[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-25 04:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) When I first picked '50' I thought it was a low priority. The problem is that I just that I don't understand this configuration file, this was the reason for removing the other half also, I thought it was redundant, silly me. There are several short and to-the-point txt files in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ (fontpackages-devel) that try to explain the fontconfig aspects relevant to the average packager. If they're not sufficient or unclear, do not hesitate to complain on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com (or open a fontpackages bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #17 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-06-25 05:11:48 EDT --- can this bug be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #18 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-25 05:20:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) can this bug be closed now? As I said in comment #12, I'd rather keep it open, just to not forget about it. I didn't really fixed the bug, I worked around it. Fixing it requires getting in touch with upstream, and have it fixed there. I tried to contact them, but I got no reply. I'll go on trying, I'm afraid that if I close this bug I'll forget about this issue. Is it really a problem to have it remain open ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-25 05:42:00 EDT --- BTW, with regard to naming, it'd be a very good idea to check the new naming conforms to the WWS spec (making it WPF and CSS compatible) http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #20 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-25 06:05:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) BTW, with regard to naming, it'd be a very good idea to check the new naming conforms to the WWS spec (making it WPF and CSS compatible) http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf Do you mean the package should be renamed ? Or some of the font attributes should be renamed ? Could you open a new bug for that please ? Please note that I am not really fonts-savvy, so if you could include as much details as possible about the request, that would be really appreciated :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-25 07:08:03 EDT --- I means the names declared in the font metadata should conform to the WWS spec. You have all the gory details in the documents I linked, with standard values for style names, the order attributes should appear in, what to put in font name, what to put in style name, what to put in preferred name (and what is their relationship), etc So it's really the same bug you want to keep open, except the 'maybe dropping the preferred name is a good idea' replaced by 'here is the spec MS published that describes the naming that will work in most apps' Do remember Adobe and MS are the entities writing the opentype spec, so their opinion should be listened to carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #22 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-25 07:34:39 EDT --- Ok, that's more clear now :) I'll try to have a look at it when I find the time to. I'll also notify upstream about this and see if they are more responsive this time. Thanks for the heads up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #26 from Victor Bogado bog...@bogado.net 2009-06-25 08:06:29 EDT --- Well according to the document you pointed out, it seems to me that for all fantasy fonts there should not be the second half of the file. — the second one tells fontconfig it can complete the font named [fontname] with glyphs taken from fonts registered under [genericname]. The argument is simple, fantasy fonts are generally used for their looks and the computer will not be able to guess witch is the best compatible look for the current project. So in my point of view, for fantasy fonts, the computer should display a missing glyph to the user instead of choosing another font that will probably surprise the user. But I guess that this should be part of a larger policy, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-25 08:38:00 EDT --- fontconfig will always try to complete the fonts and display something to the user. It's better if the user can read what you wanted to display than the user not being able to read computer messages at all (esp when those messages require action on his part). What this rule does is help fontconfig choose the best class of fonts to pick from when it needs to complete. CSS works the same way in browsers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-25 16:10:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507637] Missing fontset info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-06-25 16:50:53 EDT
---
I had cjkuni-fonts-common and cjkuni-uming-fonts installed. I just installed
cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript and cjkuni-ukai-fonts. My system is fully updated as
of this morning. It makes no difference. The xlsfonts problem reported above
and the problem reported in bz #489145 still persist.
The cjkuni-fonts-common package installs
/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/fonts.{dir,scale}, both of which contain references to
both the ukai and uming fonts, even if one or both is not installed. This is
how I wound up with a reference to a ukai font while only having the uming
fonts installed.
Anyway, installing more fonts didn't help.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-25 17:10:04 EDT --- inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #28 from Victor Bogado bog...@bogado.net 2009-06-25 17:14:58 EDT --- So you're saying that even without this fontconfig will try to complete. While I disagree that this is the way to go, I think that it is better that the system show me the error than trying to hide it, but this is more a philosophical issue. But anyway, what did you think about the last version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #13 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-25 18:07:16 EDT --- The only language which doesn't work for me out of the box on www.wikipedia.org is http://cu.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (which is Old Church Slavonic ... the language has not been actively used since 13th Century). bradford:~$ rpm -qa \*deja\* firefox xulrunner dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch xulrunner-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.x86_64 dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch firefox-3.5-0.20.beta4.fc11.x86_64 bradford:~$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #14 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-25 18:11:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) The only language which doesn't work for me out of the box on www.wikipedia.org is http://cu.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (which is Old Church Slavonic ... the language has not been actively used since 13th Century). Sorry, 11th Century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Church_Slavonic :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507637] Missing fontset info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637
--- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-06-25
20:14:12 EDT ---
Okay, I should let uming and ukai in two separate dir for them to have their
own font.{dir,scale} then.
I am creating a test sample rpm now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ta...@redhat.com|twa...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2008-11-25 23:16:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-25 23:48:44 EDT --- Actually it is worse that that since currently the main packages also contain the bold (and light) fonts... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9158
Modified Files:
cjkuni-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Jun 26 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance k AT kaio.me - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#507637 (Missing fontset info: fixed by subpackaged -common.)
Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec 19 Jun 2009 06:09:19 - 1.10
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 03:50:20 - 1.11
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ the CJK Unifonts project.
%define umingbuilddir%{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version}
%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version}
+%define umingdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-uming
+%define ukaidir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-ukai
+
%define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN
%define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW
%define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType
@@ -21,7 +24,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project.
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 0.2.20080216.1
-Release: 24%{?dist}
+Release: 25%{?dist}
Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
License: Arphic
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -49,7 +52,7 @@ BuildRequires:fontpackages-devel =
%package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts
Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face.
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:cjkunifonts-uming 0.2.20080216.1-16
%description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts
@@ -57,9 +60,7 @@ Obsoletes:cjkunifonts-uming 0.2.20
CJK Unifonts in Ming face.
-%_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc
-
-# remaining uming files
+%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/license
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt
@@ -70,11 +71,17 @@ CJK Unifonts in Ming face.
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README
%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO
+%dir %{umingdir}
+%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir}
+%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir}
+%{umingdir}/uming.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
%package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts
Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face.
Group:User Interface/X
-Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:cjkunifonts-ukai 0.2.20080216.1-16
%description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts
@@ -82,9 +89,7 @@ Obsoletes:cjkunifonts-ukai 0.2.200
CJK Unifonts in Kai face.
-%_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc
-
-# remaining ukai files
+%files -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/license
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt
@@ -95,6 +100,11 @@ CJK Unifonts in Kai face.
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README
%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO
+%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir}
+%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir}
+%{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files.
@@ -136,16 +146,43 @@ CJK Unifonts common files.
%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
-%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
-%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
-%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
-%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
-%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale
-%{catalogue}/%{name}
+%dir %{catalogue}
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-uming
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common
+Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font uming common files.
+Group:User Interface/X
+Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:cjkunifonts-common 0.2.20080216.1-16
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common
+%common_desc
+
+CJK Unifonts uming common files.
+
+%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%dir %{umingdir}
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.dir
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.scale
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common
+Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ukai common files.
+Group:User Interface/X
+Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|small...@get9.net |peter...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11 un-core-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: petersen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20955
Modified Files:
un-core-fonts.spec
Log Message:
fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795)
Index: un-core-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11/un-core-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 22:47:57 - 1.3
+++ un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 04:39:12 - 1.4
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Core 모ì: \
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.0.2
-Release: 0.7.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 0.8.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts
Summary(ko): íê¸ ìê¸ê¼´ Core 모ì
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ fi\
%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \
\
%dir %{fontdir} \
-%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf
+%{fontdir}%(echo %2).ttf
%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ìë°í
%un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ìë°íêµµì
@@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com - 1.0.2-0.8.080608
+- fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.0.2-0.7.080608
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 00:58:50 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
