[Bug 90133] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189717] Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcompris - Educational suite for kids 2-10 years old https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 04:10 EST --- I've updated both the spec file ant he -files.tar.gz with a -2 version, this fixes issue 1) unfortunatly upstreams fix for issue 2) was not correct / did not fix the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 08:26 EST --- Also emacsen-common is going to re-byte-compile apel if flim is updated or installed, in above case, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 09:19 EST --- So it's consistant across systems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 10:04 EST --- sorry, but the tar.gz file in the source RPM doesn't match with the upstream version. fedora-qa tcltls-1.5.0-7.src.rpm Starting QA for local srpm tcltls-1.5.0-7.src.rpm Checking tcltls, version 1.5.0, release 7... Are the name, version and release correct according to Fedora's package naming guidelines ([y]/n) y View the last spec diff ? ([y]/n) n Checking source 0 Source tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz is different from upstream (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) Patches found: tcltls-configurein.pkgname.patch, tcltls-1.5-rpmoptflags.patch, tcltls-1.5-64bit.patch, tcltls-makefilein-soname.patch, tcltls-tclm4-soname.patch, tcltls-1.5-relpath.patch, tcltls-1.5-pkgindex-version.patch, tcltls-1.5-ciphertest-KRB5.patch. Look at the patches ? ([y]/n) Interrupted by user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189874] Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-SubCalls - Track the number of times subs are called https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188207] Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 11:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) The package builds fine; I even learned a bit about erlang so that I could install and test it. Unfortunately there are a few problems. The only thing I think is blocking is the errant provide of sdl_driver.so, This seems not to be problem, it also happens with other packages, for example mesa-libGL provides mga_dri.so, although this is in /usr/lib/dri, or epiphany-extensions and many others. although I'd like to know what's up with the debuginfo RPM. I can't say anything about this. On the other hand, maybe the c_src directory can be excluded entirely. Issues: The license 2-clause BSD like with an added section indicating what rights the US government gets (and also indicating that this doesn't limit anyone's rights). To me it seems clearly free; someone might want to look over it and decide whether there a better license tag for this than Distributable, but I don't see this as a blocker. I am not familiar with legal matters, so I must rely on your judgement. What do you propose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 14:46 EST --- OK, I fixed the empty docs (oops!) and ghosted the .pyo files. This is my first python package, so I wasn't aware of that. Updated packages at: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace.spec http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/mftrace-1.1.19-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 14:53 EST --- As I think about it more, I'm changing my mind that fedora-usermgmt is needed here. consistent gids in a cluster is better solved by nis or some other network login system. These aren't system groups that need to be installed, so plain groupadd should be enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 15:16 EST --- http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink-0.0.14-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 17:01 EST --- I guess any which haven't been assigned first would be useful. I'm not sure about the licence for mysql-connector-net. From the looks of it, it's GPL with restrictions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 17:02 EST --- I have moved the namespace discussion to the FE list. However, I don't feel I understand the build in %post proposal well enough to properly convey it to the list - Akira, if you have the time and energy, I think it's worth bringing that up on FE list as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 17:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) Hope this is finally the right one, I must be the worst packager ever.. Nah, I've seen (and written!) much worse. :) This and #185951 look like your first Extras packages. If this is true then you need to add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug to both so that potential sponsors can review and approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 19:25 EST --- Armed with my thimblefull of Erlang knowledge I move on to this package. First issues: 1,$s/esdl/erlang-esdl/ It might be worth noting in the description that this package includes the POV exporter. Parallel make would be nice. (Sorry, I do my testing on an 8-CPU Opteron machine and hate to wait.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 19:58 EST --- The setgid handling could be improved to be a little safer. The current setgid patch uses setegid() to temporarily drop setgid rights until it tries to write to the score file. It would be better if the scorefile were opened once at the beginning of the program, then dropped permanently with setresgid(). Additionally, the LoadScores() function shouldn't need any setgid/getgid code at all if you make the high score file mode 0664 (it's currently 0060). I don't see any reason why it couldn't be world readable. I'll do a full review, but it would be easier if the above items were fixed in CVS first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189655] Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mftrace - convert TeX bitmap fonts to TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189655 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 21:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) Consistent GIDs are useful if the scoreboard files are to be shared across a cluster. This is how nethack and the like were configured at my university's computing cluster. So what? What guarantees these uids/gids are consistent with that you rsp. fedora-usermgnt chose? Answer: Your system administrator. Neither you nor fedora-usermgnt will be able to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] New: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun-cvs_20060204-1.src.rpm Description: The STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs (Network Address Translation)) server is an implementation of the STUN protocol that enables STUN functionality in SIP-based systems. STUN is an application-layer protocol that can determine the public IP and nature of a NAT device that sits between the STUN client and STUN server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 21:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) Less than for various Emacsen? I fail to see why. Well, in the release cycle POV. newer release of emacs isn't seen a long time. I suppose there may be strong request to use the latest emacs but may wants to keep the stable version together. but yes, there may be more or less such requirements on others as well. Yes, but that kind of defeats the idea of getting stuff byte compiled for whatever Emacsen are installed on that particular box. On a side note, there have been lots of reports over time on xemacs-beta about Debian's setup being broken and resulting in for example XEmacs somehow getting *.elc bytecompiled by GNU Emacs in its load path. That will obviously wreak havoc. OTOH my gut feeling is that the reports are less frequent nowadays so it's possible that the Debian folks have got it fixed. Ouch. Though I haven't seen any xemacs-beta package for Debian yet - at least in the official tree - it may be because it just doesn't follow the emacsen-common-way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 21:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) My feeling is that, while what Akira is suggesting has merit, what it's ultimately an attempt to do is to bend rpm to deal with installation from source (.el) rather than binary.. it's not so dissimilar to gentoos ebuilds etc. It really seems like trying to get rpm to do things it wasn't designed to do. I'm in favour of keeping things simple, working with binary packages, and not aiming for the canonical solution. it's sensible. discussing something without the real implementation is little messy. so I'll try to do it when I have a time, and let's continue to discuss against it then. Sorry to interrupt your package contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189952] New: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/metapixel/metapixel.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/metapixel/metapixel-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Metapixel is a program for generating photomosaics. It can generate classical photomosaics, in which the source image is viewed as a matrix of equally sized rectangles for each of which a matching image is substitued, as well as collage-style photomosaics, in which rectangular parts of the source image at arbitrary positions (i.e. not aligned to a matrix) are substituted by matching images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 22:35 EST --- I'm seeing a build failure in mock; I think you need to BR: the GL development stuff: gcc -o ../../plugins/accel/wings_ogla_drv.so -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include \ wings_ogla_drv.c -shared -fpic -lGLU -lGL wings_ogla_drv.c:26:61: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory wings_ogla_drv.c:27:62: error: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory wings_ogla_drv.c:68: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:69: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:70: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:74: error: expected ')' before '*' token wings_ogla_drv.c:82: error: expected ')' before 'flag' wings_ogla_drv.c:87: error: expected ')' before 'errorCode' wings_ogla_drv.c:95: error: expected ')' before 'coords' wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'wings_file_start': wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once wings_ogla_drv.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) wings_ogla_drv.c:140: error: 'GLU_TESS_VERTEX' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:140: error: 'wings_ogla_vertex' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:141: error: 'GLU_TESS_EDGE_FLAG' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:141: error: 'wings_ogla_edge_flag' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:142: error: 'GLU_TESS_COMBINE' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:142: error: 'wings_ogla_combine' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:143: error: 'GLU_TESS_ERROR' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:143: error: 'wings_ogla_error' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'wings_file_stop': wings_ogla_drv.c:153: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'control': wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: 'GLfloat' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:163: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:171: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:182: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:191: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c:198: error: expected expression before ')' token wings_ogla_drv.c: In function 'triangulate': wings_ogla_drv.c:213: error: 'GLdouble' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:213: error: expected ';' before 'n' wings_ogla_drv.c:214: error: 'new_vertices' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:217: error: 'tess_coords' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:218: error: 'tess_alloc_vertex' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:227: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'memcpy' wings_ogla_drv.c:227: error: 'n' undeclared (first use in this function) wings_ogla_drv.c:230: error: 'tess' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [../../plugins/accel/wings_ogla_drv.so] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189553] Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugs - The Bug Genie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189553 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 22:36 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128233) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128233action=view) Output from rpmlint Ah, guess I can attach and comment at tyhe same time. Oops. The fix I recommended only changes s/gid/uid/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128234|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 00:03 EST --- Thanks a lot the both of you, I will now add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189952] Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 00:11 EST --- Issues: The manpage is executable for some reason. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns no (non %doc) directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O No test suite, so no %check. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 01:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128237) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128237action=view) Patch fixing 2 warnings (and real problems) on x84_64 With these 2 patches the package is ok. IOW approved! under the conditition that you agree with adding both patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
