Re: [PATCH] Don't try to use agp symbols if we don't have AGP (*cough*sparc*cough*)
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 11:55 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:33:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: +#if __OS_HAS_AGP Not that this is your fault, but shouldn't this be something like __ARCH_HAS_AGP? Keep in mind the DRM for better or for worse supposedly supports more OSes than just Linux. I suspect the 'ideal' fix for upstream is to stub out drm_agp_init_ttm on !CONFIG_AGP arches. OS_HAS_AGP is just a wrapper around convoluted CONFIG_AGP, CONFIG_AGP_MODULE. Its perfectly acceptable to build a kernel with no AGP and DRM enabled on x86. Dave. regards, Kyle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: arch fun.
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:11 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
As per the discussion in #fedora-meeting today,
we're killing off kernel-i686, and just shipping..
* kernel.i586
* kernel-PAE.686
Patch below seems to dtrt.. comments?
This should prove interesting for GEM, as Intel still haven't resolved
GEM on PAE.
However I'm quite happy for this change to happen, Arjan want to try and
fix this or no GEM/KMS for F11.
Dave.
Looking at the generated config files, the biggest difference
seems to be that kernel-PAE enables Xen and all it's related
dependancies.
Dave
Index: Makefile.config
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/Makefile.config,v
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -p -r1.69 Makefile.config
--- Makefile.config 26 Jan 2009 07:19:13 - 1.69
+++ Makefile.config 5 Feb 2009 20:09:20 -
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ CFG = kernel-$(VERSION)
CONFIGFILES = \
$(CFG)-i586.config \
- $(CFG)-i686.config $(CFG)-i686-PAE.config \
+ $(CFG)-i686-PAE.config \
$(CFG)-i686-debug.config $(CFG)-i686-PAEdebug.config \
$(CFG)-x86_64.config $(CFG)-x86_64-debug.config \
$(CFG)-s390x.config $(CFG)-arm.config \
@@ -63,9 +63,6 @@ temp-s390-generic: config-s390x temp-gen
temp-ia64-generic: config-ia64-generic temp-generic
perl merge.pl $^ $@
-kernel-$(VERSION)-i686.config: config-i686 temp-x86-generic
- perl merge.pl $^ i386 $@
-
kernel-$(VERSION)-i686-debug.config: config-i686 temp-x86-debug-generic
perl merge.pl $^ i386 $@
Index: config-i586
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/config-i586,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 config-i586
--- config-i586 14 Feb 2008 19:56:06 - 1.5
+++ config-i586 5 Feb 2009 20:09:20 -
@@ -6,4 +6,3 @@ CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6=m
-# CONFIG_KVM is not set
Index: config-i686
===
RCS file: config-i686
diff -N config-i686
--- config-i686 12 Jul 2007 19:15:37 - 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-CONFIG_M686=y
-# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
-CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
-# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
-
-CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK=m
-CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_AES=m
-CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_SHA=m
Index: config-x86-generic
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/config-x86-generic,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 config-x86-generic
--- config-x86-generic30 Jan 2009 00:08:01 - 1.63
+++ config-x86-generic5 Feb 2009 20:09:20 -
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ CONFIG_NVRAM=y
CONFIG_IBM_ASM=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_586=m
-# CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK is not set
-# CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_AES is not set
-# CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_SHA is not set
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK=m
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_AES=m
+CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_SHA=m
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
Index: kernel.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1263
diff -u -p -r1.1263 kernel.spec
--- kernel.spec 5 Feb 2009 18:55:52 - 1.1263
+++ kernel.spec 5 Feb 2009 20:09:20 -
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_kdump 0
#endif
+# We only build -PAE for 686 as of Fedora 11.
+%ifarch i686
+%define with_up 0
+%endif
+
# don't do debug builds on anything but i686 and x86_64
%ifnarch i686 x86_64
%define with_debug 0
@@ -522,8 +527,7 @@ Source24: config-rhel-generic
Source30: config-x86-generic
Source31: config-i586
-Source32: config-i686
-Source33: config-i686-PAE
+Source32: config-i686-PAE
Source40: config-x86_64-generic
@@ -1477,7 +1481,9 @@ mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot
cd linux-%{kversion}.%{_target_cpu}
%if %{with_debug}
+%ifnarch i686
BuildKernel %make_target %kernel_image debug
+%endif
%if %{with_pae}
BuildKernel %make_target %kernel_image PAEdebug
%endif
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: X600 driver instability?
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:00 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Yo, Is anyone else seeing instability in recent X600 builds in Fedora (when using 3D desktop effects)? I'm getting occasional X server crashes that never used to happen with this driver - I haven't had chance to track down when it started happening in as of yet but the box stability is restored by disabling desktop effects. I need this box, but I'll schedule some crash time over the weekend or something. Next time it happens, I'll capture the X server output. There's no oops but a reproducer seems to be along the lines of: * Login to desktop * Restart VPN and connect to remove IRC proxy * xchat goes nuts with popups catching up replay traffic * kernel ringbuffer shows random segfaults from e.g. DBUS Not much to go on yet. Just thought I'd share :) Try with nomodeset maybe but I don't think it'll help. I'm trying to stabilise the 3D driver again for compiz, we've rewritten radeon support pretty much from scratch for F10 so I'm now fixing the bugs. Isn't desktop effect unuseably slow for you? I thought the speed might stop people from using it long before the crashing. Dave. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: X600 driver instability?
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 00:34 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 12:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: I'm trying to stabilise the 3D driver again for compiz, we've rewritten radeon support pretty much from scratch for F10 so I'm now fixing the bugs. It's worth saying, this is an F-9 install, with the latest kernel. I do run rawhide, but only under virtual machines with emulated hardware. Isn't desktop effect unuseably slow for you? I thought the speed might stop people from using it long before the crashing. Nope, actually for over a year X600 was perfectly rock solid, desktop effects worked just fantastic, and I was actually able to make people who looked at my machine think hey, this desktop Linux thing aint bad (ok, they might just think this Linux thing there). So whatever happened in recent *F-9* updates broke it :) Oh that isn't good, I didn't think I'd done much in recent F9 updates. Try pulling back to the older F9 xorg-x11-drv-ati, say -15. If its the kernel it must be something I've upstreamed. Dave. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686 oops and no X :(
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 16:18 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:37:32PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: Dear fellow testers, New kernel oops again and no X when starting it kernel-2.6.27-0.215.rc1.git4.fc10.i686 Here's oops http://www.kerneloops.org/submitresult.php?number=48331 nasty... did this just start recently? Any thoughts, Dave? fwiw this is hitting the BUG_ON in drm_open. mutex_lock(dev-struct_mutex); BUG_ON((dev-dev_mapping != NULL) (dev-dev_mapping != inode-i_mapping)); if (dev-dev_mapping == NULL) dev-dev_mapping = inode-i_mapping; mutex_unlock(dev-struct_mutex); should be fixed in 222 or somewhere around that, at least the bug that is open for it said that. Dave. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
