[Bug 249644] fc-cache does not cache newly installed fonts if /usr/share/fonts has newer modtime
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fc-cache does not cache newly installed fonts if /usr/share/fonts has newer modtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-06 22:02 EST --- fontconfig-2.5.0 has been in rawhide for a good while now, so guess this can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
can fonts use /etc/fonts/conf.avail ?
I see all the files in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ on my box are owned by fontconfig. Is it allowed for font packages to put config files there, or is it reserved only for fontconfig? Jens ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: can fonts use /etc/fonts/conf.avail ?
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 12:51 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote: I see all the files in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ on my box are owned by fontconfig. Is it allowed for font packages to put config files there, or is it reserved only for fontconfig? I think it's Ok. I don't see any reason not to. Jens -- behdad http://behdad.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
