Re: Raising the bar

2009-06-30 Thread kaboon
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Nicolas
Mailhotnicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:


 Le Lun 29 juin 2009 22:05, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :

 Please, keep in mind, that almost nodoby using Rawhide

 Which is why rawhide quality needs to improve because rawhide is the
 next Fedora version and if it's not usable now F12 will start will
 mass updates and destabilization as usual.

 --
 Nicolas Mailhot

Isn't this that what the topic is all about (not specifically
improving the quality of Rawhide but having a better general release
after the Rawhide period)? ;-)

Ps. Did I mention that I'm a Rawhide user myself?
Pps. The whole topic sounds like a good idea to me.

-- 
Eelko Berkenpies
http://blog.berkenpies.nl/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-18 Thread kaboon
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ingvar Hagelund
ing...@redpill-linpro.comwrote:

 As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and
 the iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools
 like libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently, one could use
 amarok as a front end to sync content. But amarok-2.x does not (yet) support
 non-hardware (that is, not found by HAL) mounts.

 It should be possible to make amarok-1.4 to work on F11. It is still
 maintained in epel, and the compilation fixes for F11 consisted of adding a
 few #include statements here and there. So it works - almost. It can read
 the db, but fails writing to it.

 While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting or fuse mounts, I could
 use some advice on getting 1.4 to work. All the parts seems to be present, I
 just can't get them to play together.

 Ingvar


Amarok 2.1 should be perfectly capable of managing iPhones. According to the
docs (ChangeLog and Bugzilla) it's supposed to thread them as an iPod. If
you got problems with your iPhone I strongly suggest that you either report
it to the Amarok developers by their mailinglist (
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok ) or the KDE bugzilla (
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184744 ). :)

-- 
Eelko Berkenpies
http://blog.berkenpies.nl/
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list