[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-11-30 17:35:28 EDT --- Is the relicensed CMAP/AGLFN data identical to the data inside this code? At a minimum, a bug should be opened with upstream QT (and freetype) to have their local copies updated to the newer licensed versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-09-26 11:09:55 EDT --- Oh, and did you scan the source package or the binary package? The source package includes copies of some third-party libraries like freetype which we don't ship (we build Qt against the system freetype). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-09-26 12:03:41 EDT --- confirmed hits on src/3rdparty/freetype only, which we don't use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-26 12:13:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of the offending files in the specific package Well for reports like http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-September/msg5.html it just can't be done there is too much data collected, I tried to post it the first time and the lists refused to let the attached data pass (too big) However it is always possible to ask me in PM for the data, or to run the test yourself. It takes a simple bog-standard repo as argument, so if you don't want to wait for a full rawhide run, just put the packages you're interested in a dir, run createrepo on it, and point repo-font-audit there (the current version only understands http:// and ftp:// URIs, I'm testing a version that works with file:// too. Will probably publish it today) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-09-26 12:06:23 EDT --- I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a problem for Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as freetype has it fixed). There's also a hit for afii64937 inside src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess it'll also need to show up somewhere in supporting documentation to really comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-09-26 12:16:27 EDT --- That said, I'm not sure whether that list in qfontsubset.cpp is copyrightable at all, especially given that it is not even presented in the same format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-26 12:18:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a problem for Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as freetype has it fixed). Yes. I'm also thinking of pointing Spot to this mess, as those files seems duplicated pretty much everywhere, and this is the kind of cleanup op he did before There's also a hit for afii64937 inside src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess it'll also need to show up somewhere in supporting documentation to really comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.) I suppose the clean solution would be to make it process a canonical copy of the data at build time (that will make the licensing appear in rpm deps checks, and make sure QT uses the same values as others). Dunno about the licensing patch. To be honest my primary interest is to make sure all our software uses the same values, and the legal angle is just here to make people interested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-26 11:38:51 EDT --- At this stage, I just relied on the google searches pabs linked to So maybe they're not accurate in this case -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-26 11:41:10 EDT --- The keywords he used are: — aglfn.txt — aglfn13.txt — glyphlist.txt — afii64937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-09-26 10:47:44 EDT --- As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of the offending files in the specific package. You obviously must have scanned the packages for offending files to know they're affected, so it shouldn't be too hard to come up with such a list and it'd make it much easier to fix the issue and to be sure we fixed it completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-26 17:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of the offending files in the specific package. If you see a way to improve this http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-September/msg00031.html while staying within list limitations (size limit, wrapping, plain text) please say how -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
