[Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 14:50:12 EDT --- $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.9lJtQ1 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x775ce700 (LWP 16870)] [New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16873)] [New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16874)] [New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16877)] [New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16878)] [New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16879)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3fa5950 (LWP 16880)] [New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16881)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)] [New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16884)] Detaching after fork from child process 16885. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 13 nov. 2008 20:40:38 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.init(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.init(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.init(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.init(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.init(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.init(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.init(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.init(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at
[Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Andy Lindeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:00:10 EDT --- After many more tests it seems the stack is not relevant — I get it both when firefow works and when it crashes However I've found out that disabling the organise status bar firefox extensions reliably made things work. Thus I suppose the openjdk plugin does something organise status bar really does not like (I've been running this extension for months on rawhide without any problem before I tried those pages with openjdk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT --- (22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine (22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed (22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need (22:32:32) nim-nim: alias (22:32:32) nim-nim: family[fontname]/family (22:32:32) nim-nim: default (22:32:32) nim-nim: family[genericname]/family (22:32:32) nim-nim: /default (22:32:32) nim-nim: /alias (22:32:59) nim-nim: with [fontname]=HanaMin (22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT --- Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up! Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 471538] New: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q fontfoge fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Open some .otf file Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open FontForge 2. Select some of attached .otf files. Actual results: FontForge Abort Expected results: Continue Running Additional info: Boisik.otf : http://mitek.webpark.cz/boisik/ cmunvi.otf : ftp://canopus.iacp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/cm_unicode/cm-unicode-0.6.3a-otf.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #2 from Víctor Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 01:52:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323540) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323540) Problematic OTF File 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #1 from Víctor Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 01:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323539) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323539) Problematic OTF File 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 471542] New: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471542 Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Upstream lately added support for all sorts of nifty libraries, and our fontforge package needs to be tweaked to accomodate them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Font Questions
Is there any difference between using iso and ISO in font names? How can I tell whether font ISO-8859-1 is installed or not? If iso-8859-1 is not installed (which seems to be the case since email specifying that iso-8859-1 is used do not display all character codes as glyphs (in mutt Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17) ) ), from where do I download the font and how do I install it. Thanks Very Much. ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Font Questions
Le Jeu 13 novembre 2008 15:26, Dave Feustel a écrit : Is there any difference between using iso and ISO in font names? How can I tell whether font ISO-8859-1 is installed or not? ISO-8859-1 is not a font it's an encoding. Depending on the software, different font systems will be used to display text in this encoding : 1. non-X console : kbd fonts 2. legacy X application : so-called X core fonts 3. anything relatively recent (CLI app in GUI terminal, GUI app) : fontconfig You seem to be in case 1 or 2. I seriously advice moving to 3 if you don't want to spend a lot of time fighting legacy systems few people maintain nowadays. -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
