Re: install System.map in kernel-devel
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:26:21PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 10/23/2007 09:05 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: The systemtap folks are interested in having System.map installed by kernel-devel, not just by the kernel rpm itself. This makes it possible to do more preparations off-line for a kernel other than an installed one. Without objection, I'll check this in on all branches. Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel, I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an oops message to get an address to use with eu-addr2line. Relocatable kernel is another thing that really screws with this. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: install System.map in kernel-devel
On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote: Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel, I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an oops message to get an address to use with eu-addr2line. Relocatable kernel is another thing that really screws with this. CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x40 CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100 Address in oops was c04622db. I had to use eu-addr2line -e vmlinux 0xc10622db And objdump just flat refuses to show line number information from vmlinux containing debug info. (But on Fedora 8 it will.) ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: install System.map in kernel-devel
Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 10/23/2007 06:28 PM, Dave Jones wrote: Are the addresses in System.map accurate? On the F7 2.6.23 kernel, I had to subtract 0x40 and add 0x100 to the address in an oops message to get an address to use with eu-addr2line. Relocatable kernel is another thing that really screws with this. CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x40 CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100 Address in oops was c04622db. I had to use eu-addr2line -e vmlinux 0xc10622db And objdump just flat refuses to show line number information from vmlinux containing debug info. (But on Fedora 8 it will.) I vaguely recall seeing a bug about this one, and I thought the solution was to set _ALIGH and _START to the same value, but these are only vague recollections... -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
