Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:16 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: Dave, Is this an offer to try and help me get the f12 kernel to boot on my system so that I can test it for you? ;-] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513528 Rodd I'd just like to thank Kyle McMartin for giving me a little help with this (maybe with a little prompting from Dave???) I can now boot rawhide so I can now help with testing. thanks Rodd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
This would be ok if you never pushed it to updates-testing But if you do that it's logical for test-users that they can start testing and not getting 2.6.27 after that - Push it to updatestesting is like go on and after that step there should be no package-conflicts if they were THANK YOU for 2.6.29.6-97 today to help to solve my problems which are nearly killing me because i have no time and energy for downgrades 4 days before my healthy issues (medical operation) especially after working the last weeks day and night nearly to burn-out with other things which had to be done before On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote: One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right, and getting it upstream. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the installed one I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release and i do not realize why F10 does not get him -- Reindl Harald the lounge interactive design GmbH A-1060 Vienna | Hofmühlgasse 17 software-development / cms-solutions phone:+43 (1) 595 3999 33 cellular: +43 (676) 40 221 40 icq: 154546673 mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net http://www.thelounge.net/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the installed one I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release and i do not realize why F10 does not get him I've been personally using 2.6.29.4-75 successfully for a while (uptime currently is 32 days), so I join you in asking why there are no recent kernels for f10. On this route, why no 2.6.30? There is a driver I need which is included in = 2.6.30. These days upstream 2.6.31 is almost released... BTW -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the installed one I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release and i do not realize why F10 does not get him I tried to ask this on the fedora kernel list and the moderator never approved the message. I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+ prior to end-of-life. joe -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote: On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts with the installed one I use the 2.6.29 since months in the meantime, F11 has it since the release and i do not realize why F10 does not get him I tried to ask this on the fedora kernel list and the moderator never approved the message. Odd, I don't recall seeing it, and there's no non-spam messages in the queue right now. I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+ prior to end-of-life. In days of old, we were able to get rebases out pretty quickly after their upstream release. These days, we're hindered by the kernel modesetting stuff we're carrying. It's closely tied to the userspace X drivers, and isn't easy to retrofit to a different kernel. One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right, and getting it upstream. I really can't wait for the day that it all gets upstream, and we can get back to the old routine of rebasing. Until then, we're kinda stuck. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10
I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+ prior to end-of-life. In days of old, we were able to get rebases out pretty quickly after their upstream release. These days, we're hindered by the kernel modesetting stuff we're carrying. It's closely tied to the userspace X drivers, and isn't easy to retrofit to a different kernel. One of the reasons we haven't pushed them as proper updates is that getting the regressions fixed is pretty time consuming, and the limited X/KMS manpower we have is better focused on making the F12 stuff work right, and getting it upstream. Dave, Is this an offer to try and help me get the f12 kernel to boot on my system so that I can test it for you? ;-] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513528 Rodd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
