Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:48 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:27:40PM +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: Bill Nottingham notting redhat com wrote: The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my laptop processor does not have PAE so I am rather interested)? yes I note that the latest build on Koji has not built an i686 without PAE version, and the comments against kernel.spec revision 1.1639 suggests there won't be a non-PAE kernel. On the other hand, revision 1.1640 references Source31: config-i686, although I don't see that file in CVS. screwup on my part. it's unnecessary. the non-PAE build is basically just config-x86-generic. Dave Now there is an i686 kernel available in Rawhide, should doing a yum update update my i586 kernel to the latest i686 version? yum update shows that it will update kernel-firmware.noarch to 2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12 and kernel-headers.i686 to 0:2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12, but it does not update the kernel package. Indeed, if I try yum install kernel-2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12.i686.rpm, yum reports: kernel-2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12.i686.rpm: does not update installed package. Quentin ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'. That was the intent, as the i586 package would be going away. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'. That was the intent, as the i586 package would be going away. Oh, I thought that proposal got shot down. We're really dropping support for all those old systems? I'm ok with it if it's been approved, but want to be sure before I start gutting the kernel of 586isms. Dave ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said: Oh, I thought that proposal got shot down. The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
Bill Nottingham notting redhat com wrote: The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare i686 was approved. Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my laptop processor does not have PAE so I am rather interested)? I note that the latest build on Koji has not built an i686 without PAE version, and the comments against kernel.spec revision 1.1639 suggests there won't be a non-PAE kernel. On the other hand, revision 1.1640 references Source31: config-i686, although I don't see that file in CVS. Quentin ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:01:54PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: This is needed for the i686-by-default feature. Bill Index: kernel.spec === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1634 diff -u -r1.1634 kernel.spec --- kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 02:07:24 - 1.1634 +++ kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 17:01:15 - @@ -195,9 +195,8 @@ %endif %define debuginfodir /usr/lib/debug -# We only build -PAE for 686 as of Fedora 11. +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'. (which no longer exists, in favour of using the 586 kernel) Dave ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
[PATCH] build a 'full' package on i686
This is needed for the i686-by-default feature. Bill Index: kernel.spec === RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1634 diff -u -r1.1634 kernel.spec --- kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 02:07:24 - 1.1634 +++ kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 17:01:15 - @@ -195,9 +195,8 @@ %endif %define debuginfodir /usr/lib/debug -# We only build -PAE for 686 as of Fedora 11. +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0 @@ -249,9 +248,9 @@ %define with_perf 0 %endif -# no need to build headers again for these arches, -# they can just use i586 and ppc64 headers -%ifarch i686 ppc64iseries +# no need to build headers again for this arch, +# they can just use ppc64 headers +%ifarch ppc64iseries %define with_headers 0 %endif ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
