Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning
Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts. However vault may be rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for the rebuild. -- Jes ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning
On 2009-08-18 11:28:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts. However vault may be rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for the rebuild. +1 Thanks, Ricky pgpPb3NIMbaE5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Freeze break request for sigul fine tuning
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote: On 2009-08-18 11:28:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: Sigul changes are very low risk, as we're mostly done with the signing and puppet is currently disabled on these hosts. However vault may be rebuilt tomorrow and if so I want the puppet modules to be correct for the rebuild. +1 +1 here as well though techncally they're not frozen yet only because we've not yet added them to the is frozen doc :) -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
