know about it. As for the particular graphic, I am *not* concerned about the calendar being English (some may be), but I would add a drop shadow to the icon. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: gnome splash and screensaver lock dialog
snip One of the things that the new gdm architecture should allow us to do (in theory, at least) is to _use_ the login screen for unlocking a locked session. snip Given that theory works, how customizable is that? As in having separated theme for different state of logged in user. Different background, Different color on login box Different color on the user currently in locked state or switched user state. ( few things on top of my head.. ) This theory could be a potential feature for F10. Instead of have to create 2 separated themes for gdm and lock one could just be created which changes background and or changes just the color on the user box in the gdm login box depending on the state that the user is inn ( locked or switched ). Best regards Johann B. begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Dunhagi 5;;Taeknigardur;Reykavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:http://www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? salutex! 2008/4/16, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED]: María Leandro wrote: I was looking the Fedora Design Service request and made some draft. This came out. Maybe it could work. Clever move, this graphic is important, very soon we will hold release parties, those parties will be listed in the Events page and the Events page does not have a banner yet. Please post the image in the wiki and let the requester (Fabian Affolter) know about it. As for the particular graphic, I am *not* concerned about the calendar being English (some may be), but I would add a drop shadow to the icon. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else attachment: FedoraEvent.png___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
María Leandro wrote: yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? I find it good enough, but as I said, not *we* are those who should like it. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
is there an SVG template or a page wiki with the dimensions, guidelines etc for these banners? i searched for it yesterday, but could not find it. cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: María Leandro wrote: yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? I find it good enough, but as I said, not *we* are those who should like it. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
I didn't too :S that's why I made my own sgv. 2008/4/16, ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is there an SVG template or a page wiki with the dimensions, guidelines etc for these banners? i searched for it yesterday, but could not find it. cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: María Leandro wrote: yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? I find it good enough, but as I said, not *we* are those who should like it. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else attachment: FedoraEvent.svg___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
that's awesome... what font(s) are used for the text on these banners? i might make up a default template with clones and such, allowing for easy creation of these banners... On the subject of the banner itself, i like the second one better (with the squares instead of the written date...) IMO, it still portrays the Event / Date metaphor effectively. The only other ideas i had for an image for this banner were involving party items like a foamy beer or a martini, which could also protray an Event. However i think the date / calendar image is a much better way to go cheers, ryanlerch 2008/4/16 María Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I didn't too :S that's why I made my own sgv. 2008/4/16, ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is there an SVG template or a page wiki with the dimensions, guidelines etc for these banners? i searched for it yesterday, but could not find it. cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: María Leandro wrote: yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? I find it good enough, but as I said, not *we* are those who should like it. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
2008/4/16, ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: that's awesome... what font(s) are used for the text on these banners? URW Gothic L i might make up a default template with clones and such, allowing for easy creation of these banners... On the subject of the banner itself, i like the second one better (with the squares instead of the written date...) IMO, it still portrays the Event / Date metaphor effectively. The only other ideas i had for an image for this banner were involving party items like a foamy beer or a martini, which could also protray an Event. However i think the date / calendar image is a much better way to go lol :D cheers, ryanlerch 2008/4/16 María Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I didn't too :S that's why I made my own sgv. 2008/4/16, ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is there an SVG template or a page wiki with the dimensions, guidelines etc for these banners? i searched for it yesterday, but could not find it. cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: María Leandro wrote: yup... you're right... not even me use English as a native language. What about this design? I find it good enough, but as I said, not *we* are those who should like it. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://www.iseit.net http://www.latinux.org http://www.fedora-ve.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56 Be yourself... Don't be anyone else ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
RE: Amateur Radio Banner: Rough Sketch B+W
Evening, Frank. If it will help, you are more than welcome to use this. http://www.zianet.com/ZYLOO/JRC-HF.png (Built in the GIMP.) 73 Dan ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Wiki Banner Template (work in progress)
2008/4/15 ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Any ideas / suggestions are appreciated... Looks pretty good. One thing I would recommend would be to set up the text to be right aligned by default... Jeff ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
ryan lerch wrote: that's awesome... what font(s) are used for the text on these banners? i might make up a default template with clones and such, allowing for easy creation of these banners... Even if all the info isn't there, it *should* be: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/ArtTeamProjects/WikiDesign -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even if all the info isn't there, it *should* be: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/ArtTeamProjects/WikiDesign page for wikibanners across the board or just the ArtTeam banner? If the latter, should we create a new page for these details? cheers, ryanlerch ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: FedoraEvents - Artwork/DesignService
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:52 PM, ryan lerch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even if all the info isn't there, it *should* be: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/ArtTeamProjects/WikiDesign page for wikibanners across the board or just the ArtTeam banner? If the latter, should we create a new page for these details? cheers, ryanlerch sorry, that should have been: is that page ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/ArtTeamProjects/WikiDesign) for wikibanners across the board or just the ArtTeam banner? If the latter, should we create a new page for these details? cheers, ryanlerch ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
