Re: execshield rebase

2008-12-04 Thread Roland McGrath
I've been thinking for a while execshield.patch could be split into two or
three cleaner patches.  Some of those might even be upstreamable as config
options or something.  It really isn't that big a patch at this point.

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


Re: execshield rebase

2008-12-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:05:03PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
  I've been thinking for a while execshield.patch could be split into two or
  three cleaner patches.  Some of those might even be upstreamable as config
  options or something.  It really isn't that big a patch at this point.

I tried back in July when I got the diff down to under a thousand lines.
Linus wasn't really enthusiastic.

http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/linus-es.txt
has the interesting bits..

The get_wchan bit that he mentions definitly should be factored out.
It's completely unrelated to the NX-emulation.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list