rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10728/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 22 Feb 2009 10:47:08 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:26:11 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600 +apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235377546 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel import.log,1.4,1.5
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11072/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 22 Feb 2009 10:51:14 - 1.4 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:27:24 - 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229540973 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233345796 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235299849 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235377618 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11328/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:28:35 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-12.fc11.src.rpm:1229541266 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-14_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-14.fc11.src.rpm:1232062969 +bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-15_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-15.fc11.src.rpm:1235377691 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel import.log,1.12,1.13
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11923/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- import.log 8 Feb 2009 09:12:06 - 1.12 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:29:58 - 1.13 @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001 dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011 dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218 +dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:123533 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontpackages/devel import.log,1.11,1.12
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12915/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- import.log 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 - 1.11 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:32:21 - 1.12 @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006 fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636 +fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235377920 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13197/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:25:25 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:33:30 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215804309 gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229541904 +gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235377988 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13498/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:27:14 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:34:43 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215807827 gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542008 +gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378061 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13836/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:28:57 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:35:54 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215808097 gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229542115 +gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235378131 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14248/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:30:55 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:37:07 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215808489 gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542223 +gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378203 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14625/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:32:35 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:38:19 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215808757 gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229542332 +gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1235378277 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14901/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:34:18 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:39:29 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809112 gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229542434 +gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235378349 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15618/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:37:36 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:42:22 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809267 gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542633 +gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378495 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15961/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:39:21 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:43:32 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215850441 gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229542735 +gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378590 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16578/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:42:45 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:46:04 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216755659 gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229542939 +gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378734 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16859/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:44:27 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:47:19 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3_fc10:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809328 gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-5_fc11:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-5.fc11.src.rpm:1229543045 +gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-6_fc11:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235378814 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17113/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:46:11 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:48:31 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216483310 gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229543149 +gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:123537 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 08:49:08 + 2009 --- *** Issue 99482 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17378/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 22 Feb 2009 10:42:06 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:49:44 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809363 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229543250 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235299287 +gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235378962 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17624/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:49:50 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:50:54 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216482262 gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229543362 +gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235379032 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18099/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:53:31 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:53:19 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809463 gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229543577 +gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235379178 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18559/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:57:03 - 1.2 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:55:42 - 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809664 gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-11.fc11.src.rpm:1229543800 +gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-12_fc11:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-12.fc11.src.rpm:1235379320 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18817/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:57:19 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232144541 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-4_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233428004 +google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-5_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235379417 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19278/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 - 1.1 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:59:47 - 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ sil-andika-fonts-1_0-4_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233039407 +sil-andika-fonts-1_0-5_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235379566 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19671/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.1 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 - 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 +sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/xgridfit/devel import.log,1.4,1.5 xgridfit.spec,1.10,1.11
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20719/devel
Modified Files:
import.log xgridfit.spec
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- import.log 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 - 1.4
+++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:03:38 - 1.5
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397
xgridfit-1_17-1_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233346359
xgridfit-1_17-2_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-2.a.fc11.src.rpm:1234826759
+xgridfit-1_17-3_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-3.a.fc11.src.rpm:1235379796
Index: xgridfit.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- xgridfit.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 - 1.10
+++ xgridfit.spec 23 Feb 2009 09:03:39 - 1.11
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name:xgridfit
Version: 1.17
-Release: 2.a%{?dist}
+Release: 3.a%{?dist}
Summary: Font hinting tool
# This is where we drop fontforge
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 1.17-3.a
+â global-ization
+
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.17-2.a
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21004/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 20:00:45 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:04:54 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3_fc10:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809853 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-1_fc10:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220274279 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-3_fc11:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229544015 +yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-4_fc11:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235379872 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.122, 1.123
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21733/devel
Modified Files:
fontconfig.spec
Added Files:
import.log
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
fontconfig-2_6_97-4_g945d6a4_fc11:HEAD:fontconfig-2.6.97-4.g945d6a4.fc11.src.rpm:1235380189
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.122
retrieving revision 1.123
diff -u -r1.122 -r1.123
--- fontconfig.spec 16 Feb 2009 11:34:37 - 1.122
+++ fontconfig.spec 23 Feb 2009 09:10:14 - 1.123
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%define freetype_version 2.1.4
+%global freetype_version 2.1.4
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
Version: 2.6.97
-Release: 3.g945d6a4%{?dist}
+Release: 4.g945d6a4%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -135,6 +135,10 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
+- 2.6.97-4.g945d6a4
+â global-ization
+
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4
- Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font().
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge.spec,1.40,1.41 import.log,1.1,1.2
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22446/devel
Modified Files:
fontforge.spec import.log
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild
Index: fontforge.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41
--- fontforge.spec 21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 - 1.40
+++ fontforge.spec 23 Feb 2009 09:15:19 - 1.41
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1))}
+%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1))}
-%define docs_version 20081224
-%define gettext_package FontForge
+%global docs_version 20081224
+%global gettext_package FontForge
Name: fontforge
Version:20081224
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Outline and bitmap font editor
Group: Applications/Publishing
@@ -142,6 +142,10 @@
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
+- 20081224-2
+â global-ization
+
* Fri Feb 20 2009 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com - 20081224-1
- Upgrade to 20081224
- Enable python bindings
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log 8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 - 1.1
+++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:15:19 - 1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
fontforge-20080927-1_fc10:HEAD:fontforge-20080927-1.fc10.src.rpm:1226141478
+fontforge-20081224-2_fc11:HEAD:fontforge-20081224-2.fc11.src.rpm:1235380490
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/stix-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20449/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: F11 mass rebuild Index: import.log === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 - 1.3 +++ import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:02:21 - 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ stix-fonts-0_9-7_fc10:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809789 stix-fonts-0_9-9_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229543904 stix-fonts-0_9-10_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-10.fc11.src.rpm:1232141192 +stix-fonts-0_9-11_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235379717 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l ||aposte.net) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 05:27:55 EDT --- Hi Minto, Thank you for looking at it. You still have several leftovers from the previous templates (defines for common directories, etc). I suggest you do a diff with the latest /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec in fontpackages-devel and try to reduce the delta. Fontpackages 1.20 should be queued for all releases but if it's not hit a mirror next to you yet you can pull it directly from koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288 Also, please rename your package to sil-padauk-fonts as has already be done for the other SIL fonts. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||486977 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 09:57:39 EDT --- From #11, I've done 1, 2, 5 and 6. I could use assistance with 3, 4, 7 and 8, so I'll submit a review for the new package and set it blocking this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 10:32:36 EDT --- 3. is mostly just filling the right template in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ The feedback I have so far from the people who looked at them is that it was harder to decide to look at them than actually use them. Can't do a lot for the first part. 4. is mostly cosmetic For 7 8 I'd be happy to clarify the doc or templates if you could tell me what you don't understand (very frustrating to write help and not know what part is wrong) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 10:40:47 EDT --- Well, for 7, do I need a compat- package? I don't think I do. For 8, I already use -n in the %_font_pkg macro, is that sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 10:53:26 EDT --- You need a compat package if you want to provide an upgrade path for users of the current package that upgrades to the full font set. Having the main package require the other packages is a no-go, it kills modularity For 8 if you do not use -n in %package and %description as documented in the templates I'd be surprised if it built at all. That still does not tell me what I should change in the doc to avoid the next packager making the same mistakes :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 11:12:02 EDT --- How does a compat subpackage doing the same thing *not* kill modularity? 8: But it does. I'll have another look at the templates. As far as doc changes, maybe it's just me, but I find concrete examples to be more illuminating that templates. Could just be my learning style, but I had more luck understanding what needed to be done (or so I thought) by looking at the already-converted specs that at the templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 12:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) How does a compat subpackage doing the same thing *not* kill modularity? Because nothing depends on the compat package, it can be removed, and new installes do not even see it exists 8: But it does. I'll have another look at the templates. As far as doc changes, maybe it's just me, but I find concrete examples to be more illuminating that templates. Could just be my learning style, but I had more luck understanding what needed to be done (or so I thought) by looking at the already-converted specs that at the templates. The problem with concrete example is a pure package is rather uncommon and blind cut pasting results in copying quirks. But if you want to look at concrete converted packages, certainly there is no lack of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 12:18:18 EDT --- repoquery gives me: moodle-0:1.9.4-1.fc10.noarch cinepaint-0:0.22.1-10.fc10.i386 plplot-0:5.9.0-2.svn8752.fc10.i386 gramps-0:2.2.10-1.fc9.noarch ftgl-utils-0:2.1.2-8.fc9.i386 slingshot-0:0.8.1p-1.fc8.noarch gramps-0:3.0.4-1.fc10.noarch cinepaint-0:0.22.1-7.fc9.i386 That need freefont. Moodle and slingshot are mine. Would it not be better to simply pull the band-aid off and fix all these right after freefontgnu-free-fonts, and be done with it? I wasn't suggesting copy/pasting, just reading for guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state. Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 13:41:09 EDT --- The point of a compat package is to kill the old name completely so packages depending on it adapt to the new font name now. I think that's the same thing you mean as pulling the band-aid (also the packagers of those should seriously consider why they depend on freefont and not one of our default fonts) But first, freefont packaging need to be fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state. Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 13:37:54 EDT --- dejavu-fonts-sans existed before FPC engaged in naming bikesheding. Since FPC changed the rules just before F11 alpha it was kept as provides to avoid alpha breakage. However, it will be gone in this evening's rawhide Behdad is probably the one you want to talk to if you want to know what will trigger font autoinstall in F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 13:50:39 EDT --- Exactly! We both want that, I think, but what I'm getting at is, why is forcing packages to move from freefont to freefont-compat to gnu-free-fonts better than forcing packages to go from freefont to gnu-free-fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 14:05:50 EDT --- IIRC freefont has several font families inside So package deps need to move from freefont to gnu-free-foo1-fonts, gnu-free-foo2-fonts, etc And users need to be upgraded from freefont to gnu-free-fonts-compat that requires gnu-free-foo1-fonts, gnu-free-foo2-fonts A gnu-free-fonts package should never exist in the system or people will start adding deps on it I've tried to explain this in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Can.27t_I_use_my_old_package_name_instead_of_a_-compat_subpackage.3F But I've clearly failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-02-23 14:15:01 EDT --- So instead of main package, subpackages for font families and a compat package, it's just the subpackages for font families and a compat package, so that there is not an RPM that matches the name of the SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-23 14:25:11 EDT --- That way the only packages ending in -fonts in the repo are packages that actually contain font files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #7 from Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 15:51:00 EDT --- shrug.. I take it I just need to change that requires definition to match the naming. -jefbikesheds are a poor analogy where I live...sleddog doghouses..i can relate tospaleta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel efont-unicode-bdf.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel
In directory
cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30615/efont-unicode-bdf/devel
Modified Files:
efont-unicode-bdf.spec
Log Message:
Mass rebuild, etc part 2
Index: efont-unicode-bdf.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel/efont-unicode-bdf.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- efont-unicode-bdf.spec 18 Aug 2007 07:14:27 - 1.3
+++ efont-unicode-bdf.spec 23 Feb 2009 22:10:59 - 1.4
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: %{name}
Version:0.4.2
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@
%{catalogdir}/fonts-%{name}
%changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.4.2-8
+- F-11: Mass rebuild
+
* Sat Aug 18 2007 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.4.2-7
- Drop X related dependency completely, along with chkfontpath drop
(related to #252268, #252275)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dair...@users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mcmons...@o2.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ta...@redhat.com, ryo-dair...@users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6 I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing (SCIM + Anthy) and displaying. The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and readable fonts. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Just try displaying any Japanese text. This is the update, that probably changed fonts: Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional ]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages vlgothic-fonts.noarch20090204-2.fc10 installed vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 installed Available Packages VLGothic-fonts.noarch20081029-1.fc10 updates VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state. Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-02-23 17:30:12 EDT --- I hope it's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-02-23 17:31:07 EDT --- I hope it's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state. Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 |CVE-2006-3467 freetype: |freetype: integer overflow |integer overflow |vulnerability due to|vulnerability due to |incomplete fix for |incomplete fix for |CVE-2006-1861 |CVE-2006-1861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487070] New: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861 Alias: CVE-2006-3467 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861 Product: Security Response Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-20 06-3467 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: impact=moderate,source=rehdat,reported=20060710,public =20060718 Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: vulnerability AssignedTo: security-response-t...@redhat.com ReportedBy: vda...@redhat.com CC: a...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Other Target Release: --- Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2006-3467 to the following vulnerability: Name: CVE-2006-3467 URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3467 Assigned: 20060710 Reference: URL: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/451426/100/200/threaded Reference: MISC: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190593 Integer overflow in FreeType before 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCF file, as demonstrated by the Red Hat bad1.pcf test file, due to a partial fix of CVE-2006-1861. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel abyssinica-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21542
Modified Files:
abyssinica-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: abyssinica-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel/abyssinica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- abyssinica-fonts.spec 21 Dec 2008 11:13:12 - 1.3
+++ abyssinica-fonts.spec 23 Feb 2009 23:59:18 - 1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:1.0
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:SIL Abyssinica fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.0-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 1.0-3
- Updated to current Fedora font packaging guidelines
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|impact=moderate,source=rehd |impact=moderate,source=redh |at,reported=20060710,public |at,reported=20060710,public |=20060718 |=20060718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/alfont/devel alfont.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/alfont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28558
Modified Files:
alfont.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: alfont.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/alfont/devel/alfont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- alfont.spec 19 Feb 2008 07:50:27 - 1.3
+++ alfont.spec 24 Feb 2009 00:32:49 - 1.4
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: alfont
Version:2.0.6
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Font rendering library for the Allegro game library
Group: System Environment/Libraries
License:FTL
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.0.6-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Tue Feb 19 2008 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@fedoraproject.org -
2.0.6-4
- Autorebuild for GCC 4.3
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4970
Modified Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 22 Feb 2009 10:47:06 - 1.5
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 01:19:20 - 1.6
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20081007
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
%doc *.txt README
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20081007-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20081007-6
â fix url (thanks nirik)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5114
Modified Files:
apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec22 Feb 2009 10:51:13 - 1.6
+++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec24 Feb 2009 01:20:13 - 1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20090125
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: Heuristica font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20090125-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20090125-3
â fix url (thanks nirik)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12290
Modified Files:
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 - 1.5
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 01:58:36 - 1.6
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
Version:1.3
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.3-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 1.3-6
- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12614
Modified Files:
asana-math-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- asana-math-fonts.spec 21 Feb 2009 07:02:36 - 1.6
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 02:00:24 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:0.914
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:An OpenType font with a MATH table
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.914-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com - 0.914-5
- Fix various build failures
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6202
Modified Files:
baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec 14 Nov 2007 04:59:19 - 1.5
+++ baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 03:55:39 - 1.6
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.2
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Korean bitmap fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
%{catalogue}/%{name}
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.2-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Wed Nov 14 2007 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com - 2.2-5
- better url
- use fontname macro
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.16,1.17
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6382
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 - 1.16
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 03:56:31 - 1.17
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.2
-Release:19%{?dist}
+Release:20%{?dist}
Summary:Free Korean TrueType fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@
%__rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.2-20
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-19.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#483327
- Reowned font directory by subpackage -common.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel bitmap-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20257
Modified Files:
bitmap-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: bitmap-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel/bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- bitmap-fonts.spec 14 Jul 2008 20:54:03 - 1.18
+++ bitmap-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 04:52:15 - 1.19
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: bitmap-fonts
Version: 0.3
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
License: Lucida and MIT and Public Domain
Source0: bitmap-fonts-%{version}.tar.bz2
Source1: fixfont-3.5.tar.bz2
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.3-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Mon Jul 14 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 0.3-6
- fix license tag
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.14, 1.15
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20990
Modified Files:
bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 - 1.14
+++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 04:53:12 - 1.15
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.10
-Release: 15%{?dist}
+Release: 16%{?dist}
Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.10-16
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.10-15
â prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #42 from Ryo Dairiki ryo-dair...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-23 23:59:14 EDT --- Problem: - Chinese gryphs are shown when you use Monospace even in Japanese locale. - Some characters seems different in the same context, as different gryphs are selected according to the following characters. (For example, the width of the space character followed by A (alphabet) has different width with the one followed by a (hiragana).) Reason: Fontconfig choose proper gryph for virtual fonts, according to the current locale, and the context. If you write Japanese in Japanese locale, fontconfig seeks to fonts which has Japanese gryphs. It seems like some Chinese fonts also has Japanese gryphs by some reason. Maybe, they are in CJ unified regions, so we cannot fix this problem simply by eliminating them. Talking about the second problem, both Japanese fonts and DejaVu fonts have space characters, so fontconfig sometimes choose gryphs from Japanese fonts, and sometimes from DejaVu fonts. Solution: Change the gryph selection order of Fontconfig. In Japanese environment, gryphs from Japanese gryphs should be chosen first. In Chinese environment, gryphs from Chinese gryphs should be chosen first. Talking about DejaVu fonts, either locale specific gryphs or DejaVu gryphs should be chosen independently with the context. This change maybe require huge change in fonts.conf and might need some patches in the source of fontconfig too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1834
Modified Files:
brettfont-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: brettfont-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/brettfont-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- brettfont-fonts.spec20 May 2008 00:22:48 - 1.3
+++ brettfont-fonts.spec24 Feb 2009 05:49:03 - 1.4
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:20080506
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:A handwriting font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20080506-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Mon May 19 2008 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com - 20080506-3
- Remove extraneous metadata (#447350)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 01:48:10 EDT --- The issue is 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf. After renaming it to 67-... various glyphs came up as gothic. This file probably needs to be split into a high-priority serif portion, and a low-priority sans portion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18998
Modified Files:
cf-bonveno-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 - 1.1
+++ cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 07:04:31 - 1.2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.1
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
%dir %{_fontdir}/
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-3
- changed font config file according to files provided in the
fontpackages-devel package.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 02:09:38 EDT --- Perhaps you can test with the cjkuni-*fonts packages in rawhide and see if that works better for you? They already have some fontconfig changes included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24264
Modified Files:
chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:49:12 - 1.3
+++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 07:23:44 - 1.4
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:20090124
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Decorative Sans Serif Font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20090124-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Tue Jan 27 2009 Clint Savage he...@fedoraproject.org 20090124-2
Fixed a typo in the changelog
* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage he...@fedoraproject.org 20090124-1
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: jkeating
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27613
Modified Files:
cjkuni-fonts.spec
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 01:27:16 - 1.6
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 07:35:16 - 1.7
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 0.2.20080216.1
-Release: 20%{?dist}
+Release: 21%{?dist}
Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
License: Arphic
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -221,6 +221,9 @@
%__rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.2.20080216.1-21
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance cchance at redhat.com - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#483329
- Reowned font directory by -common subpackage.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
Le jeudi 19 février 2009 à 20:30 +0100, AKanda a écrit : Hello, Hi Akanda, The last update for VLgothicsvlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch is perhaps not good. (Install by yum.) Sorry for the delay, I was hoping other CJK users would answer, I don't use CJK myself. Chinese, Korean and Japanese fonts are an old source of pain for font packagers, due to: 1. the way Unicode.org decided it would be a good idea to have them share codepoints (Han unification), so CJK packagers compete with each other to make their pet font the default 2. the complexity of the associated glyphs, that make some users claim bitmap fonts should be preferred to vector fonts at small sizes (of course others disagree, and latin users clearly prefer bitmap fonts, except when people are not careful they change both instead of just one). Almost every single CJK update breaks things, and we can not freeze CJK fonts as new releases and new fonts are requested by users. I can unfortunately not offer a lot of help. CJK problems can only be fixed by CJK users. We need more CJK people to install various combinations of CJK packages and check they do the right thing for every CJK locale. If you have the time please test various combinaisons of CJK fonts in F10 (or better rawhide) and report your findings in bugzilla. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Checking_fontconfig_rules Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
Chinese, Korean and Japanese fonts are an old source of pain for font packagers, due to: ... CJK information processing being very hard to do correctly. See Ken Lunde's amazing 900-page tome, CJKV Information Processing, which recently appeared in its second edition: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596514471/ 1. the way Unicode.org decided it would be a good idea to have them share codepoints (Han unification), so CJK packagers compete with each other to make their pet font the default I can't relate these two. By the same reasoning, Fraktur fonts would compete with modern Latin fonts, Urdu fonts would compete with Arabic fonts, and Hindi fonts would compete with Marathi fonts. Font packagers competing with each other in pushing their fonts is not acceptable either. If that doesn't stop, we should perhaps centralize our fontconfig configuration files to avoid such fontconfig wars. On a separate note, it wasn't unicode.org who decided to unify Han characters. It was a consensus effort, supported by various national standardization bodies, including those of China, Japan, and Korea. Please don't spread FUD ;-) You can read about the actual history of Han Unification here: http://unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/appE.pdf Roozbeh ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
1. the way Unicode.org decided it would be a good idea to have them share codepoints (Han unification), Using unified code points to represent Han glyphs is nothing wrong, the only issue is the current fonts and fontconfig are not capable of distinguishing the z-variants, as Unicode consortium proposed. so CJK packagers compete with each other to make their pet font the default I think it is quite the opposite: this happens most often when people are trying to read CJK text under non-CJK locales. Pango does not assume language preference, and it falls into a mixed situation where both the context language and the fall-back font sequence in fontconfig (likely 65-nonlatin) play together to determine the font to select, and the results are messy. It would have been better if one of the Han variants is the default when this happens, for example, the one that covers the most unicode code points, at least, all the characters will have uniform font styles, rather than the mosaics from many CJK fonts. ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problem : japanese-fonts (vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10)
I think the particular problem here under F10 is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 - Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is quite the opposite: this happens most often when people are trying to read CJK text under non-CJK locales. Pango does not assume language preference, and it falls into a mixed situation where both the context language and the fall-back font sequence in fontconfig (likely 65-nonlatin) play together to determine the font to select, and the results are messy. It would have been better if one of the Han variants is the default when this happens, for example, the one that covers the most unicode code points, at least, all the characters will have uniform font styles, rather than the mosaics from many CJK fonts. Hmm, maybe we should define PANGO_LANGUAGE for non CJK locale, but to which value. Well guess most points would be zh? ;) Jens ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
