[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-20 03:26:11 EDT --- I don't know, the whole renaming process is under-formalised. Ask nirik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #4 from Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au 2009-01-20 04:17:06 EDT --- Split into denemo and denemo-music-fonts packages in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 04:20:36 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480458, which changed state. Bug 480458 Summary: [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480465, which changed state. Bug 480465 Summary: [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480476, which changed state. Bug 480476 Summary: [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 04:58:18 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 04:59:01 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480475, which changed state. Bug 480475 Summary: [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480471, which changed state. Bug 480471 Summary: [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 04:58:52 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #8 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 05:01:58 EDT --- needs another attempt, will be = 3.0.1-15.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480750] New: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750
Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: ccha...@redhat.com
ReportedBy: quen...@armitage.org.uk
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ccha...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
yum update fails reporting liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts all require
liberation-common-fonts, however, the package name appears to be
liberation-fonts-common
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.04-93-5
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum update
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum reports missing dependencies
Expected results:
update succeeds
Additional info:
The liberation-fonts.spec file creates a package liberation-fonts-common, but
liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts have a dependency on liberation-common-fonts
(i.e. comman and fonts reversed).
The same applies for baekmuk-ttf-fonts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 04:58:30 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-20 06:04:13 EDT --- All the previous comments fixed in 0.20050515-11 (rawhide). Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #9 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-01-20 07:04:15 EDT --- :) Are you referring to a missing change log or something else?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #20 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 07:37:24 EDT --- hi, I changed the fontconfig in accordance with the basic font config template. I think the rest is fine now? Here are the packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicholas Wourms nwou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nwou...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Nicholas Wourms nwou...@gmail.com 2009-01-20 11:14:49 EDT --- Please update the publican package to reflect this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||480473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||477336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-20 12:30:42 EDT --- Adding CC for slingshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-20 13:02:01 EDT --- How's this? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79532 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 13:14:21 EDT --- :D my first approved package! thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480480, which changed state. Bug 480480 Summary: [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480456] [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-20 14:13:17 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide for dejavu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480456, which changed state. Bug 480456 Summary: [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 15:58:05 EDT --- I built fontconfig-2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82.fc11 on the same day. That fixes this. Not sure why that one didn't show up in rawhide instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.31,1.32
Author: mclasen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14119
Modified Files:
liberation-fonts.spec
Log Message:
Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies. Yay, font activism
Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32
--- liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:36:24 - 1.31
+++ liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 22:53:43 - 1.32
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
Version: 1.04.93
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two
# exceptions:
# The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
%package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
%common_desc
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 1.04.93-6.fc11
+- Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies
+
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 1.04.93-5.fc11
- Resolved: rhbz#477410
- Refined .spec file based on Mailhot's review on rhbz.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #14 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:04:54 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #8 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:06:16 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #42 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:31:49 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-16.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quen...@armitage.org.uk --- Comment #15 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- *** Bug 480750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480750] liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- fixed on rawhide *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477410 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Component|VLGothic-fonts |fontconfig Blocks||446452 AssignedTo|ryo-dair...@users.sourcefor |besfa...@redhat.com |ge.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkeat...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 20:02:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I built fontconfig-2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82.fc11 on the same day. That fixes this. Not sure why that one didn't show up in rawhide instead. Because your build failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.33, 1.34 fontconfig.spec, 1.115, 1.116 sources, 1.34, 1.35
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5572
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
* 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce
- Update to 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34
--- .cvsignore 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 - 1.33
+++ .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 - 1.34
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz
+fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.115
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -r1.115 -r1.116
--- fontconfig.spec 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 - 1.115
+++ fontconfig.spec 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 - 1.116
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
-Version: 2.6.92
-Release: 1.git.64.g167bb82%{?dist}
+Version: 2.6.93
+Release: 1.git.64.g6aa4dce%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,8 +131,11 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce
+- Update to 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce
+
* Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82
-- Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g167bb82
+- Update to 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82
* Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34
- Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35
--- sources 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 - 1.34
+++ sources 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 - 1.35
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3aef92ac30c2ed24ea89a5007ecbf588 fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz
+f5050687560a61a87781c34fdf6a65d9 fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #3 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 20:49:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329524) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329524) test fix, post auto-hinting applied with fontforge Could you please check if this .ttf has 'u' fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 20:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Would you mean the pixel on bottom left corner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(c...@zone38.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 21:22:33 EDT --- I'm extremely sorry Jesse. Not sure what I've been smoking. Anyway. .93 is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #5 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 21:27:37 EDT --- Still broken, but in a different way. See attachment 329526. For what it's worth, the u is OK in version 1.03 of the font - can the hinting be copied from that version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(c...@zone38.net) | --- Comment #4 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 21:27:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329526) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329526) Appearance of auto-hinted u in Liberation Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #6 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 21:50:20 EDT --- I have checked again. The hinting instructions and cvt are totally same between ver 1.03 and current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:00:23 EDT --- Weird. No idea what would be causing that. I may have to play with it in FontForge some myself to see what might be causing this quirk... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts - New directory
Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts added to the repository ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel - New directory
Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel added to the repository ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1
Author: petersen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts
Added Files:
Makefile
Log Message:
Setup of module cjkuni-fonts
--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Top level Makefile for module cjkuni-fonts
all : CVS/Root common-update
@cvs update
common-update : common
@cd common cvs update
common : CVS/Root
@cvs checkout common
CVS/Root :
@echo ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout exit 1
clean :
@find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \;
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1
Author: petersen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
Added Files:
.cvsignore Makefile sources
Log Message:
Setup of module cjkuni-fonts
--- NEW FILE .cvsignore ---
--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Makefile for source rpm: cjkuni-fonts
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2009/01/21 03:02:14 petersen Exp $
NAME := cjkuni-fonts
SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec))
define find-makefile-common
for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ;
then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q
update ; fi ; echo $$d/Makefile.common ; break ; fi ; done
endef
MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common))
ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),)
# attept a checkout
define checkout-makefile-common
test -f CVS/Root { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common echo
common/Makefile.common ; } || { echo ERROR: I can't figure out how to
checkout the 'common' module. ; exit -1 ; } 2
endef
MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common))
endif
include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON)
--- NEW FILE sources ---
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:03:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) ok, so this is a rename of an existing font? Yep, new package required for rename under new fonts packaging guidelines. cvs admin done Caius please import and build new package there so that Nicolas can review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #8 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:15:04 EDT --- I have triaged on my Fedora 10 and Liberation Mono Bold looks fine (attached screenshots). Since I didn't have problem on my OpenOffice, I currently have no idea about this yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #9 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:16:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329532) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329532) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #12 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:20:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329537) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329537) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #11 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:19:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329536) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329536) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #13 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:22:53 EDT --- It looks fine with hinting turned off on my system too; same if I set fontconfig to use auto-hinting. Only if I use bytecode hinting (which is enabled by default in Ubuntu) does it look wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spe
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28457/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkuni-fonts.spec cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch import.log Log Message: renamed from cjkunifonts --- NEW FILE CIDFnmap.zh_CN --- %! % Copyright (C) 2001 Taiji Yamada and gs-cjk project % % This file is part of GNU Ghostscript. % % GNU Ghostscript is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but % WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. No author or distributor accepts responsibility % to anyone for the consequences of using it or for whether it serves any % particular purpose or works at all, unless he says so in writing. Refer % to the GNU General Public License for full details. % % Everyone is granted permission to copy, modify and redistribute GNU % Ghostscript, but only under the conditions described in the GNU General % Public License. A copy of this license is supposed to have been given % to you along with GNU Ghostscript so you can know your rights and % responsibilities. It should be in a file named COPYING. Among other % things, the copyright notice and this notice must be preserved on all % copies. % $Id: CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v 1.2 2003/05/23 04:42:46 llch Exp $ % CID fontmap for the Arphic trutype fonts % See ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/chinese-fonts-truetype/LICENSE % for license information regarding these fonts. % Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; /GBZenKai-Medium(/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf); /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; --- NEW FILE CIDFnmap.zh_TW --- %! % Copyright (C) 2001 Taiji Yamada and gs-cjk project % % This file is part of GNU Ghostscript. % % GNU Ghostscript is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but % WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. No author or distributor accepts responsibility % to anyone for the consequences of using it or for whether it serves any % particular purpose or works at all, unless he says so in writing. Refer % to the GNU General Public License for full details. % % Everyone is granted permission to copy, modify and redistribute GNU % Ghostscript, but only under the conditions described in the GNU General % Public License. A copy of this license is supposed to have been given % to you along with GNU Ghostscript so you can know your rights and % responsibilities. It should be in a file named COPYING. Among other % things, the copyright notice and this notice must be preserved on all % copies. % $Id: CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v 1.1 2003/03/31 15:44:38 tagoh Exp $ % CID fontmap for the Arphic trutype fonts % See ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/chinese-fonts-truetype/LICENSE % for license information regarding these fonts. % Adobe-CNS1 /ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf); /ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; --- NEW FILE FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN --- %! % The map is a set of records like this : % % /CIDfont_name options_dict ; % % where options_dict is a dictionary with the following entries : % % Key Type Description % PathstringAbsolute path to font file, or relative path to font file from % the GS_EXTFONTPATH value. % CIDFontType integer PostScript type for this CID font. Only 0 is currently allowed. % Note that this is unrelated to the real type of the font file - % the bridge will perform format conversion. % FAPIname Name of the renderer to be used with the font. /AgfaUFST and % /FreeType is now allowed -- depends on which options Ghostscript % was built with. % SubfontId integer (optional) Index of the font in font collection, such as FCO or TTC. % It is being ignored if /Path doesn't specify a collection. % CSI array Must have strongly 2 elements. % The first element of the array specifies Ordering of CIDSystemInfo. % The second element specifies Supplement of CIDSystemInfo. % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % /BousungEG-Light-GB /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] ; /GBZenKai-Medium /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] ; % /MSungGBK-Light /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] ; /Adobe-GB1 /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] ; --- NEW FILE FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #14 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:44:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329538) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329538) fixed by copying hinting from u in v1.03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #16 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:48:04 EDT --- I fixed it by using Edit - Copy From - TrueType Instructions to copy the u character from version 1.03 to 1.04. The font file itself is in attachment 329538, and a screenshot of how the fixed version appears under bytecode hinting is in attachment 329539. Feel free to adopt this patched version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #13 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 00:21:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329546) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329546) oowriter shows R is displayed nicely 6px-18px -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis
tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Broken dependencies: elisa
elisa has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On x86_64: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On i386: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On ppc64: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
