rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 import.log, 1.5, 1.6
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19520/devel
Modified Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log
Added Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch
Log Message:
fix bolditalic
apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch:
Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch ---
--- orig/Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd 2008-10-06 14:27:35.0 +0200
+++ new/Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd2009-09-28 08:53:05.29204 +0200
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
68
1297
EndShort
-LangName: 1033 Copyright (c)
2007-2008, Andrey V. Panov (pa...@canopus.iacp.dvo.ru),+AAoA-with Reserved Font
Name Edrip.+AAoACgAA-This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font
License, Version 1.1.+AAoA-This license is copied together with this font
package in OFL.txt, +AAoA-and is also available with a FAQ
at:+AAoA-http://scripts.sil.org/OFL; http://scripts.sil.org/ofl;
LangName: 1049 +BBUENARABDgEPwAA
+LangName: 1033 Bold Italic Copyright
(c) 2007-2008, Andrey V. Panov (pa...@canopus.iacp.dvo.ru),+AAoA-with Reserved
Font Name Edrip.+AAoACgAA-This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open
Font License, Version 1.1.+AAoA-This license is copied together with this font
package in OFL.txt, +AAoA-and is also available with a FAQ
at:+AAoA-http://scripts.sil.org/OFL; http://scripts.sil.org/ofl;
Encoding: UnicodeBmp
Compacted: 1
UnicodeInterp: none
Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 16:56:50 - 1.8
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 07:24:37 - 1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20081007
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/edr
Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Patch0:%{name}-license.patch
+Patch1:%{name}-bolditalic.patch
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ Latin alphabets.
%prep
%setup -q -c
%patch0 -p1
+%patch1 -p1
%build
make %{?_smp_mflags} all
@@ -61,14 +63,21 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%doc *.txt README
%changelog
-* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20081007-9
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
+* Mon Sep 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 20081007-10
+— fix BoldItalic naming
+
+* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+- 20081007-9
+— Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
-* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net - 20081007-8
+* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 20081007-8
— Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge
-* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20081007-7
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+- 20081007-7
+— Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20081007-6
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- import.log 15 Mar 2009 19:16:03 - 1.5
+++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 07:24:37 - 1.6
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:
apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600
apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235377546
apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8.fc11.src.rpm:1237144512
+apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-10_fc12:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-10.fc12.src.rpm:1254122643
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525881] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525881 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-28 03:29:17 EDT --- maintenance-wise, I think the simpler solution is to create a separate package for the Adobe stuff and have the miriad other packages that use it require or buildrequire it. This way at least the legal bits will be traced properly and we'll be sure all our apps use the same CID values -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.5, 1.6 ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf, 1.4, 1.5 ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 import.log, 1.8, 1.9
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10331/devel
Modified Files:
ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf
ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf
ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
tweak fontconfig fixing
Index: ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 - 1.5
+++ ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 - 1.6
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
edit name=family
stringÉcolier court/string
/edit
+edit name=fullname
+ stringÉcolier court/string
+/edit
/match
alias binding=same
familyEcolier_court/family
Index: ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -
1.4
+++ ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 -
1.5
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
edit name=family
stringÉcolier lignes court/string
/edit
+edit name=fullname
+ stringÉcolier lignes court/string
+/edit
/match
alias binding=same
familyEcolier_lignes_court/family
Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ecolier-court-fonts.spec13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 - 1.11
+++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 - 1.12
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ this package.
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20070702
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 20070702-12
+— Tweak the fontconfig fixing
+
* Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20070702-11
— Fix the font naming to something more user friendly (remove PS1 legacy
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- import.log 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 - 1.8
+++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 - 1.9
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD
ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7.fc11.src.rpm:1232193736
ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8.fc11.src.rpm:1235377848
ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11_fc12:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11.fc12.src.rpm:1252865221
+ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-12_fc12:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-12.fc12.src.rpm:1254126844
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, 1.6, 1.7 google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 import.log, 1.10, 1.11
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14525/devel
Modified Files:
google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf
google-droid-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
tweak fontconfig fixing
Index: google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 -
1.6
+++ google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 -
1.7
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
edit name=family
stringDroid Sans/string
/edit
+edit name=fullname
+ stringDroid Sans/string
+/edit
edit name=fontversion
int2/int
/edit
@@ -27,6 +30,9 @@
edit name=family
stringDroid Sans/string
/edit
+edit name=fullname
+ stringDroid Sans/string
+/edit
edit name=fontversion
int1/int
/edit
Index: google-droid-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- google-droid-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 - 1.13
+++ google-droid-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 - 1.14
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ other screen text.
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
# No sane versionning upstream, use the date we did a git dump
Version: 20090906
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 20090906-5
+— Tweak the fontconfig fixing
+
* Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20090906-4
— follow the fontpackages template more closely
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- import.log 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 - 1.10
+++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 - 1.11
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ google-droid-fonts-20090906-1_fc12:HEAD:
google-droid-fonts-20090906-2_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252351928
google-droid-fonts-20090906-3_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-3.fc12.src.rpm:1252833055
google-droid-fonts-20090906-4_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-4.fc12.src.rpm:1252849244
+google-droid-fonts-20090906-5_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.src.rpm:1254127710
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 fontpackages.spec, 1.22, 1.23 import.log, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.16, 1.17
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20285/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.27
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17
--- .cvsignore 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 - 1.16
+++ .cvsignore 28 Sep 2009 09:05:15 - 1.17
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz
+fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz
Index: fontpackages.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.22 -r1.23
--- fontpackages.spec 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 - 1.22
+++ fontpackages.spec 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 - 1.23
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
%global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
Name:fontpackages
-Version: 1.26
+Version: 1.27
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
@@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
+- 1.27-1
+— Brownpaper bag release ×2
+
* Sun Sep 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
- 1.26-1
— Brownpaper bag release
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19
--- import.log 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 - 1.18
+++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 - 1.19
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ fontpackages-1_23-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag
fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.24-1.fc12.src.rpm:1253998725
fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286
fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733
+fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17
--- sources 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 - 1.16
+++ sources 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 - 1.17
@@ -1 +1 @@
-04432ee25dd0b907504bb0a7aacf0724 fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz
+c2987bf1553807157ad681c253335dfd fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 08:02:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362881) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362881) Screenshot on ghostscript I still need to investigate further more and this may mislead to get the right thing perhaps but just tried the vertical writing on ghostscript-8.70-1.fc12. and it looks good to me. Coming questions would be: 1. How OOo render for the vertical writing. e.g. referring the vert table in TTF or anything else 2. How about gs? just for updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 08:04:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362883) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362883) testcase that I tried on ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User cl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|thb |af Status|STARTED |NEW Target milestone|OOo 3.2 |OOo 3.x --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 28 13:37:19 + 2009 --- reassigned as there is no progress on this issue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #39 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 13:37:17 EDT --- yup, seems OK, navit runs without errors, nothing else seems to have any problems. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #40 from mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-28 13:50:27 EDT --- Thank you! I will add the patch proposed in comment #35 to next release of freetype, 2.3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #7 from Mark mel4j...@gmail.com 2009-09-28 14:10:58 EDT --- After updating to rawhide on 28.09.2009 I have not noticed previous behaviour since then. I cannot reproduce any more Java (Eclipse) crash with these new rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(besfa...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #31 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 14:48:18 EDT --- Lets get back to this after f12... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490941] fc-match times roman results in a Sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 16:09:43 EDT --- What makes you think 'fc-match times roman' should match a serif font? There are two relevant names, one is times, the other is times new roman. There is no such family named times roman. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525592] lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525592 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-09-29 01:00:48 EDT --- built corresponding packages for rawhide thanks for notifying same :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-29 01:34:55 EDT --- Tomorrow's rawhide should revert to vlgothic which help with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: Heuristica metadata problem
Le Dim 13 septembre 2009 17:56, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Hi, While reviewing the output of the automated tests we run on our packages, I noticed Heuristica Bold Italic trips our metadata sanity test because it declares “BoldItalic” (no space) instead of the modern “Bold Italic” (space). BTW Edrip has the same problem -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
New font package review request for Sheherazade SIL font
Hi all, I've created a new font package request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Any comments and/or suggestions are highly appreciated. Notice that this is my first font package :) Thanks, Hedayat ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
bitmap-fonts by default?
We have been looking at updating bitmap-fonts recently, and noticed that it is still listed mandatory in the comps @base-x group. So I just wondered a couple of naive questions: - does bitmap-fonts have to be installed by default? - what actually needs it? Jens ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
