Re: [Echo] Updated preferences-desktop-theme icon set draft
Martin Sourada a écrit : Looking better. Now the only icon that does not seem crisp enough for me is the 22x22. I think you need to simplify the design there (like has been done for the 16x16). I think it would look better if the progress bar in 16x16 was thicker (perhaps two or three pixels would work). Set progress bar ticker for 16x16 icon. Hopefully 22x22 will look good enough. Luya References: --- http://luya.fedorapeople.org/echo/applications/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: [Echo] New emblem-symbolic-link icon set draft
Martin Sourada a écrit : First the most obvious issue - you used wrong perspective. It's an emblem icon and thus it needs to use the isometric perspective. Also I think it would work better if the arrow was thinner. I'd suggest you try to recreate it yourself and use rounded edges even for the white inner outline, like I did e.g. in mail-replied. I think it looks better and all newer echo icons are made that way. Martin Updated icons. Luya References: http://luya.fedorapeople.org/echo/emblems ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: [Echo] Updated preferences-desktop-theme icon set draft
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 00:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Martin Sourada a écrit : Looking better. Now the only icon that does not seem crisp enough for me is the 22x22. I think you need to simplify the design there (like has been done for the 16x16). I think it would look better if the progress bar in 16x16 was thicker (perhaps two or three pixels would work). Set progress bar ticker for 16x16 icon. Hopefully 22x22 will look good enough. Looking good, I have no further comments. Don't forget to hide the plate layer before commit. Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fourth draft for F10 sleeves for your comments
Jarod Wen wrote: Hi all, Sorry for this late update. Please find them from the link http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/sleeve_arts.html Cool the main layout is great. The text on the back is a bit large though and doesn't use MgOpen Modata. Also, Inter-Compatible PCs = I've never heard of this term. I'm not sure what it means. The main changes are: New drafts with single png file as background. Do you have an SVG file with the text laid over the background image? The '10' looks like it has some artifacts on it and it's kind of pixelated. The nebula has been removed due to the cost of printing. Just to be clear, there is no restriction on colors for the sleeves as i mentioned earlier. The color restrictions only apply to the discs themselves as they are screen-printed. The sleeves follow a different printing process for which the cost is not based on the number of the colors. However, I think this looks much better without the nebula. The final artwork for F10 does not have the nebula so it wouldn't match that artwork with it. Some additional information about the live CD is added. Looks good! There are some problems on the fonts since my X11 fails to load MgOpen fonts. I will fix this later when I am back to my lab. Maybe I can take the base image and lay the fonts on top for you. ~m ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
