Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
For me there's no problem to license the image in GPLv2+. But I think that right now Fedora is the holder of the artwork. But if I had to do something, or write something, I will. Let me know. Cheers Samuele - Original Message - From: Charlie Brej [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, 23 October, 2008 11:12:49 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+ Would it be possible for the copyright holders of the solar artwork to permit two derived images to be licensed under GPLv2+. Images: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/background.png http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~brejc8/temp/star.png This would remove some complications around packaging the Plymouth solar plugin. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list -- Samuele Storari Art Director Byte-Code srl mobile: +39 347 50 798 32 office: +39 02 9840047 http://www.byte-code.com ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
Samuele Storari wrote: For me there's no problem to license the image in GPLv2+. But I think that right now Fedora is the holder of the artwork. You will be *always* the copyright holder for your work. By signing the CLA you allow Fedora to use your work under a certain license, but your rights remain intact. But if I had to do something, or write something, I will. Let me know. This email should be enough. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
So the final license will be CC-BY-SA and/or GPLv2+? Currently I'm preparing package for Solar KDE Themes (rhbz#467943) and it's now CC-BY-SA. R. --- Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno Red Hat, Inc. +420 532 294 275 - Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Samuele Storari wrote: For me there's no problem to license the image in GPLv2+. But I think that right now Fedora is the holder of the artwork. You will be *always* the copyright holder for your work. By signing the CLA you allow Fedora to use your work under a certain license, but your rights remain intact. But if I had to do something, or write something, I will. Let me know. This email should be enough. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
Jaroslav Reznik wrote: So the final license will be CC-BY-SA and/or GPLv2+? Currently I'm preparing package for Solar KDE Themes (rhbz#467943) and it's now CC-BY-SA. From my understanding, it's both. It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed also GPLv2+ -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
Charlie Brej wrote: Nicu Buculei wrote: From my understanding, it's both. It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed also GPLv2+ I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can stay as CC-BY-SA which (AFAIK) is a better licence for artwork. The best option is dual license, both CC-BY-SA and GPL, otherwise you can go in murky waters: the GPL talks about the source code, and what is the source fode for those two images? The layered .xcf. So having a consistent (dual) license is the easiest way. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
- Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charlie Brej wrote: Nicu Buculei wrote: From my understanding, it's both. It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed also GPLv2+ I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can stay as CC-BY-SA which (AFAIK) is a better licence for artwork. The best option is dual license, both CC-BY-SA and GPL, otherwise you can go in murky waters: the GPL talks about the source code, and what is the source fode for those two images? The layered .xcf. So having a consistent (dual) license is the easiest way. Ok, sounds good for me. So I'm going to use multiple licenses for solar-kde-theme. CC-BY-SA for artwork and GPLv2 for source code of themes (it's inherited work from original KDM theme). Thanks! R. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
