from:"bugzilla\-daemon"

[Bug 32540] [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540


Holger Freyther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #3 from Holger Freyther   2009-12-15 01:30:34 
PST ---
Landed in r52143.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 32540] [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540


Eric Seidel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #44847|review? |review+
   Flag||




--- Comment #2 from Eric Seidel   2009-12-15 01:15:53 PST ---
(From update of attachment 44847)
OK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 32540] [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540


WebKit Review Bot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||webkit-bot-watch...@googleg
   ||roups.com,
   ||webkit.review@gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from WebKit Review Bot   2009-12-14 
22:51:01 PST ---
style-queue ran check-webkit-style on attachment 44847 without any errors.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 32540] New: [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540

   Summary: [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp
   Product: WebKit
   Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.5
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Platform
AssignedTo: webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: ze...@selfish.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com



Holger Freyther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #44847||review?
   Flag||


Created an attachment (id=44847)
 --> (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=44847)
Patch

Remove code that became unused due the change in r51758.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 23981] cairo doesn't respect TrueType gasp tables (and fonts look ugly as a result)

2009-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23981





--- Comment #5 from Nicholas Miell   2009-12-05 10:38:53 
PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > As an end user, I would prefer my fonts to render correctly instead of
> > incorrectly.
> 
> In any case there should be a way to override the font's gasp table. I
> personally favour seeing the few badly antialiased glyphs than seeing them all
> as bitmapped.
> 

Antialiasing the font anyway but lying to the bytecode about whether the AA is
being performed might be an interesting exercise. That can't be done at the
cairo level, though.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 23981] cairo doesn't respect TrueType gasp tables (and fonts look ugly as a result)

2009-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23981





--- Comment #4 from Ben Laenen   2009-12-05 03:56:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> As an end user, I would prefer my fonts to render correctly instead of
> incorrectly.

In any case there should be a way to override the font's gasp table. I
personally favour seeing the few badly antialiased glyphs than seeing them all
as bitmapped.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 23981] cairo doesn't respect TrueType gasp tables (and fonts look ugly as a result)

2009-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23981


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
   ||l...@redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 1281] Use a public identifier for fonts.conf

2009-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1281





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-11-18 
08:59:52 PST ---
Looking at the catalog spec I'm not so sure it needs a different identifier.
This question is probably best to ask on the xml list where people that write
reference books can answer

 http://www.xml.org/xml-dev/


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-10-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #203 from Kyle Huey   2009-10-30 21:28:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #202)
> Then this capability should be in SeaMonkey 2.0, which uses Gecko 1.9.1.4.  Is
> that correct?

Yes.  See http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1/changes
(Ctrl-F for "font-face")

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-10-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #202 from David E. Ross   2009-10-30 21:18:04 PDT 
---
Then this capability should be in SeaMonkey 2.0, which uses Gecko 1.9.1.4.  Is
that correct?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #201 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd   
2009-10-28 13:48:17 PDT ---
@font-face is in Gecko 1.9.1. Were you asking about something more specific?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #200 from David E. Ross   2009-10-28 13:41:34 PDT 
---
In which Gecko version has this been fixed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 421317] Thunderbird's default-font options shows only one member of the font family

2009-10-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421317


(:Aureliano Buendía)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||uly...@email.it
  Component|General |Preferences
  QAContact|gene...@thunderbird.bugs|preferen...@thunderbird.bug
   ||s




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 17311] Add a FC_LOCALE_LANG element

2009-10-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17311


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
   ||l...@redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0

2009-10-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||NOTOURBUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0

2009-10-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-10-22 
00:31:46 PST ---
The correct solution is probably to write a filter that adds the freetype info
to the font files, so they become normal unicody fonts any font libe can use.

Then the fc-query error can be modified to just point people to this filter.

I don't think Fedora should ship fonts that can not be used in fontconfig at
this stage. If they can't be fixed easily, I'd say just drop them.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0

2009-10-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613





--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH   2009-10-21 23:37:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Indeed, in the pattern you got after modifying that line, you see that charset
> is empty, that is, fontconfig could not recognize any character in the font 
> and
> hence the face is useless.  That's why fontconfig skips it.  Sounds like
> NOTABUG to me.  What kind of font is this?

It's a Japanese bitmap font. so fontconfig is just checking to skip the broken
BDF/PCF fonts highly likely not having any charset detected? I see - I don't
still see there are any useful cases not skipping non-BDF/PCF fonts that has no
charsets though.

However the assumption as described at that comment isn't necessarily true. 
Since it was available before we are moving to Unicode, most BDF/PCF fonts
available in the world should be encoded by "none". but just put glyphs with
the glyph IDs for the charset. in fact, it does in this case.

FreeType is (internally) capable to add any CMaps that is used to look up the
glyph ID from the character code though, no exported FT_CMap structure. if
adding the own CMap to transcode Unicode to the charset, it may works as
expected without modifying the application code.  but I guess fontconfig won't
support such fonts so far, because fontconfig and other rendering library
focuses on Unicode only and using the internal APIs doesn't make sense?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0

2009-10-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org




--- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-10-21 
15:53:40 PST ---
Reading the comment before that block of code suggests that the code is correct
in its current form:

/*
 * Skip over PCF fonts that have no encoded characters; they're
 * usually just Unicode fonts transcoded to some legacy encoding
 * FT forces us to approximate whether a font is a PCF font
 * or not by whether it has any BDF properties.  Try PIXEL_SIZE;
 * I don't know how to get a list of BDF properties on the font. -PL
 */
if (FcCharSetCount (cs) == 0)
{
#if HAVE_FT_GET_BDF_PROPERTY
if(FT_Get_BDF_Property(face, "PIXEL_SIZE", &prop) == 0)
goto bail2;
#endif
}


Indeed, in the pattern you got after modifying that line, you see that charset
is empty, that is, fontconfig could not recognize any character in the font and
hence the face is useless.  That's why fontconfig skips it.  Sounds like
NOTABUG to me.  What kind of font is this?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0

2009-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
   ||l...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|kei...@keithp.com   |freedesk...@behdad.org
  QAContact|freedesk...@behdad.org  |kei...@keithp.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22394] Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata

2009-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394


Ben Laenen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Comment #2 from Ben Laenen   2009-10-07 12:42:37 PST ---
Indeed, this is a duplicate of bug #15149.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15149 ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22394] Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata

2009-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394


Kim Xupei  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xu...@nm.ru




--- Comment #1 from Kim Xupei   2009-10-07 10:45:18 PST ---
I would say that this is the same issue as described in Bug# 15149.

It would be great to fix this, as it renders Dejavu Serif Condensed pretty much
unusable for Mac users.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103


Sylvain Pasche (:syp)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|513439  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103


Sylvain Pasche (:syp)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||513439




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions)

2009-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927


Bug 378927 depends on bug 508734, which changed state.

Bug 508734 Summary:  checkbox ugliness with high DPI
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508734

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property

2009-08-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512





--- Comment #61 from Magne Andersson   2009-08-18 12:54:28 
PDT ---
Will this make it in for 1.9.2, or is it for a later version?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions)

2009-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927


Dão Gottwald  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||508734




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-07-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Bastien Nocera  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera   2009-07-31 08:13:51 PST 
---
* freedesktop.org.xml.in: Add *.otf as a glob for
OpenType fonts so file managers use magic to check
for fonts vs. OO.o documents (Closes: #20854)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-28 
11:27:43 PST ---
Ok, actually setting FC_DEBUG=256 already does that.  Running on Droid Sans
Japanese shows that the FULLWIDTH YEN SIGN is the only char missing.  Removed
it from Japanese orth.  Feel free to patch rawhide until a release is out.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-07-27 
13:57:03 PST ---
It would be very nice if there was a tool that computed percentage of coverage
for all fontconfig-known languages (to detect almost-complete languages) and
that could then be used to list missing codepoints for a specific language
(once you've decided language XXX is almost complete and interesting and want
to know what remains to be done to complete it)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942





--- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-27 
11:46:26 PST ---
Humm, I/we should add a new tool to report which chars are missing in a font to
be marked with a lang.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 18724] RFE: font merging

2009-07-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-07-26 
11:49:56 PST ---
I tried it in the droid font package and no one complained, so it didn't break
anything, but I didn't have the time to test it extensively.

I do wish CJK users spent some of their copious bugzilla time on it


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 18724] RFE: font merging

2009-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org




--- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-25 
13:22:52 PST ---
Nicolas, did you try that?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-07-25 
12:50:33 PST ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=117372
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org




--- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-25 
12:42:32 PST ---
Where do I get Droid Sans Japanese?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22942] New: fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese

2009-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22942

   Summary: fc-query does not detect Japanese in Droid Sans Japanese
   Product: fontconfig
   Version: 2.7
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: fc-cat
AssignedTo: freedesk...@behdad.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
 QAContact: kei...@keithp.com
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


Droid Sans Japanese was clearly created to support Japanese, but fc-query does
not tag it with japanese lang so it won't be used by apps

 fc-query DroidSansJapanese.ttf 
Pattern has 20 elts (size 32)
family: "Droid Sans Japanese"(s)
familylang: "en"(s)
style: "Regular"(s)
stylelang: "en"(s)
fullname: "Droid Sans Japanese"(s)
fullnamelang: "en"(s)
slant: 0(i)(s)
weight: 80(i)(s)
width: 100(i)(s)
spacing: 90(i)(s)
foundry: "unknown"(s)
file: "DroidSansJapanese.ttf"(s)
index: 0(i)(s)
outline: FcTrue(s)
scalable: FcTrue(s)
charset: 0030: 103fffef  fffe  780f fffe
 787f
004e: 43f36f8b 9b462442 e3e0e82c 400a0004 db365f65 04497977 e3f0ecd7
08c56038
004f: 3403e602 35518000 7eabe0c8 98698200 2942a948 8060e803 ad93441c
4568c03a
0050: 8656aa60 02403f7a 14618388 21741020 07022021 40bc3000 4462a624
0a2060a8
0051: 85740217 9c840402 14157bfb 11e27f24 02efb665 20ff1f75 38403a70
676326c3
0052: 20924dd9 0fc946b0 4850bc98 a03f8638 88162388 52323e09 e3a422aa
c72c00dd
0053: 26e1a166 8f0a840b 559e27eb 89bbc241 85400014 08496361 8ad07f0c
05cfff3e
0054: a803ff1a 7b407a41 80024745 38eb0500 0005d851 710c9934 01000397
24046366
0055: 005180d0 430ac000 30c89071 5808 f7000e99 00415f80 941000b0
62800018
0056: 09d00240 01568200 08015004 05101d10 001084c1 10504025 4d8a410f
a60d4009
0057: 914cab19 098121c0 0003c485 8652 00080b04 0009041d 905c4849
1699
0058: 22200c65 24338412 47960c03 42250a04 90880028 4f084900 d3aa14a2
3e87d830
0059: 1f618604 41867ea4 05b3c390 211857a5 2a48241e 4a041128 161b0a40
88400d60
005a: 9502020a 10608221 04000243 80001444 0c04 7000 00c11a06
0c00024a
005b: 00401a00 40451404 bdb30029 052b0a78 bfa0bba9 8379407c e81d12fc
c5694bf6
005c: 044aeff6 ff022115 402bed63 0242d033 00131000 59ca1b02 02a0
2c41a703
005d: 8ff24880 0204 10055800 00489200 20011894 34805004 684c3200
68be49ea
005e: 2e42184c 21c9a820 80b050b9 ff7c001e 14e0849a 01e028c1 ac49870e
dddb130f
005f: 89fbbe1a 51a2a2e0 32ca5502 928b3e46 438f1dbf 32186703 33c03028
a9230811
0060: 3a65c000 04028fe3 86252c4e 00a1bf3d 8cd43a1a 317c06c9 950a00e0
0edb018b
0061: 8c20e34b f0101182 a7287d94 40fbc9ac 06534484 5a90 00013fc8
f5d40048
0062: ec577701 891dc442 49286b83 d2424109 59fe061d 3a221800 3b9fb7e4
c0eaf003
0063: 82021386 e4008980 10a1b200 0cc44b80 8944d309 48341faf 0c458259
0450420a
0064: 10c8a040 44503140 01004004 05408280 442c0108 1a056a30 051420a6
645690cf
0065: 3121 cbf09c18 63e2a120 01b5104c 9a83538c 3281b8b2 0a84987a
0c0233e7
0066: 9018d4cc 9070a1a1 e0048a1e 0451c3d4 21c2439a 53104844 36400292
f3bd0241
0067: e8f0ab09 a5d27dc0 d24bc242 d0afa43f 34a11aa0 03d88247 651bc452
c83ad294
0068: 40c8001c 33140e06 b21b614f c0d00088 a898a02a 166ba1c5 85b42e50
0604c08b
0069: 1e04f933 a251056e 76380400 73b8ec07 18324406 c8164081 63097c8a
aa042980
006a: ca9c1c24 27604e0e 83000990 81040046 10816011 0908540d cc0a000e
0c000500
006b: a0440430 6784008b 8a195288 8b18865e 41602e59 9cbe8c10 891c6861
00089800
006c: 089a8100 41900018 e4a14007 640d0505 0e4d310e ff0a4806 2aa81632
000b852e
006d: ca841800 696c0e20 1632 03905658 1a285120 11248000 432618e1
0eaa5d52
006e: ae280fa0 4500fa7b 89406408 c044c880 b1419005 24c48424 603a1a34
c1949000
006f: 003a8246 c106180d 99100022 1511e050 00824057 020a041a 8930004f
444ad813
0070: ed228a02 400510c0 01021000 31018808 02044600 0708f000 a2008900
2202
0071: 16100200 10400042 02605200 200052f4 82308510 42021100 80b54308
9a2070e1
0072: 08012040 fc653500 ab0419c1 62140286 00440087 02449085 0a85405c
33803207
0073: b8c00400 c0d0ce20 0080c030 0d250508 00400a90 080c0200 40006505
41026421
0074: 0268 847c0024 de22 40498619 4808 20010084 10108400
01c742cd
0075: d52a7038 1d8f1968 3e12be50 81d92ef5 2412cec4 732e0828 4b3424ac
d41d020c
0076: 80002a02 08110097 114411c4 7d451786 064949d9 87914000 d8c4254c
491444ba
0077: c8001b92 15800271 0c81 c200096a 40024800 ba493021 1c802080
1008e2ac
0078: 00341004 841400e1 2020 10149800 04aa70c2 54208688 04130c62
20109180
0079: 02064082 54001c40 e4e90

[Bug 16818] fontformat in match pattern is not respected?

2009-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16818


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org




--- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-22 
15:33:54 PST ---
SCALABLE seems to be more useful.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 419962] CSS font-weight:bolder support

2009-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419962





--- Comment #4 from John Daggett (:jtd)   2009-07-22 
01:30:11 PDT ---
Another testcase using downloadable fonts:

http://people.mozilla.org/~jdaggett/font-face/synthetic-variations.html

Expected result: normal column text is always rendered with the regular face,
italic with regular italic, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22338] Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22338





--- Comment #3 from James Cloos   2009-07-21 14:02:10 PST ---
> I can write a very small pango tool to do that, would it be helpful?

It would be most useful if that tool is designed to work on a given list
of font files.  (Checking all of the fonts of which fontconfig is aware
is then reduced to:

  fc-list -f '%{file}\n' | tr \\n \\0 | xargs -0 $LINT

where $LINT is the name of the new tool.)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22215] Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215





--- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski   2009-07-21 13:04:49 
PST ---
The bug you linked to was opened by me, as suggested by nim-nim. We were not
sure where it belonged.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22338] Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22338





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-07-21 
12:50:09 PST ---
I don't think anyone would mind if it's pango-level. The basic need is just a
font linting tool that anyone can run over a ttf/otf (and probably pcf/type1)
font to check what needs to be fixed to make apps happy. Right now WWS seems
the lowest-hanging fruit to fix, and easiest to sell to font authors (because
of Microsoft and Adobe stance on WWS).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22215] Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||NOTOURBUG




--- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-21 
12:35:57 PST ---
I'm pretty sure this is a pango bug, not fontconfig.  There are multiple bugs
open for it in pango's bugzilla.  See for example:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563862


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22338] Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22338


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||freedesk...@behdad.org




--- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-07-21 
12:33:52 PST ---
I can write a very small pango tool to do that, would it be helpful? The thing
is, fontconfig doesn't really know about WWS, whereas pango's entire font model
is based on it.  That's why pango has problem using fonts with arbitrary style
names while fontconfig has no problem reporting them.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Sylvain Pasche  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||503150




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Lars Gunther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||501902




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


John Daggett (:jtd)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #199 from John Daggett (:jtd)   2009-07-01 
16:44:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #192)
> I am searching for a bug about @font in SVG. Should one be opened.
> 
> Testcase: http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/593/webfonts_in_svg.svg
> 
> It works in Safari and Opera.

Lars, please file a new bug.  Be sure to note the platform you're testing on.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #198 from Lars Gunther   2009-07-01 11:11:18 
PDT ---
This was originally brought to my attention from by Erik Dahlström of Opera and
the SVG WG. He knows way much more about this than I do, and I will bring this
discussion to his attention. It is over my head, and I frankly do not have the
time to debug this right now.

The testcase at m8y.org does fail in Opera 10 beta.

(P.S. Sorry for my bad spelling. Absent minded while typing...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 410678] Linux Footprint

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410678


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
   ||at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 419962] CSS font-weight:bolder support

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419962


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
   ||at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #197 from b...@m8y.org  2009-07-01 08:35:02 PDT ---
Only a couple of the fonts are "failing"
Given this bug, if you scroll back through the many many comments, discusses
various bugs in true type fonts, and given the Tuffy font loads, I'm inclined
to suspect the fonts that don't load are prbably buggy.

BTW, Lars, did you try my http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase124.svg in Opera?
I'm about to file a bug against Webkit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #196 from Lars Gunther   2009-07-01 08:17:18 
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=386286)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=386286)
Sidia by side comparison of Minefiield (3.6 1 July) and Opera 10 beta of SVG
using @font and TTF fonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #195 from Lars Gunther   2009-07-01 08:14:15 
PDT ---
Re #193: The test case I was referring to is not about SVG fonts. It is about
using the CSS declaration @font-face in SVG files, like so:

@font-face { 
font-family: tuffy; 
src: url(ryanlerch_-_Tuffy_Bold.ttf) format("truetype");
}

Comment #192 was probably badly worded.

Re #194: The test case does indeed fail in Firefox 3.5 and Minefield. I will
attach a screen grab.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #194 from b...@m8y.org  2009-07-01 07:26:35 PDT ---
Lars, I'm a bit confused SVG fonts is unrelated to CSS fonts in SVG.
The testcase you linked to, the CSS font embedded in the SVG works just fine in
Firefox.

http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase124.svg
A simpler testcase, also tested data URI embedded font, does *NOT* work in
Opera 10 - I'm actually a bit puzzled by this.

It also fails in Safari 4.

It does, however, work just fine in Firefox. ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22579] New: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows apps

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22579

   Summary: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows
apps
   Product: DejaVu
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: General
AssignedTo: dejavu-b...@lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102911

« Every windows application that relies on the GDI call GetKerningPairs() will
fail with these problematic 
fonts. On the other hand the font's kern table is valid and OOo is right that
it trusts GDI to provide the 
kerning pairs. There are four ways to fix it:
1. fix Windows so that GetKerningPairs() ignores pairs it cannot handle
2. remove the problematic kernings from the DejaVu Serif fonts
3. make sure that every glyph mentioned in the kern table has a (proper or
dummy) unicode inside the 
baseplane
4. make OOo and all other Windows applications avoid GDI calls and parse all
font tables themselves »


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #193 from Vlado Valastiak (wladow, Mozilla.sk)   
2009-07-01 02:02:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #192)
> I am searching for a bug about @font in SVG. Should one be opened.

Bug 119490 P1 and blocker for Firefox.next

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #192 from Lars Gunther   2009-07-01 01:56:08 
PDT ---
I am searching for a bug about @font in SVG. Should one be opened.

Testcase: http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/593/webfonts_in_svg.svg

It works in Safari and Opera.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 13019] add fc-query

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019


Behdad Esfahbod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-06-24 
12:36:06 PST ---
I believe I've fixed this in 2.7.0.  Please reopen otherwise.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22394] New: Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394

   Summary: Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata
   Product: DejaVu
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Serif
AssignedTo: dejavu-b...@lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


Dejavu Serif Condensed Italic (lgc) files  have bad metadata, causing
fontconfig to think they are "Condensed" only, and inducing font selectors in
error


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22393] Make the font naming WWS-clean

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22393


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
   ||l...@redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-06-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


WulfTheSaxon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||wulf.bugm...@yahoo.com




--- Comment #191 from WulfTheSaxon   2009-06-19 
21:58:11 PDT ---
@Comment #189 and comment #190
The current behavior seems reasonable to me. It's not that much different than
alt text being shown before images load or an interlaced PNG/GIF. I wouldn't be
averse to an about:config pref, though. (On the author side, JavaScript should
be able to handle it.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-06-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #190 from Patrick Garies   2009-06-19 21:32:30 
PDT ---
@Comment #189:
I would hope that Mozilla doesn't follow the Safari approach. It's very bad
when you're on dial-up and have to sit there waiting for content just because
someone feels that function should follow form. (And, contrary to an apparently
popular misconception, not everyone in the world has broadband or even has it
available.)

For an example of what I mean, try looking at the examples at
 on a dial-up connection in
Safari. You sit there staring at a blank box for a long time (i.e., up to 10
seconds) while you wait for a very small amount of text to display. In terms of
rendering time, that's ridiculous. (And, to top it off, the fonts are less
readable than the standard system fonts.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-06-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #189 from Ian Kennedy   2009-06-19 
05:00:47 PDT ---
If you are downloading a font via @font-face Firefox will first render the text
with a standard font before downloading and then re-rendering the text using
the correct font. This is pretty ugly and doesn't happen in Safari, it would
also seem to be a waste of CPU time to render things twice.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22338] New: Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22338

   Summary: Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts
   Product: fontconfig
   Version: 2.6
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: library
AssignedTo: freedesk...@behdad.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
 QAContact: kei...@keithp.com
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


(it would be nice if there was a fc-query component in fontconfig BTW)

Since MS' WWS naming model makes stuff simpler for application authors, and
will be required in new window code, it would be mighty nice if fc-query warned
in its general report if a font file didn't respect this model.

Respecting the WWS model is declaring fields 21 and 22 or 16 in 17 in ways that
respect WWS (only weight, width and slant in sytles)

This way we can point FLOSS authors to fc-query as linting tools and promote
font naming our apps can handle easily


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22268] New: [RFE] Add Phœnician support

2009-06-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22268

   Summary: [RFE] Add Phœnician support
   Product: DejaVu
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: General
AssignedTo: dejavu-b...@lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


See

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22215] Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications

2009-06-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215





--- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski   2009-06-10 12:50:29 
PST ---
For reference, this is on an up-to-date Fedora 10 x86_64, with
fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10. I did dome testing with Fedora 11, but unfortunately
the situation did not seem to have improved.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 22215] New: Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications

2009-06-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215

   Summary: Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications
   Product: fontconfig
   Version: 2.6
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: library
AssignedTo: kei...@keithp.com
ReportedBy: beleg...@gmail.com
 QAContact: freedesk...@behdad.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com


Originally reported in Red Hat bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=466678
Beginning with the release of Fedora 7 in May 2007, fonts belonging to Arial
Narrow group began to be merged with ordinary Arial - there was no longer a
separate Arial Narrow family in the font selector, only Arial. The narrow
styles were supposed to be added to the Arial family, but the problem is that
it is impossible to select the Narrow glyphs afterwards. With LANG=C, the
situation is the least broken:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347200
Regular narrow can be selected, but narrow italic, narrow bold and narrow bold
italic cannot. With LANG=pl_PL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320146
even narrow regular is gone. Also, please note that the styles are displayed in
pretty random languages.
fc-list seems to list all eight styles fine:
$ fc-list | grep Arial | sort
Arial
Black:style=Normalny,Normal,obyčejné,Standard,Κανονικά,Regular,Normaali,Normál,Normale,Standaard,Обычный,Normálne,Navadno,Arrunta
Arial,Arial
Narrow:style=Kursywa,Narrow,Cursiva,kurzíva,kursiv,Πλάγια,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,Dőlt,Corsivo,Cursief,Itálico,Курсив,İtalik,Poševno,Etzana
Arial,Arial
Narrow:style=Normalny,Narrow,Normal,obyčejné,Standard,Κανονικά,Regular,Normaali,Normál,Normale,Standaard,Обычный,Normálne,Navadno,Arrunta
Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Narrow,Negreta cursiva,tučné
kurzíva,fed kursiv,Fett Kursiv,Έντονα Πλάγια,Bold Italic,Negrita
Cursiva,Lihavoitu Kursivoi,Gras Italique,Félkövér dőlt,Grassetto
Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet Kursiv,Negrito Itálico,Полужирный
Курсив,Tučná kurzíva,Fet Kursiv,Kalın İtalik,Krepko poševno,Lodi
etzana
Arial,Arial
Narrow:style=Pogrubiony,Narrow,Negreta,tučné,fed,Fett,Έντονα,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,Félkövér,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,Полужирный,Fet,Kalın,Krepko,Lodia
Arial:style=Kursywa,Cursiva,kurzíva,kursiv,Πλάγια,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,Dőlt,Corsivo,Cursief,Itálico,Курсив,İtalik,Poševno,nghiêng,Etzana
Arial:style=Normalny,Normal,obyčejné,Standard,Κανονικά,Regular,Normaali,Normál,Normale,Standaard,Обычный,Normálne,Navadno,thường,Arrunta
Arial:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Negreta cursiva,tučné kurzíva,fed kursiv,Fett
Kursiv,Έντονα Πλάγια,Bold Italic,Negrita Cursiva,Lihavoitu
Kursivoi,Gras Italique,Félkövér dőlt,Grassetto Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet
Kursiv,Negrito Itálico,Полужирный Курсив,Tučná kurzíva,Fet
Kursiv,Kalın İtalik,Krepko poševno,nghiêng đậm,Lodi etzana
Arial:style=Pogrubiony,Negreta,tučné,fed,Fett,Έντονα,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,Félkövér,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,Полужирный,Fet,Kalın,Krepko,đậm,Lodia

The only applications that seem to be able to distinguish between the narrow
glyphs are firefox and KDE's font installer.
Please let me know if I can provide any other information.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Matthias Clasen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|NOTOURBUG   |




--- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen   2009-06-08 08:08:43 
PST ---
Bastien, 

we need to add a glob for *.otf to the font mime type too, since the current
agreed-on matching algorithm only looks at magic to disambiguate if there is a
glob conflict.

I tested locally that adding the glob makes otf fonts show up correctly in
nautilus.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #188 from philippe   2009-05-18 17:21:20 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #187)
> The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some 
> point
> fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong
> with it?
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/brohuv

The test case uses Vera Serif bold, which seems to have bad checksums. See bug
483459.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #187 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd   
2009-05-18 09:01:14 PDT ---
The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point
fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong
with it?

http://tinyurl.com/brohuv

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103





--- Comment #93 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 
  2009-05-15 04:09:57 PDT ---
Filed bug 493202 on comment #53.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103





--- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 
  2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT ---
Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as originally reported.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)

2009-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103





--- Comment #91 from Josh Lee   2009-05-05 21:26:11 PDT ---
Just curious, what's the status of this bug? With newer versions of Windows
exposing the font scaling setting more prominently to the user, this bug might
see more visibility, and it's silly to consider manually overriding
laout.css.dpi to be a proper fix.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


philippe  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@l-c-n.com




--- Comment #186 from philippe   2009-05-01 07:45:51 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #185)
> Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04:
> 
> In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text
> renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box),
> after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads.
> 
> I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a 
> font
> with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour?
That is bug 489445, that should land on gecko 1.9.1 (Fx 3.5b) soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #185 from Greg K Nicholson [:gkn]   2009-05-01 
07:40:28 PDT ---
Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04:

In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text
renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box),
after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads.

I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a font
with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Bastien Nocera  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||NOTOURBUG




--- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera   2009-05-01 05:00:31 PST 
---
It is a bug in the file managers. File a bug against them.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854





--- Comment #5 from Brian Burger   2009-05-01 03:22:15 
PST ---
Copypasta from one of my comments on the Launchpad bug:

This is not a problem with the current Gnome Font Viewer, as is easily proven:
1. Find an OTF font file on your system.
2. If you just double-click on it, OpenOffice attempts to open it, and fails.
2. Right-click the OTF, go Open With -> Open With Other Application -> Font
Viewer
3. Font Viewer opens and displays the OTF preview just as it should, exactly
like a TTF is shown.

So I'm not sure how this bug can be Invalid against all three of the targets
currently listed. It's should be valid against at least one, if not all.

(The above was all done on Ubuntu 9.04)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Brian Burger  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||blurdes...@gmail.com
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|NOTOURBUG   |




--- Comment #4 from Brian Burger   2009-05-01 03:19:32 
PST ---
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/338682

Over on Launchpad, Seb Bacher is saying this isn't a Nautilus/file-handling
bug.

Over here, it's not a mime-type bug.

It's got to be one or the other. So which is it?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197


Werner Lemberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #7 from Werner Lemberg   2009-04-27 10:43:15 PST ---
This is now fixed in the FreeType git repository.  Please test.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Bastien Nocera  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||seb...@ubuntu.com




--- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera   2009-04-20 09:51:59 PST 
---
*** Bug 20603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Bastien Nocera  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||NOTOURBUG




--- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera   2009-04-20 09:31:42 PST 
---
All the mime-types associated with *.otf have magic data associated, so
front-ends should be able to detect which is which by using magic in case of
conflict.

Adding weight for one or the other would cause more problems than it would
solve. So file a bug against the applications that fail to detect the files
correctly instead.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-04-16 
00:29:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Behdad, it's not clear to me what you mean with `all input ASCII glyphs
> have the same width'.

I mean, if the unhinted, design width, of the ASCII digit glyphs are all the
same, the autohinter should ensure that their hinted width is also the same.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #5 from Werner Lemberg   2009-04-15 23:28:20 PST ---
Behdad, it's not clear to me what you mean with `all input ASCII glyphs
have the same width'.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod   2009-04-15 
23:21:01 PST ---
The autohinter already has lots of heuristics based on individual Latin
characters.  I'd rather it also handles the issue at hand (that is, if all
input ASCII glyphs have the same width, they should be hinted to have the same
output width also).  There is no place for this kind of tweak higher in the
stack really.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #3 from Werner Lemberg   2009-04-15 22:15:21 PST ---
It's completely irrelevant whether the unhinted numerals have the same width
or not.  In a TrueType font, the hinting instructions modify the advance width
as needed, and this information is not available to the autohinter.

There are two possibilities: Either FreeType gets an option for the autohinting
module to instruct that some glyphs (numerals and probably some others too)
should have the same width, or the library which uses FreeType does this.  IMHO
it should be the latter.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #2 from whyoh   2009-04-15 09:20:40 PST ---
thanks for the quick response.

hmm.  can't the library tell that the numerals are all the same width in the
unhinted font?

if so then might there be an option or rule to tell the autohinter: "numerals
are special - don't hint them (much) if they're all the same width in this
font"?

i think that would be enough for me.  but i'm a little hesitant about where (if
at all) it's appropriate to assert the "specialness" of numerals vs hinting.

and what should we say when everyone starts raising "my numerals are fuzzy!!"
bugs?  ;-)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197





--- Comment #1 from Werner Lemberg   2009-04-15 09:02:01 PST ---
Reading the redhat bug description I see that you are not using the TT hinter.

With the autohinter I fear this problem is unavoidable.  It probably has to
be handled on a level higher than FreeType: If you pass a font to the library,
the autohinter simply doesn't know that the digits 0-9 are intended to have the
same width.  As you certainly aware there are fonts containing `old digits'
which intentionally have different widths.

I can imagine that there is an option to `fontconfig' which forces the
same width to all digits if the autohinter is used (probably using the average
value of all digit widths).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 21197] New: hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197

   Summary: hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of
dejavu sans font
   Product: freetype
   Version: unspecified
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: trivial
  Priority: medium
 Component: general
AssignedTo: w...@gnu.org
ReportedBy: c...@btinternet.com
CC: freedesk...@behdad.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-
l...@redhat.com


using the default dejavu sans font on fedora 11 snap1 numerals aren't all the
same width when 'full' or 'medium' hinting is enabled.  this leads to a
'jiggling text' effect on ticking clocks.

versions are:
freetype-2.3.9-3.fc11.i586
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch

for more details see redhat bug 495820


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-04-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Bug 70132 depends on bug 486559, which changed state.

Bug 486559 Summary: Eldiablo.ttf font doesn't work through @font-face
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486559

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Gabriele Best  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||486559




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 20854] OTF is a font format

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854


Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-
   ||l...@redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-03-25 
01:52:20 PST ---
(for example I count ~ 30 packages including one or many OTF font files in
Fedora, and none including ODF OTF files)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #184 from David Baron [:dbaron]   2009-03-14 
19:14:02 PDT ---
I filed the checksum issue as bug 483459.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #183 from Bill Gianopoulos   2009-03-11 16:17:24 PDT 
---
(In reply to comment #182)
> (In reply to comment #181)
> 
> > WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file
> > /home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp,
> > line 809
> 
> Too bad!! I just did some research on the vera fonts. Bitstream donated them 
> to
> open source through the gnome foundation. The four font files are broken from
> the source...
> 
> That means there are no correct files to be found, and also that almost every
> linux installation have the faulty files, and of course this also means that
> Gecko needs to render fonts even with invalid checksum as in the vera font
> case, since these broken fonts render fine with Safari for windows for 
> example.
> 
> The files VeraBd.ttf, VeraIt.ttf, VeraSe.ttf, VeraSeBd.ttf all have checksum
> error
> in their "head" table.
Wern''t you asked in comment 180 to stop spamming this bug and to file a new
bug on this issue?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #182 from Stellan Klebom   2009-03-11 16:10:12 
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #181)

> WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file
> /home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp,
> line 809

Too bad!! I just did some research on the vera fonts. Bitstream donated them to
open source through the gnome foundation. The four font files are broken from
the source...

That means there are no correct files to be found, and also that almost every
linux installation have the faulty files, and of course this also means that
Gecko needs to render fonts even with invalid checksum as in the vera font
case, since these broken fonts render fine with Safari for windows for example.

The files VeraBd.ttf, VeraIt.ttf, VeraSe.ttf, VeraSeBd.ttf all have checksum
error
in their "head" table.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #181 from David Baron [:dbaron]   2009-03-11 
14:56:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #173)
> It seems like some ttf-files won't work.
> See my test case http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera2.html .
> 
> This testcase uses all 10 font files in the Bitstream Vera font family. 
> Firefox
> fails to load 4 of them. As far as I know they are all standard true type
> fonts.

When I load this testcase in a DEBUG build, I see 4 occurrences of this warning
printed to the console:

WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file
/home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp,
line 809

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #180 from Ryan VanderMeulen   2009-03-11 13:35:03 
PDT ---
This is almost certainly fodder for a new bug rather than posting more messages
to this one and subjecting everyone CCed to it to this. Please file a new one
and mark it as blocking this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #179 from Stellan Klebom   2009-03-11 13:05:48 
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #176)
> According to the error console, there are errors occurring parsing your HTML,
> with invalid values specified for several things.  You may want to check that.

My test cases all validate for HTML 4.01 strict and CSS3.

The messages you are referring to are CSS warnings for
http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera.html
not for
http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera2.html
that I asked you about.

In the "vera2" case Shiretoko only loads 6 out of 10 font files in windows
version.

In the "vera" case Shiretoko is generating CSS-warnings for valid CSS3. That's
because full standard isn't implemented.

For example "font-weight: all" or "font-style: all" etc is unsupported by
Gecko.

Gecko also don't regonize a list of values per spec. e.i. "font-style: oblique,
italic" or "font-weight: 400, 500, 600".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #178 from Jeff Walden   2009-03-11 01:08:12 
PDT ---
http://silver.warwickcompsoc.co.uk/mozilla/misc/nserror?0x805303f4 sez that's
NS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI.  A glance at nsCSSScanner::NextURL doesn't show anything
odd, so I suspect the code to create a URL from the resulting string doesn't
like the unescaped character, maybe.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #177 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt)   2009-03-11 
00:20:42 PDT ---
When I try
https://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2935/=webfont-sample.html ,
nsFontFaceLoader::OnStreamComplete for
http://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf gets called
with aStatus=0x805303f4 (a failure that I don't recognize).  mCanceled is 1 in
nsHttpChannel::OnStopRequest.

I wonder whether
url("https://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf";) or
url("/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf") may work better, but I don't know.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #176 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd   
2009-03-10 21:53:09 PDT ---
According to the error console, there are errors occurring parsing your HTML,
with invalid values specified for several things.  You may want to check that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 458169] [...@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux

2009-03-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||480098




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

[Bug 70132] Support @font-face

2009-03-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132





--- Comment #175 from Stellan Klebom   2009-03-10 18:56:55 
PDT ---
Well I'm at the latest Shiretoko too...

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090310
Shiretoko/3.1b4pre

Slightly strange? I tried with a fresh empty prfoile just in case. Same result.

What did you see with my vera2 testcase?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

1 2 3 4 5 >

1 - 100 of 440 matches

Mail list logo